Amelioration of cognitive and biochemical impairment in Aβ-based rodent model of Alzheimer's disease following fractionated X-irradiation

Radiation Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Pathophysiological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD) include extracellular amyloid plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles. Recent studies also demonstrated a role of neuroinflammation in the progression of the disease. Clinical trials and animal studies using low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) have shown therapeutic potential for AD. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence on the use of LDRT for the treatment of AD, outlines potential mechanisms of action, and discusses current challenges in the planning of future trials.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic review of human and animal studies as well as registered clinical trials describing outcomes for RT in the treatment of AD was conducted. We followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles published until July 1, 2023, were included.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 993 articles. After the removal of duplicates and ineligible publications, a total of 16 (12 animal, 4 human) studies were included. Various dose regimens were utilized in both animal and human trials. The results revealed that LDRT reduced the number of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, and it has a role in the regulation of genes and protein expression involved in the pathological progression of AD. LDRT has demonstrated reduced astro- and microgliosis, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects, and an alleviation of symptoms of cognitive deficits in animal models. Most studies in humans suggested improvements in cognition and behavior. None of the trials or studies described significant (>grade 2) toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Preclinical studies, animal studies, and early clinical trials in humans have shown a promising role for LDRT in the treatment of AD pathologies, although the underlying mechanisms are yet to be fully explored. Phase I/II/III trials are needed to assess the long-term safety, efficacy, and optimal treatment parameters of LDRT in AD treatment.

Alzheimer's disease and low-dose radiation therapy: A new hope

The concept of low-dose radiation (LDR)-induced hormetic responses was initially observed approximately 70 years ago and systematically reviewed along with the discovery of LDR-induced adaptive responses in a cytogenetic in vitro study in 1980s. By the end of the 1990s, discussions regarding the potential applications of LDR-induced hormesis and adaptive responses for preventing or treating chronic diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) had taken place. Until 2016, reports on radiotherapy for the subjects with AD and for genetic AD model mice were published. Subsequently, several preclinical studies with animal models of AD and clinical studies in AD subjects were conducted. A significant milestone was achieved with the online availability of a new Systematic Review based on qualified publications from these preclinical and clinical studies. This mini-review provides a concise historical introduction to LDR-induced hormesis and adaptive responses with discussion of AD radiotherapy with either LDR or relatively high dose radiation. Highlights of this Systematic Review cover promising outcomes, challenges, and new questions, followed by discussion of potential mechanisms.

Low-Dose Whole Brain Radiation Therapy for Alzheimer's Dementia: Results From a Pilot Trial in Humans

PURPOSE

We report neurocognitive, imaging, ophthalmologic, and safety outcomes following low-dose whole brain radiation therapy (LD-WBRT) for patients with early Alzheimer dementia (eAD) treated in a pilot trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Trial-enrolled patients were at least 55 years of age, had eAD meeting NINCDS-ADRDA (National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association) Alzheimer's Criteria with confirmatory fluorodeoxyglucose and florbetapir positron emission tomography findings; had the capacity to complete neurocognitive function, psychological function, and quality-of-life assessments; had a Rosen modified Hachinski score ≤4; and had estimated survival >12 months.

RESULTS

Five patients were treated with LD-WBRT (2 Gy × 5 over 1 week; 3 female; mean age, 73.2 years [range, 69-77]). Four of 5 patients had improved (n = 3) or stable (n = 1) Mini-Mental State Examination (second edition) T-scores at 1 year. The posttreatment scores of all 3 patients who improved increased to the average range. There were additional findings of stability of naming and other cognitive skills as well as stability to possible improvement in imaging findings. No safety issues were encountered. The only side effect was temporary epilation with satisfactory hair regrowth.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results from 5 patients with eAD treated with LD-WBRT (10 Gy in 5 fractions) demonstrate a positive safety profile and provide preliminary, hypothesis-generating data to suggest that this treatment stabilizes or improves cognition. These findings will require further evaluation in larger, definitive, randomized trials.