Flexor tendon repair using a new suture technique: a comparative in vitro biomechanical study

Biomechanical evaluation of the ST-knot: A new suture for flexor tendon repair

PURPOSE

Although tendon lacerations are common, there is currently no consensus on choice of suture. Easy and fast sutures that impart enough strength to allow mobilization are needed. This study compared the ex vivo biomechanical strength (force required to create a 2 mm tendon gap) of a novel suture (ST-knot) with that of a conventional suture (double Kessler).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty fresh deep flexor tendons from porcine forelimbs were used. Both repaired tendon ends were mounted on standard traction jaws of an axial traction machine at an initial distance of 40 mm for all tendons. A high-definition camera was used to determine the force forming a 2 mm gap. Ten tendons in group 1 (ST-knot) and 10 in group 2 (double Kessler) were prepared with PDS 4.0 (single thread for Kessler, double thread for ST-knot). Tendons in groups 3 (ST-knot) and 4 (double Kessler) were repaired with PDS 1.0 using the same principle.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the force required to form a 2 mm tendon gap between groups 1 and 2, and this trend was identical when using a stronger thread in groups 3 and 4. The maximum force before rupture, mode of repair failure, stress and stiffness were also comparable, with no significant differences between groups 1 and 2, or between groups 3 and 4.

CONCLUSIONS

The ST-knot showed comparable results to the double-Kessler knot, whichever the thread used. Because it involves fewer steps than conventional techniques and is easy to perform, the ST-knot may offer a therapeutic solution, particularly in complex trauma with multiple tendon injury.

Biomechanics Study of the Holding Power between Tendon and Suture Using Different Techniques

Background: The holding power of a repaired flexor tendon injury is related to surface sutures, suture material and different techniques. Nowadays, a barbed suture material offers the possibility of knotless flexor tendon repair but many hospitals use non-barbed suture materials. The purpose of this study was to compare a barbed suture material and a non-barbed suture material for primary stability under static loading and increased knots in the non-barbed suture material (knot technique) for increased holding power of tendons in animal testing. Methods: Forty-five fresh porcine tendons were randomized into three groups: Group 1 (grasping technique group) used a four-strand core suture grasping a four-strand modified Kessler suture by non-barbed suture material [Non-absorbable monofilament polybutester 3-0] was used to repair the tendon with a surgical knot; in Group 2 (knot technique group) a four-strand core suture used the knot technique by non-barbed suture material [Non-absorbable monofilament polybutester 3-0] to repair the tendon with a continuous suture adding surgical knots in the same place as the surgical knot at the repair sites; and Group 3 (knotless technique group) used a four-strand core suture with the knotless technique in modified Kessler suture with barbed suture material [Non-absorbable monofilament polybutester 3-0] to repair the tendon without a knot. Our objective was to compare the ultimate tensile strength between the groups. Results: The mean tensile strength was 30.38 ± 5.04 N for group 1, 41.71 ± 2.62 for group 2 and 47.53 ± 4.89 for the group 3. The ANOVA test revealed a significant difference among the various techniques (p < 0.05). The highest tensile strength was found in the knotless technique using barbed suture material group. Conclusions: The knotless technique using barbed suture material demonstrated the highest tensile strength in suture repairs. The maximum tensile strength was significantly higher in this group.