The association between pan-immune-inflammation value and survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Could Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value be a Marker for the Diagnosis of Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon?

Inflammation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of the coronary slow flow phenomenon (CSFP). The newly developed inflammatory marker, pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. This study investigated the predictive value of PIV for diagnosing CSFP in comparison to other inflammation-based markers. A total of 214 patients, 109 in the CSFP group and 105 in the normal coronary flow (NCF) group, were retrospectively included in the study. Coronary flow was calculated using the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame count method. In addition to PIV, other inflammatory markers such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were calculated for the patients. The average age of patients was 50.3 ± 8.4, with a male ratio of 55.1%. Compared to the NCF group, patients in the CSFP group had higher levels of hyperlipidemia, glucose, triglyceride, NLR, PLR, SII, and PIV, while their high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), was lower (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that HDL-C, glucose, triglyceride, and PIV were independent predictor factors for CSFP (p < 0.05). PIV is a strong and independent predictor factor for CSFP and superior in predicting CSFP compared to other inflammatory markers.

Development and internal validation of a nomogram based on peripheral blood inflammatory markers for predicting prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory markers, including the product of neutrophil count, platelet count, and monocyte count divided by lymphocyte count (PIV) and the platelet-to-white blood cell ratio (PWR), have not been previously reported as prognostic factors in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. In order to predict overall survival (OS) in NPC patients, our goal was to create and internally evaluate a nomogram based on inflammatory markers (PIV, PWR).

METHODS

A retrospective study was done on patients who received an NPC diagnosis between January 2015 and December 2018. After identifying independent prognostic indicators linked to OS using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, we created a nomogram with the factors we had chosen.

RESULTS

A total of 630 NPC patients in all were split into training (n = 441) and validation sets (n = 189) after being enrolled in a population-based study in 2015-2018 and monitored for a median of 5.9 years. In the training set, the age, PIV, and PWR, selected as independent predictors for OS via multivariate Cox's regression model, were chosen to develop a nomogram. Both training and validation cohorts had C-indices of 0.850 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.768-0.849) and 0.851 (95% CI: 0.765-0.877). Furthermore, compared with traditional TNM staging, our nomogram demonstrated greater accuracy in predicting patient outcomes. The risk stratification model derived from our prediction model may facilitate personalized treatment strategies for NPC patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings confirmed the prognostic significance of the PWR and PIV in NPC. High PIV levels (>363.47) and low PWR (≤36.42) values are associated with worse OS in NPC patients.

Host-related indexes in head and neck cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Peripheral blood host-related indexes have been widely studied in cancer patients. Several authors have shown the prognostic capacity of these indexes in head and neck cancer. Therefore, there has been an increasing interest in this topic recently.

RECENT FINDINGS

The main variables analyzed and used to create these host-related indexes are peripheral blood leukocytes - including neutrophils, monocytes and lymphocytes - albumin and hemoglobin levels. Other factors with proven prognostic capacity in some studies are: platelets, C-reactive protein, and BMI. Among all the combined indexes, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio has been the most accepted and used worldwide. Nonetheless, there are other indexes which group multiple of these factors that have shown better prognostic capacity, and are promising in the near future.

SUMMARY

Host-related indexes are ideal biomarkers to be used on our daily-basis. There is enough evidence to start considering them when assessing patients with head and neck cancer.

Prognostic capacity of PIV (pan-immune-inflammation value) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), an index that results from the following ratio: (neutrophils × monocytes × platelets)/lymphocytes, has been proposed as a prognostic biomarker in different tumour models. The aim of this study is to analyse the prognostic capacity of PIV in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 1187 patients with HNSCC treated at our centre between 2000-2017. PIV value was obtained from an analysis performed within 3 weeks prior to the start of treatment.

RESULTS

PIV value was significantly associated with toxic consumption (0.001), tumour location (0.0001), tumour extension (0.0001), and histological grade (0.016). Four categories were defined based on PIV value using a recursive partitioning analysis: category I: PIV < 136.3 (n = 118, 9.9%), category II: PIV 136.3-451.1 (n = 594, 50.0%), category III: PIV 451.1-1,141.2 (n = 357, 30.1%), and category IV: PIV > 1141.2 (n = 118, 9.9%). A significant and ordered decrease in disease-specific survival was observed as the PIV category increased. This decrease in survival was independent of the type of treatment, tumour extension, or location of the primary tumour. The PIV category was and independent prognostic factor of disease-specific survival in a multivariable study.

CONCLUSIONS

PIV is a prognostic biomarker in patients with HNSCC.

Association between pan-immune-inflammation value and coronary slow flow phenomenon in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries

INTRODUCTION

Coronary slow flow phenomenon (CSFP) is characterized by the delayed contrast filling of terminal vessels of coronary arteries in the presence of normal or nearly normal epicardial coronary arteries. Given that inflammation plays a role in cardiovascular disorders, including CSFP, using peripheral blood-derived compound prognostic indexes could be a feasible way to predict the presence of CSFP. Therefore, in the present study, we evaluated the association between pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) and the CSFP.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study was composed of 612 patients aged over 18 years who underwent CAG for suspected stable ischemic heart disease. The association of clinical and laboratory parameters with the CSFP was evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 54 (IQR 46-63) and 61.3% of the patients were male. The 12.6% (84/612) of the patients had CSFP, while the coronary flow was normal in the remaining 87.4% of patients. The PIV levels had moderate success for the prediction of the CSFP (AUC: 0.675, 95% CI: 0.615-0.735, p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, male gender (OR: 4.858, 95% CI: 2.851-8.277, p < 0.001), presence of diabetes (OR: 2.672, 95% CI: 1.396-5.113, p = 0.003), lower HDL-C values (OR: 2.120, 95% CI: 1.286-3.496, p = 0.003), and higher PIV levels (OR: 2.527, 95% CI: 1.519-4.203, p < 0.001) were associated with a higher risk of CSFP.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that a higher risk of CSFP in patients with PIV levels. If supported by prospective evidence, PIV levels could be used as a minimally invasive reflector of CSFP.

Prognostic significance of pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

Background

Blood-based immune-inflammation indexes have been widely used to predict survival in a variety of cancers. In this research, we seeked to evaluate a novel immune-inflammation marker, named the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) undergoing definitive radiotherapy.

Methods

A group of 377 patients with NPC was retrospectived analyzed. Clinical data and laboratory data were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed in order to determine the optimal PIV cut-off value. Survival curves were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic variables were identified using a Cox regression model. Additionally, we developed a nomogram and assessed its acuracy using the concordance index (C-index) and a calibration curve.

Results

The optimal PIV cut-off value was 146.24 according to ROC analysis. High PIV was related to poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score (p = 0.017), more advanced T (p＜0.001) and clinical stages (p = 0.024). In univariate analysis, older Age, poorer ECOG PS, higher Epstein-Barr virus DNA (EBV-DNA), advanced T, N and clinical stage, and higher PIV levels were related to patients' poorer overall survival (OS). Poorer ECOG PS, higher EBV-DNA, later T stage, later clinical stage, and higher PIV were associated with patients' poorer progression free survival (PFS). Male sex and later T stage were associated with patients' poorer locoregional recurrence free survival (LRRFS). Poorer ECOG PS, higher EBV-DNA, later T stage, later clinical stage, and higher PIV were associated with patients' poorer distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that PIV was an independent prognostic index for OS (HR 2.231, 95 % CI 1.241-4.011, P = 0.007), PFS (HR 1.664, 95 % CI 1.003-2.760, P = 0.049), and DMFS(HR 2.081, 95 % CI 1.071-4.044, P = 0.031). Nomogram C-indexes for the nomogram of OS were 0.684, and PFS were 0.62, respectively. Survival predictions and actual survival were consistent according to the calibration curve.

Conclusions

Pre-treatment PIV is a promising biomarker for predicting survival in patients with NPC.

Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value Is Independently Correlated to Impaired Coronary Flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Immune-inflammatory biomarkers have been shown to be correlated with impaired coronary flow (ICF) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. In this study, we assessed the relation between a novel comprehensive biomarker, pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), and ICF after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A total of 687 patients who underwent pPCI between 2019 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Blood samples were collected at admission. PIV and other inflammation parameters were compared. PIV was calculated as (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. Postprocedural coronary flow was assessed by thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) classification. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a group with ICF defined as postprocedural TIMI 0 to 2 and a group with normal coronary flow defined as postprocedural TIMI flow grade of 3. The mean age was 61 ± 12 years, and 22.4% of the patients were women. Compared with the normal coronary flow group (median 492, interquartile range 275 to 931), the ICF group (median 1,540, interquartile range 834 to 2,909) showed significantly increased PIV (p <0.001). The optimal cutoff for the PIV was 804, as determined by receiver operating characteristic curve. The incidence of ICF was 17.0% in all patients, 6.4% in low-PIV group (<804), and 34.2% in high-PIV group (≥804). Multivariate analyses revealed that a baseline PIV ≥804 was independently associated with post-pPCI ICF (odds ratio 5.226, p <0.001). PIV was superior to neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio in determining ICF. In conclusion, a high-PIV was significantly associated with an increased risk of ICF after pPCI. Moreover, PIV was a better indicator of ICF than were other inflammatory markers.

The prognostic importance of the pan-immune-inflammation value in patients with septic shock

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), a novel biomarker combining neutrophil platelet, monocyte, and lymphocyte counts, some of the most widespread indicators of systemic inflammation, can predict mortality and prognosis in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with septic shock.

METHOD

This prospective study was performed with 82 patients aged 18 or over admitted to a tertiary ICU with diagnoses of septic shock. Patients with hematological disease and neutropenia were excluded. PIV was calculated with the formula [neutrophil count (103/μL) × platelet count (103/μL) × monocyte count (103/μL)]/lymphocyte count (103/μL).

RESULTS

Median age, presence of hypertension, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) levels, and neutrophil, monocyte, and platelet counts were lower in the low-PIV group than in the high-PIV group (p < 0.05). The highest area under ROC curve (AUC) was determined for Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (0.94 (0.89 - 0.99)), followed by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (0.81 (0.70 - 0.91)), APACHE II (0.80 (0.69 - 0.91)) and lactate (0.77 (0.67 - 0.88)). Median survival was longer in the low-PIV group than in the high-PIV group (28 (15.25 - 40.76) vs 16 (9.46 - 22.55) days, respectively, p < 0.05). The univariate Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model showed that high PIV (HR = 2.13 (1.03-4.38)), low GCS (HR = 3.31 (1.34 - 8.15)), high SOFA (HR = 9.41 (2.86 - 30.95)), high APACHE II (HR = 3.08 (1.47 - 6.45)), high lactate (HR = 6.56 (2.73 - 15.75)), and high procalcitonin (PCT) (HR = 2.73 (1.11 - 6.69)) values were associated with a decreased survival time among ICU patients (p < 0.05). The multivariate CPH model showed the age-adjusted risk estimates for these six laboratory parameters. High lactate (HR = 7.97 (2.19 - 29.08)) and high SOFA scores (HR = 4.85 (1.22 - 19.32)) were significantly associated with shorter survival in ICU patients (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this research suggest that PIV could predict the longer survival in patients with septic shock. Despite PIV score's capability to show inflammation, it is not significantly associated with mortality in the multivariate analysis.

A Novel Prognostic Model Using Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value and Programmed Death Ligand 1 in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding the prognostication of the Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC).

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of PIV in patients with R/M HNSCC receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed to have R/M HNSCC and treated with ICI were reviewed retrospectively. The cutoff value of PIV was set at the median. Patients were stratified into high PIV and low PIV. Kaplan-Meier curves were estimated for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 192 patients were included in our study for oncologic outcomes evaluation. For the total population, the median PFS was 5.5 months and OS was 18.2 months. After stratification by PIV, median PFS was 11.7 months in the low PIV and 2.8 months in the high PIV groups (p < 0.001). The median OS was 21.8 months in the low PIV and 11.5 months in the high PIV groups (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that PIV and PD-L1 were independent predictors associated with survival. A prognostic model using both PIV and PD-L1 was constructed. The median PFS was 12.2, 6.4, and 3.0 months for patients with risk scores of 0, 1, and 2, respectively (p < 0.001). The median OS was 23.7, 18.1, and 11.4 months for patients with risk scores of 0, 1, and 2, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PIV is a prognostic biomarker in patients with R/M HNSCC treated with ICI. A prognostic model using PIV and PD-L1 could provide outcome prediction and risk stratification.

Prognostic significance of the pretreatment pan-immune-inflammation value in cancer patients: an updated meta-analysis of 30 studies

Background

The pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) has been reported as a promising prognostic biomarker in multiple cancers but still remains inconclusive. The objective of this study is to systematically investigate the association of the pretreatment PIV with survival outcomes in cancer patients, based on available literature.

Methods

Online databases including PubMed, Embase and the Web of Science were thoroughly searched for studies evaluating the prognostic role of the pretreatment PIV in cancers from the inception to June 2023. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were always assessed using a random-effects model. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12.0.

Results

Thirty studies were finally included after comprehensively study searching. In total, 8,799 cancer patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that patients in the high PIV group had a significantly poorer overall survival (HR = 2.07; 95%CI: 1.77-2.41; I2 = 73.0%) and progression-free survival (HR = 1.83; 95%CI: 1.37-2.45; I2 = 98.2%) than patients in the low PIV group. The prognostic significance of the PIV score on overall survival and progression-free survival was observed across various geographical regions, tumor stages and treatment strategies. Sensitivity analyses supported the stability of the above combined results.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrated that the pretreatment PIV could be a non-invasive and efficacious prognostic biomarker for cancer patients.

Role of sarcopenia on survival and treatment-related toxicity in head and neck cancer: a narrative review of current evidence and future perspectives

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to provide an up-to-date summary of sarcopenia and its clinical implications for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS

We conducted a literature review of recent studies investigating the prevalence of sarcopenia in HNC patients, its detection using MRI or CT scans, and its association with clinical outcomes such as disease-free and overall survival time, radiotherapy-related side effects, cisplatin toxicity, and surgical complications.

RESULTS

Sarcopenia, characterized by low skeletal muscle mass (SMM), is a prevalent condition in HNC patients and can be effectively detected using routine MRI or CT scans. Low SMM in HNC patients is associated with increased risks of shorter disease-free and overall survival times, as well as radiotherapy-related side effects such as mucositis, dysphagia, and xerostomia. In addition, cisplatin toxicity is more severe in HNC patients with low SMM, leading to higher dose-limiting toxicity and treatment interruptions. Low SMM may also predict higher risks of surgical complications in head and neck surgery. Identifying sarcopenic patients can aid physicians in better riskstratifying HNC patients for therapeutic or nutritional interventions to improve clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia is a significant concern for HNC patients and can impact their clinical outcomes. Routine MRI or CT scans can effectively detect low SMM in HNC patients. Identifying sarcopenic patients can aid physicians in better risk-stratifying HNC patients for therapeutic or nutritional interventions to improve clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to explore the potential of interventions to mitigate the negative effects of sarcopenia in HNC patients.