(Non-)utilization of pre-hospital emergency care by migrants and non-migrants in Germany

[Self-help measures as determinants of emergency department utilization among people with and without a migration history in Germany]

INTRODUCTION

We analyzed whether there were differences between people with and without migration history in their implementation of self-help measures before they accessed the services of an emergency department and if there was an association between self-help measures and an appropriate utilization of emergency departments.

METHODS

The data basis of this secondary analysis is the EUMaR study, which was conducted from July 2018 to July 2019 and aimed to identify causes contributing to inappropriate and frequent use of emergency departments by migrants. Our study aimed to analyze the differences in self-help measures carried out by the population groups using several multiple logistic regressions. The association between self-help measures implemented and appropriate emergency department utilization was quantified using a multiple logistic regression as well as interactions.

RESULTS

The odds of first-generation migrants visiting an emergency department on their own initiative (OR=1.28; 95% CI, 1.01-1.61) was high compared to people without migrant history. Furthermore, the odds of their doing something by themselves against their complaints (OR=0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.86) were low. The odds of appropriate utilization of emergency services by respondents who self-initiated a visit to an emergency department were lower (OR=0.41; 95% CI, 0.34-0.50). The odds of appropriate utilization of emergency department services by respondents who had previously measured vital signs (e. g., blood pressure) were higher (OR=1.28; 95% CI, 1.02-1.59).

CONCLUSION

Barriers to the health care system as well as to general practitioners, medicines or medical aids among first-generation migrants could explain the increased odds of their visiting an emergency department on their own and the lower odds of their doing something by themselves about their complaints. A hypothesis of our study is that measuring vital signs may help to better assess individual health status.

[Black box: Attenders with psychosocial needs in the emergency department]

OBJECTIVES

The aims are (a) assessment of the prevalence of psychosocial emergencies in the emergency department (ED), (b) determination of the proportion of cases not coded as diagnosis (unreported cases), and (c) characterization of identified patients.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, psychosocial emergencies in one week were identified from routine documentation of the central ED of the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte (CCM). After exclusion of planned admitted cases, 862 patients were included in the study. The identified psychosocial emergencies were descriptively analyzed with regard to their sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and compared with other emergencies.

RESULTS

The prevalence of psychosocial emergencies in the reported period was 11.9% (n = 103). A large proportion of psychosocial emergencies were not coded (35.9%) or not fully coded (20.4%) as an ICD diagnosis (unreported cases). There was a statistically relevant difference in gender distribution with a significantly higher proportion of males among psychosocial emergencies (70.9%) compared to other emergencies (50.7%; p < 0.0001). The two most common treatment causes among psychosocial emergencies were substance abuse (66.0%) and homelessness (20.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows a relevant proportion of psychosocial emergencies among all treatments in ED routine data and a high proportion of cases not captured in the coded diagnoses. EDs thus represent an important point of contact for vulnerable patient groups but standardized screening and identification are still lacking.

Health service behaviors of migrants: A conceptual framework

Universal health coverage is vital to the World Health Organization's (WHO's) efforts to ensure access to health as a human right. However, it has been reported that migrants, including both international immigrants and internal migrants, underuse health services. Establishing a conceptual framework to facilitate research on the health service behaviors (HSB) of migrants is particularly important. Many theoretical frameworks explaining the general population's HSB have been published; however, most theoretical frameworks on migrants' HSB only focus on international immigrants without the inclusion of internal migrants. Of note, internal migrants are much more abundant than immigrants, and this group faces similar barriers to HSB as immigrants do. Based on theoretical frameworks of immigrants' HSB and Anderson's behavior model, the author proposes a new conceptual framework of migrants' HSB that includes both immigrants and internal migrants. The new conceptual framework divides the determinants into macro-structural or contextual factors, health delivery system characteristics, and characteristics of the population at risk and describes subgroup-specific factors. The author added some variables and reclassified variables in some dimensions, including characteristics of health delivery systems and access to healthcare. The characteristics of health delivery systems comprise the volume, organization, quality, and cost of the health delivery system, while the characteristics of access to healthcare include time accessibility, geographic accessibility, and information accessibility. The outcomes of HSB have been expanded, and relationships between them have been reported. The mediating effects of some variables have also been described. This conceptual framework can facilitate a deep and comprehensive understanding of the HSB determination process for migrants, including internal migrants.

Investigating associated factors of primary and specialist health care utilization among people with selected nationalities: results of a multilingual survey in two German federal states

BACKGROUND

Approximately every fourth person in Germany has a migration background. Health research on the use of primary and specialist health care in this group is still scarce. Few studies have suggested a difference in the use of primary and specialist health care among people with a migration background. Potential resources and barriers to health care access should be investigated as they are critical to health equity. This study investigates associated sociodemographic, migration-sensitive, and health-related factors of primary and specialist health care utilization among people with a migration background as defined by nationality.

METHODS

Analyses are based on data from a feasibility study of the project "Improving Health Monitoring in Migrant Populations" (IMIRA), conducted by the Robert Koch Institute. The sample (n = 1055) included persons with Croatian, Polish, Romanian, Syrian, and Turkish nationalities living in the federal states of Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany. Descriptive and bivariate analyses as well as multiple binary logistic regression analyses were carried out to assess sociodemographic (sex, age, socioeconomic position), health-related (self-rated health), and migration-sensitive factors (duration of residence in Germany, residence status, German language proficiency) associated with the use of primary and specialist health care services in the past 12 months.

RESULTS

Of the total study population, 79.62% visited a general practitioner and 59.53% a specialized physician in the past 12 months. Participants who were female sex, aged 65 and older, and with moderate/poor/very poor self-rated health had higher odds of visiting a general practitioner and a specialized physician, with the strongest impact from self-rated health. After controlling for sociodemographic and health-related factors, duration of residence in Germany and residence status were associated with primary but not with specialist health care utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that migration-sensitive characteristics, such as duration of residence, should be considered in a differentiated manner in health services research to gain detailed insights into health care utilization and its potential barriers among the heterogenous group of people with a migration background. Further research needs to be done to evaluate how to get people into contact with a general practitioner.

Intended healthcare utilisation in cases of severe COVID-19 and inflammatory gastrointestinal disease: results of a population survey with vignettes

OBJECTIVES

To examine variations in intended healthcare utilisation in severe cases of COVID-19 and inflammatory gastrointestinal disease (IGD).

DESIGN

Representative cross-sectional telephone survey.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

1207 randomly drawn adults of the city of Hamburg, Germany, between November 2020 and January 2021.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Different vignettes with severe symptoms were presented varying in sex, age (child, middle-aged person, older person), daytime (Tuesday morning or Tuesday evening) and disease (COVID-19 or IGD), while the degree of urgency was equivalent for all cases. The respondents were asked for the intended healthcare utilisation resulting in three different alternatives: general practitioner (GP)/paediatrician, medical on-call service ('116117') and emergency care (accident and emergency department, emergency practice, rescue service). In multivariate analyses, associations of characteristics of the vignettes and participants (sex, age, education, migration background) with intended healthcare utilisation were tested. In a further step, analyses were conducted separately for IGD and COVID-19.

RESULTS

Regarding the vignettes' characteristics, intended utilisation of GP/paediatrician is associated with female sex, higher age, daytime (morning) and COVID-19 symptoms, the medical on-call service with male sex, daytime (evening) and COVID-19 symptoms and the emergency medicine with younger age, daytime (evening) and IGD. Women chose more often the GP/paediatrician, men preferred emergency medicine. Only in case of IGD, higher educated persons more often chose the medical on-call service while people with a migration background decided less often for medical on-call service and emergency medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite comparable urgency, the findings suggest variations of intended healthcare utilisation depending on various characteristics of the vignettes and respondents. Depending on the type of disease inequalities vary. Overall, information about healthcare alternatives in severe cases has to be improved and clear pathways to facilitate healthcare utilisation has to be further developed.

Diverting less urgent utilizers of emergency medical services to primary care: is it feasible? Patient and morbidity characteristics from a cross-sectional multicenter study of self-referring respiratory emergency department consulters

Objective

Diversion of less urgent emergency medical services (EMS) callers to alternative primary care (PC) is much debated. Using data from the EMACROSS survey of respiratory ED patients, we aimed to characterize self-referred EMS patients, compare these with non-EMS patients, and assess scope and acceptability of a potential redirection to alternative PC.

Results

Of n = 292 self-referred patients, n = 99 were transported by EMS. Compared to non-EMS patients, these were older, triaged more urgently and arrived out-of-hours more frequently. The share of chronically and severely ill patients was greater. Out-of-hours ED visit, presence of a chronic pulmonary condition as well as a hospital diagnosis of respiratory failure were identified as determinants of EMS utilization in a logistic model, while consultation for access and quality motives as well as migrant status decreased the probability. EMS-transported lower urgency outpatients visiting during regular physicians’ hours were defined as potential PC cases and evaluated descriptively (n = 9). As a third was medically complex and potentially less suitable for PC, redirection potential could be estimated at only 6% of EMS cases. This would be reduced to 2% if considering patients’ judgment concerning the appropriate setting. Overall, the scope for PC diversion of respiratory EMS patients seems limited.

Inequalities in health care utilization among migrants and non-migrants in Germany: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite the growing number of people with migrant background in Germany, a systematic review about their utilization of health care and differences to the non-migrant population is lacking. By covering various sectors of health care and migrant populations, the review aimed at giving a general overview and identifying special areas of potential intervention.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in PubMed database including records that were published until 1st of June 2017. Further criteria for eligibility were a publication in a peer-reviewed journal written in English or German language. The studies have to report quantitative and original data of a population residing in Germany. The appropriateness of the studies was judged by both authors. Studies were excluded if native controls were not originated from the same sample. Moreover, indicators of health care utilization have to assess individual behaviour like consultation or participation rates. 63 studies met the inclusion criteria for a qualitative synthesis of the findings.

RESULTS

The overall findings indicate a lower utilization among migrants, although the results vary in terms of health care sector, indicator of health care utilization and migrant population. For specialist care, medication use, therapist consultations and counselling, rehabilitation as well as disease prevention (early cancer detection, prevention programs for children and oral health check-ups) a lower utilization among people with migrant background was found. The lower usage was particularly shown for migrants of the 1st generation, people with two-sided migrant background, children/adolescents and women. Due to the methodological heterogeneity a meta-analysis was not feasible. As most of the studies were cross-sectional, no causal interpretations could be drawn.

CONCLUSIONS

The inequalities in utilization could not substantially be explained by differences in the socioeconomic status. Other reasons of lower utilization could be due to differences in need, preferences, information, language and formal access barriers (e.g. charges, waiting times, travel distances or lost wages). Different migrant-specific and migrant-sensitive strategies are relevant to address the problem for certain health care sectors and migrant populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO ( CRD42014015162 ).

Association between health service utilisation of internal migrant children and parents' acculturation in Guangdong, China: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the health service utilisation of internal migrant children in Guangdong, China, and to explore the association between children's health service utilisation and their parents' acculturation.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey between April and May 2016.

SETTING

Six society-run schools of Tianhe and Baiyun districts in Guangzhou City of China.

PARTICIPANTS

We recruited all students at grade 7 or 8 and one of their parents who resided in Guangzhou over 6 months without permanent registered residence (hukou) in Guangzhou (1161 pairs completed this survey). 258 children were ill within the past 2 weeks or during the last year.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome was self-reported health service utilisation. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the association between children's unmet needs for outpatient or inpatient service and their parents' acculturation (categorised into high, middle and low groups).

RESULTS

In total, 216 children, or 18.6% of the total subjects, were ill within the past 2 weeks and were in need of outpatient service; 94 children, or 8.1% of the total subjects, were in need of inpatient service. Among them, 17.6% and 46.8% of the migrant children had unmet needs for outpatient and inpatient services, respectively. After controlling for enabling resources and predisposing characteristics, migrant children with parents in the middle-acculturation group (adjusted OR=3.17, 95% CIs 1.2 to 8.3, P<0.05) were more likely to have an unmet outpatient need than high-acculturation or low-acculturation groups, although only statistically significant when comparing with the high-acculturation group. Stratified analysis suggested that this association could be moderated by their family economic status.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that the association between migrant children's health service utilisation and their parents' acculturation was complex and could be moderated by family economic status. Increasing the service utilisation among migrant children requires improving the acculturation and economic status of the parents of internal migrants.