Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

First long-term analysis of survival and clinical outcome in patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: follow-up of a prospective cohort study

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was introduced to improve post-operative alignment, and consequently the revision rate and clinical results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Short- to mid-term data are conflicting regarding these theoretical advantages of PSI. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the survival rate and clinical outcome in PSI TKA 8.4 years after initial surgery. To our knowledge, no other study investigated long-term follow-up of TKA procedures using PSI. From a total cohort of 184 consecutive patients (200 TKA) 136 patients (144 TKA, 72%) were prospectively analysed at a mean follow-up of 8.4 years (±0.4). A survival analysis with all-cause revision of TKA as endpoint was performed. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained preoperatively and after 1-, 2-, 5-, and 8.4-years of follow-up. Differences between these moments of follow-up were analysed. At final follow-up, 4 TKAs (2%) had undergone revision, all between 2-4 years after primary surgery. Reasons for revision were late infection, aseptic loosening, instability and polyethylene insert breakage. The median score of certain PROMs (WOMAC, VAS, EQ-index, EQ-VAS) decreased compared to previous follow-up scores but were significantly higher than preoperative scores. After 8.4 years of follow-up, no additional revision surgery was performed compared to 5-years postoperatively. Certain PROMs at 8.4-year follow-up decreased compared to earlier moments of follow-up, but all PROMs improved compared to preoperative PROMs.

Functional Outcome of Mechanical Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery: A Short-Term Cohort Study at an Indian Tertiary Care Hospital

Background

In severe arthritis cases, goal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) management is to attain pain-free joint and restore the overall limb alignment. There are limited short-term studies published from Indian hospitals that investigated the importance of neutral mechanical component alignment in TKA patients.

Methods

Retrospective and prospective study was conducted at the Department of orthopaedics, Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pune from June 2020 to September 2022. Enrolled patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using clinical examination, radiological assessment and functional outcomes through the Oxford knee score, Knee society score and VAS score.

Results

204 patients enrolled, and 267 knees were evaluated for the study. Osteoarthritis was the commonest diagnosis (254 knees, 95.13%). Pre-operatively, 92.13% knees were varus, 4.87% valgus and 3% neutral while post-operatively, 51.69% were varus, 16.1% were valgus, and 32.32% were with neutral axis. Majority of patients with a pre-operative neutral axis converted to varus axis (62.5%), while most valgus axis cases preoperatively converted to a neutral axis (53.84%). For pre-operative varus subgroup, the majority patients with < 10° pre-operative axis converted to neutral (41.28%). Majority patients with 10°-20° pre-operative axis remained varus (60.53%) and with > 20° pre-operative axis remained varus (78.26%). Functional outcome parameters were significantly improved at follow-up (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Short-term postoperative functional scores were significantly improved in postoperative cases, with the postoperative alignment of 0° ± 3° relative to the mechanical axis was achieved. Thus, postoperative neutral mechanical alignment of 0° ± 3° can be the standard of care for patients undergoing TKA.

Graphical abstract

Cost-effectiveness of patient specific vs conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Over the past years, patient specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been implemented and routinely used. No clear answer has been given on its associated cost and cost-effectiveness when compared to conventional instrumentation (CI) for TKA.

AIM

To compare the cost and cost-effectiveness of PSI TKA compared to CI TKA.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in healthcare, economical healthcare, and medical databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EconLit). It was conducted in April 2021 and again in January 2022. Relevant literature included randomised controlled trials, retrospective studies, prospective studies, observational studies, and case control studies. All studies were assessed on methodological quality. Relevant outcomes included incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, quality-adjusted life years, total costs, imaging costs, production costs, sterilization associated costs, surgery duration costs and readmission rate costs. All eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed for outcomes with sufficient data.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies were included into the systematic review. Two were included in the meta-analysis. 3994 PSI TKAs and 13267 CI TKAs were included in the sample size. The methodological quality of the included studies, based on Consensus on Health Economic Criteria-scores and risk of bias, ranged from average to good. PSI TKA costs less than CI TKA when considering mean operating room time and its associated costs and tray sterilization per patient case. PSI TKA costs more compared to CI TKA when considering imaging and production costs. Considering total costs per patient case, PSI TKA is more expensive in comparison to CI TKA. Meta-analysis comparing total costs for PSI TKA, and CI TKA showed a significant higher cost for PSI TKA.

CONCLUSION

Cost for PSI and CI TKA can differ when considering distinct aspects of their implementation. Total costs per patient case are increased for PSI TKA when compared to CI TKA.

The efficacy and safety of patient-specific instrumentation in primary total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery has been shown to increase accuracy of component positioning. However, it is unclear whether this also translates to actual benefits for patients in terms of better outcomes (efficacy) or less complications such as revisions (safety). We therefore systematically reviewed the literature to determine the efficacy and safety of PSI in primary TKA.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials comparing PSI to non-PSI in primary TKA were included. A random effects model was used with meta-regression in case of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies were included with a total of 1816 TKA in the PSI group and 1887 TKA in the control group. There were no clinically relevant differences between the PSI-group and non-PSI group regarding all outcomes. There was considerable heterogeneity: meta-regression analyses showed that the year the study was published was an important effect modifier. Early publications tended to show a positive effect for PSI compared to non-PSI TKA, whereas later studies found the opposite.

CONCLUSION

Based on evidence of moderate certainty, our study suggested that there were no clinically relevant differences in efficacy and safety between patients treated with PSI TKA and patients treated with non-PSI TKA.

Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Current Concepts Review

»

Bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) is an effective surgical treatment for bilateral knee arthritis and can be performed as a simultaneous surgery under a single anesthetic setting or as staged surgeries on separate days.

»

Appropriate patient selection is important for simultaneous BTKA with several factors coming into consideration such as age, comorbidities, work status, and home support, among others.

»

While simultaneous BTKA is safe when performed on appropriately selected patients, current evidence suggests that the risk of complications after simultaneous BTKA remains higher than for staged BTKA.

»

When staged surgery is preferred, current evidence indicates that complication risks are minimized if the 2 knees are staged at least 3 months apart.

»

Simultaneous BTKA is the economically advantageous treatment option relative to staged BTKA, primarily because of shorter total operative time and total hospital stay.

Correlation between component alignment and short-term clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between component alignment and short-term clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

50 TKA patients from a regional hospital were enrolled in the study. The following component alignments were measured from radiological data acquired within 1 week after surgery: hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), medial distal femoral angle (MDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), femoral flexion-extension angle (FEA), tibial slope angle (TSA), femoral rotational angle (FRA) and tibial rotational angle (TRA). The Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scoring system was used to assess clinical outcomes after 1 year, with patients being divided into three groups (excellent, good and not good) according to the HSS scores. Difference analysis and linear correlation analysis were used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The results showed significant differences in MDFA (p = 0.050) and FEA (p = 0.001) among the three patient groups. It was also found that the total HSS had only a moderate correlation with FEA (r = 0.572, p < 0.001), but FEA had a positive linear correlation with pain scores (r = 0.347, p = 0.013), function scores (r = 0.535, p = 0.000), ROM scores (r = 0.368, p = 0.009), muscle scores (r = 0.354, p = 0.012) and stability scores (r = 0.312, p = 0.028). A larger MDFA was associated with lower FE deformity scores (r = -0.289, p = 0.042) and the TSA had a positive influence on the ROM (r = 0.436, p = 0.002). Also, changes in FRA produced a consequent change in the FE deformity score (r = 0.312, p = 0.027), and the muscle strength scores increased as TRA increased (r = 0.402, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The results show that the FEA plays a significant role in clinical outcomes after TKA. Surgical techniques and tools may need to be improved to accurately adjust the FEA to improve joint functionality and patient satisfaction.

The coronal alignment technique impacts deviation from native knee anatomy after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze and quantify the changes in native coronal alignment of a population of TKA patients according to different alignment goals.

METHODS

Five hundred and twenty TKAs were analyzed. The following angles were measured using an image-free navigation system prior to prosthetic implantation: medial femorotibial mechanical angle without stress and with maximum manual stress to reduce the deformity, medial distal femoral mechanical angle, medial proximal tibial mechanical angle. The native angles were derived from the osteoarthritic knee angles using a validated correction technique, and the overall, femoral and tibial coronal phenotypes were defined. Five different coronal alignment techniques were simulated: mechanical (MA), restricted mechanical (RMA), anatomical (AA), kinematic (KA) and restricted kinematic (RKA). The overall, femoral and tibial coronal phenotypes were compared before and after TKA. The primary endpoint was the binary criterion of whether or not TKA restored the natural overall phenotype. Secondary endpoints were the binary criteria of whether or not the natural femoral and tibial phenotypes were restored by TKA. The rates of restored and non restored phenotypes were compared with a Chi-square test at a 0.05 level of significance, with post hoc tests between all pairs of techniques at a 0.01 level of significance.

RESULTS

The overall phenotype was restored significantly differently by the five alignment techniques: 15% for MA, 23% for RMA, 2% for AA, 100% for KA and 79% for RKA (p < 0.001). There was a significant difference between each of the technique pairs (p < 0.01 to p < 0.001), except for the mechanical alignment-restricted mechanical alignment pair. The femoral phenotype was restored significantly differently by the five alignment techniques: 37% for MA, 58% for RMA, 19% for AA, 100% for KA and 85% for RKA (p < 0.001). The tibial phenotype was restored significantly differently by the five alignment techniques: 36% for MA, 36% for RMA, 17% for AA, 100% for KA and 88% for RKA (p < 0.001). There was a significant difference between each pair of techniques for both femoral and tibial phenotypes (p < 0.01 to p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Except for the kinematic alignment technique, the various alignment techniques induce significant changes in the pre-arthritic anatomy of the TKA patient. The surgeon must be aware of these modifications. The clinical relevance of this alteration still needs to be defined.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Minimum 5-Year Outcomes of a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Control Trial Assessing Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was developed to produce more accurate alignment of components and consequently improve clinical outcomes when used in total knee arthroplasty. We compare radiological accuracy and clinical outcomes at a minimum of 5-year follow-up between patients randomized to undergo total knee arthroplasty performed using PSI or traditional cutting block techniques.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized control trial included patients blinded to the technique 1used. Outcome measures were coronal alignment measured radiologically, Euroqol-5D, Oxford knee score, and International Knee Society Score measured at 1- and 5-year follow-up.

RESULTS

At a minimum 5-year follow-up, there were 38 knees in the PSI group and 39 in the conventional instrumentation group for analysis. Baseline demographics and clinical outcome scores were matched between groups. Overall, there was no significant difference in the coronal femoral angle (P = .59), coronal tibial angle (P = .37), tibiofemoral angle (P = .99), sagittal femoral angle (P = .34), or the posterior tibia slope (P = .12) between knees implanted using PSI and those implanted with traditional cutting blocks. On the measurement of coronal alignment, intraobserver reliability tests demonstrated substantial agreement (k = 0.64). Clinical outcomes at both 1-year and 5-year follow-up demonstrated statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in scores from baseline in both groups, but no difference could be detected between the Euroqol-5D (P = .78), Oxford knee score (P = .24), or International Knee Society Score (P = .86) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

This study has shown no additional benefit to PSI in terms of improved alignment or functional outcomes at minimum 5-year follow-up over traditional techniques.

Prosthetic Accuracy Depends on the Design of Patient-Specific Instrumentation: Results of a Retrospective Study Using Three-Dimensional Imaging

To determine accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), the preoperative three-dimensional (3D) plan should be superimposed on the postoperative 3D image to compare prosthetic alignment. We aimed to compare prosthetic alignment on a preoperative 3D computed tomography (CT) plan and postoperative 3D-CT image, and evaluate the accuracy of PSI during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Thirty consecutive knees (30 patients) who underwent TKA using PSI were retrospectively evaluated. The preoperative plan was prepared using 3D CT acquisitions of the hip, knee, and ankle joints. The postoperative 3D CT image obtained 1 week after surgery was superimposed onto the preoperative 3D plan using computer software. Differences in prosthetic alignment between the preoperative and postoperative images were measured using six parameters: coronal, sagittal, and axial alignments of femoral and tibial prostheses. Differences in prosthetic alignment greater than 3 degrees were considered outliers. Two observers performed all measurements. All parameters were repeatedly measured over a 4-week interval. This measurement method's intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities were more than 0.81 (very good). For the femoral and tibial prostheses, absolute differences between the preoperative and postoperative 3D CT images were significantly larger in the sagittal than in the coronal and axial planes (p < 0.001). The outlier rate for the sagittal alignment of femoral and tibial prostheses was significantly higher than that for the alignment of coronal and axial planes (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the range of motion (ROM) before and after TKA when comparing cases with and without outliers in the sagittal plane. Even though the present study did not reveal any issues with the ROM that depended on the presence of an outlier, accurate verification of prosthetic alignment for individual PSI models may be necessary because the designs, referenced images, and accuracy are different in each model.

CT-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in over 700 cases: single-use instruments are as accurate as standard instruments

PURPOSE

Efforts in total knee arthroplasty are made to improve accuracy for a correct leg axis and reduce component malpositioning using patient-specific instruments. It was hypothesized that use of patient-specific instruments (vs. computer-navigated and conventional techniques) will reduce the number of outliers. Our second hypothesis was that single-use instrumentation will lead to the same accuracy compared to patient-specific instruments made of metal.

METHODS

708 primary total knee arthroplasties between 2014 and 2018 using computer tomography (CT)-based patient-specific cutting block technique and a preoperative planning protocol were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative data [hip-knee-angle (HKA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), tibial slope, femoral component flexion] was compared to postoperative performed standard radiological follow-up X-rays. Differences of > 3° between measurements were defined as outliers.

RESULTS

Overall 500 prostheses using standard instrumentation and 208 prostheses using single-use instruments were implanted. Preoperative HKA axes (- 1.2°; p < 0.001), femoral component flexion (Δ 0.8°, p < 0.001), LDFA (Δ - 1.5°, p < 0.001), MPTA (Δ - 0.5°, p < 0.001) and tibial posterior slopes (Δ 0.5°, p < 0.001), respectively, were different from postoperative axes. More outliers occurred using standard (vs. single-use) instruments (p < 0.001) regarding postoperative HKA (ranges of standard- vs. single-use: instruments: HKA 178.0°-180.5° vs. 178.0°-180.5°, femoral component flexion 0.0°-6.0° vs. 0.0°-4.5°, LDFA 90.0°-91.0° vs. 90.0°-90.0°, MPTA 90.0°-90.0° vs. 90.0°-90.0°, tibial posterior slope - 10° to 10° vs. - 1° to 10°). No differences were seen for other angles measured. Comparing both systems, total number of outliers was higher using standard (8%) vs. single-use instruments (4.3%).

CONCLUSION

This study shows a high accuracy of CT-based patient-specific instrumentation concerning postoperative achieved knee angles and mechanical leg axes. Single-use instruments showed a similar accuracy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparison of post-operative three-dimensional and two-dimensional evaluation of component position for total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the post-operative three-dimensional (3D) femoral and tibial component positions in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by the same co-ordinates' system as for pre-operative planning and to compare it with a two-dimensional (2D) evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-five primary TKAs due to osteoarthritis were included. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the femur and tibia was obtained and pre-operative 3D planning was performed. Then, 3D and 2D post-operative evaluations of the component positions were performed. KneeCAS (LEXI, Inc., Tokyo, Japan), a lower-extremity alignment assessment system, was used for the 3D post-operative evaluation. Standard short-knee radiographs were used for the 2D post-operative evaluation. Differences between the pre-operative planning and post-operative coronal and sagittal alignment of components were investigated and compared with the results of the 3D and 2D evaluations.

RESULTS

According to the 3D evaluation, the difference between the pre-operative planning and actual post-operative sagittal alignment of the femoral component and the coronal and sagittal alignments of the tibial component were 2.6° ± 1.8°, 2.2° ± 1.8° and 3.2° ± 2.4°, respectively. Using the 2D evaluation, they were 1.9° ± 1.5°, 1.3° ± 1.2° and 1.8° ± 1.4°, making the difference in 3D evaluation significantly higher (p = 0.013, = 0.003 and < 0.001). For the sagittal alignment of the femoral component and the coronal and sagittal alignment of the tibial component, the outlier (> ± 3°) ratio for the 3D evaluation was also significantly higher than that of the 2D evaluation (p < 0.001, = 0.009 and < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The difference between the pre-operative planning and post-operative component alignment in the 3D evaluation is significantly higher than that of the 2D, even if the same cases have been evaluated. Two-dimensional evaluation may mask or underestimate the post-operative implant malposition. Three-dimensional evaluation using the same co-ordinates' system as for pre-operative planning is necessary to accurately evaluate the post-operative component position.

A short-term radiological and clinical comparison between the bi-cruciate and cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty A retrospective case controlled study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to provide a short term comparison in radiological and clinical outcome between Bi-Cruciate Retaining (BCR)- and Cruciate Retaining (CR) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

The cohort consists of 122 patients undergoing a TKA with PSI, equally distributed over the BCR- and CR-TKA group. Perioperative conditions were observed and radiological images were analysed pre-, 6-weeks, and 1-year postoperative to quantify alignment differences between BCR- and CR-TKA. Preoperatively predicted templates were compared with the implanted size to determine predictive value. In addition mean range of motion and revision rates were determined in both groups.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in amount of outliers in component alignment between BCR- and CR-TKA. Outliers of the Hip-Knee-Ankle-Axis (HKA-axis) occurred significantly more frequent (P = 0.009) in the BCR-group (37.7%) compared to CR-TKA (18.0%). No clinically relevant differences regarding the predictive sizing of implant components was obtained. No significant differences were observed in revision rates (P = 1.000) and ROM (p = 0.425) between the BCR-groep and CR-group at 2-years FU.

CONCLUSION

This study illustrates that although the HKA-axis was not fully restored, bi-cruciate retaining surgical technique for BCR-TKA is safe and effective with comparable radiological and clinical outcome as CR TKA. Randomized controlled trials with longer follow up on the HKA-axis alignment and clinical parameters are needed to confirm the presented results and should focus on possible cut off values concerning leg axis in order to define in what patients a BCR-TKA can safely be used.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

Retrospective Case Controlled Study.

Patientenspezifische Instrumentierung und Totalendoprothesen am Knie

Hintergrund

Die patientenspezifische Instrumentierung (PSI) ist eine vielversprechende neue Technologie in der orthopädischen Chirurgie, die das Ziel verfolgt, die Implantationstechnik der Knietotalendoprothese (Knie-TEP) im Vergleich zur konventionellen Instrumentierung zu vereinfachen und präziser zu machen. Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, Vorteile und Grenzen der PSI für die primäre Knie-TEP zu beschreiben.

Material und Methoden

Es erfolgte eine umfassende Literaturrecherche zum Thema PSI in der Knieprothetik hinsichtlich Evidenz für Planung, Präzision, klinische Ergebnisse, intraoperative Parameter sowie Kosten und Effizienz.

Ergebnisse

Die dreidimensionale Computertomographie (CT) weist in der präoperativen Planung der Knie-TEP eine höhere Genauigkeit auf als 2‑D-Röntgenaufnahmen. Die meisten Arbeiten postulierten keine signifikanten Effekte zugunsten der Genauigkeit der PSI gegenüber der Standard-Knie-TEP. Aber sie berichteten auch nicht, dass die Genauigkeit mit PSI schlechter sei. Hinsichtlich des klinischen Outcomes gibt es genügend Konsens unter den veröffentlichten Studien, um festzuhalten, dass es kurz- und mittelfristig keinen Unterschied zwischen Patienten gibt, die mit PSI oder konventioneller Technik operiert wurden. Eine große Metaanalyse konnte weder eine kürzere Operationszeit noch eine geringere Komplikationsrate für die PSI-Knie-TEP feststellen. Lediglich der intraoperative Blutverlust erwies sich als niedriger im Vergleich zur Standardtechnik, jedoch mit unveränderter Transfusionsrate. Kosteneffektivitätsanalysen lassen schlussfolgern, dass die PSI aktuell (noch) nicht kosteneffektiv ist.

Diskussion

Obwohl die aktuell vorliegenden Studienergebnisse die PSI-Technologie hinsichtlich vieler messbaren Kriterien nicht eindeutig von der Standardtechnik abheben, zeigt die PSI viele theoretische und praktische Vorteile.

Patient-Specific Instrumentation Accuracy Evaluated with 3D Virtual Models

There have been remarkable advances in knee replacement surgery over the last few decades. One of the concerns continues to be the accuracy in achieving the desired alignment. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was developed to increase component placement accuracy, but the available evidence is not conclusive. Our study aimed to determine a PSI system’s three-dimensional accuracy on 3D virtual models obtained by post-operative computed tomography. We compared the angular placement values of 35 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) operated within a year obtained with the planned ones, and we analyzed the possible relationships between alignment and patient-reported outcomes. The mean (SD) discrepancies measured by two experienced engineers to the planned values observed were 1.64° (1.3°) for the hip–knee–ankle angle, 1.45° (1.06°) for the supplementary angle of the femoral lateral distal angle, 1.44° (0.97°) for the proximal medial tibial angle, 2.28° (1.78°) for tibial slope, 0.64° (1.09°) for femoral sagittal flexion, and 1.42° (1.06°) for femoral rotation. Neither variables related to post-operative alignment nor the proportion of change between pre-and post-operative alignment influenced the patient-reported outcomes. The evaluated PSI system’s three-dimensional alignment analysis showed a statistically significant difference between the angular values planned and those obtained. However, we did not find a relevant effect size, and this slight discrepancy did not impact the clinical outcome.

[Clinical application of distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide based on knee CT and full-length X-ray film of lower extremities]

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the feasibility and accuracy of distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on knee CT and full-length X-ray film of lower extremities.

METHODS

Between July 2016 and February 2017, 20 patients with severe knee joint osteoarthritis planned to undergo primary TKA were selected as the research object. There were 9 males and 11 females; aged 53-84 years, with an average of 69.4 years. The body mass index was 22.1-31.0 kg/m 2, with an average of 24.8 kg/m 2. The preoperative range of motion (ROM) of the knee joint was (103.0±19.4)°, the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 5.4±1.3, and the American Hospital of Special Surgery (HSS) score was 58.1±11.3. Before operation, a three-dimensional model of the knee joint was constructed based on the full-length X-ray film of lower extremities and CT of the knee joint. The distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide was designed and fabricated, and the thickness of the distal femoral osteotomy was determined by digital simulation. The thickness of the internal and external condyle of the distal femur osteotomy before operation and the actual thickness of the intraoperative osteotomy were compared. The intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage loss, and hidden blood loss were recorded. The ROM of knee joint, VAS score, and HSS score at 3 months after operation were recorded to evaluate effectiveness. The position of the coronal and sagittal plane of the distal femoral prosthesis were assessed by comparing the femoral mechanical-anatomical angle (FMAA), anatomical lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA), mechanical femoral tibial angle (mFTA), distal femoral flexion angle (DFFA), femoral prosthesis flexion angle (FPFA), anatomical lateral femoral component angle (aLFC), and the angle of the femoral component and femoral shaft (α angle) between pre- and post-operation.

RESULTS

TKA was successfully completed with the aid of the distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide. There was no significant difference between the thickness of the internal and lateral condyle of the distal femur osteotomy before operation and the actual thickness of the intraoperative osteotomy ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 3 months. All incisions healed by first intention, and there was no complications such as periarticular infection and deep vein thrombosis. Except for 1 patient who was not treated with tranexamic acid, the intraoperative blood loss of the rest 19 patients ranged from 30 to 150 mL, with an average of 73.2 mL; the postoperative drainage loss ranged from 20 to 500 mL, with an average of 154.5 mL; and the hidden blood loss ranged from 169.2 to 1 400.0 mL, with an average of 643.8 mL. At 3 months after operation, the ROM of the knee was (111.5±11.5)°, and there was no significant difference when compared with the preoperative one ( t=-1.962, P=0.065). The VAS score was 2.4±0.9 and HSS score was 88.2±7.5, showing significant differences when compared with the preoperative ones ( t=7.248, P=0.000; t=-11.442, P=0.000). Compared with the preoperative measurements, there was a significant difference in mFTA ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in aLDFA, FMAA, or DFFA; compared with the preoperative plan, there was no significant difference in FPFA, aLFC, or α angle ( P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of distal femoral patient-specific cutting guide based on knee CT and full-length X-ray film of lower extremity can achieve precise osteotomy, improve coronal and sagittal limb alignment, reduce intraoperative blood loss, and obtain satisfactory short-term effectiveness.

Clinical value of CT-based patient-specific 3D preoperative design combined with conventional instruments in primary total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the operation and early clinical effect in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) about the novel combination of CT-based patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) preoperative design and conventional osteotomy instruments, compared with the conventional method.

Methods

After a 1:1 propensity score-matching (PSM), patients were matched to the novel technique group and the conventional group, 109 cases in each group. The conventional group adopted a preoperative design based on a full-length radiograph (FLX) and received TKA with conventional osteotomy instruments. The novel technique group used a CT-based patient-specific 3D preoperative design combined with conventional osteotomy instruments; during the surgery, the femoral entry point, femoral valgus osteotomy angle, the fix point of tibial plateau extramedullary guide pin, and the position of tibial extramedullary positioning rod were accurately selected according to the preoperative 3D design to ensure accurate intraoperative implementation. The lower limb alignment, component position, operation time, tourniquet time, hospital stay, blood loss volume, incidence of postoperative complications, visual analog scale (Vas) score, and New Knee Society Score System (NEW-KSS) at 1 day before operation and 1, 6, and 12 months after operation were recorded and compared.

Results

The novel technique group was significantly better than the conventional group in controlling lateral tibial component angle (LTC) (P < 0.001), and the novel technique group had lower percentages of hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) outliers (P < 0.001) and overcorrection (P = 0.003). The operation time, tourniquet time, and hospital stay of the novel technique group was shorter (P < 0.05). In 1 month after the operation, the novel technique group achieved a significantly better VAS score (P < 0.05), but a similar NEW-KSS score (P > 0.05) when compared with the conventional group. But in 6 and 12 months after surgery, no statistical differences were seen in the above two scores (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The novel technique of CT-based patient-specific 3D preoperative design combined with conventional instruments can improve the accuracy of osteotomy in primary total knee arthroplasty, with benefits of significantly reducing pain and rapid recovery during the early postoperative period, but having no obvious effect on outcome after a 1-year follow-up.

Fewer femoral rotational outliers produced with CT- than with MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Previous studies comparing the surgical accuracy between computed tomography (CT)- and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) methods have produced contradictory results. The aim of this study was to determine which is the more reliable imaging method (CT versus MRI) for patient-specific total knee arthroplasty (TKA). CT-based PSI is hypothesised to have an advantage regarding the number of outliers.

METHODS

A total of 22 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including 1749 TKA cases, were eligible for the meta-analysis. RCTs, systematic reviews and meta-analyses on this topic published in databases before September 2018 were identified by a literature search. The primary outcome was the number of lower extremities with greater than 3° of difference in alignment angles between the postoperative outcomes and target outcomes. The parameters calculated from the meta-analysis included risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Additionally, the publication bias and heterogeneity of the studies were assessed.

RESULTS

The risk of femoral rotational outliers in the PSI group (RR = 0.48; 95% CI 0.24-0.98) was significantly reduced. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed that the accuracy in the CT-based PSI group was significantly higher than that in the MRI-based CSI group (RR = 0.31; 95% CI 0.10-0.92).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis shows that when performing TKA with PSI, preoperative CT is beneficial for the production of the PSI, resulting in a significantly lower proportion of outliers in femoral rotational alignment. CT should be the preferred choice for imaging when performing TKA surgery with PSI to obtain better femoral rotational alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study (systematic review and meta-analysis), Level I.

Does patient-specific instrumentation increase the risk of notching in the anterior femoral cortex in total knee arthroplasty? A comparative prospective trial

PURPOSE

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was usually applied in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to acquire a favourable alignment. We hypothesized that using PSI had a potential risk of notching in the anterior femoral cortex, because the femoral component may be placed in an overextension position due to the distal femoral sagittal anteversion. The aim of this study was to figure out the relationship between the notch and the distal femoral sagittal anteversion in PSI-assisted TKA.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-one patients who were to undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomly divided into conventional instrumentation (CI) group and PSI group. The computed tomography (CT) data of lower extremities was collected and imported to the Mimics software to reconstruct the three-dimensional (3D) bone image of the femur. The angle between distal femoral anatomic axis (DFAA) and femoral mechanical axis (FMA) on sagittal plane was defined as distal femoral sagittal anteverted angle (DFSAA) and measured. The number of notch intra-operative and post-operative was recorded. Then, we calculated the incidence of the notch and analyzed its relationship with DFSAA.

RESULTS

The average DFSAA of 262 femurs is 2.5° ± 1.5° (range, 0.0°-5.7°). When DFSAA ≥ 3°, the incidence of notch was 7.10% in CI group and 33.30% in PSI group, respectively, which shows significant statistical difference in the two groups (P = 0.016 < 0.05). When DFSAA < 3°, the incidence of notch was 6.50% in CI group and 5.30% in PSI group, respectively, which shows no significant statistical difference in the two groups (P = 0.667 > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DFSAA could be taken as an indicator to predict the notch when performing TKA assisted with PSI. Especially when the DFSAA ≥ 3°, the risk of notch could be markedly increased.

Medical 3D Printing Cost-Savings in Orthopedic and Maxillofacial Surgery: Cost Analysis of Operating Room Time Saved with 3D Printed Anatomic Models and Surgical Guides

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

Three-dimensional (3D) printed anatomic models and surgical guides have been shown to reduce operative time. The purpose of this study was to generate an economic analysis of the cost-saving potential of 3D printed anatomic models and surgical guides in orthopedic and maxillofacial surgical applications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A targeted literature search identified operating room cost-per-minute and studies that quantified time saved using 3D printed constructs. Studies that reported operative time differences due to 3D printed anatomic models or surgical guides were reviewed and cataloged. A mean of $62 per operating room minute (range of $22-$133 per minute) was used as the reference standard for operating room time cost. Different financial scenarios were modeled with the provided cost-per-minute of operating room time (using high, mean, and low values) and mean time saved using 3D printed constructs.

RESULTS

Seven studies using 3D printed anatomic models in surgical care demonstrated a mean 62 minutes ($3720/case saved from reduced time) of time saved, and 25 studies of 3D printed surgical guides demonstrated a mean 23 minutes time saved ($1488/case saved from reduced time). An estimated 63 models or guides per year (or 1.2/week) were predicted to be the minimum number to breakeven and account for annual fixed costs.

CONCLUSION

Based on the literature-based financial analyses, medical 3D printing appears to reduce operating room costs secondary to shortening procedure times. While resource-intensive, 3D printed constructs used in patients' operative care provides considerable downstream value to health systems.

[PSI-technique for kinematic alignment]

BACKGROUND

Compared with the current gold standard of knee endoprosthetics, the concept of kinematic alignment is more responsive to the individual anatomy of the patient as it enables the three-dimensional restoration of individual axes, joint lines and capsule tension. One point of criticism is the lack of intraoperative control over individual bone resections with conventional instrumentation. However, with the help of CT-based individual 3D-printed cutting blocks, a precise preoperative plan can be transferred to the operating room. The aim of this article is to explain the operative technique of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI)-protected kinematic alignment.

METHODS

The procedure is based on a preoperative 3D model of the bony anatomy of the patient, with the aid of which the planning of the operation, with the positioning and size of the implant, as well as the necessary bone resections, are carried out. With this information about anatomy and resection levels the individual cutting blocks are produced, aided by a 3D printer. Intraoperative control is achieved by measuring the resection by means of a gage and comparison with the digital 3D design.

DISCUSSION

With the aid of the 3D-printed PSI cutting blocks the preoperative plan of kinematic alignment can be implemented in a precise manner. It is a simple tool and does not require any great expense. Compared with the conventional instrumentation, the operating time is shortened. However, because of the purely CT-based design, no information about the state of the soft tissue is obtained.

Comparable clinical outcome and implant longevity after CT- or MRI-based patient-specific instruments for total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up of a RCT

PURPOSE

Patient-specific instruments (PSI) are already widespread used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Either computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are used pre-operatively to create jigs to guide resection during surgery. This study is a sequel of previous work that showed significantly more radiological outliers for posterior slope when CT-based guides were used. The aim of this study was to assess differences in revision rate and clinical outcome between the two groups at 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

At the 2-year follow-up, 124 patients were analysed in this prospective, randomised single-blind study. A survival analysis with revision of the TKA as endpoint was performed. Patients fulfilled four patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs). Scores on the questionnaires were compared between both groups at the different follow-up visits.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, there was no significant difference in the survival rates of the CT- and MRI-based PSI surgery. Postoperatively, the PROMs significantly improved within each group compared with the pre-operative values. There were no significant differences for the PROMs between both groups at the 2-years follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Although previous results showed more outliers regarding posterior slope for CT-based PSIs, no difference in revision rate or the outcome of PROMs was found at 2-year follow-up. Further research to determine what the influence is of radiological outliers on implant survival and clinical outcomes is necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Comparable level of joint awareness between the bi-cruciate and cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instruments: a case-controlled study

PURPOSE

Bi-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA) is recognized as an alternative to the cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA) within the pursuit of retrieving the "forgotten artificial knee joint". The aim of this study was to provide a short-term comparison in functional and clinical outcomes between BCR- and CR-TKA.

METHODS

The cohort consisted of 61 BCR-TKA patients, matched with 61 suitable CR-TKA patients, and operated between 2014 and 2016 due to osteoarthritis. Patient-reported outcome measurements were assessed preoperatively and at 3, 12, 24 and 36 months postoperatively. In addition, perioperative conditions were observed and radiological images were analysed pre- and 1 year postoperatively. Effect size for the FJS-12 was calculated at 3-year follow-up to quantify the difference between BCR- and CR-TKA.

RESULTS

Patients reported a significant improved health-related quality of life (p = 0.017) and a non-significant difference in joint awareness at 3-year-follow-up with a moderate effect size (0.4). Operating time in BCR-TKA (1:16, ± 0:16) is significantly longer (p < 0.000) than in CR-TKA (0:50, ± 0:12). Blood loss significantly increased (p = 0.005) in BCR-TKA (246.4 cc, 79.8) compared to CR-TKA (195.5 cc, ± 106.2). Comparable length of hospital stay (n.s.) was observed in BCR-TKA (1.1 days, ± 1.1) and CR-TKA (1.3 days, ± 1.3). Outliers of the hip-knee-ankle axis occurred significantly more frequent (P = 0.015) in the BCR group (37.7%) compared to CR-TKA (18.0%).

CONCLUSION

Joint awareness of the BCR-TKA was not significantly reduced compared to the CR-TKA. However, this study illustrates that bi-cruciate-retaining surgical technique for TKA is a promising step further in the pursuit of reducing joint awareness and retrieving the artificial forgotten total knee. Since a functional ACL increases rotational stability and proprioception, future research should focus on knee kinematics in modern BCR-TKA measured with gait analyses.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV therapeutic, retrospective, cohort study.

Design improvement in patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty improved the accuracy of the tibial prosthetic alignment in the coronal and axial planes

PURPOSE

The accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still controversial, especially in the tibial prosthesis. It was hypothesized that the design modification of PSI improved the tibial prosthetic alignment and reduced the associated complications. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of a conventional PSI with that of a newly designed PSI for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a new three-dimensional (3D) measurement method.

METHODS

Thirty TKAs each using the conventional and newly designed PSIs were studied. The postoperative 3D-computed tomography (3D CT) image was superimposed on the preoperative 3D CT plan. The absolute differences in the tibial prosthetic alignment between the preoperative and postoperative 3D CT images were directly measured in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes. Knees in which the difference in the prosthetic alignment was > 3° were considered deviations.

RESULTS

The new PSI showed less mean absolute differences and lower rate of deviations than the conventional PSI in the coronal and axial planes (p = 0.045 and p = 0.004, respectively). The deviations (> 3°) of the tibial prosthesis using the conventional PSI were 27, 30, and 63% and of those using the new PSI were 0, 20, and 20% in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report to evaluate the effect of improvement in PSI design on the postoperative alignment using 3D method, and it clearly showed that the modification significantly improved the accuracy of alignment and reduced the deviations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, case-control study, Level III.

Patient-Specific or Conventional Instrumentations: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective

To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) with the conventional instrumentation (CI).

Methods

RCTs were selected in PubMed and Embase from 2012 to 2018. Key data extracted included malalignment of mechanical axis, blood loss, surgical time, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Score (KSS), length of stay, and complications. Subgroup analysis was also performed regarding different PSI systems and different image processing methods.

Results

29 RCTs with 2487 knees were eligible for the meta-analysis. Results showed that PSI did not improve the alignment of the mechanical axis compared with CI, but MRI-based PSI and Visionaire-specific PSI decrease the risk of malalignment significantly (P = 0.04 and P = 0.04 and P = 0.04 and P = 0.04 and P = 0.04 and

Conclusion

PSI reduced the blood loss and improved KSS. MRI-based PSI reduced operative time and risk of malalignment of mechanical axis compared with CT-based PSI. Moreover, Visionaire-specific PSI achieves better alignment result of the mechanical axis than other systems.

Patient-specific instrumentation improved three-dimensional accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative radiographic analysis of 1257 total knee arthroplasties

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare restoration of mechanical limb alignment and three-dimensional component-positioning between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

Radiographic data of patients undergoing mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (n = 1257), using either conventional (n = 442) or patient-specific instrumentation (n = 812), were analyzed. To evaluate accuracy of axis restoration and 3D-component-positioning between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation, absolute deviations from the targeted neutral mechanical limb alignment and planned implant positions were determined. Measurements were performed on standardized coronal long-leg and sagittal knee radiographs. CT-scans were evaluated for accuracy of axial femoral implant rotation. Outliers were defined as deviations from the targeted neutral mechanical axis of > ± 3° or from the intraoperative component-positioning goals of > ± 2°. Deviations greater than ± 5° from set targets were considered to be severe outliers.

Results

Deviations from a neutral mechanical axis (conventional instrumentation: 2.3°± 1.7° vs. patient-specific instrumentation: 1.7°± 1.2°; p < 0.001) and numbers of outliers (conventional instrumentation: 25.8% vs. patient-specific instrumentation: 10.1%; p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the patient-specific instrumentation group. Significantly lower mean deviations and less outliers were detected regarding 3D-component-positioning in the patient-specific instrumentation compared to the conventional instrumentation group (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Patient-specific instrumentation prevented from severe limb malalignment and component-positioning outliers (> ± 5° deviation). Use of patient-specific instrumentation proved to be superior to conventional instrumentation in achieving more accurate limb alignment and 3D-component positioning, particularly regarding femoral component rotation. Furthermore, the use of patient-specific instrumentation successfully prevented severe (> 5° deviation) outliers.

Total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instrumentation for osteoarthritis of the knee: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instrumentation (TKA-PSI), which are disposable cutting block guides generated to fit each patient's 3-dimensional knee anatomy, has been developed to treat patients with end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee. Surrogate markers such as radiographic malalignment have been well investigated, however, patient-important outcomes are not well examined to elucidate the efficacy of TKA-PSI. The aim of this review is to determine if TKA-PSI improves patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), surgery time, blood loss, transfusion and complications (e.g. surgical site infection, deep venous thrombosis, and revision TKA).

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ongoing clinical trials. For PROMs, surgery time, blood loss, and transfusion rate, we included randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing TKA-PSI and standard TKA to treat osteoarthritis of the knee. For complications, we also included non-randomized comparative studies (non-RCT).

RESULTS

This review includes 38 studies, 24 of which were RCT and 14 of which were non-RCT. These included a total of 3487 patients. The predominant population in the included studies highly reflected the general population, with 62% being female, aged over 60 and having end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee. TKA-PSI did not improve PROMs as compared to standard TKA for less than 1-year (mean difference 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.92-0.97 in the Oxford knee score, mean 3-month follow-up) and for 1-year or more (mean difference 0.25, 95%CI - 4.39-4.89 in the WOMAC score, mean 29-month follow-up). TKA-PSI did not reduce surgery time (mean difference - 3.09 min, 95%CI -6.73-0.55). TKA-PSI decreased blood loss with a small effect size corresponding to a 0.4 g/dl hemoglobin decrease (95%CI 0.18-0.88), but did not decrease transfusion rate (risk difference - 0.04, 95%CI -0.09-0.01). TKA-PSI did not reduce complication rates (risk difference 0.00, 95%CI - 0.01-0.01 in the composite outcome).

CONCLUSIONS

TKA-PSI does not improve patient-reported outcome measures, surgery time, and complication rates as compared to standard TKA. TKA-PSI decreases blood loss with a small effect, which is not enough to reduce transfusion rate.

Single-Use Custom Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Effect on In-Hospital Complications, Length of Stay, and Discharge Disposition

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a quality surgical intervention with rapidly increasing use. This growth has brought with it a host of new technologies, including custom instrumentation (CI). With the current emphasis on value-based health care, the clinical benefit of CI TKA must be evaluated. The goal of this study was to compare CI and conventional TKA regarding multiple quality metrics, in-hospital complications, length of stay, and discharge destination. The authors propensity score matched 231 conventional TKAs to 231 consecutive CI TKAs for age, sex, and body mass index. Preoperative risk factors analyzed were age, sex, body mass index, and preoperative hemoglobin. Perioperative factors included transfusion rate, hemoglobin drop, hemovac output, operative time, length of stay, discharge disposition, deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism rates, and in-hospital vital sign data. There were no differences in preoperative demographics between groups. Postoperatively, there was no difference between conventional and CI TKA in operative time, transfusion rate, discharge hemoglobin, length of stay, discharge disposition, or in-hospital venous thromboembolism rates. In the conventional and CI groups, length of stay was 2.6 and 2.5 days (P=.43) and discharge disposition was 82% home and 83% home (P=.90), respectively. Although CI TKA is commonly implemented, in this analysis, compared with conventional TKA, it was not associated with any difference in length of stay, discharge disposition, operative time, transfusion rate, or in-hospital complications. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(5):299-303.].

Patient-Specific Instrumentation Does Not Affect Rotational Alignment of the Femoral Component and Perioperative Blood Loss in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Proposed aims of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are to improve accuracy of component alignment, while reducing blood loss and surgical time. The primary goal of this prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial is to verify whether PSI improves the rotational alignment of the femoral component in comparison to conventionally implanted TKA.

METHODS

One-hundred thirty-three consecutive patients were assessed for eligibility. Block randomization was performed to allocated patients in the treatment (PSI) or control group. During hospital stay, surgical times were recorded, and total blood volume loss and estimated red blood cell were calculated. Two months after surgery, a computed tomography of the knee was obtained to measure femoral component rotation to the transepicondylar axis and tibial component slope.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were enrolled. PSI did neither result in a significant improvement in femoral component rotation nor result in a reduction of outliers, as compared with conventional instrumentation. No significant improvement in terms of tibial slope, blood loss, total surgical time, and ischemia time could be identified. The number of tibial recuts required in the PSI group was significantly higher than in the control group (P = .0003).

CONCLUSION

PSI does not improve the accuracy of femoral component rotation in TKA in comparison to conventional instrumentation. Moreover, PSI did not appear to influence any of the other variables investigated as secondary goals by this study. The results of this study do not support its routine use during standard TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized, controlled trial.

Influence of instrumentation on the surgical time to implant a total knee prosthesis

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate if there is a difference in the time that the surgery is prolonged to implant a knee prosthesis according to the instrumentation system used.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the duration of 243 interventions (skin-to-skin time and ischemia time) performed by the same surgeon. Seventy-two cases operated with conventional instruments (IC), 68 by means of computer assisted surgery (CAS) and 103 with personalized instrumentation system (PSI).

RESULTS

IC skin-to-skin time 87,85 min (SD 11,86). IC ischemia time 94,44 min (SD 11,49). Computer assisted surgery skin-to-skin time 123,46 min (SD 11,27). Computer assisted surgery ischemia time 129,63 min (SD 11,37). PSI skin-to-skin time 78,69 min (SD 13,06). PSI ischemia time 84,63 min (SD 12,06). There is a significant difference between PSI and the other instrumentation systems (p 0,000).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the time consumption for the implantation of a knee prosthesis has been significantly lower when cutting blocks have been used, than when we have used other systems.

Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures. During the past decade, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been commercially introduced in order to simplify and make TKA surgery more effective, precise and efficient than conventional mechanical instrumentation (CI) and computer-assisted surgery (CAS). Nevertheless, there are critical arguments against PSI for routine use. The aim of the current manuscript is to describe advantages and limitations of PSI for primary TKA.

AREAS COVERED

By means of a description of the available literature different aspects are discussed (accuracy, clinical and functional outcomes, operative time, blood loss, efficiency and costs).

EXPERT OPINION

Most publications do not claim a significant increase in PSI accuracy over CI, but they also do not postulate PSIs accuracy is worse either. Regarding clinical aspects, PSI did not appear to give any advantage over standard techniques although, equally, it did not appear to show any disadvantages. PSI seems to reduce operative time, could reduce perioperative blood loss and provides logistical benefits in the operation room. Further studies will be required to more thoroughly assess all the advantages and disadvantages of this promising technology as an alternative to CI and CAS.

Accuracy of tibial cuts with patient-specific instrumentation is not influenced by the surgeon's level of experience

PURPOSE

It was hypothesized that surgeon's experience as well as bone density play a significant role in achieving accurate cuts with patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of the tibial cuts in different bone densities made by a highly experienced orthopedic surgeon on one hand and a less experienced orthopedic surgeon on the other.

METHODS

Tibial models from three different sawbone densities were developed for this study. Each surgeon performed 21 cuts. A coordinate measuring machine was used to analyse the cuts. The K-Cohen test was performed to evaluate the results. The analyzed parameters were guide positioning and deviation from the guide cut to the tibial cut, including varus/valgus angle, the tibial slope, cut height, planarity (mm²), and rugosity (mm).

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the positioning of the tibial cut guide between the two surgeons for the tibial slope (p < 0.05), while no difference was observed for the varus/valgus angle (n.s.) and the cut height (n.s.). No significant difference in the tibial cut was observed between the surgeons for the tibial slope angle (n.s.), varus/valgus angle (n.s.), planarity (n.s.), and rugosity (n.s.). In the different bone types, no significant difference was observed for the tibial slope (n.s.) and varus/valgus angle (n.s.), while planarity and rugosity showed significant differences (p < 0.05). Our study showed no significant difference in the tibial cuts for the tibial slope, varus/valgus angle, planarity, and rugosity between the two surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, it could be demonstrated that accuracy of the cuts is ensured by PSI not depending on the surgeon's experience and the bone mineral density. This speaks to its clinical significance: PSI might be suited for less experienced surgeons to reduce outliers in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

No difference in mid-term survival and clinical outcome between patient-specific and conventional instrumented total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this multicentre prospective randomized controlled trial was to compare the survival rate and clinical outcome in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after MRI-based patient-specific instruments (PSI) and conventional instruments 5 years after initial surgery.

METHODS

At a mean follow-up of 5.1 years (0.4), 163 patients (90.6%) with a mean age of 71.8 years (8.7) were analysed. A survival analysis with revision of the TKA as endpoint was performed. The Knee Society Score (KSS), evaluations on plain radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained preoperatively and at each FU.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, one TKA in the PSI- (1.2%) and 3 TKAs in the conventional group (3.8%) had undergone revision surgery (n.s.). No radiological abnormalities were noted at any time point. Postoperatively, the KSS and PROMs significantly improved within each group compared with the preoperative values. There were no clinically relevant differences for the KSS [PSI: 77.4, 9.8 (95% CI 75.0-79.7) vs. conventional: 77.3 10.5 (95% CI 74.9-79.8)] and the PROMs between both groups (n.s.) at 5 years follow-up.

CONCLUSION

There is still a lack of reliable data on the survival of TKA and clinical evidence, when using PSI for TKA. Longer follow-up studies are, therefore, needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Patient-specific instrumentation improved axial alignment of the femoral component, operative time and perioperative blood loss after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to compare patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) with standard instrumentation (SI) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PSI is hypothesized to have advantages with respect to component alignment; number of outliers (defined as alignment > 3° from the target alignment); operative time; perioperative blood loss; and length of hospital stay. This new surgical technique is expected to exhibit superior performance.

METHODS

A total of 23 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2058 knees that compared the clinical outcomes of TKA between PSI and SI were included in the present analysis; these RCTs were identified via a literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through March 1, 2018. The outcomes of interest included coronal, sagittal and axial component alignment (presented as the angle of deviation from the transcondylar line); number of outliers; operative time; perioperative blood loss; and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in postoperative femoral axial alignment between PSI and SI patients (95% CI - 0.71 to - 0.21, p = 0.0004, I² = 48%). PSI resulted in approximately 0.4° less deviation from the transcondylar line than SI. Based on our results, PSI reduced operative time by a mean of 7 min compared with SI (95% CI - 10.95 to - 3.75, p < 0.0001, I² = 78%). According to the included literature, PSI reduced perioperative blood loss by approximately 90 ml compared with SI (95% CI - 146.65 to - 20.18, p = 0.01, I² = 74%). We did not find any differences between PSI and SI with respect to any other parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

PSI has advantages in axial alignment of the femoral component, operative time, and perioperative blood loss relative to SI. No significant differences were found between PSI and SI with respect to alignment of the remaining components, number of outliers, or length of hospital stay.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study (systematic review and meta-analysis), Level I.

Early outcomes of patient-specific posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty implants

Patient-specific implants have been linked to stiffness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patient-specific implants. We performed a retrospective review with a primary outcome of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA); secondary outcomes included Knee Society Scores (KSS), Knee Society Functional Scores (KSFS), range of motion (ROM), and Forgotten Joint Scores (FJS). Pre-operative measurements were similar in both groups. There was one MUA in the CPS and two in the OTS groups. There was no difference in postoperative scores. Our study suggests patient-specific implants have comparable rates of MUA and functional outcomes as conventional implants.

Significant differences between manufacturer and surgeon in the accuracy of final component size prediction with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may improve component sizing. Little has been reported about accuracy of the default plan created by the manufacturer, especially for CT-based PSI. The goal of this study was to evaluate the reliability of this plan and the impact of the surgeon's changes on the final accuracy of the guide sizes.

METHODS

Forty-five patients eligible for primary TKA were prospectively enrolled. The planned implant sizes were prospectively recorded from the initial manufacturer's proposal and from the final plan adjusted in light of the surgeon's evaluation; these two sizes where then compared to the actually implanted sizes. Fisher's exact test was used to test differences for categorical variables. Agreement between pre-operative plans and final implant was evaluated with the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

The manufacturer's proposal differed from the final implant in 9 (20.0%) femoral and 23 (51.1%) tibial components, while the surgeon's plan in 6 (13.3%, femoral) and 12 (26.7%, tibial). Modifications in the pre-operative plan were carried out for five (11.1%) femoral and 23 (51.1%) tibial components (p = 0.03). Appropriate modification occurred in 22 (88.0%) and 19 (76.0%) cases of femoral and tibial changes. The agreement between the manufacturer's and the surgeon's pre-operative plans was poor, especially with regard to tibial components.

CONCLUSION

The surgeon's accuracy in predicting the final component size was significantly different from that of the manufacturer and changes in the initial manufacturer's plan were necessary to get an accurate pre-operative plan of the implant sizes.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Careful evaluation of the initial manufacturer's plan by an experienced knee surgeon is mandatory when planning TKA with CT-based PSI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Patient-specific instruments (PSIs) are already in relatively common use, and their post-operative radiographic results are equal to those for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with conventional instrumentation. PSI use requires a preoperative MRI scan, CT scan, or a combination of MRI and a long-leg standing radiograph. However, there is no consensus as to which of these modalities, MRI or CT, is the preferred imaging modality when performing TKA with PSIs.

METHODS

This systematic literature review and meta-analysis studied the differences in alignment outliers between CT- and MRI-based PSI for TKA. A search of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase was conducted, without restriction on date of publication. Only level I evidence studies written in English that included TKA with the use of MRI- and CT-based PSI were selected. A meta-analysis was then performed of the rate of outliers in the biomechanical axis and individual femoral and tibial component alignment. Where considerable heterogeneity among studies was present or the data did not provide sufficient information for performing the meta-analysis, a qualitative synthesis was undertaken.

RESULTS

Twelve randomized controlled trials, studying 841 knees, were eligible for data extraction and meta-analysis. MRI-based PSI resulted in a significantly lower proportion of coronal plane outliers with regard to the lateral femoral component (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.89, P = 0.02), without significant heterogeneity (n.s.). There were no significant differences regarding the biomechanical axis or frontal femoral and individual tibial component alignment.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that alignment with MRI-based PSI is at least as good as, if not better than, that with CT-based PSI. To prevent for malalignment, MRI should be the imaging modality of choice when performing TKA surgery with PSI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Can a Single-Use and Patient-Specific Instrumentation Be Reliably Used in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Multicenter Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this controlled multicenter study is to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using single-use fully disposable and patient-specific cutting guides (SU) and compare the results to those obtained with traditional patient-specific cutting guides (PSI) vs conventional instrumentation (CI).

METHODS

Seventy consecutive patients had their TKA performed using SU. They were compared to 140 historical patients requiring TKA that were randomized to have the procedure performed using PSI vs CI. The primary measure outcome was mechanical axis as measured on a standing long-leg radiograph using the hip-knee-ankle angle. Secondary outcome measures were Knee Society and Oxford knee scores, operative time, need for postoperative transfusion, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

The mean hip-knee-ankle value was 179.8° (standard deviation [SD] 3.1°), 179.2° (SD 2.9°), and 178.3° (SD 2.5°) in the CI, PSI and SU groups, respectively (P = .0082). Outliers were identified in 16 of 65 (24.6%), 15 of 67 (22.4%), and 14 of 70 (20.0%) knees in the CI, PSI, and SU group, respectively (P = .81). There was no significant difference in the clinical results (P = .29 and .19, respectively). Operative time, number of unit transfusion, and length of hospital stay were not significantly different between the 3 groups (P = .45, .31, and 0.98, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The use of an SU in TKA provided similar clinical and radiologic results to those obtained with traditional PSI and CI. The potential economic advantages of single-use instrumentation in primary TKA require further investigation.

The Robustness of Trials That Guide Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Surgery

BACKGROUND

The fragility index (FI) may prove to be a powerful metric of trial robustness. The FI is the minimum number of patient events that would need to become nonevents in order to nullify a significant result. The fragility quotient (FQ) is the FI divided by the total sample size. This study evaluates the robustness of the 20% of orthopaedic clinical trials that were cited as having strong evidence in the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Clinical Practice Guidelines and that could be analyzed with these indices.

METHODS

From the AAOS recommendations with strong evidence, we extracted the randomized controlled trials that were cited as having supporting evidence that could be analyzed with the FI. Each trial's FI was calculated using the fragility calculator (http://www.fragilityindex.com). With use of the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0, we evaluated the likelihood of bias. We also performed a post hoc power analysis of eligible studies.

RESULTS

The median FI for the 72 trials was 2 events, and the median FQ was 0.022. Of the 72 trials, only 3 (4.2%) were at a low risk of bias, and 35 (48.6%) were at a high risk of bias. Thirty-eight (53%) of the trials were underpowered. We identified a strong correlation between a trial's FI or FQ and the trial's power.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that trials that provided strong evidence for orthopaedic surgery guidelines were largely fragile, underpowered, and at risk of bias.

Medial parapatellar approach leads to internal rotation of tibial component in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate if the type of approach [medial parapatellar approach (MPA) versus lateral parapatellar approach with tibial tubercle osteotomy (LPA)] influences rotation of femoral and/or tibial component and leg axis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It was the hypothesis that MPA leads to an internally rotated tibial TKA component.

METHODS

This study included 200 consecutive patients in whom TKA was performed using either a parapatellar medial (n = 162, MPA) or parapatellar lateral approach with tibial tubercle osteotomy (n = 38, LPA). All patients underwent clinical follow-up, standardized radiographs and computed radiography (CT). TKA components' position and the whole leg axis were assessed on 3D reconstructed CT scans (sagittal, coronal and rotational). Mean values of TKA component position and the whole leg alignment of both groups were compared using a t test. The tibial component was graded as internally rotated (<3° of external rotation (ER)), neutral rotation (equal or between 3° and 6° of ER) and externally rotated (>6° ER). The femoral component was graded as internally rotated [>3° of internal rotation (IR)], neutral rotation (equal or between -3° IR and 3° of ER) and externally rotated (>3° ER).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in terms of whole leg axis after TKA between both groups (MPA: 0.2° valgus ± 3.4; LPA: 0.0° valgus ± 3.5). Means of tibial component rotation were 2.7° ER ± 6.1 (MPA) and 7.6° ER ± 5.4 (LPA). Patients of group LPA presented a significantly less internally rotated (LPA: 18.4%; MPA: 48.8%) and more externally rotated (LPA: 52.6%; MPA: 22.8%) tibial component (p < 0.001). No significant differences were seen for the femoral component position, tibial valgus/varus and tibial slope.

CONCLUSION

The type of approach (medial versus lateral) significantly influenced tibial TKA component rotation. It appears that a MPA tends to internally rotate the tibial TKA component and a LPA tends to externally rotate the tibial TKA. The anterior cortex should not be used as landmark for tibial TKA component placement when using the lateral approach with tibial tubercle osteotomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Acute Perioperative Comparison of Patient-Specific Instrumentation versus Conventional Instrumentation Utilization during Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

Utilizing patient-specific instrumentation during total knee arthroplasty has gained popularity in recent years with theoretical advantages in blood loss, intraoperative time, length of stay, postoperative alignment, and functional outcome, amongst others. No study has compared acute perioperative measures between patient-specific instrumentation and conventional instrumentation in the bilateral total knee arthroplasty setting. We compared patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation in the setting of bilateral total knee arthroplasty to determine any benefits in the immediate perioperative period including surgical time, blood loss, pain medication use, length of stay, and discharge disposition. A total of 49 patients with standard instrumentation and 31 patients with patient-specific instrumentation were retrospectively reviewed in a two-year period at one facility. At baseline, the groups were comparable with respect to age, ASA, BMI, and comorbid conditions. We analyzed data on operative time, blood loss, hemoglobin change, need for transfusion, pain medication use, length of stay, and discharge disposition. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in regards to these parameters. Patient-specific instrumentation in the setting of bilateral total knee arthroplasty did not provide any immediate perioperative benefit compared to conventional instrumentation.

Comparison of Customized Cutting Block and Conventional Cutting Instrument in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Customized cutting block (CCB) was designed to ensure the accurate alignment of knee prostheses during total knee arthroplasty. Given the paucity of CCB efficacy data, we compare CCB with conventional cutting guide using a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

One hundred eight osteoarthritic knee patients underwent total knee arthroplasty by one experienced surgeon were randomized to receive CCB (n = 54) or conventional cutting instrument (CCI) surgery (n = 54). The primary outcomes were limb alignment, prostheses position, and operative time. The secondary outcomes were hemodynamic alteration after surgery, functional outcomes (modified Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index) and range of motion at 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Mean hip-knee-ankle angle in the CCB group was 179.4° ± 1.8° vs 179.1° ± 2.4° in the CCI group, Δ = 0 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.6 to 1.1, P = .55). Mean operative time was faster in the CCB arm: 93 ± 12 vs 104 ± 12 minutes, Δ = 11 (95% CI -16.7 to -7.2, P < .0001). There were no differences in hemodynamic parameters, mean blood loss (446 [CCB] vs 514 mL [CCI], Δ = -68 [95% CI -138 to 31 mL, P = .21]), postoperative hemoglobin changes, incidence of hypotension (systolic <90 mm Hg), oliguria, and rates of blood transfusion. Functional outcomes and range of motion were also similar.

CONCLUSION

There was no improvement in alignment, hemodynamic changes, blood loss, and knee functional outcomes. CCB reduced surgical time by 11 minutes in our population. CCB cost-effectiveness should be further investigated.

No radiological and clinical advantages with patient-specific positioning guides in total knee replacement

Background and purpose - Although the use of patient-specific positioning guides (PSPGs) in total knee replacement (TKR) in theory is promising, the technique has not yet proven its superior- ity compared with the conventional method. We compared radio- logical alignment and clinical outcome between TKR performed with the use of PSPGs and the conventional operation method. Patients and methods - 3 hospitals participated in a prospec- tive trial. 109 patients were randomized to either the conventional method or to the use of PSPGs. Postoperatively a full-length standing anteroposterior radiograph and a postoperative CT scan were taken. On the CT scan the alignments were measured for both the femoral and tibial components in the frontal, sagit- tal, and axial plane. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Eurocol-5D-3L (Eq5D) descriptive system and visual analogue scale (VAS), a pain score (NRS), and range of motion (ROM) were recorded preoperatively, and at 3 months, 1, and 2 years. The operation time and length of hospital stay were recorded. Results - 90 patients were available for postoperative CT mea- surements. A statistically significant difference was found between the conventional TKR instrumentation and the use of PSPGs for the frontal femoral (mean (SD) 0.6° (1.7) vs. -0.3° (2.2), CI 0.08 to 1.69) and tibial (-0.3° (1.5) vs. 0.9° (2.1), CI -1.98 to -0.44) compo- nent angles and for the tibial alignment in the sagittal plane (-3.8° (3.0) vs. -2.2° (2.5), CI -2.72; -0.42). The proportions of outliers were similar between the groups as well as the hip-knee-ankle angle, the KOOS sub scores, the Eq5D, pain (NRS), ROM, opera- tion time, and length of hospital stay. Interpretation - The use of PSPGs requires a preoperative CT scan or MRI and the guides have an additional cost. As this study was not able to prove any extra benefit of the use of PSPGs we recommend the conventional operation method for TKR.

Consistency in patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instrumentation: a 5-year follow-up of 200 consecutive cases

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 5-year follow-up results of the first 200 total knee arthroplasties (TKA) performed by one high-volume surgeon, using patient-specific information (PSI). To date, there has been no other research into the mid-term follow-up of TKA performed using PSI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 184 consecutive patients (200 TKA) were evaluated. Outcome measures included implant survival rate, adverse events, and the following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Pain Visual Analogue Score (VAS) and EuroQol-5D Score (EQ-5D).

RESULTS

Revision surgery was performed for late secondary prosthetic joint infection (n = 1, total revision), aseptic loosening (n = 1, tibial component revision), instability (n = 1, isolated polyethylene insert exchange), and polyethylene insert breakage (n = 1, isolated polyethylene insert exchange). Other adverse events were as follows: debridement, antibiotics and implant retention for early prosthetic joint infection (n = 1), surgical debridement for haemarthrosis (n = 1), superficial wound infection (n = 2), thromboembolic events (n = 2), compartment syndrome (n = 1), and nerve injury (n = 2). All median outcome scores for patient reported outcome measures at 5 years improved significantly compared with the preoperative values (p ≤ 0.05). Median outcome scores were not significantly different between 1- and 5-year moments of follow-up, except for a significant decrease of EQ-VAS (p ≤ 0.05) between these two follow-up moments.

CONCLUSION

PROMs are consistent for 5-year follow-up of TKA using PSI. After 5 years of follow-up, revision surgery for any reason occurred in four patients (2%).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Patient-specific instruments for total knee arthroplasty can accurately predict the component size as used peroperative

PURPOSE

Patients-specific instruments (PSI) for implantation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be used to predict the implant size for both the femur and the tibia component. This study aims to determine the impact of approval of the PSI planning for TKA on the frequency of, and reason for intraoperative changes of implant sizes.

METHODS

The clinical records of 293 patients operated with MRI- (90.4 %) and CT-based (9.6 %) PSI were reviewed for actual used implant size. Preoperative default planning from the technician and approved planning by the operating surgeon were compared with the intraoperative implanted component size for both the femur and tibia. Intraoperative reason for not following the default sizes was outdated. Furthermore, MRI- and CT-based PSI were compared for these outcomes.

RESULTS

In 93.9 and 91.1 % for, respectively, the femur and tibia (n.s.), the surgeon planned size was implanted during surgery. The predicted size of the femur (p < 0.00) and the tibia (p < 0.00) component planned by a technician differed from the implanted component sizes in 62 (21.2 %) and 51 (17.4 %) patients, respectively. In 17 cases, the femoral component size was adapted intraoperative based on the expert opinion of the operating surgeon. In 26 cases, the tibia component was changed during the surgery because of a mediolateral overhang, sclerotic bone, medial or lateral release, limited extension and/or fixed varus deformity. The results between the MRI- and CT-based PSI did not differ (n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

PSI is a tool to help the surgeon to achieve the best possible results during TKA. The planning made by a technician should always be validated and approved by the operating surgeon who has the ultimate responsibility regarding the operation. With PSI, the operating surgeon is able to minimize intraoperative implant size errors in advance to improve operating room efficiency with possible lowering hospital costs per procedure.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

III.

Using Bayesian statistics to estimate the likelihood a new trial will demonstrate the efficacy of a new treatment

Background

The common frequentist approach is limited in providing investigators with appropriate measures for conducting a new trial. To answer such important questions and one has to look at Bayesian statistics.

Methods

As a worked example, we conducted a Bayesian cumulative meta-analysis to summarize the benefit of patient-specific instrumentation on the alignment of total knee replacement from previously published evidence. Data were sourced from Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. All randomised controlled comparisons of the effect of patient-specific instrumentation on the coronal alignment of total knee replacement were included. The main outcome was the risk difference measured by the proportion of failures in the control group minus the proportion of failures in the experimental group. Through Bayesian statistics, we estimated cumulatively over publication time of the trial results: the posterior probabilities that the risk difference was more than 5 and 10%; the posterior probabilities that given the results of all previous published trials an additional fictive trial would achieve a risk difference of at least 5%; and the predictive probabilities that observed failure rate differ from 5% across arms.

Results

Thirteen trials were identified including 1092 patients, 554 in the experimental group and 538 in the control group. The cumulative mean risk difference was 0.5% (95% CrI: −5.7%; +4.5%). The posterior probabilities that the risk difference be superior to 5 and 10% was less than 5% after trial #4 and trial #2 respectively. The predictive probability that the difference in failure rates was at least 5% dropped from 45% after the first trial down to 11% after the 13th. Last, only unrealistic trial design parameters could change the overall evidence accumulated to date.

Conclusions

Bayesian probabilities are readily understandable when discussing the relevance of performing a new trial. It provides investigators the current probability that an experimental treatment be superior to a reference treatment. In case a trial is designed, it also provides the predictive probability that this new trial will reach the targeted risk difference in failure rates.

Trial registration

CRD42015024176.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0401-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: simpler, faster and more accurate than standard instrumentation-a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

This randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) to standard instrumentation regarding efficacy to achieve a good coronal alignment and differences in surgical time, blood loss and length of stay.

METHODS

Ninety-five of 100 randomized patients eligible for total knee arthroplasty were analysed. PSI with magnetic resonance and long-leg radiograph was performed in 47 patients, while 48 patients received standard instrumentation. Primary outcome measure was coronal alignment, evaluated with long-leg radiograph. Deviation >3° varus/valgus was considered an outlier. Surgical time was compared from skin to skin. Length of stay was a post hoc analysis. Blood loss was evaluated comparing the number of blood units spent, fall in haemoglobin and haematocrit levels.

RESULTS

Standard instrumentation had a higher number of outliers in the coronal alignment with a relative risk of 3.015, compared to PSI. Surgical time was reduced by 18 min (24.8 %) with the PSI, as well as length of stay, with a half-day reduction. Number of blood units spent was significantly less in the PSI group. Relative risk of transfusion was 7.09 for patients in the standard instrumentation group. Difference in Hg and Htc levels were not significant. No patient had to abandon PSI. Minor changes to preoperative plan occurred in 14.9 % of the patient: cut review in 4.3 % and insert change in 10.6 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) is able to provide important advantages over standard instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: it lowers the risk of outliers and transfusion, is a faster procedure and enables a shorter length of stay with a low rate of intraoperative adjustments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation

PURPOSE

A 24-month prospective follow-up study was carried out to compare perioperative clinical outcomes, radiographic limb alignment, component positioning, as well as functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and conventional instrumentation (CI).

METHODS

Ninety consecutive patients, satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were scheduled to undergo TKA with either PSI or CI. A CT-based PSI was used in this study, and a senior surgeon performed all surgeries. Patients were clinically and functionally assessed preoperatively, 6 and 24 months post-operatively. Perioperative outcomes were also analysed, including operating time, haemoglobin loss, the need for blood transfusion, length of hospitalisation, and radiographic features.

RESULTS

At 24-month follow-up, clinical and functional outcomes were comparable between the two groups. PSI performed no better than CI in restoring lower limb mechanical alignment or improving component positioning. There were no differences in operating time, haemoglobin loss, transfusion rate, or length of hospitalisation between PSI and CI.

CONCLUSION

No significant clinical benefit could be demonstrated in using PSI over CI after 24 months, and routine use of PSI is not recommended in non-complicated TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.