[Pacemaker erythema with telangiectasis ]

Reticular telangiectatic erythema: case report and literature review

Background:

Reticular telangiectatic erythema is a benign cutaneous reaction that may occur in patients who have received a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Reticular telangiectatic erythema is characterized by asymptomatic telangiectasias, blanchable erythematous patches, or both overlying and/or adjacent to the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Purpose:

We describe a man who developed reticular telangiectatic erythema after receiving a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and review the salient features of this condition. We also summarize the conditions that can mimic reticular telangiectatic erythema.

Materials and methods:

The features of a man with reticular telangiectatic erythema are presented and the literature on reticular telangiectatic erythema is reviewed.

Results:

Our patient developed reticular telangiectatic erythema within one month of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion. The subcutaneous manifestations were asymptomatic. The patient concurred to have periodic clinical follow up and his condition will be monitored for any changes.

Conclusion:

Reticular telangiectatic erythema is a benign condition characterized by the development of erythema, telangiectasia, or both following insertion of a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Other subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-related side effects, such as pressure dermatitis and contact dermatitis, can mimic the condition. Reticular telangiectatic erythema can also be observed following insertion of other devices or, rarely, in the absence of inserted devices. Local microcirculatory changes and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-related obstruction of blood flow have been suggested as possible mechanisms of pathogenesis. The diagnosis can usually be established by clinical presentation. Therefore, patch testing can usually be omitted. Reticular telangiectatic erythema is typically asymptomatic and thus removal of the device is not required.

Allergic reaction to spinal cord stimulator

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to report on the possibility of allergic reaction to the components of a spinal cord stimulator.

DESIGN

We describe a severe allergic reaction after the insertion of a spinal cord stimulator in a patient with complex regional pain syndrome type 1.

SETTING

The patient was being followed in an office-based pain management practice.

PATIENT

The patient is a 41-year-old woman with complex regional pain syndrome type 1, posttrauma.

INTERVENTION

Insertion of a cervical and lumbar spinal cord stimulator.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome measures were a numerical scale of pain intensity and the ability to perform the activities of daily living.

RESULTS

Adequate pain control complicated by allergic reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

There exists a possibility that a patient may experience an allergic reaction to spinal cord stimulator components. Recognition of such contact sensitivity is important for physicians implanting such devices. Patients may be misdiagnosed as having infections, which can delay appropriate management; definitive diagnosis can be confirmed with a patch test. Treatment consists of removal of such devices.