Management of the first episode of traumatic patellar dislocation: an international survey

Increased tibial tuberosity torsion has the greatest predictive value in patients with patellofemoral instability compared to other commonly assessed parameters

PURPOSE

The multifactorial nature of patellofemoral instability requires a comprehensive assessment of the affected patients. While an association between tibial tuberosity (TT) torsion and patellofemoral instability is known, its specific effect has not yet been investigated. This study investigated the effect of TT torsion on patellofemoral instability.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study compared patients who underwent surgical intervention for patellofemoral instability and asymptomatic controls. TT torsion was measured in addition to other commonly assessed risk factors for patellofemoral instability using standardised computed tomography (CT) data of the lower extremities. The diagnostic performances of the assessed parameters were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated.

RESULTS

The patellofemoral instability group consisted of 79 knees, compared to 72 knees in the asymptomatic control group. Both groups differed significantly in all assessed parameters (p < 0.001), except for tibial torsion (n.s.). Among all parameters, TT torsion presented the best diagnostic performance for predicting patellar instability with an area under the curve of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.98; p < 0.001). A cut-off value of 17.7° yielded a 0.87 sensitivity and 0.89 specificity to predict patellar instability (OR, 55.2; 95% CI, 20.5-148.6; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Among the evaluated risk factors, TT torsion had the highest predictive value for patellofemoral instability. Patients with TT torsions ≥ 17.7° showed a 55-fold increased probability of patellofemoral instability. Therefore, TT torsion should be included in the assessment of patients with patellofemoral instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Specific considerations in female patients with patellar instability: current concepts

Prior literature suggests that patellofemoral instability (PFI) is significantly more prevalent in women than in men. This higher prevalence is commonly attributed to anatomical differences between sexes, particularly with patellofemoral alignment. These differences encompass a higher rate of trochlear dysplasia (TD), patella alta, an increased Q angle, and soft tissue imbalances. In recent years worse outcomes have been reported in female patients after patellofemoral stabilization surgery using medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) alone or in combination with a tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO), for this reason an "à la carte" plan (addressing the individuals anatomical risk factors) could be more appropriate for female patients.

Non-operative Management of Acute Knee Injuries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute knee injuries are commonly encountered in both the clinical and sideline setting and may be treated operatively or non-operatively. This article describes an evidence-based approach to non-operative acute knee injury. This includes history, physical exam, imaging, and initial management. In addition, the non-operative management of three such injuries-ligament injury, meniscus injury, and patellar dislocation injury-will be discussed via a case-based practical approach.

RECENT FINDINGS

Aside from grade III ACL tears, most acute knee ligament injuries, especially in the absence of other concurrent injuries, can be treated non-operatively. There is new evidence that acute traumatic meniscus tears in those younger than 40 can be successfully treated non-operatively and can do equally, as well as those that undergo surgery, at 1 year out from injury. Based on the current literature, a short period of knee bracing in extension with progression to weightbearing to tolerance is recommended after initial patellar dislocation. Many of the most common acute knee injuries, including MCL tears, meniscus tears, and patellar dislocations, can be managed non-operatively. A detailed systemic approach to initial evaluation, including pertinent history, physical exam, and appropriate imaging, is essential and complementary to the subsequent non-operative treatment algorithm.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Gracilis Tendon Graft and "All Suture" Knotless Anchors for Patellar Fixation

Patellar dislocation is a frequent sports-related knee injury. The primary restraint to lateral translation of patella is medial patellofemoral ligament. Several treatments for patella dislocation have been described in the literature. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe the surgical technique for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using gracilis tendon and 2 knotless soft anchors, avoiding patella tunneling.

Predicting the Probability of Recurrence Based on Individualized Risk Factors After Primary Lateral Patellar Dislocation Treated Nonoperatively

PURPOSE

To develop a comprehensive and effective personalized scoring system on the basis of demographic and clinical characteristics for predicting recurrence probability in patients with primary lateral patellar dislocation (LPD).

METHODS

Participants included 261 primary patients with LPD with 2-year minimum follow-up from our hospital across 2013 to 2020. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected retrospectively. The backward stepwise method was performed to identify independent predictors and construct a nomogram to predict the probability of recurrence. The predictive performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

After variables selection, 6 independent predictors of recurrence (skeletal maturity, trochlear dysplasia, tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance, mechanical axis deviation, Insall-Salvati index, and patellar tilt) were enrolled in our model. Validation of this nomogram in both training and validation cohort revealed powerful predictive ability, with an area under the curve of 0.962 and 0.977, respectively. The nomogram also showed great calibration and good clinical practicability.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study presented a nomogram that incorporates 6 independent risk factors (skeletal maturity, trochlear dysplasia, tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance, mechanical axis deviation, Insall-Salvati index, and patellar tilt), which can be conveniently used to accurately predicts the risk of recurrence after primary LPD in individual cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic study.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction appears to be a better treatment than repair, proximal realignment, or conservative management for primary patellar dislocation: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes and re-dislocation rates of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, MPFL repair, combined proximal realignment (CPR), and conservative management for primary patellar dislocation by conducting a systematic literature search of the available studies. The hypothesis was that MPFL repair and MPFL reconstruction would be better options for treating primary patellar dislocation.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials or prospective studies of primary patellar dislocation treated with MPFL reconstruction, MPFL repair, CPR, or conservative management were identified from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases through December 31, 2021. A total of 626 patients met the prespecified inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of each study was assessed using a risk of bias table, Detsky quality index, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The end-point data collected included comparisons of the mean in functional scores on knee outcomes scales and the number of patients who experienced re-dislocation. A network meta-analysis of the relevant literature was performed to investigate which treatment showed better outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 10 trials were included in this study. There was no statistically significant difference in the subgroup analysis in terms of the functional outcomes among MPFL reconstruction, MPFL repair, CPR, and conservative management. However, MPFL reconstruction showed statistically significantly better outcomes than MPFL repair, CPR, or conservative management in terms of the re-dislocation rate. Additionally, surface under the cumulative ranking curve percentage showed that MPFL reconstruction had a lower probability of re-dislocation than MPFL repair even though there was no significant difference (0.24, 95% confidence interval: 0.02-2.91).

CONCLUSION

Using a network meta-analysis, this meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in functional outcomes in a subgroup analysis. In re-dislocation subgroup analysis, MPFL repair and MPFL reconstruction produced significantly better results than other treatments. Also, surface under the cumulative ranking curve percentage showed that MPFL reconstruction had a lower probability of re-dislocation than MPFL repair.

Association of patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) with quadratus lumborum and lower limb muscle tightness a cross-sectional study

Background

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is characterized by peripatellar or retro patellar pain, as a result of changes in the physical and biochemical components of the patellofemoral joint. The main contributory factor is being the excessive load on the patellofemoral joint. The change in the flexibility of lower limb muscles is one of the factors for developing PFPS.

Objective

To find the association of quadratus lumborum (QL) and lower limb muscles tightness in patients with unilateral PFPS.

Materials and methods

50 PFPS participants (21 male and 29 female) were included and assessed for muscle tightness on both affected and unaffected side. The QL, rectus femoris, hamstring, iliotibial band (ITB) and gastrocnemius tightness were measured using inch tape and mobile inclinometer. A Chi Square test and phi crammer's v criteria were used to check the association and the strength of it.

Results

A significant association was found between tightness of rectus femoris (PFPS-right Chi 19.99 p < 0.001; Phi-0.632, PFPS-left Chi-5.52 p = 0.019 and Phi- 0.332), gastrocnemius (PFPS-right Chi 8.78 p = 0.003; Phi-0.419, PFPS-left Chi- 11.41 p = 0.001; Phi- 0.478), iliotibial band (PFPS-right Chi 7.83 p = 0.005; Phi-0.396, PFPS left Chi-3.68 p = 0.055; Phi- 0.27). There was no significant association of hamstring tightness (PFPS-right Chi - 3.68 p = 0.055; Phi-0.055, PFPS left Chi-1.11 p = 0.291; Phi- 0.019) and QL (PFPS right Chi - 1.10 p = 0.293; Phi-0.293, PFPS left Chi-0.79 p = 0.372; Phi- 0.372).

Conclusion

PFPS was associated with tightness of rectus femoris, gastrocnemius, ITB and no association found between hamstring and QL muscle tightness and PFPS.