Distant migration of gel filler: imaging findings following breast augmentation

Vulvar migration of injected polyacrylamide hydrogel following breast augmentation: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Vulvar migration is a rare complication of filler injection for breast augmentation, generally presenting as repeated pain and fever. We will report a case of woman with polyacrylamide hydrogel breast injection develops vulvar abscess.

CASE PRESENTATION

A woman with a history of polyacrylamide hydrogel breast injection was noted to have vulvar abscess due to migration of filler materials. Filler removal surgery and vacuum sealing drainage was performed for this patient. The patient was discharged from the hospital with no further complications. After a review of pertinent literature, only four previous case reports are found. Local inflammatory response, infection, large volume injections, inframammary fold destruction, hematogenous or lymphatic migrate, trauma, gravity and external pressure could play essential parts in the migration of injected filler.

CONCLUSION

Polyacrylamide hydrogel migration poses a worldwide challenge, necessitating personalized solutions. Our case study underscores the importance of comprehensive examinations for individuals with a history of filler breast injection when suspecting vulvar filler migration.

A Rare Cause of Breast Swelling in Lactating Women: Aquafilling® Gel Injection

Aquafilling® gel has been used in recent years as an alternative method to breast augmentation surgery. In this case report, we aimed to discuss radiological imaging findings and complications of Aquafilling® gel injection. Case: A 34-year-old lactating female patient presented with swelling and pain in the left breast. Ultrasonography showed massive septate fluid collections with dense content in both breasts and between the pectoral muscle fibers. On mammography, both breasts appeared dense with large mass opacities. On magnetic resonance imaging, extensive fluid-signal cystic areas were observed. Peripheral enhancement around the fluid in the left breast was present in the contrast-enhanced series. We learned from her anamnesis that Aquafilling® was applied to both breasts 5 years ago. Ultrasonography-guided sampling was performed from the cystic areas in the left breast and cytological examination revealed basophilic Aquafilling® material surrounded by diffuse inflammatory infiltrates. Breast augmentation history should be questioned in suspicious cases because Aquafilling® gel injection and its complications can present with a wide variety of symptoms and may mimic various other conditions on radiological imaging, such as cancer, abscess, granulomatous mastitis, and parasite infections.

Key Points to Select a Device for Dermatologic Ultrasound

What points to consider when selecting a device for practicing dermatologic ultrasound is an excellent question. After we met the requisites published in the guidelines for practicing dermatologic ultrasound, it is necessary to consider the main objective of the use because it is not the same to be focused mostly on the avoidance of the puncture of important facial vessels such as the case of injectors of cosmetic fillers in comparison to the use of operators that need to deal with the diagnosis and monitoring of a wide range of dermatologic pathologies. Currently, a broad variety of ultrasound devices meets the minimum requirements for practicing these examinations in the market. Thus, small, portable, and high-end devices may present advantages and limitations that must be balanced according to the primary purposes and the budget. Moreover, the shape and footprint of the probes can make difficult or facilitate a dermatologic procedure. Other points to consider are the type of storage and the need for technical service. In summary, there are key points that we need to consider when we select a dermatologic ultrasound device in dermatology or aesthetics.