1
|
Kennedy JA, Palchan-Hazan T, Maronnier Q, Caselles O, Courbon F, Levy M, Keidar Z. An extended bore length solid-state digital-BGO PET/CT system: design, preliminary experience, and performance characteristics. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:954-964. [PMID: 38012446 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06514-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A solid-state PET/CT system uses bismuth germanium oxide (BGO) scintillating crystals coupled to silicon photomultipliers over an extended 32 cm axial field-of-view (FOV) to provide high spatial resolution and very high sensitivity. Performance characteristics were determined for this digital-BGO system, including NEMA and EARL standards. METHODS Spatial resolution, scatter fraction (SF), noise equivalent count rate (NECR), sensitivity, count rate accuracy, and image quality (IQ) were evaluated for the digital-BGO system as per NEMA NU 2-2018, at 2 sites of first clinical install. System energy resolution was measured. Bayesian penalized-likelihood reconstruction (BPL) was used for IQ. EARL Standards 2 studies were reconstructed by BPL combined with a contrast-enhancing deep learning algorithm. An Esser PET phantom was evaluated. Three patient examples were obtained with low-dose radiotracer activity: 2 MBq/kg of [18F]FDG ([18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose), 2.3 MBq/kg [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE ([dodecane tetra-acetic acid,Tyr3]-octreotate), and 14.5 MBq/kg [82Rb]RbCl ([82Rb]-rubidium-chloride). Total scan times were ≤ 8 min. RESULTS NEMA sensitivity was 47.6 cps/kBq at the axial center. Spatial resolution at 1 cm from the center axis was ≤4.5 mm (filtered back projection) and ≤3.8 mm (ordered subset expectation maximization). SF was 35.6%, count rate accuracy was 2.16%, and peak NECR was 485.2 kcps at 16.9 kBq/mL. Contrast for IQ was 61.1 to 90.7% (smallest to largest sphere) with background variations from 7.6 to 2.1%, and a "lung" error of 4.7%. The average detector energy resolution was 9.67%. Image quality for patient scans was good. EARL Standards 2 criteria were robustly met and Esser phantom features ≥4.8 mm were resolved at 2 min per bed position. CONCLUSION A solid-state 32 cm axial FOV digital-BGO PET/CT system provides good spatial and energy resolution, high count rates, and superior NEMA sensitivity in its class, enabling fast clinical acquisitions with low-dose radiotracer activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Kennedy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, P.O.B. 9602, 3109601, Haifa, Israel.
- Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
| | - Tala Palchan-Hazan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, P.O.B. 9602, 3109601, Haifa, Israel
| | - Quentin Maronnier
- Medical Imaging Department, Oncopole Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | - Olivier Caselles
- Medical Imaging Department, Oncopole Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | - Frédéric Courbon
- Medical Imaging Department, Oncopole Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | - Moshe Levy
- GE Healthcare, Tirat HaCarmel, Tirat HaCarmel, Israel
| | - Zohar Keidar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, P.O.B. 9602, 3109601, Haifa, Israel
- Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Colori A, Ackwerh R, Chang YC, Cody K, Dunlea C, Gains JE, Gaunt T, Gillies CMS, Hardy C, Lalli N, Lim PS, Soto C, Gaze MN. Paediatric radiotherapy in the United Kingdom: an evolving subspecialty and a paradigm for integrated teamworking in oncology. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:21-30. [PMID: 38263828 PMCID: PMC11027255 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqad028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Many different malignancies occur in children, but overall, cancer in childhood is rare. Survival rates have improved appreciably and are higher compared with most adult tumour types. Treatment schedules evolve as a result of clinical trials and are typically complex and multi-modality, with radiotherapy an integral component of many. Risk stratification in paediatric oncology is increasingly refined, resulting in a more personalized use of radiation. Every available modality of radiation delivery: simple and advanced photon techniques, proton beam therapy, molecular radiotherapy, and brachytherapy, have their place in the treatment of children's cancers. Radiotherapy is rarely the sole treatment. As local therapy, it is often given before or after surgery, so the involvement of the surgeon is critically important, particularly when brachytherapy is used. Systemic treatment is the standard of care for most paediatric tumour types, concomitant administration of chemotherapy is typical, and immunotherapy has an increasing role. Delivery of radiotherapy is not done by clinical or radiation oncologists alone; play specialists and anaesthetists are required, together with mould room staff, to ensure compliance and immobilization. The support of clinical radiologists is needed to ensure the correct interpretation of imaging for target volume delineation. Physicists and dosimetrists ensure the optimal dose distribution, minimizing exposure of organs at risk. Paediatric oncology doctors, nurses, and a range of allied health professionals are needed for the holistic wrap-around care of the child and family. Radiographers are essential at every step of the way. With increasing complexity comes a need for greater centralization of services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Colori
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Raymond Ackwerh
- Department of Anaesthetics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
| | - Yen-Ch’ing Chang
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Kristy Cody
- Department of Radiotherapy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
| | - Cathy Dunlea
- Department of Radiotherapy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer E Gains
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Trevor Gaunt
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
| | - Callum M S Gillies
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Hardy
- Department of Radiotherapy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
| | - Narinder Lalli
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Pei S Lim
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Carmen Soto
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
| | - Mark N Gaze
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6DD, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|