Primidone crystalluria following overdose. A report of a case and an analysis of the literature

Drug-Induced Kidney Stones and Crystalline Nephropathy: Pathophysiology, Prevention and Treatment

Drug-induced calculi represent 1-2% of all renal calculi. The drugs reported to produce calculi may be divided into two groups. The first one includes poorly soluble drugs with high urine excretion that favour crystallisation in the urine. Among them, drugs used for the treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency, namely atazanavir and other protease inhibitors, and sulphadiazine used for the treatment of cerebral toxoplasmosis, are the most frequent causes. Besides these drugs, about 20 other molecules may induce nephrolithiasis, such as ceftriaxone or ephedrine-containing preparations in subjects receiving high doses or long-term treatment. Calculi analysis by physical methods including infrared spectroscopy or X-ray diffraction is needed to demonstrate the presence of the drug or its metabolites within the calculi. Some drugs may also provoke heavy intra-tubular crystal precipitation causing acute renal failure. Here, the identification of crystalluria or crystals within the kidney tissue in the case of renal biopsy is of major diagnostic value. The second group includes drugs that provoke the formation of urinary calculi as a consequence of their metabolic effects on urinary pH and/or the excretion of calcium, phosphate, oxalate, citrate, uric acid or other purines. Among such metabolically induced calculi are those formed in patients taking uncontrolled calcium/vitamin D supplements, or being treated with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors such as acetazolamide or topiramate. Here, diagnosis relies on a careful clinical inquiry to differentiate between common calculi and metabolically induced calculi, of which the incidence is probably underestimated. Specific patient-dependent risk factors also exist in relation to urine pH, volume of diuresis and other factors, thus providing a basis for preventive or curative measures against stone formation.

Use of Antiepileptic Drugs in Patients with Kidney Disease

The number of medications used to treat different types of seizures has increased over the last 10-15 years. Most of the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are likely to be unfamiliar to many nephrologists. For both the older and newer AEDs, basic pharmacokinetic information, recommendations for drug dosing in patients with reduced kidney function or who are on dialysis, and adverse renal and fluid-electrolyte effects are reviewed. Newer AEDs are less likely to have significant drug-drug interactions than older agents, but are more likely to need dosage adjustment in patients with reduced kidney function. The most common renal toxicities of these drugs include metabolic acidosis, hyponatremia, and nephrolithiasis; interstitial nephritis and other adverse effects are less common. Little is known about the clearance of most of the newer AEDs with high-efficiency hemodialyzers or with peritoneal dialysis. Monitoring of drug levels when available, careful clinical assessment of patients taking AEDs, and close collaboration with neurologists is essential to the management of patients taking AEDs.

The risk-benefit ratio of anticonvulsant drugs

The concepts underlying the notion of a risk-benefit ratio for anticonvulsant therapy have determined the development of the drug treatment of epilepsy over many years. The risk element in the ratio arises from the various possible physical and psychological adverse effects of anticonvulsant therapy; the benefit is derived from the capacity of therapy to prevent seizures and thus reduce the disadvantages which result from having epilepsy. The physical adverse effects of anticonvulsant therapy may involve many tissues and organs. The drugs tend to depress cerebral, cerebellar and brain stem function, and may slow peripheral nerve conduction. Prolonged intake may cause hypocalcaemia and osteoporosis, folate depletion, various haematological and immunological abnormalities, and overgrowth of subcutaneous and gingival tissues. Idiopathic reactions may involve the skin, lymph nodes, liver, pancreas, kidney and thyroid, and cause electrolyte disturbances, while maternal anticonvulsant intake during pregnancy may be associated with an increased incidence of fetal malformations. Local reactions may occur at drug administration sites, and anticonvulsants may interact pharmacokinetically and pharmacodynamically with co-administered drugs. The taking of anticonvulsants sometimes has undesirable psychological effects on both the patient and his or her family. Epilepsy itself often results in adverse psychological consequences which emanate from the uncertainty and insecurity that is imposed by the unpredictable occurrence of seizures, from the limitations epilepsy sets on the patient's lifestyle and employment prospects, and from unfavourable community attitudes towards the disorder. Contemporary anticonvulsant therapy is not fully effective in all patients, but to the extent that it can control seizures it may help alleviate these emotional burdens that are a result of epilepsy. The consensus of present day medical opinion is that, in the great majority of clinical situations, the benefits of anticonvulsant therapy outweigh the disadvantages. However, to provide optimal management for individual patients, the risk-benefit ratio of therapy must be repeatedly assessed at all stages of a patient's treatment, and therapeutic decisions taken in the light of the ratio as it applies to the individual.