Lesion size and varus malalignment are the major determinants leading to poorer clinical outcomes after combined microfracture treatment for focal cartilage lesions during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

The "hump" a new arthroscopic phenomenon guiding for reliable therapy of osteochondritis dissecans of variable stability status

INTRODUCTION

Despite 150 years of research, there are currently no reliable morphological characteristics that can be used to differentiate between stable and unstable juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (JOCD) lesions in the knee joint. Arthroscopic probing is still the gold standard. In arthroscopic evaluation, a previously undescribed pattern of a cartilaginous convex elevation ("hump") was identified as a new feature and potential sign of JOCD in transition to instability. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes after surgical intervention (drilling) on the "hump".

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective case series of sixteen patients with an arthroscopically detectable "hump", the analysis of clinical function scores (Lysholm, Tegner) and morphological MRI monitoring of radiological healing were performed. The assessment of lesion healing was based on pre- and postoperative MRI examinations. The "hump" was defined as an arthroscopically impressive protrusion of the femoral articular surface with a minimally softened, discolored, but intact cartilage margin that, is not mobile upon in the arthroscopic palpation hook test. The primary therapy of choice was drilling of all "humps".

RESULTS

The "hump" could be detected arthroscopically in 16 of 59 JOCD lesions. Specific MRI correlations with the "hump" or arthroscopic unstable lesions could not be detected. Not all "humps" showed signs of MRI-based healing after the drilling, and in some a dissection of the osteochondral flap occurred within the first postoperative year. As a result, secondary refixation became necessary.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, the "hump" was identified as an important differential diagnostic arthroscopic feature of an arthroscopically primarily stable JOCD lesion, potentially placing the lesion at risk of secondary loosening over time. Therefore, drilling alone may not be appropriate in the event of arthroscopic "hump" discovery, but additional fixation may be required to achieve the healing of the lesion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Cartilage repair strategies in the knee according to Dutch Orthopedic Surgeons: a survey study

BACKGROUND

This study surveyed Dutch orthopedic surgeons on the management of cartilage defects in the knee and the adherence to the recently updated Dutch knee cartilage repair consensus statement (DCS).

METHODS

A web-based survey was sent to 192 Dutch knee specialists.

RESULTS

The response rate was 60%. Microfracture, debridement and osteochondral autografts are performed by the majority, 93%, 70% and 27% of respondents, respectively. Complex techniques are used by < 7%. Microfracture is mainly considered in defects 1-2 cm² (by > 80%) but also in 2-3 cm² (by > 40%). Concomitant procedures, e.g., malalignment corrections, are performed by 89%. Twenty-one percent of surgeons treat patients aged 40-60 years. Microfracture, debridement and autologous chondrocyte implantation are not considered to be highly affected by age > 40 years by any of the respondents (0-3%). Moreover, for the middle-aged there is a large spread in treatments considered. In case of loose bodies, the majority (84%) only performs refixation in the presence of attached bone.

CONCLUSION

Small cartilage defects in ideal patients may be well treated by general orthopedic surgeons. The matter becomes complicated in older patients, or in case of larger defects or malalignment. The current study reveals some knowledge gaps for these more complex patients. Referral to tertiary centers might be indicated, as is stated by the DCS, and this centralization should enhance knee joint preservation. Since the data from present study are subjective, registration of all separate cartilage repair cases should fuel objective analysis of clinical practice and adherence to the DCS in the future.

Effect of Soft Tissue Interposition and Postoperative Suspensory Cortical Button Migration on Functional Outcomes and Ligamentization After Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction

Background:

Soft tissue interposition between a suspensory cortical button and the lateral femoral condyle is the most common cause of postoperative suspensory cortical button migration in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Purpose:

To investigate the effects of soft tissue interposition and suspensory cortical button migration after ACLR on functional outcomes and graft ligamentization.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Included were 249 patients who underwent single-bundle ACLR with hamstring tendon autografts. To measure soft tissue imposition, the patients were divided into 2 groups: those in whom the suspensory cortical button was in contact with (group 1) or at least 1 mm away from (group 2) the lateral femoral condyle on 1-day postoperative radiographs. To measure suspensory cortical button migration, the patients in group 2 were further divided into 2 subgroups: those with button migration (group M) and those without migration (group non-M) as observed on 12-month postoperative radiographs. Ligamentization was evaluated according to Howell classification (grades 1-4) on 12-month follow-up magnetic resonance imaging scans. Also recorded were preoperative and 24-month postoperative Lysholm and Tegner scores and 24-month postoperative arthrometer measurements for anterior knee laxity.

Results:

There was no significant difference between groups 1 and 2 or between groups M and non-M in terms of demographic characteristics or additional intra-articular pathologies detected intraoperatively. Normal anterior laxity (<3 mm) was detected in 83.7% of the patients postoperatively, and all patients showed statistically significant pre- to postoperative improvement on the Tegner (from 4.1 to 4.3) and Lysholm (from 44.0 to 89.2) scores (P < .05 for both). No significant difference in postoperative functional results or graft ligamentization was found between either the soft tissue interposition groups (groups 1 and 2) or the suspensory cortical button migration groups (groups M and non-M).

Conclusion:

Differences between patients in soft tissue interposition and suspensory cortical button migration did not significantly affect postoperative clinical or functional outcomes or graft ligamentization after single-bundle ACLR.