Low tibial osteotomy for moderate ankle arthritis

Outcomes of ankle arthrodesis in adult patients with ankle osteoarthritis in Kashin-Beck disease

PURPOSE

We retrospectively evaluated the characteristics of these patients and the effectiveness of ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of ankle arthritis caused by Kashin-Beck disease (KBD).

METHODS

A retrospective study of KBD patients with ankle osteoarthritis who underwent ankle arthrodesis between December 2012 and January 2022 was performed. A total of 46 patients were included. The general characteristics, clinical manifestations and imaging features of the patients were recorded and summarized. measured using the VAS score, and ankle function was assessed by the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score.

RESULTS

Multiple subchondral cystic changes were found in 42(91.3%) patients. The VAS scores for both resting and weight-bearing conditions were 6.28 ± 1.30 vs. 2.09 ± 1.12 (P < .001) and 6.87 ± 1.01 vs. 2.17 ± 0.98 (P < .001), respectively. The AOFAS scores were 59.17 ± 5.50 and 88.39 ± 1.42, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The subchondral multiple cystic transformation of the ankle KBD has a certain suggestive role.Arthrodesis is an effective method to reduce ankle pain and improve ankle function in KBD patients with ankle osteoarthritis.

Functional and radiographic assessments of post-traumatic asymmetrical ankle osteoarthritis treatment using supramalleolar osteotomies

PURPOSE

This study's objective is to assess the effectiveness of supramalleolar osteotomies (SMOT) in the treatment of asymmetrical ankle osteoarthritis in terms of the improvement in alignment assessed radiographically and its impact on symptoms measured by the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score (AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score).

METHODS

Twelve patients participated in this prospective observational case series study. Standing anteroposterior, true lateral, and mortise views radiographs were taken. For preoperative planning, the lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA), talar tilt (TT), talocrural angle (TCA), and anterior distal tibial angle (ADTA) were all measured. A medial opening wedge osteotomy mainly was used to treat the varus arthritis ankle. A further oblique fibular osteotomy is frequently necessary.

RESULTS

The male-to-female ratio was 3:1, and the mean age of the patients was 26.25 ± 13.032 years. There were highly statistically significant differences between pre-and post-operative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score (p < 0.001). Statistically significant differences concerning ankle range of motion (p = 0.002, < 0.001) of dorsiflexion and planter flexion were detected. Comparison between pre-and post-operative patients' radiology characteristics shows statistically significant differences concerning TT (p = 0.016) and LDTA (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

SMOT is very effective in the treatment of post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis and postpones ankle fusion or total ankle replacements. This surgery significantly improves functional and radiological outcomes as well as the range of motion in the ankle. Meticulous preoperative planning by radiological measurements of different angles around the ankle is considered the crucial factor in success of that operation.

Trimalleolar Fractures Treated by Open Reduction Internal Fixation Compared With Arthroscopically Assisted Reduction and Minimally Invasive Surgery

BACKGROUND

Currently, the standard of treatment for trimalleolar (TM) fracture is osteosynthesis through open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). This study assessed whether arthroscopically assisted reduction and minimally invasive surgery (AARMIS) can be an alternative surgical method for TM fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 49 patients with TM that were surgically treated. 27 patients received ORIF and 22 patients underwent AARMIS . At baseline, we recorded the patient's demographic features, fracture pattern (AO-OTA and Haraguchi classification), and surgical method. For postoperative results, we examined the patient's radiographic outcome, including time to union, quality of fracture reduction, as well as functional outcomes (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle hindfoot score, ankle range of motion, and visual analog scale of pain) and perioperative complications.

RESULTS

At mean follow-up of 46.6±24.6 (ORIF) and 36.4±18.5 months (AARMIS), both groups had comparable radiographic outcomes. No significant difference in rates of early ankle OA were detected. In terms of functional outcome, VAS pain and AOFAS score at postoperative day 3, postoperative month 3, and at final follow-up were not different. In terms of range of motion, we did not find a significant difference in mean range of motion.

CONCLUSION

Patients with TM fractures treated with AARMIS achieved satisfactory results and was not significantly different in radiographic and functional performance compared with ORIF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Supramalleolar osteotomy for the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis leads to favourable outcomes and low complication rates at mid-term follow-up: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate both the clinical and radiographic outcomes following supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) in patients with ankle osteoarthritis, and to analyse the level of evidence (LOE) and quality of evidence (QOE) of the included studies.

METHODS

A systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting clinical data following SMO for the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis were included and assessed. The level and quality of evidence of the included studies were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies with 1160 patients (1182 ankles) were included. Overall, 78.8% patients presented with post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis. The weighted mean AOFAS score improved from 52.6 ± 9.7 (range 33.8-78.4) preoperatively to 78.1 ± 5.7 postoperatively at weighted mean follow-up of 50.4 ± 18.6 months (range 24.5-99.0).  The most frequently utilised radiographic parameter was the tibial anterior surface angle, which improved from a preoperative weighted mean of 86.3° ± 5.6° (range 76.0°-102.0°) to a postoperative weighted mean of 89.9° ± 3.7° (range 84.9°-99.6°). The complication rate was 5.1% with non-union as the most commonly reported complication (1.6%). Secondary procedures were carried out in 28.2% of patients, the most common of which was implant and hardware removal (17.6%). The failure rate was 6.8%. Two studies were LOE II, 3 studies were LOE III, and 19 studies were LOE IV. The mean Modified Coleman Methodology Score was 59.3 ± 6.6 and the mean MINORS criteria score of all the included studies was 9.5 ± 3.7.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review demonstrates good clinical and radiological outcomes, together with a low failure rate at mid-term follow-up following supramalleolar osteotomy in patients with ankle osteoarthritis. However, a moderate reoperation rate (28.2%) was reported. A low failure rate (6.8%) was reported, which must be interpreted in light of the shortcomings of the design of the included studies and a relatively short follow-up period. In addition, there is a low level and quality of evidence in the current literature with inconsistent reporting of data which underscores the need for further higher quality research to be conducted. Our review highlights that SMO may be an effective and safe procedure in the setting of early-to-intermediate-stage ankle osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Early results of intramedullary nail fixation in distal tibia oblique osteotomy for the reduction of soft tissue complications

PURPOSE

During distal tibial oblique osteotomy, external fixators can increase pin site infection risk, whereas plates can cause wound necrosis, necessitating a compromise between soft-tissue position and length. We provide the first report of the early results of intramedullary nail fixation in these osteotomies for avoiding soft tissue complications.

METHODS

Ten ankles, classed as Takakura-Tanaka stages 3a to 4 and unclassified and treated via distal tibial oblique osteotomy for ankle osteoarthritis between 2017 and 2021, were included. Osteotomy was performed obliquely from the distal medial tibia to the tibiofibular joint. The distal tibial fragment was rotated distally in the coronal plane for realignment. An intramedullary nail fixation was applied for stabilization. The resulting gap was filled with iliac bone graft. Ankles were evaluated on the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot ankle-Hindfoot Scale and Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire before surgery and at final follow-up. Radiographic assessments were performed.

RESULTS

Bone union was achieved within 3 months in all patients. There were no cases of wound necrosis or correction loss postsurgery. Japanese Society scale scores significantly improved from 40.3 ± 15.9 to 87.5 ± 12.6 (P < 0.01). Mean self-evaluation scale scores (pain and pain-related, physical functioning and daily living, social functioning, general health and well-being) improved significantly. shoe-related scores did not change significantly but improved. There was no correction loss after surgery, with an average widening of 24.2 mm and opening angle of 22.6° at the osteotomy site.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that intramedullary nail for fixation of the osteotomy site in distal tibial oblique osteotomy effectively prevents soft tissues complications even in osteotomy sites with large openings.

Is there an optimal degree of correction for ankle varus deformity after supramalleolar osteotomy? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the angle targeted for in varus ankle deformity after supramalleolar osteotomy (SMOT). The aim of this study was to investigate which obtained correction has the best clinical outcome after valgus SMOT.

METHODS

A systematic review according PRISMA guidelines was conducted with studies being eligible for inclusion when published in English, German or Dutch, patients older than 18 years at study entrance, primary or posttraumatic varus ankle osteoarthritis, using any valgus SMOT technique, describing radiological alignment and clinical outcome at baseline and after at least 12 months follow-up. Risk of bias was assessed using the McMaster University Occupational Therapy Evidence-Based Practice Research Group quality assessment tool. The electronical databases PubMed, EMBASE and Cinahl were used as data sources. Included cohorts were categorized according to the mean obtained medial distal tibia angle (MDTA; ranged between 87° and 100°). A linear mixed effect model was used for individual patient data to assess the association between the MDTA and the (difference in) clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Thirty studies including 33 patient cohorts with 922 ankles were identified. At a mean follow-up of 4 years no differences in clinical outcome between correction categories were found. Individual data of 34 ankles showed no relationship between obtained MDTA and clinical outcome either.

CONCLUSION

This review could not demonstrate an optimal degree of correction after valgus SMOT. Results were hampered by biased low quality studies and the widespread use of unreliable 2D alignment measures such as the MDTA.

牵张成形术治疗中重度踝关节炎中远期疗效分析

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the mid- and long-term effectiveness of external fixator distraction arthroplasty in the treatment of moderate to severe ankle arthritis.

METHODS

The clinical data of 23 patients with moderate to severe ankle arthritis treated with external fixation distraction arthroplasty who met the selection criteria between January 2007 and November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 20 males and 3 females; the age ranged from 21 to 65 years, with an average age of 43.7 years. Etiology included 8 cases of primary ankle arthritis, in which 5 cases combined with varus deformity; 15 cases of traumatic ankle arthritis, the cause of injury was 5 cases after ankle fracture surgery, 3 cases after Pilon fracture surgery, 5 cases of chronic ankle instability and repeated sprain, and 2 cases of other causes. According to Takakura staging system, there were 4 cases of stage ⅢA, 12 cases of stage ⅢB, and 7 cases of stage Ⅳ; according to Giannini staging system, there were 5 cases of stage Ⅱ and 18 cases of stage Ⅲ; according to Cheng staging system, 16 cases were in stage Ⅲ, and 7 cases stage Ⅳ. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were used to evaluate the improvement of ankle pain and function before operation and at last follow-up, and the data were analyzed according to different etiological groups. At last follow-up, the surgical results were evaluated subjectively and objectively. The changes of ankle joint space before operation and at last follow-up were compared. The patients were divided into two groups according to their age: ≤45 years old group [young group, 10 cases, aged (35.62±7.41) years old] and >45 years old group [middle-aged and elderly group, 13 cases, aged (54.20±6.20) years old]. The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS score were compared before and after operation between the two groups, and the influence of age on distraction arthroplasty was analyzed.

RESULTS

The external fixator was removed after 3 months of continuous distraction,12 patients got infection around the wire tunnels. All the 23 patients were followed up 13-143 months, with an average of 56.9 months; the follow-up time was (43.46±32.77) months and (69.80±37.79) months in the young group and middle-aged and elderly group, respectively. At last follow-up, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS score significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05). According to etiological analysis, there was no significant difference in AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS score before and after operation ( P>0.05) in Pilon fracture patients, while the significant difference was found in remaining patients ( P<0.05). There was significant difference in AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score before operation between the young group and the middle-aged and elderly group ( t=2.110, P=0.040), but no significant difference in preoperative VAS score and the differences in VAS score and AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score before and after operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). The subjective and objective results of pain evaluation at last follow-up showed that 4 patients had no pain, 12 patients had moderate pain relief, 5 patients had mild pain relief, and 2 patients had no significant pain relief; among the 10 patients who were followed up more than 5 years, there were 2, 5, 2, and 1 patient, respectively; 2 patients who were followed up more than 10 years had moderate pain relief. At last follow-up, the ankle joint space was (3.7±0.4) mm, which significantly increased when compared with before operation [(1.5±0.2) mm] ( t=1.791, P=0.002). The ankle joint space was (2.9±0.5) mm in 10 patients who were followed up more than 5 years, and 3.3 mm and 3.0 mm in 2 patients who were followed up more than 10 years.

CONCLUSION

Distraction arthroplasty of the ankle joint can achieve satisfactory results in patients with moderate to severe ankle arthritis (except for arthritis caused by Pilon fracture), and age has no significant effect on distraction arthroplasty.

Clinical Outcomes of Supramalleolar Osteotomy in Intermediate Stage of Varus Ankle Osteoarthritis in Joint Preservation

Supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) is an effective treatment for intermediate-stage varus ankle osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed to investigate how clinical outcomes were associated with radiological changes and cartilage regeneration shown on arthroscopy before and after SMO in patients with intermediate-stage varus ankle OA. Twenty-six cases with intermediate-stage varus ankle OA underwent SMO with at least 1 year of postoperative follow-up. Clinical assessment was performed preoperatively and postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot (AOFAS) scores, and their associations with postoperative changes in tibial ankle surface angle (TAS), talar tilt, tibial lateral surface angle, and heel alignment ratio. The degrees of cartilage regeneration in the tibia plafond and talar dome were observed via second-look arthroscopy. Afterward, their associations with the corresponding clinical outcomes were analyzed. There were significant changes in the TAS, talar tilt, and heel alignment ratio (p < .001, for all). However, there were no significant changes in the tibial lateral surface angle (p = .864) at the final follow-up compared to its preoperative value. Postoperative changes in TAS (p = .013) and the degree of cartilage regeneration (p = .028) in the talar dome significantly influenced the final follow-up AOFAS score. Changes in the TAS angle and the degree of cartilage regeneration after SMO were predictors of clinical outcomes after SMO. In particular, greater changes in the TAS angle corresponded to better clinical outcomes.

Joint-Preserving Surgery in Varus Ankle Osteoarthritis

Ankle deformity is a disabling condition especially if concomitant with osteoarthritis (OA). Varus ankle OA is one of the most common ankle OA deformities. This deformity usually leads to unequal load distribution in the ankle joint and decreases joint contact surface area, leading to a progressive degenerative arthritic situation. Varus ankle OA might have multiple causative factors, which might present as a single isolated factor or encompassed together in a single patient. The etiologies can be classified as post-traumatic (e.g., after fractures and lateral ligament instability), degenerative, systemic, neuromuscular, congenital, and others. Treatment options are determined by the degree of the deformity and analyzing the pathology, which range from the conservative treatments up to surgical interventions. Surgical treatment of the varus ankle OA can be classified into two categories, joint-preserving surgery (JPS) and joint-sacrificing surgery (JSS) as total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. JPS is a valuable treatment option in varus ankle OA, which should not be neglected since it has showed a promising result, optimizing biomechanics and improving the survivorship of the ankle joint.

Analysis of Whole Limb Alignment in Ankle Arthritis

A full-length standing posteroanterior radiograph that includes the calcaneus (hip-to-calcaneus radiograph) is obtained for evaluation of the mechanical axis of the entire lower limb in patients with a lower limb condition involving malalignment. Such evaluation clarifies several pathomechanical aspects of hindfoot disorders, facilitates surgical planning, and elucidates factors contributing to unsatisfactory results of a particular operation. Whole limb alignment is influenced not only by the knee joint but also by the ankle joint; thus, knee realignment influences hindfoot alignment and vice versa. It is essential to analyze alignment of the whole limb in planning corrective lower limb surgery.

Joint Preservation Strategies for Managing Varus Ankle Deformities

Joint preserving strategies have evolved to a successful treatment option in early and midstage medial ankle OA caused by varus deformity. Though talar tilt can often not be fully corrected, it provides substantial postoperative pain relief, functional improvement, and slowing of the degenerative process. Osseous balancing with osteotomies is the main step for restoration of ankle mechanics and normalization of joint load. Overall, the key for success is to understand the underlying causes that have contributed to the varus OA in each case, and to use all treatment modalities necessary to restore appropriate alignment of the hindfoot complex.

Perioperative axial loading computed tomography findings in varus ankle osteoarthritis: Effect of supramalleolar osteotomy on abnormal internal rotation of the talus

BACKGROUND

We used axial loading computed tomography (AL CT) to evaluate preoperative and postoperative talocrural joints of patients who underwent supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) to treat varus ankle osteoarthritis.

METHODS

We performed retrospective analyses of 16 patients (18 feet) who underwent SMO including fibular osteotomy. Radiographic assessment was performed with weightbearing radiographs and AL CT. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).

RESULTS

The mean 2-year follow-up tibial-ankle surface angle, talar tilt angle, Takakura stage, and tibial-lateral surface angle were all significantly different relative to preoperative parameters (P<.05). The mean 6-month follow-up talus rotation ratio was significantly corrected compared to the preoperative value (P=.001). The mean 2-year follow-up AOFAS, VAS at gait, and FAAM scores were all significantly improved relative to preoperative measurements (P=.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal internal rotation of the talus in mild to moderate varus ankle osteoarthritis found on AL CT was significantly corrected after SMO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.

Functional and radiological medium term outcome following supramalleolar osteotomy for asymmetric ankle arthritis- A case series of 33 patients

Introduction

Ankle arthritis is one of the most disabling and painful conditions. Up to 37.5% of ankle arthritis presents as asymmetric arthritis with ankle malalignment. Supramalleolar osteotomy is a joint sparing operation, which aims to realign the ankle joint that will prevent progression of arthritis and relieve patient's symptoms.

Aim

The aim of this study is to analyse the medium term functional and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent supramalleolar osteotomy for asymmetric ankle arthritis.

Materials and methods

This is a retrospective outcome study of medium term outcome for 33 patients who underwent Supramalleolar osteotomy for asymmetric ankle arthritis by a single surgeon. We assessed the functional outcome of the patients with AOFAS and VAS score. The radiological parameters measured were Tibial articular surface ankle (TAS), Hind foot alignment angle (HFA) and Talar tilt angle (TT). We used the paired Student's t-test to compare the preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements, AOFAS and VAS scores. We set the significance level at P < 0.05.

Results

We had 21 patients who underwent lateral closing wedge osteotomy for varus deformity and 12 patients who underwent medial closing wedge osteotomy for valgus deformity. The mean followup was 72 months [29-73]. The mean AOFAS score significantly improved by 44.82 ± 7.97 (p < 0.0001). The VAS score significantly improved by 5.06 ± 1.41 (p < 0.0001). All the radiological parameters showed statistically significant improvement. All osteotomy united by 8-10 weeks. We had one case of late deep wound infection, which settled down with by metalwork removal. The arthritis progressed in three cases, two patients had fusion and one patient had ankle replacement. We had 90.9% survival rate for our osteotomy at 6 years.

Conclusion

Supramalleolar osteotomy is an excellent option for patients with asymmetric ankle arthritis with good functional and radiological outcome and good medium term survival rate.

Supramalleolar Distal Tibiofibular Osteotomy for Medial Ankle Osteoarthritis: Current Concepts

The supramalleolar osteotomy is a joint-preserving surgical procedure. It is a very good treatment option for the asymmetric varus ankle and medial compartment osteoarthritis. The primary objective of the procedure is to shift medial concentration of stress toward the lateral intact articular cartilage to redistribute the joint loads during ambulation. Several studies have shown that deformities of the ankle result in uneven load distribution in the ankle joint, which eventually leads to articular cartilage degeneration. Since the lateral articular cartilage is intact, joint-sacrificing procedures such as total ankle replacement or ankle arthrodesis are not the most appropriate treatment choices for medial compartment arthritis. Results of supramalleolar osteotomies are very promising in terms of functional outcome and pain relief. In younger patients with medial compartment varus ankle osteoarthritis or even with a normal tibial anterior surface angle, supramalleolar osteotomies can be performed to realign the ankle to promote regeneration of the asymmetrically damaged cartilage. In this review article, we will discuss the indications, complications, surgical techniques, and outcomes of the supramalleolar osteotomy reported in the current literature.

Low Tibial and Fibular Osteotomy for Treating Varus-Type Post-Traumatic Ankle Osteoarthritis: A Case Report

In Indonesia, arthrodesis becomes a choice of treatment in the absence of ankle arthroplasty implants for young adults. Arthrodesis on ankle osteoarthritis (OA) often leads to functional impairment. Low tibiofibular osteotomy is an alternative and it has been known to be the preferable option for those in the productive-ages. A 22-year-old male with a previous history of a motorbike accident, operated eight years ago, came with persistent pain on the left ankle that has worsened over the years. Plain radiography with a tibial-ankle surface angle (TAS) of 74^o (normally 88^o-93^o) indicated varus deformity. Osteotomy was performed on distal tibia above the syndesmotic joint, as well as on the middle third of fibula. Open wedge osteotomy of the tibia was corrected until the normal TAS angle was reached by fluoroscopy. Cortical allograft was used to fill the osteotomy gap. Instrumentation was performed using a clover leaf® plate with 6 screws insertion for fixation stability. All results were satisfactory. Twelve weeks post-operatively, the patient was performing activities normally. Four-month post-operative radiological evaluation showed fusion of graft and the angle of TAS of 89°. Post-operative functional assessment using the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeon (AAOS) Foot and Ankle Measurement (FAM) questionnaires showed significant improvement (pre 89, post 38).

The preliminary report about the modified supramalleolar tibial osteotomy for asymmetric ankle osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

Supramalleolar tibial osteotomy (SMO) for asymmetric ankle osteoarthritis (OA) is known to lead to satisfactory. Here, authors present a preliminary report on SMO surgical treatment in patients with asymmetric ankle arthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed cases of asymmetric ankle OA treated by modified SMO between January 2011 and October 2015. Clinical assessment was performed with the use of the ankle and hindfoot score of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), foot function index, and visual analogue scale (VAS). Patient satisfaction with surgery and postoperative subjective symptoms were examined. Radiographic evaluation included preoperative and postoperative tibial anterior surface angle (TAS angle), talar tilt angle (TT angle), and tibial lateral surface angle (TLS angle). Takakura stage was measured.

RESULTS

The average follow-up period was 46.3 months. The AOFAS score was 55.7 ± 6.03 preoperatively and 76.0 ± 4.73 postoperatively. Foot function index was 60.7 ± 8.78 preoperatively and 30.8 ± 7.59 postoperatively. VAS was 7.2 ± 0.53 before surgery and 1.9 ± 0.85 after surgery. Clinical evaluations showed statistically significant improvement. The majority of patients reported satisfactory results in the subjective satisfaction evaluation. TAS angle was 84.6 ± 1.82 preoperatively and 94.0 ± 2.79 postoperatively. TLS angle was 78.8 ± 2.11 preoperatively and 81.8 ± 1.80 postoperatively. TT angle was 3.6 ± 1.26 before surgery and 2.1 ± 0.79 after surgery. Thirteen cases showed radiographic improvement of Takakura stage. Complications were not observed.

CONCLUSION

Modified SMO is a useful procedure that provides for the union and stability of osteotomy with the advantages of the existing SMO and can be performed without bone graft.

Extraarticular Supramalleolar Osteotomy in Asymmetric Varus Ankle Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, supramalleolar osteotomy has become a valuable alternative for treatment of ankle osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the preoperative stage of ankle osteoarthritis or tilt of the talus in the ankle mortise impacts radiologic and clinical outcomes following a supramalleolar osteotomy.

METHODS

Forty-four patients who underwent a supramalleolar osteotomy for posttraumatic asymmetric varus ankle osteoarthritis were included. Subgroups were formed according to the preoperative stage of ankle osteoarthritis and the tilt of the talus in the ankle mortise. The radiographic and clinical outcomes of each subgroup were compared, and survival rates calculated.

RESULTS

Ankles with a preoperative Takakura stage of 2 and 3a showed a significant higher survival rate at 5 years (88% [95% CI, 67-100] and 93% [95% CI, 80-100]) compared with ankles with a preoperative Takakura stage of 3b (47% [95% CI, 26-86]; P = .044). The 5-year survival rate for patients with a preoperative tilt of the talus in the ankle mortise of 4-10 degrees was 85% (95% CI, 68-100), while patients with a preoperative tilt of >10 degrees showed a 5-year survival rate of 65% (95% CI, 46-93; P = .117).

CONCLUSION

Supramalleolar osteotomy was a valuable treatment option for early to mid-stage posttraumatic asymmetric varus ankle osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

A flexion osteotomy for correction of a distal tibial recurvatum deformity

Aims

There is little information about how to manage patients with a recurvatum deformity of the distal tibia and osteoarthritis (OA) of the ankle. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiological outcome of addressing this deformity using a flexion osteotomy and to assess the progression of OA after this procedure.

Patients and Methods

A total of 39 patients (12 women, 27 men; mean age 47 years (28 to 72)) with a distal tibial recurvatum deformity were treated with a flexion osteotomy, between 2010 and 2015. Nine patients (23%) subsequently required conversion to either a total ankle arthroplasty (seven) or an arthrodesis (two) after a mean of 21 months (9 to 36). A total of 30 patients (77%), with a mean follow-up of 30 months (24 to 76), remained for further evaluation. Functional outcome, sagittal ankle joint OA using a modified Kellgren and Lawrence Score, tibial lateral surface (TLS) angle, and talar offset ratio (TOR) were evaluated on pre- and postoperative weight-bearing radiographs.

Results

Postoperatively, the mean score for pain, using a visual analogue scale, decreased significantly from 4.3 to 2.5 points and the mean American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score improved significantly from 59 to 75 points (both p < 0.001). The mean TLS angle increased significantly by 6.6°; the mean TOR decreased significantly by 0.24 (p < 0.001). Radiological evaluation showed an improvement or no progression of sagittal ankle joint OA in 32 ankles (82%), while seven ankles (18%) showed further progression.

Conclusion

A flexion osteotomy effectively improved the congruency of the ankle joint. In 30 patients (77%), the joint could be saved, whereas in nine patients (23%), the treatment delayed a joint-sacrificing procedure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:682–690.

Joint-Preserving Procedures in Patients with Varus Deformity: Role of Supramalleolar Osteotomies

The most common cause for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis is posttraumatic, sometimes resulting from concomitant supramalleolar deformity. Aims of the supramalleolar osteotomy include restoring the lower-leg axis to improve intraarticular load distribution and retarding degeneration of the tibiotalar joint. Preoperative planning is based on conventional weight-bearing radiographs. Often advanced imaging, including computed tomography and/or MRI, is needed for a better understanding of the underlying problem. Postoperative complications are not uncommon, including progression of tibiotalar osteoarthritis in up to 25% within 5 years of all patients who have supramalleolar osteotomies.

Prognostic Factors Affecting Correction Angle Changes After Supramalleolar Osteotomy Using an Opening Wedge Plate for Varus Ankle Osteoarthritis

Supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) has been suggested as an effective salvage treatment for varus ankle osteoarthritis. To identify the prognostic factors affecting the correction angle changes after SMO, a total of 53 consecutive patients (58 ankles) were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical and radiologic outcomes were evaluated, and statistical analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors associated with the clinical and radiologic outcomes. The mean visual analogue scale scores and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores improved significantly at the final follow-up (both p <.001). The mean tibial-ankle surface (TAS), talar tilt (TT), and tibial-lateral surface angles improved significantly after surgery, compared with the preoperative assessments (all, p <.001). However, at the final follow-up, these angles had changed significantly, compared with their immediate postoperative values (all p <.001), and the changes in the TAS and TT angles significantly influenced the clinical outcomes at the final follow-up (both p <.05). Male sex, high body mass index (≥26.4 kg/m²), and the existence of the lateral cortex breakages were significantly associated with the changes in the TAS and TT angle (all p <.05). Therefore, surgeons should consider these prognostic factors before performing SMO.

Management of Posttraumatic Ankle Arthritis: Literature Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Trauma is the principle cause of osteoarthritis in the ankle, which is associated with significant morbidity. This review highlights the current literature for the purpose of bringing the reader up-to-date on the management of posttraumatic ankle arthritis, describing treatment efficacy, indications, contraindications, and complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies on osteoarthritis have demonstrated variability among anatomic locations regarding the mechanisms and rates of development for posttraumatic osteoarthritis, which are attributed to newly discovered biological differences intrinsic to each joint. Regarding surgical management of posttraumatic ankle arthritis, osteochondral allograft transplantation of the talus, and supramalleolar osteotomies have demonstrated promising results. Additionally, the outpatient setting was found to be appropriate for managing pain following total ankle arthroplasty, associated with low complication rates and no readmission. Management for posttraumatic ankle arthritis is generally progressive. Initial treatment entails nonpharmacologic options with surgery reserved for posttraumatic ankle arthritis refractory to conservative treatment. Patient demographics and lifestyles should be carefully considered when formulating a management strategy, as outcomes are dependent upon the satisfaction of each set of respective criteria. Ultimately, the management of posttraumatic ankle arthritis should be individualized to satisfy the needs and desires, which are specific to each patient.

Supramalleolar Osteotomy Combined With an Intra-articular Osteotomy for the Reconstruction of Malunited Medial Impacted Ankle Fractures

BACKGROUND:

Malunion of a medial impacted ankle fracture may cause varus ankle deformity. This retrospective study examined the use of supramalleolar osteotomy combined with an intra-articular osteotomy in patients with malunited medial impacted ankle fractures.

METHODS:

Twenty-four patients with malunited medial impacted ankle fracture were treated between January 2011 and December 2014. Using Weber's classification, 10 had type A fractures and 14 had type B, and with the AO classification, 20 had 44A2 and 4 had 44B3. All of these patients had varus ankle deformity. Supramalleolar osteotomy combined with an intra-articular osteotomy was performed. The visual analog scale (VAS) for pain during daily activities, the Olerud and Molander Scale and the modified Takakura classification stage were used to determine the clinical outcomes and a radiographic analysis was performed.

RESULTS:

The radiographic parameters, including the tibial ankle surface (TAS) angle and talar tilt angle (TTA), showed significant differences between the preoperative and follow-up assessments. The mean tibial lateral surface (TLS) did not show a significant change. The average Olerud and Molander Scale score improved significantly from 56.4 ± 6.21 preoperatively to 77.0 ± 6.11 at the latest follow-up ( P < .01). The mean VAS decreased significantly from 6.7 ± 0.8 preoperatively to 3.1 ± 0.6 at the latest follow-up ( P < .01). No significant difference in the modified Takakura classification stage was observed between the preoperative assessment and the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of a supramalleolar osteotomy combined with an intra-articular osteotomy was an effective option for the treatment of malunited medial impacted ankle fractures associated with varus ankle deformity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Level IV, retrospective case series.

[Osteotomies of the distal tibia]

OBJECTIVE

Restoration of physiological alignment of the distal tibia and thereby restoration of physiological loading of the ankle joint; joint preservation in asymmetric degenerative arthritis of the ankle.

INDICATIONS

Congenital deformities of the distal tibia; acquired deformities of the distal tibia; asymmetric degenerative arthritis with partially preserved cartilage.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Absolute contraindications comprise severe nicotine abuse, Charcot arthropathy, peripheral polyneuropathy, relevant peripheral arterial vessel disease, poor local soft tissue condition, acute infection and extensive cartilage damage grade 3-4 in the Outerbridge classification in the complete joint.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Medial and lateral open and closed wedge osteotomies and dome osteotomies of the distal tibia are used, and shortening, lengthening and derotating osteotomies of the fibula.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

For 6 weeks, 15-20 kg partial weight-bearing in a below knee cast or a walker orthosis; full weight-bearing depending on osseous healing after 9-12 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Between July 2012 and May 2017, 15 patients (10 men, 5 women) underwent a supramalleor osteotomy. Average age was 41.8 years (range 17-63 years) and the retrospective average follow-up was 28.7 months (range 3-47 months). Mean preoperative AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) hindfoot score was 54.3 (range 26-86) and postoperatively a mean of 74.2 (44-100). Preoperatively, 9 patients had varus malalignment and 6 patients valgus malalignment; overall, 4 patients developed complications requiring surgical intervention (26.7%). Osteosynthetic material was removed in 60% of the patients.

Supramalleolar Osteotomy With Distraction Arthroplasty in Treatment of Varus Ankle Osteoarthritis With Large Talar Tilt Angle: A Case Report and Literature Review

We treated a 57-year-old female with modified Takakura stage 3B varus ankle osteoarthritis. Her preoperative talar tilt angle was 21.3°. The patient wished to avoid ankle joint arthrodesis or replacement. Therefore, medial opening wedge supramalleolar osteotomy with fibular osteotomy was used for her varus ankle osteoarthritis. Also, fixed medial distraction arthroplasty was performed to improve her talar tilt. After 3 months, the external device was removed, and the patient was allowed partial weightbearing and began full weightbearing 4 months postoperatively after the osteotomy site had reached bony union radiographically. At the 3-year follow-up visit, a radiograph showed the medial ankle joint space enlargement had been maintained. The talar tilt angle had decreased to 3.3°, and the modified Takakura stage had improved to stage 1. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot scale score had improved from 26 points preoperatively to 85 points at 3 years postoperatively. Our findings suggested that good clinical and radiologic results can be achieved with supramalleolar osteotomy combined with distraction arthroplasty in the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis with a large talar tilt angle.

Second-Look Arthroscopic Evaluation and Clinical Outcome After Supramalleolar Osteotomy for Medial Compartment Ankle Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of medial compartment ankle osteoarthritis after supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) without the bone marrow stimulation procedure and confirm cartilage recovery by second-look arthroscopy.

METHODS

Twenty-two ankles that were followed for more than 1 year after SMO were retrospectively reviewed. Visual analog scale pain scores and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scores were used for functional evaluations. The tibial anterior surface angle and tibial lateral surface angle were measured on radiographs, and ankle osteoarthritis was classified by Takakura stage. Among the 22 patients, 21 underwent ankle arthroscopy prior to SMO, and second-look arthroscopy was performed in 16 patients 1 year postoperatively. Tibiotalar cartilage regeneration was evaluated according to the modified Outerbridge classification for the 14 patients who had undergone SMO without the bone marrow stimulation procedure.

RESULTS

The mean visual analog scale and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society scores significantly improved from 6.5 preoperatively to 1.1 postoperatively and from 60.7 preoperatively to 87.1 postoperatively, respectively ( P < .05). The mean tibial anterior surface and tibial lateral surface angles significantly improved from 83.5° and 76.9° preoperatively to 93.8° and 80.2° postoperatively, respectively ( P < .05). All preoperative Takakura stage IIIa cases and IIIb case improved to postoperative stage II. On second-look arthroscopy, cartilage regeneration of the medial compartment of the tibiotalar joint was observed in 12 of 14 patients (85%), whereas cartilage deterioration was not observed in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

SMO without the bone marrow stimulation procedure for medial ankle osteoarthritis demonstrated cartilage regeneration in the medial tibiotalar joint in most patients by second-look arthroscopy, as well as satisfactory clinical and radiologic outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Peri-talar re-alignment osteotomy for joint preservation in asymmetrical ankle osteoarthritis

Various types of re-alignment surgery are used to preserve the ankle joint in cases of intermediate ankle arthritis with partial joint space narrowing.The short-term and mid-term results after re-alignment surgery are promising, with substantial post-operative pain relief and functional improvement that is reflected by high rates of patient satisfaction.In this context, re-alignment surgery can preserve the joint and reduce the pathological load that acts on the affected area.Good clinical and radiological outcomes can be achieved in asymmetrical ankle osteoarthritis by understanding the specific deformities and appropriate indications for different surgical techniques. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:324-331. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160021.

[Supramalleolar osteotomy treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis with or without fibular osteotomy]

Objective

To compare the functional and radiological outcomes of supramalleolar osteotomy (SMOT) between with and without fibular osteotomy for varus ankle osteoarthritis.

Methods

Between April 2009 and April 2014, 41 patients (41 feet) with mid-staged varus ankle osteoarthritis were treated with SMOT. Fibular osteotomy was not performed in 19 cases (group A), and fibular osteotomy was performed in 22 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, side, body mass index, osteoarthritis stage, pathogeny, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hind score, ankle osteoarthritis scale (AOS) pain and function scores, range of motion (ROM) of the ankle joint, tibial articular surface angle (TAS), talar tilt angle (TT), tibiocrural angle (TC), and tibial lateral surface angle (TLS) between 2 groups ( P>0.05). The bone union was observed after operation, and functional and radiological outcomes were compared between 2 groups at last follow-up.

Results

All incisions healed by stage I, and no surgery related complications occurred. The mean follow-up time was 36.6 months (range, 16-55 months). Pain and limited activity were observed in 1 case of groups A and B respectively, and ankle arthrodesis was performed. All cases achieved bony union; the bone union time was (3.6±0.4) months in group A and (3.9±0.7) months in group B, showing no significant difference ( t=1.61, P=0.12). At last follow-up, no significant difference was found in TAS, TLS, TT, and TC between groups ( P>0.05). However, group B was significantly better than group A in improvement of TT and TC ( P<0.05). The AOFAS ankle-hind score, AOS pain and function scores, ROM of the ankle joint showed no significant difference between groups ( P>0.05). According to the modified Takakura stage, the improvement rates of groups A and B were 55.6% and 57.1%, respectively; no significant difference was found between 2 groups ( χ²=0.01, P=0.92).

Conclusion

SMOT with fibular osteotomy is helpful in correction of TT and TC in patients with relative longer fibula.

The role of fibular for supramalleolar osteotomy in treatment of varus ankle arthritis: a biomechanical and clinical study

Background

Supramalleolar osteotomy (SMOT) is a well-accepted treatment method for mid-stage varus ankle osteoarthritis (OA). However, few studies have examined the role of fibular osteotomy in SMOT. The objective of the current study was to compare the biomechanical and clinical outcomes of SMOT with and without fibular osteotomy.

Methods

Eight cadaveric lower legs with 10° varus/valgus SMOT models were tested using a Tekscan ankle sensor. Tibiotalar joint contact with and without fibular osteotomy conditions were compared. Forty-one varus ankle OA patients treated with SMOT were included; 22 underwent fibular osteotomy, and 19 did not. The Maryland foot score and radiological angles were used for clinical evaluation.

Results

The mean contact area and pressure did not differ significantly between normal and varus/valgus conditions with the fibula preserved. After fibular osteotomy, the mean contact area decreased and the mean contact pressure increased significantly in varus and valgus conditions (P < 0.01). The loading center moved to the opposite direction with and without fibular osteotomy in varus/valgus conditions. After a mean follow-up of 36.6 months (range 17–61), there was no significant difference in the Maryland scores of the two groups. However, in the fibular osteotomy group, the talar tilt angle decreased (P < 0.05), and the tibiocrural angle improved significantly (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Fibular osteotomy facilitates the translation of tibiotalar contact pressure and is helpful for varus ankle realignment in patients with large talar tilts and small tibiocrural angles.

Supramalleolar Osteotomy With or Without Fibular Osteotomy for Varus Ankle Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Supramalleolar osteotomy (SMOT) is an alternative operative procedure for the management of early and midstage varus ankle arthritis. However, whether fibular osteotomy is needed is controversial. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the functional and radiologic outcomes of pre- and postoperative SMOT, and to compare the outcomes between patients with and without fibular osteotomy.

METHODS

Forty-one Takakura stage 2 and 3 varus ankle osteoarthritis patients treated with SMOT were included. Fourteen males and 27 females with a mean age of 50.7 (range, 32-71) years were followed with a mean of 36.6 (range, 17-61) months. There were 22 cases with fibular osteotomy and 19 without. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, Maryland foot score, and Ankle Osteoarthritis Score (AOS) were used for pre- and postoperative functional evaluation. The tibial articular surface angle (TAS), talar tilt (TT), tibiocrural angle (TC), and tibial lateral surface angle (TLS) were evaluated pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up, the mean AOFAS score (from 50.8 to 83.1 points) and Maryland score (from 58.3 to 81.6 points) in overall were improved (P < .01); the mean AOS pain (from 42.6 to 26.1 points) and function (from 53.4 to 36.8 points) scores were decreased (P < .01). For radiologic evaluation, all the included parameters were improved (P < .05) except TLS. The mean Takakura stage was decreased (P < .01). No significant difference could be detected in comparing the functional outcomes between those with and without fibular osteotomy. However, in the fibular osteotomy group, TT was decreased (P < .05) and TC was improved (P < .01) significantly.

CONCLUSION

SMOT was promising, with substantial functional improvement and malalignment correction for varus ankle arthritis. Fibular osteotomy may be necessary in cases with large TT and small TC angles.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Supramalleolar Osteotomies for the Treatment of Ankle Arthritis

Supramalleolar osteotomy is a joint-preserving surgical treatment for patients with asymmetric valgus or varus ankle arthritis. The primary goal of the procedure is to realign the spatial relationship between the talus and tibia and thereby normalize joint loading within the ankle. Procedures to balance the soft tissues, as well as hindfoot osteotomy and arthrodesis, may also be necessary. Clinical studies of supramalleolar osteotomy demonstrate that correction of the altered biomechanics associated with asymmetric arthritis improves functional outcomes.

Arthroscopic evaluation of persistent pain following supramalleolar osteotomy for varus ankle osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to investigate pain experienced by patients after supramalleolar osteotomy for varus ankle osteoarthritis and to analyse correlations between this pain and arthroscopic findings.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients (31 ankles) who underwent arthroscopic evaluation after supramalleolar osteotomy were reviewed retrospectively. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess pain, and the patients were instructed to record the time point, location, and character of the pain. The tibial-ankle surface angle, talar tilt, and tibial-lateral surface angle were measured on radiographs.

RESULTS

The location, time point, and character of the pain experienced by the patients changed after supramalleolar osteotomy. The mean VAS score was significantly improved after supramalleolar osteotomy at the time of the arthroscopic evaluation (P < 0.001) and improved further after the arthroscopic procedures (P = 0.026). During arthroscopy, pathologic lesions such as adhesions, synovitis, and soft-tissue impingement were identified. A significant correlation was found between adhesions and dull pain and pain at rest (P = 0.016 and P = 0.005, respectively). In addition, soft-tissue impingement in the lateral gutter was significantly correlated with dull pain, pain at rest, and clicking pain (P = 0.001, P = 0.035, and P = 0.042, respectively). No significant correlations were found between post-operative radiographic measurements and development of pathologic lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of arthroscopy, persistent pain experienced after supramalleolar osteotomy was found to be associated with adhesions, synovitis, and soft-tissue impingement in medial and lateral gutters of the ankle. Arthroscopy can be helpful in identifying and treating painful lesions commonly seen after supramalleolar osteotomy. An understanding of these painful lesions will help patients have more realistic expectations regarding the supramalleolar osteotomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series study, Level IV.

Additional mesenchymal stem cell injection improves the outcomes of marrow stimulation combined with supramalleolar osteotomy in varus ankle osteoarthritis: short-term clinical results with second-look arthroscopic evaluation

Background

Supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) is reported to be an effective treatment for varus ankle osteoarthritis by redistributing the load line within the ankle joint. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been proposed as a new treatment option for osteoarthritis on the basis of their cartilage regeneration ability. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical, radiological, and second-look arthroscopic outcomes between MSC injection with marrow stimulation and marrow stimulation alone in patients with varus ankle osteoarthritis who have undergone SMO.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 62 patients (64 ankles) with varus ankle osteoarthritis underwent second-look arthroscopy at a mean of 12.8 months after arthroscopic marrow stimulation combined with SMO; 33 ankles were subjected to marrow stimulation alone (group I), and 31 were subjected to marrow stimulation with MSC injection (group II). Clinical outcome measures included a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Radiological outcome variables included the tibial–ankle surface (TAS), talar tilt (TT), and tibial–lateral surface (TLS) angles. In second-look arthroscopy, cartilage regeneration was evaluated using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade.

Results

The mean VAS score improved significantly from 7.2 ± 1.0 to 4.7 ± 1.4 in group I and from 7.3 ± 0.8 to 3.7 ± 1.5 in group II at the final follow-up (P < 0.001 for both groups). The mean AOFAS score also improved significantly from 61.7 ± 5.8 to 80.9 ± 6.7 in group I and from 60.6 ± 6.1 to 85.2 ± 5.1 in group II at the final follow-up (P < 0.001 for both groups). There were significant differences in the mean VAS and AOFAS scores between groups at the final follow-up (P = 0.002 and 0.010, respectively). At second-look arthroscopy, there were significant differences in ICRS grades between groups(P = 0.015 for medial aspect of the talar dome, P = 0.044 for medial aspect of the tibial plafond, and P = 0.005 for articular surface of the medial malleolus). ICRS grades were significantly correlated with clinical outcomes in both groups (all P < 0.05). Mean TAS, TT, and TLS angles improved significantly after SMO in both groups but were not significantly correlated with clinical outcomes or ICRS grade (all n.s.).

Conclusions

The clinical and second-look arthroscopic outcomes of MSC injection with marrow stimulation were better compared to those of marrow stimulation alone in patients with varus ankle osteoarthritis who have undergone SMO. Furthermore, the ICRS grade is significantly correlated with clinical outcome.

Efficacy of multimodal drug injection after supramalleolar osteotomy for varus ankle osteoarthritis: A prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of postoperative pain is important to ensure patient comfort and functional improvement. Despite the frequent use of multimodal drug injection for pain control after orthopedic surgery, few studies have evaluated its use after supramalleolar osteotomy.

METHODS

Supramalleolar osteotomy was performed in 62 patients (65 ankles). Thirty patients (31 ankles) were randomly assigned to receive multimodal drug injection (injection group) and 32 patients (34 ankles) were assigned to receive no multimodal drug injection (control group). The two groups were compared with regard to the degree of postoperative pain, the number of times patients pushed the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) button, the total amount of fentanyl administered, and the frequency of additional diclofenac sodium injections.

RESULTS

The injection group had significant pain reduction during the first 36 postoperative hours compared to the control group. There were significant differences between the groups in the number of times that patients pushed the PCA button as well as the total amount of fentanyl administered up to 24 h postoperatively. The mean frequency of additional diclofenac sodium injections in the first 12 postoperative hours was significantly less in the injection group compared to that in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal drug injection was effective in reducing pain and decreasing both fentanyl and diclofenac sodium usage in patients undergoing supramalleolar osteotomy. Therefore, multimodal drug injection should be considered for improved pain control and patient comfort in the early postoperative period after supramalleolar osteotomy.

Supramalleolar Osteotomies for Posttraumatic Malalignment of the Distal Tibia

Supramalleolar osteotomies of the tibia (SMOT) for posttraumatic distal tibial malalignment has shown to reduce pain, improve function and radiographic signs of osteoarthritis, and delay ankle arthrodesis or total joint replacement. The procedure also protects the articular cartilage from further degenerative processes by shifting and redistributing loads in the ankle joint. It is technically demanding and requires extensive preoperative planning. The type of osteotomy (opening vs closing wedge) does not influence the final outcome. However, based on the limited evidence, a grade I treatment recommendation has been given for supramalleolar osteotomies of the tibia to treat mild to moderate ankle arthritis in the presence of distal tibial malalignment.

Cartilage lesions and ankle osteoarthrosis: review of the literature and treatment algorithm

The main etiology of ankle osteoarthrosis is post-traumatic and its prevalence is highest among young individuals. Thus, this disease has a great socioeconomic impact and gives rise to significant losses of patients’ quality of life. The objective of its treatment is to eliminate pain and keep patients active. Therefore, the treatment should be staged according to the degree of degenerative evolution, etiology, joint location, systemic condition, bone quality, lower-limb alignment, ligament stability and age. The treatment algorithm is divided into non-surgical therapeutic methods and options for surgical treatment. Joint preservation, joint replacement and arthrodesis surgical procedures have precise indications. This article presents a review on this topic and a proposal for a treatment algorithm for this disease.

Supramalleolar Osteotomy: Indications and Surgical Techniques

Supramalleolar osteotomies are a surgical treatment option for asymmetric varus or valgus ankle arthritis where at least 50% of the joint surface is spared. Procedure selection requires significant preoperative planning for appropriate execution. Thus, the surgeon must be familiar with the principles of deformity correction. With appropriate patient selection and proper preoperative planning, the procedure has been shown to yield excellent results, redistributing forces more evenly across the ankle joint by restoring the mechanical axis of the lower leg with minimal complications.

Distal Tibial Osteotomy without Fibular Osteotomy for Medial Ankle Arthritis with Mortise Widening

Introduction

A patient with medial ankle osteoarthritis and a widened ankle mortise can be treated successfully with an oblique distal tibial osteotomy, without fibular osteotomy, to narrow the mortise and shift the weight-bearing axis to a more normal position.

Step 1: Patient Positioning and Preoperative Assessment

With the patient under spinal or general anesthesia, check for mortise widening with a valgus stress test.

Step 2: Surgical Approach

Expose the ankle joint through an anterior approach.

Step 3: Corrective Osteotomy

Perform an oblique osteotomy of the distal part of the tibia and narrow the widened mortise by shifting the osteotomized fragment.

Step 4: Fixation and Bone-Grafting

Stabilize the osteotomy site with a locking plate and apply bone graft to the osteotomy site.

Step 5: Closure

Close the soft tissue in layers.

Results

Eighteen patients (fifteen female and three male; mean age, fifty-seven years) with symptomatic medial ankle osteoarthritis and mortise widening underwent distal tibial oblique osteotomy without fibular osteotomy between 2008 and 2011.

Indications

Contraindications

Pitfalls & Challenges

Weight-bearing-line analysis in supramalleolar osteotomy for varus-type osteoarthritis of the ankle

BACKGROUND

We determined the preoperative and postoperative passing points of the mechanical axis of the lower limb at the level of the tibial plafond using a new method involving a full-length standing posteroanterior radiograph that includes the calcaneus (a hip-to-calcaneus radiograph) and correlated them to the clinical results after supramalleolar osteotomy for ankle osteoarthritis.

METHODS

We reviewed the hip-to-calcaneus radiographs of fifty lower limbs of forty-one patients treated for lower limb malalignment at our institution. The mechanical axis point of the ankle was the point at which the mechanical axis divides the coronal length of the plafond, expressed as a percentage. Four independent observers performed all measurements twice. Supramalleolar tibial osteotomy was performed in twenty-seven ankles (twenty-four patients) to treat moderate varus-type osteoarthritis of the ankle. The mean follow-up period was 2.8 years (range, two to 5.3 years). Clinical assessment was based on the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale.

RESULTS

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in identifying the mechanical ankle joint axis point were very high. The mean postoperative mechanical axis point was 50% (range, 13% to 70%) in ankles for which the preoperative point was ≤0%, whereas the mean postoperative point was 81% (range, 48% to 113%) in ankles for which the preoperative point was >0%. The mean change in AOFAS score was significantly less for patients with a preoperative point of ≤0% than for those with a preoperative point of >0% (p=0.004). Improvement was significantly greater in ankles with a postoperative mechanical ankle joint axis point of ≥80% than in ankles with a postoperative mechanical ankle joint axis point of <60% (p=0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

Traditional tibial correction resulted in great variation in the locations of the postoperative mechanical ankle joint axis point. In ankles with the preoperative point more medial than the tibial plafond, the point was insufficiently moved to the lateral side, and the clinical outcomes were less satisfactory.

Single-stage supramalleolar osteotomy for coronal plane deformity

A variety of surgical procedures are utilized for management of ankle osteoarthritis. The most common etiology in patients with ankle osteoarthritis is post-traumatic often resulting in asymmetric ankle osteoarthritis with concomitant valgus or varus deformity. A substantial part of tibiotalar joint is often preserved, therefore, in appropriate patients, joint-preserving surgery holds the potential to be a superior treatment option than joint-sacrificing procedures including total ankle replacement or ankle arthrodesis. This review is designed to describe indications and contraindications for single-stage supramalleolar realignment surgery. Complications associated with this type of surgery and postoperative outcome are highlighted using recent literature.

Supramalleolar Osteotomy With Bone Marrow Stimulation for Varus Ankle Osteoarthritis: Clinical Results and Second-Look Arthroscopic Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO), which redistributes the load line within the ankle joint, has been reported as an effective treatment for varus ankle osteoarthritis. However, no study has examined cartilage regeneration in the medial compartment of the ankle after SMO.

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of SMO and to identify the association between the outcomes of SMO and cartilage regeneration evaluated by second-look arthroscopy. The hypothesis was that cartilage regeneration would be an important predictor of the outcomes of SMO and that arthroscopic marrow stimulation would aid in cartilage regeneration.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A total of 31 ankles were retrospectively evaluated after arthroscopic marrow stimulation with SMO for varus ankle osteoarthritis; second-look arthroscopy was conducted for all these ankles. Clinical outcome measures included a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Radiological outcome variables included the tibial-ankle surface angle (TAS), talar tilt (TT), and tibial-lateral surface angle (TLS), and progression of degenerative arthritis of the ankle was assessed. In the second-look arthroscopy, cartilage regeneration was evaluated using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation VAS and AOFAS scores were 7.1 ± 0.8 and 62.9 ± 4.0 preoperatively, and they significantly improved to 3.4 ± 1.3 and 83.1 ± 7.5, respectively (P < .001, for both) at the time of the second-look arthroscopy (mean, 13.2 months postoperatively). However, at final follow-up (mean, 27.4 months postoperatively), they were significantly decreased to 4.1 ± 1.6 and 79.9 ± 8.0, respectively, compared with the values at second-look arthroscopy (P < .001, for both). The mean TAS, TT, and TLS improved significantly after SMO but showed no significant correlation with the clinical outcomes and ICRS grade (P > .05 for all three). At second-look arthroscopy, the ICRS overall repair grades were normal in 1 (3%), nearly normal in 7 (23%), abnormal in 13 (42%), and severely abnormal in 10 (32%). Progressive degenerative arthritis was observed in 13 cases (42%). The ICRS grade was significantly associated with the clinical outcomes (P < .0001) and development of degenerative arthritis of the ankle joint (P = .002).

CONCLUSION

This study showed improved clinical outcomes after SMO for varus ankle osteoarthritis in comparison to the preoperative assessments. Furthermore, the ICRS grade was significantly associated with the clinical outcomes of SMO at final follow-up and significantly associated with the development of degenerative arthritis of the ankle joint. Therefore, arthroscopic marrow stimulation should be considered with SMO to ensure adequate cartilage regeneration. However, given the ICRS grades observed at the time of the second-look arthroscopies and the progression of degenerative arthritis in 42%, the long-term prognosis in this group of patients is uncertain.

Supramalleolar osteotomies for degenerative joint disease of the ankle joint: indication, technique and results

Patients with varus or valgus hindfoot deformities usually present with asymmetric ankle osteoarthritis. In-vitro biomechanical studies have shown that varus or valgus hindfoot deformity may lead to altered load distribution in the tibiotalar joint which may result in medial (varus) or lateral (valgus) tibiotalar joint degeneration in the short or medium term. The treatment of asymmetric ankle osteoarthritis remains challenging, because more than half of the tibiotalar joint surface is usually preserved. Therefore, joint-sacrificing procedures like total ankle replacement or ankle arthrodesis may not be the most appropriate treatment options. The shortand midterm results following realignment surgery, are very promising with substantial pain relief and functional improvement observed post-operatively. In this review article we describe the indications, surgical techniques, and results from of realignment surgery of the ankle joint in the current literature.

Biomechanics of asymmetric ankle osteoarthritis and its joint-preserving surgery

More than half of the patients with ankle osteoarthritis have a malalignment of the hindfoot. These patients might benefit from joint-preserving realignment surgery. This article provides an overview of the effects of asymmetric ankle osteoarthritis on the patients' biomechanical and neuromuscular gait patterns in comparison to data from healthy subjects. Furthermore, data from gait analyses after joint-preserving realignment surgery are presented that give an indication of the biomechanical and neuromuscular adaptations to supramalleolar osteotomies.

Ankle osteoarthritis: etiology, diagnostics, and classification

Osteoarthritis (OA) is defined as the syndrome of joint pain and dysfunction caused by substantial joint degeneration. In general, OA is the most common joint disease and is one of the most frequent and symptomatic health problems for middle-aged and older people: OA disables more than 10% of people who are older than 60 years. This article reviews the etiology of ankle OA, and describes the onset and development of posttraumatic ankle OA, the most common form of OA in the tibiotalar joint. Various methods of clinical and radiographic assessment are described in detail.

Ankle joint pressure changes in a pes cavovarus model: supramalleolar valgus osteotomy versus lateralizing calcaneal osteotomy

BACKGROUND

A fixed cavovarus foot deformity can be associated with anteromedial ankle arthrosis due to elevated medial joint contact stresses. Supramalleolar valgus osteotomies (SMOT) and lateralizing calcaneal osteotomies (LCOT) are commonly used to treat symptoms by redistributing joint contact forces. In a cavovarus model, the effects of SMOT and LCOT on the lateralization of the center of force (COF) and reduction of the peak pressure in the ankle joint were compared.

METHODS

A previously published cavovarus model with fixed hindfoot varus was simulated in 10 cadaver specimens. Closing wedge supramalleolar valgus osteotomies 3 cm above the ankle joint level (6 and 11 degrees) and lateral sliding calcaneal osteotomies (5 and 10 mm displacement) were analyzed at 300 N axial static load (half body weight). The COF migration and peak pressure decrease in the ankle were recorded using high-resolution TekScan pressure sensors.

RESULTS

A significant lateral COF shift was observed for each osteotomy: 2.1 mm for the 6 degrees (P = .014) and 2.3 mm for the 11 degrees SMOT (P = .010). The 5 mm LCOT led to a lateral shift of 2.0 mm (P = .042) and the 10 mm LCOT to a shift of 3.0 mm (P = .006). Comparing the different osteotomies among themselves no significant differences were recorded. No significant anteroposterior COF shift was seen. A significant peak pressure reduction was recorded for each osteotomy: The SMOT led to a reduction of 29% (P = .033) for the 6 degrees and 47% (P = .003) for the 11 degrees osteotomy, and the LCOT to a reduction of 41% (P = .003) for the 5 mm and 49% (P = .002) for the 10 mm osteotomy. Similar to the COF lateralization no significant differences between the osteotomies were seen.

CONCLUSION

LCOT and SMOT significantly reduced anteromedial ankle joint contact stresses in this cavovarus model. The unloading effects of both osteotomies were equivalent. More correction did not lead to significantly more lateralization of the COF or more reduction of peak pressure but a trend was seen.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In patients with fixed cavovarus feet, both SMOT and LCOT provided equally good redistribution of elevated ankle joint contact forces. Increasing the amount of displacement did not seem to equally improve the joint pressures. The site of osteotomy could therefore be chosen on the basis of surgeon's preference, simplicity, or local factors in case of more complex reconstructions.

Joint-preserving surgery of asymmetric ankle osteoarthritis with peritalar instability

A varus or valgus talar tilt that increases under weight-bearing is commonly seen in osteoarthritic ankles. Loss of peritalar stability may be the underlying cause for the talus shifting and rotating on the calcaneonavicular surfaces, as given by applied forces. The instability pattern and the resulting deformity can be assessed and classified using weight-bearing conventional radiographs. Appropriate osseous balancing may be the most appropriate treatment to restore a regular position of talus within the ankle mortise. In cases with severe peritalar instability, subtalar fusion may be advised. Soft tissue reconstruction may be needed to achieve physiologic balance of the hindfoot complex.