Sándor L, Barzo P, Kuncz A, Elek P. [Anterior cervical fusion in the lower cervical spine. Locked vs nonlocked screw plate, pure cancellous bone vs tricortical strut].
Chirurg 2008;
79:461-73. [PMID:
18214399 DOI:
10.1007/s00104-007-1454-x]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Physical alterations in cervical fusions endanger healing. Experimentally we determined less stability loss in fixations using cancellous bone grafts than in those using tricortical grafts. Four hundred eighty-five Patients underwent anterior cervical fusion, for a total of 700 Segments. Patients were divided into four groups: (1) nonlocked H plate with autogenous cancellous bone, (2) nonlocked H plate with autogenous tricortical graft, (3) locked cervical plate with tricortical graft, and (4) stand-alone cage with cancellous bone. Evaluations included X-ray and random CT scan examinations. Our results suggest that anterior cervical fusions using nonlocked H screw plate systems with pure autogenous cancellous bone grafts provide the fastest (6 weeks) and most secure bone healing (P=0.00001), whereas fixations using nonlocked or locked screw plate systems and tricortical autograft require prolonged healing and develop nonunions more frequently. Complete consolidation was achieved using stand-alone cages filled with pure autogenous cancellous bone, but bony healing was delayed due to the cage. Rate of nonunions were: groups 1 and 4 0%, and groups 2 and 3 4.5% and 21%, respectively.
Collapse