Intramedullary nailing of abnormally bowed atypical femoral shaft fractures: surgical technique

Atypical Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Fractures: The Unsolved Problem

Atypical femoral fractures (AFF) are stress or insufficiency fractures induced by low energy trauma or no trauma, frequently correlated with prolonged bisphosphonate therapy. The diagnosis follows major and minor criteria, originally described by the Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research in 2010 and updated in 2014. However, the definition of AFFs in the report excluded periprosthetic fractures. When atypical fractures occur close to a prosthetic implant the situation become critical, the surgical treatment is often demolitive and supported by medical treatment. Moreover, acute ORIF as a first line treatment is frequently burdened by a high failure rate , and often a stem revision is required as second line treatment. The healing process is long and difficult with poor functional results and impairing outcomes. We present a case treated at our institution of a 78 year old woman with a history of a femoral atypical periprosthetic fracture, complicated by multiple surgical revisions. Its arduous management reflects all the difficulties that these type of fractures could present to the surgeon, while its good final result may teach us how to approach them in a correct way.

Straight nail insertion through a laterally shifted entry for diaphyseal atypical femoral fractures with bowing: good indications and limitations of this technique

PURPOSE

Inserting a straight (piriformis fossa entry) nail through the tip of the greater trochanter has been used for treating atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) with bowing. This study aimed to determine what degree of bowing can be successfully treated using a laterally shifted entry technique.

METHODS

Twenty-three complete and six incomplete diaphyseal AFFs treated using the shifted entry technique were retrospectively analysed. Radiologic parameters and complications were evaluated. The complete AFFs were divided into two groups based on the severity of preoperative bowing: grade 0-II bowing and < 20° lateral bowing (minimal/moderate) and grade III bowing or ≥ 20° lateral bowing (severe). Comparison according to postoperative malalignment, a change of lateral or anterior bowing ≥ 5° was also performed.

RESULTS

Three complete AFFs in the minimal/moderate group showed malalignment, as did all in the severe group (p < 0.001). The change of bowing was greater for the severe group in lateral and anterior bowing (p = 0.004 and 0.001, respectively). A greater fracture gap was found on AP and lateral radiographs in the severe group (p = 0.044 and 0.026, respectively). In the comparison according to postoperative malalignment, a significant difference was found for the percentage of severe deformity (p < 0.001). All incomplete AFFs were united without complication.

CONCLUSION

Diaphyseal AFFs with grade 0-II bowing and < 20° anterior bowing were treated successfully by the shifted entry technique. However, postoperative malalignment was found in all cases of AFFs with severe bowing. Therefore, other techniques should be considered for AFFs with grade III bowing or ≥ 20° anterior bowing.