Prediction of thrombosis risk in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria

Comparison of human leukocyte antigen in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria of different clone sizes

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein-deficient hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell development caused by PIGA mutations cannot fully explain the pathogenesis of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). Herein, patients newly diagnosed with PNH at our hospital between April 2019 and April 2021 were recruited. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II loci were analyzed, and patients were stratified by PNH clone sizes: small (< 50%) and large (≥ 50%). In 40 patients (29 males; 72.5%), the median PNH clone size was 72%. Thirteen (32.5%) and twenty-seven (67.5%) patients harbored small and large PNH clones, respectively. DRB1*15:01 and DQB1*06:02 had higher frequencies in patients with PNH than in healthy controls (adjusted P-value = 4.10 × 10-4 and 4.10 × 10-4, respectively). Whole HLA class I and II allele contributions differed (P = 0.046 and 0.065, not significant difference) when comparing patients with small and large PNH clones. B*13:01 and C*04:01 allelic frequencies were significantly higher in patients with small clones (P = 0.032 and P = 0.032, respectively). Patients with small clones had higher class II HLA evolutionary divergence (HED) (P = 0.041) and global class I and II HED (P = 0.019). In the entire cohort, 17 HLA aberrations were found in 11 (27.5%) patients. No significant differences in HLA aberrations were found between patients with small or large clones. In conclusion, patients with small clones tended to have a higher frequency of immune attack-associated alleles. A higher HED in patients with small clones may reflect a propensity for T cell-mediated autoimmunity. HLA aberrations were similar between patients with small and large clones.

Swiss Survey on current practices and opinions on clinical constellations triggering the search for PNH clones

This national survey investigated the current practice in Switzerland by collecting participants' opinions on paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) clone assessment and clinical practice.

Aim

This study aimed to investigate clinical indications prompting PNH clones' assessment and physician's accessibility of a flow cytometry facility, and also to understand clinical attitudes on the follow-up (FU) of patients with PNH clones.

Methods

The survey includes 16 multiple-choice questions related to PNH and targets physicians with a definite level of experience in the topic using two screener questions. Opinion on clinical management was collected using hypothetical clinical situations. Each participant had the option of being contacted to further discuss the survey results. This was an online survey, and 264 physicians were contacted through email once a week for 5 weeks from September 2020.

Results

In total, 64 physicians (24.2%) from 23 institutions participated (81.3% hematologists and 67.2% from university hospitals). All had access to flow cytometry for PNH clone testing, with 76.6% having access within their own institution. The main reasons to assess for PNH clones were unexplained thrombosis and/or hemolysis, and/or aplastic anemia (AA). Patients in FU for PNH clones were more likely to be aplastic anemia (AA) and symptomatic PNH. In total, 61% of the participants investigated PNH clones repetitively during FU in AA/myelodysplastic syndromes patients, even when there was no PNH clone found at diagnosis, and 75% of the participants tested at least once a year during FU. Opinions related to clinical management were scattered.

Conclusion

The need to adhere to guidelines for the assessment, interpretation, and reporting of PNH clones emerges as the most important finding, as well as consensus for the management of less well-defined clinical situations. Even though there are several international guidelines, clear information addressing specific topics such as the type of anticoagulant to use and its duration, as well as the indication for treatment with complement inhibitors in some borderline situations are needed. The analysis and the discussion of this survey provide the basis for understanding the unmet needs of PNH clone assessment and clinical practice in Switzerland.

Complement Inhibition in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH): A Systematic Review and Expert Opinion from Central Europe on Special Patient Populations

INTRODUCTION

Hemolysis in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is complement-mediated due to the lack of complement inhibitors in the hemopoietic cell membranes, making complement inhibition the best approach to manage PNH. Three complement inhibitors are approved by the European Medicines Agency as targeted therapy for PNH: eculizumab and ravulizumab, two humanized monoclonal antibodies targeting the same complement 5 (C5) epitope, approved in 2007 and 2019, respectively, and the more recently approved cyclic peptide, the complement 3 (C3) inhibitor pegcetacoplan. Although national and international PNH treatment guidelines exist, they do not take into consideration the latest clinical trial evidence. Given the lack of evidence-based data for some clinical situations encountered in real life, we identified specific populations of patients who may benefit from switching to proximal C3 from terminal C5 inhibition.

METHODS

The expert recommendations presented here were created using a Delphi-like process by a group of expert PNH specialists across Central Europe. Based on an initial advisory board meeting discussion, recommendations were prepared and reviewed as part of a Delphi survey to test agreement.

RESULTS

Using a systematic approach, literature databases were searched for relevant studies, and 50 articles were reviewed by the experts and included as supporting evidence.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of these recommendations uniformly across healthcare institutions will promote the best use of complement inhibition in managing PNH, and has the potential to positively impact patient outcomes in Central Europe and worldwide.

When does a PNH clone have clinical significance?

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is an acquired blood disease caused by somatic mutations in the phosphatidylinositol glycan class A (PIGA) gene required to produce glycophosphatidyl inositol (GPI) anchors. Although PNH cells are readily identified by flow cytometry due to their deficiency of GPI-anchored proteins, the assessment of the clinical significance of a PNH clone is more nuanced. The interpretation of results requires an understanding of PNH pathogenesis and its relationship to immune-mediated bone marrow failure. Only about one-third of patients with PNH clones have classical PNH disease with overt hemolysis, its associated symptoms, and the highly prothrombotic state characteristic of PNH. Patients with classical PNH benefit the most from complement inhibitors. In contrast, two-thirds of PNH clones occur in patients whose clinical presentation is that of bone marrow failure with few, if any, PNH-related symptoms. The clinical presentations are closely associated with PNH clone size. Although exceptions occur, bone marrow failure patients usually have smaller, subclinical PNH clones. This review addresses the common scenarios that arise in evaluating the clinical significance of PNH clones and provides practical guidelines for approaching a patient with a positive PNH result.

Thrombotic Complications in Patients with Immune-Mediated Hemolysis

Autoimmune hemolytic anemias are rare and heterogeneous disorders characterized by hemolysis, which is a well-recognized risk factor for thrombosis. The most common immune-mediated anemias are represented by autoimmune hemolytic anemia and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, both associated with a high rate of thrombosis. Multiple pathophysiological mechanisms for thrombosis have been proposed, involving hemolysis itself and additional effects of the immune system. Despite the increasing awareness of the thrombotic risk in these conditions, evidence-based guidance on prevention and management of thrombotic events is lacking. We herein report available evidence on epidemiological data on thrombosis and thrombophilia in immune-mediated hemolysis, together with possible underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. In addition, we summarize current recommendations for treatment of thrombosis in immune-mediated hemolysis. In particular, we address the issue of thrombotic complications treatment and prophylaxis by proposing a therapeutic algorithm, focusing on specific situations such as splenectomy and pregnancy.