Survival Benefits of Surgical Resection in Patients with Recurrent Biliary Tract Carcinoma

Lenvatinib Beyond First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma

Introduction

Lenvatinib, a multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors that target vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and fibroblast growth factor receptors, recently demonstrated a treatment effect in various tumors. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib for patients with biliary tract cancers (BTCs) who had received ≥1 line of prior systemic anti-BTC therapy.

Methods

This open-label, single-arm study included adult (≥18 years) patients with histologically confirmed BTC. Efficacy and safety were evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors RECIST Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) and the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4.0). Changes in tumor biomarkers throughout the treatment period were recorded.

Results

41 patients received lenvatinib treatment. The ORR was 12% (95% CI: 1.7–22.7), with a median PFS of 3.8 months (95% CI: 1.3–6.3) and an OS of 11.4 months (95% CI: 6.6–16.2). Thirty-nine (95.1%) patients experienced ≥1 treatment-related adverse event. Decreasing carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level predicted tumor size reduction in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with a sensitivity of 77.7% and a specificity of 73.9%.

Conclusions

Lenvatinib which was individualized based on the patient’s weight has promising clinical activity against advanced BTC and had an acceptable safety profile. Additionally, serum biomarkers and gene sequencing may hold the potential to guide our treatment.

Oncological outcomes of surgery for recurrent biliary tract cancer: who are the best candidates?

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the impact of surgery on outcomes in patients with recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC) and elucidate factors affecting survival after surgery for this disease.

METHODS

A single-center study was undertaken in 178 patients with recurrent BTC, of whom 24 underwent surgery for recurrence, 85 received chemotherapy, and 69 received best supportive care. Then, we carried out a multicenter study in 52 patients undergoing surgery for recurrent BTC (gallbladder cancer, 39%; distal cholangiocarcinoma, 27%; perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, 21%; intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 13%).

RESULTS

In the single-center study, 3-year survival after recurrence was 53% in patients who underwent surgery, 4% in those who received chemotherapy, and 0% in those who received best supportive care (p < 0.001). Surgery was an independently prognostic factor (p < 0.001). In the multicenter series, the respective 3-year and 5-year survival after surgery for recurrence was 50% and 29% in the 52 patients. Initial site of recurrence was the only independent prognostic factor (p = 0.019). Five-year survival after surgery for recurrence in patients with single distant, multifocal distant, and locoregional recurrence was 51%, 0%, and 0%, respectively (p = 0.002). Sites of single distant recurrence included the liver (n = 13, 54%), distant lymph nodes (all from gallbladder cancer, n = 7, 29%), lung (n = 2, 9%), peritoneum (n = 1, 4%), and abdominal wall (n = 1, 4%).

CONCLUSION

Surgery may be an effective option for patients with less aggressive tumor biology characterized by single distant recurrence in recurrent BTC.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of liver metastases from extrahepatic primary cancers 2021

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy is standard treatment for colorectal liver metastases; however, it is unclear whether liver metastases from other primary cancers should be resected or not. The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery therefore created clinical practice guidelines for the management of metastatic liver tumors.

METHODS

Eight primary diseases were selected based on the number of hepatectomies performed for each malignancy per year. Clinical questions were structured in the population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) format. Systematic reviews were performed, and the strength of recommendations and the level of quality of evidence for each clinical question were discussed and determined. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations.

RESULTS

The eight primary sites were grouped into five categories based on suggested indications for hepatectomy and consensus of the guidelines committee. Fourteen clinical questions were devised, covering five topics: (1) diagnosis, (2) operative treatment, (3) ablation therapy, (4) the eight primary diseases, and (5) systemic therapies. The grade of recommendation was strong for one clinical question and weak for the other 13 clinical questions. The quality of the evidence was moderate for two questions, low for 10, and very low for two. A flowchart was made to summarize the outcomes of the guidelines for the indications of hepatectomy and systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines were developed to provide useful information based on evidence in the published literature for the clinical management of liver metastases, and they could be helpful for conducting future clinical trials to provide higher-quality evidence.