One-trocar appendectomy

Easily Applicable Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using Straightforward Instrumental Alignment and Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic appendectomy is one of the most frequently performed operations. As such, single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) is indicated as a feasible and safe procedure comparable to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA). However, novice surgeons face challenges in performing SILA, because the role of the surgeon's hands is reversed. We introduce an easily applicable technique of SILA by adapting the alignment of CLA.

METHODS

A series of 61 consecutive patients underwent SILA between January 2019 and December 2019 by 4 surgeons at Bundang CHA Medical Center. Acute appendicitis was diagnosed preoperatively by abdomino-pelvis computed tomography or ultrasonography. During the operation, a 3-channel Glove port was used with conventional laparoscopic instruments.

RESULTS

The study participants consisted of 32 males and 29 females, with a mean age of 26.8 years (range, 4 to 66 y). The mean body mass index was 20.79 kg/m2 (range, 11.89 to 27.04 kg/m2). The mean operation time was 37.5±17.0 minutes. There was only 1 case of conversion with 1 additional port. Eight patients (13.1%) experienced postoperative complications defined by Dindo-Clavien-Strasberg classification: grade 1 wound complication in 7 patients and grade 2 postoperative bowel obstruction in 1 patient. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.5±1.3 days.

CONCLUSION

Alignment of the instruments during CLA was successfully implemented into a SILA. Our new, easily applicable SILA technique will decrease the learning curve for novice surgeons in performing single-incision laparoscopic surgery.

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe procedure for beginners to perform: experience from 1948 cases

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SIL-A) has recently become an option for treating appendicitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and surgical outcomes of SIL-A by residents and surgeons during the learning period.

METHODS

A total of 1948 consecutive patients who underwent SIL-A from May 2008 to November 2014 were studied retrospectively. Surgeries were performed by residents and eight surgeons. Prior to the first case, surgeons and residents had been trained in a training protocol during the learning period. Three initial cases of SIL-A were performed under the supervision of experienced surgeons. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (learning period, n = 483), the first 40 cases by each surgeon and resident; and group 2 (experienced period, n = 1465), cases after the 40th procedure performed by each surgeon. Surgical results were compared between the two groups by performing propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in patient demographics and characteristics of appendicitis between the two groups. The operating time was longer in group 1 than in group 2 (45.3 ± 18.0 vs. 33.9 ± 16.1 min, p < 0.001). The morbidity rate (7.0% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.795) was similar between the two groups. Readmission rate (2.1% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.414) and reoperation rate (0.8% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.348) were also similar between the two groups. However, the rate of incisional hernia occurrence (0.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.066) tended to be larger in group 1 than in group 2 without showing a significant difference.

CONCLUSION

SIL-A is a technically feasible and safe procedure when it is performed by residents and surgeons during learning period under an appropriate training protocol. However, residents and surgeons in the learning period should perform it carefully to prevent incisional hernias.

Safety and feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy as a training procedure for surgical residents

Background:

Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SPLA) is one of the most commonly performed single-port surgeries worldwide. This study aimed to determine whether the performance of SPLA by residents without sufficient experience as operators of conventional LA (CLA) is safe and feasible.

Patients and Methods:

Records of patients who underwent LA between March 2017 and February 2018 at a hospital in Korea were retrospectively analysed. Patients aged <18 years or >80 years were excluded from the study. SPLA and CLA were performed by two 2^nd-year residents (junior group) and three 3^rd-year residents (senior group). Demographic data, perioperative variables and surgical outcomes were compared.

Results:

During the study period, 154 patients underwent LA (104 SPLA and 50 CLA) performed by surgical residents. No differences were found between the SPLA and CLA groups in demographic data or perioperative variables, except for the drain insertion rate. The SPLA group had significantly shorter mean operation times than did the CLA group. No significant difference was observed between the junior and senior groups in the mean operation time for LA. Perioperative outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Fewer women underwent SPLA performed by 2^nd-year residents compared with SPLA performed by 3^rd-year residents. However, there were no differences in other general characteristics or perioperative outcomes.

Conclusions:

SPLA was safe and feasible when performed by junior residents. Surgical residents with sufficient experience as assistants during laparoscopic appendectomies could perform SPLA safely. Furthermore, SPLA could serve as a teaching procedure for surgical residents.

A Comparative Study on the Transareola Single-Site Versus Three-Port Endoscopic Thyroidectomy

OBJECTIVE

To explore the feasibility, safety, and advantages of transareola single-site endoscopic thyroidectomy.

METHODS

From January 2014 to December 2015, 40 patients were randomly divided into an observation group who received single-site endoscopic thyroidectomy by the areola approach and a control group who underwent three-port endoscopic thyroidectomy by the areola approach with 20 patients in each group. The feasibility and safety of the operation and postoperative clinical outcomes were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization time (P > .05) between the two groups. The subcutaneous dissection area in the observation group (130 [120-130] cm²) was significantly smaller than that in the control group (180 [170-190] cm²) (P < .01). In addition, there is much less postoperative drainage in the observation group (70 [50-80] mL) than in the control group (80 [60-100] mL) (P = .036). Furthermore, 24-hour postoperative pain score in the observation group (4.0 [3.0-5.5]) was significantly lower compared with that in the control group (5.0 [4.0-7.0]) (P = .047). Moreover, patients in the observation group present with significantly higher 7-day postoperative cosmetic satisfaction scores (9.0 [8.0-9.0]) than those in the control group (7.0 [7.0-8.0]) (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Transareola single-site endoscopic thyroidectomy exhibits superior advantages in clinical outcomes such as causing less pain and achieving better cosmetic satisfaction, compared with three-port endoscopic thyroidectomy.

The role of single-incision laparoscopic surgery in abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to determine the role of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in abdominal and pelvic operations.

DATA SOURCES

The Medline, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases were systematically searched until October 2009 using "single-incision laparoscopic surgery" and related terms as keywords. References from retrieved articles were reviewed to broaden the search

STUDY SELECTION

The study included case reports, case series, and empirical studies that reported SILS in abdominal and pelvic operations.

DATA EXTRACTION

Number of patients, type of instruments, operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, length of hospital stay, length of follow-up evaluation, and complications were extracted from the reviewed items

DATA SYNTHESIS

The review included 102 studies classified as level 4 evidence. Most of these studies investigated SILS in cholecystectomy (n=34), appendectomy (n=24), and nephrectomy (n=17). For these procedures, operative time, hospital stay, and complications were comparable with those of conventional laparoscopy. Conversion to conventional laparoscopy was seldom performed in cholecystectomy (range, 0-24%) and more frequent in appendectomy (range, 0-41%) and nephrectomy (range, 0-33%).

CONCLUSION

The potential benefits of SILS include superior cosmesis and possibly shorter operative time, lower costs, and a shortened time to full physical recovery. Careful case selection and a low threshold of conversion to conventional laparoscopic surgery are essential. Multicenter, randomized, prospective studies are needed to compare short- and long-term outcome measures against those of conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Efetividade e segurança da apendicectomia videoassistida em porta única transumbilical em adolescentes e adultos

OBJETIVO: Aplicar o método apendicectomia videoassistida em porta única transumbilical (AVATU) e avaliar a sua efetividade e a sua segurança. MÉTODO: A AVATU visa combinar os benefícios do acesso laparoscópico com a segurança e simplicidade da remoção do apêndice pela técnica convencional. Analisou-se, retrospectivamente, 300 adolescentes e adultos, com diagnóstico pressuposto de apendicite aguda, nos quais indicou-se a AVATU como abordagem inicial, entre junho de 2001 e junho de 2006. A exeqüibilidade do procedimento no tratamento da apendicite aguda em todos os seus estágios de evolução, tempo operatório e a necessidade de conversão para apendicectomia convencional ou laparoscópica, foram os parâmetros utilizados para avaliação da efetividade do método. A segurança foi avaliada pela incidência de complicações transoperatórias, pós-operatórias e mortalidade. RESULTADOS: Houve necessidade de conversão para a via convencional ou laparoscópica em 9% dos casos. As principais causas de conversão foram aderências inflamatórias locais densas e apendicite aguda nas suas formas mais avançadas. A incidência de complicações pós-operatórias foi de 6,6%, incluindo 1,3% de abscesso intra-abdominal e 2,0% de infecção de sítio cirúrgico. Não ocorreram óbitos. O resultado histopatológico confirmou 11,7% de apendicite em estágio avançado. CONCLUSÃO: A AVATU mostrou-se exeqüível, efetiva e segura. Os resultados deste estudo e os atrativos da técnica, podem avalizar a recomendação do método na abordagem inicial de pacientes adolescentes e adultos, com suspeita de apendicite aguda.