[Minimally invasive adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: routine or risk?]

[Pheochromocytomatosis after adrenalectomy: metastasis or cell seeding?]

Pheochromocytomatosis is defined as a multifocal cell dissemination limited to the operatively opened space with no signs of distant metastasis. After primary adrenalectomy due to a pheochromocytoma this is a rare and underrecognized manifestation of a tumor recurrence. Between 2010 and 2019 a total of 5 patients with the presentation of pheochromocytomatosis were treated in this center. Clinical and survival data were compared to 12 patients with a metastasized pheochromocytoma. Patients presenting with pheochromocytomatosis showed a better but not significant overall survival (136.8 vs. 107 months). Furthermore, patients with pheochromocytomatosis presented more often with a noradrenaline secretion type. Tumor recurrence in the pheochromocytomatosis group occurred on average 69.2 months after the initial diagnosis and was therefore much later than in patients with distant metastases from a pheochromocytoma (39 months, p = 0.13). This article outlines this special manifestation of recurrence of a pheochromocytoma based on this patient collective. Besides technical operative aspects there appears to be evidence for tumor-specific factors that promote the development of pheochromocytomatosis. Importantly, it seems that all patients with a pheochromocytoma should receive lifelong aftercare and that patients should be closely monitored during the first 5 years after surgery.

Management and follow up of extra-adrenal phaeochromocytoma

Introduction

The prevalence of phaeochromocytoma (PCC) in patients with hypertension is 0.1–0.6% and about 10% of PCCs are detected in extra–adrenal tissue. The diagnosis and therapy of this rare disease detected as a retroperitoneal tumor mass can be difficult for clinicians.

Material and methods

A PubMed database was searched for the peer–reviewed articles, the listed articles until Dec 2012 were included. Following key words were used: “extra–adrenal phaeochromocytoma”, “paraganglioma”, “diagnosis”, “therapy”, “surgery”, “genetic analysis”, and “SDH mutation”.

Results

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) are first choice imaging tools for PCC (sensitivity 90–100%). For the validation of the diagnosis or follow up, the functional imaging 123I–metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) or Fluorine–18–L–dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F–DOPA) positron emission tomography (excellent specificity and sensitivity of 90–100% in detection of small tumors >1–2 cm) are used. Laparoscopic surgery with complete resection is a safe and a first choice approach. The conversion (about 5%) to direct open operation was needed for large lesions (>8 cm) with the suspicion of malignancy. Currently, there are no histological criteria for distinguishing benign and malignant tumors. The genetic testing (Sanger DNA sequencing) for hereditary syndromes (von Hippel–Lindau, neurofibromatosis, etc.) is used for prediction of malignancy and recurrence. All patients should get individual and risk–adapted genetic analysis and consultation, including family members. The rate of malignancy in ePCC is about 30% (PCC about 5–10%). In patients with proven SDHB germline mutations, higher malignancy rate, multiple PCCs and recurrences are likely. A stringent lifelong clinical follow–up is recommended in these cases. Patients with syndromic hereditary forms should be screened for other often associated neoplasms.

Conclusions

New imaging tools and genetic analysis are crucial to improve the diagnosis and prognosis of phaeochromocytoma.