Preoperative predictors of beyond endoscopic submucosal dissection indication or lymphovascular invasion in endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on endoscopic submucosal dissection for the management of early esophageal and gastric cancers: methodology and review of evidence

This document from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) provides a full description of the methodology used in the review of the evidence used to inform the final guidance outlined in the accompanying Summary and Recommendations document regarding the role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the management of early esophageal and gastric cancers. This guideline used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework and specifically addresses the role of ESD versus EMR and/or surgery, where applicable, for the management of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and their corresponding precursor lesions. For ESCC, the ASGE suggests ESD over EMR for patients with early-stage, well-differentiated, nonulcerated cancer >15 mm, whereas in patients with similar lesions ≤15 mm, the ASGE suggests either ESD or EMR. The ASGE suggests against surgery for such patients with ESCC, whenever possible. For EAC, the ASGE suggests ESD over EMR for patients with early-stage, well-differentiated, nonulcerated cancer >20 mm, whereas in patients with similar lesions measuring ≤20 mm, the ASGE suggests either ESD or EMR. For GAC, the ASGE suggests ESD over EMR for patients with early-stage, well or moderately differentiated, nonulcerated intestinal type cancer measuring 20 to 30 mm, whereas for patients with similar lesions <20 mm, the ASGE suggests either ESD or EMR. The ASGE suggests against surgery for patients with such lesions measuring ≤30 mm, whereas for lesions that are poorly differentiated, regardless of size, the ASGE suggests surgical evaluation over endosic approaches.

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on endoscopic submucosal dissection for the management of early esophageal and gastric cancers: summary and recommendations

This clinical practice guideline from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) provides an evidence-based summary and recommendations regarding the role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the management of early esophageal and gastric cancers. It is accompanied by the document subtitled "Methodology and Review of Evidence," which provides a detailed account of the methodology used for the evidence review. This guideline was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework and specifically addresses the role of ESD versus EMR and/or surgery, where applicable, for the management of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and their corresponding precursor lesions. For ESCC, the ASGE suggests ESD over EMR for patients with early-stage, well-differentiated, nonulcerated cancer >15 mm, whereas in patients with similar lesions ≤15 mm, the ASGE suggests either ESD or EMR. The ASGE suggests against surgery for such patients with ESCC, whenever possible. For EAC, the ASGE suggests ESD over EMR for patients with early-stage, well-differentiated, nonulcerated cancer >20 mm, whereas in patients with similar lesions measuring ≤20 mm, the ASGE suggests either ESD or EMR. For GAC, the ASGE suggests ESD over EMR for patients with early-stage, well- or moderately differentiated, nonulcerated intestinal type cancer measuring 20 to 30 mm, whereas for patients with similar lesions <20 mm, the ASGE suggests either ESD or EMR. The ASGE suggests against surgery for patients with such lesions measuring ≤30 mm, whereas for lesions that are poorly differentiated, regardless of size, we suggest surgical evaluation over endoscopic approaches.

The C-Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Large Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after transcatheter chemoembolization (TACE).

METHODS

Totally, 958 HCC patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B were incorporated into the secondary analysis. X-Tile software was applied to determine the optimal cutoff point for CAR, and the total patients were divided into two groups. Cox proportional hazard regression models and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate the relationship between CAR and overall survival (OS). Stratified analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic role of CAR in subgroups of major confounding factors, such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), diameter of the main tumor, Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) and modified GPS (mGPS).

RESULTS

The optimal cutoff level for the CAR was 0.06. There was a direct correlation between an elevated CAR (≥ 0.06) and shorter OS after adjustment (HR:1.580; 95%CI:1.193-2.092). Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test showed a significant difference in OS curves between the two groups (P < 0.001). CAR showed the distinct value of prognostic stratification in most subgroups, especially in the subgroup of GPS-0 (HR:1.966; 95%CI:1.453-2.660), mGPS-0 (HR:1.984; 95%CI:1.509-2.608) and AFP ≤ 400 ng/ml (HR:1.925; 95%CI:1.393-2.659).

CONCLUSION

The CAR was one of the prognostic factors for HCC patients undergoing TACE treatment. CAR could also provide further prognostic stratification for HCC patients who appear to have a good prognosis, such as patients with AFP-negative, GPS-0 or mGPS-0 to identify patients at a higher risk of death for closer follow-up or more aggressive treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, Cohort Study.

Regional Lymph Node Dissection as an Additional Treatment Option to Endoscopic Resection for Expanded Indications in Gastric Cancer: a Prospective Cohort Study

Purpose

Expanded indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in early gastric cancer (EGC) remain controversial due to the potential risk of undertreatment after adequate lymph node dissection (LND). Regional LND (RLND) is a novel technique used for limited lymphadenectomy to avoid gastrectomy. This study established the safety and effectiveness of RNLD as an additional treatment option after ESD for expanded indications.

Materials and Methods

A total of 69 patients who met the expanded indications for ESD were prospectively enrolled from 2014 to 2017. The tumors were localized using intraoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) before RLND. All patients underwent RLND first, followed by conventional radical gastrectomy with LND. The locations of the preoperative and intraoperative EGD were compared. Pathologic findings of the primary lesion and the RLND status were analyzed.

Results

The concordance rates of tumor location between the preoperative and intraoperative EGD were 79.7%, 76.8%, and 63.8% according to the longitudinal, circumferential, and regional locations, respectively. Of the 4 patients (5.7%) with metastatic LNs, 3 were pathologically classified as beyond the expanded indication for ESD and 1 had a single LN metastasis in the regional lymph node.

Conclusions

RLND is a safe additional option for the treatment of EGC in patients meeting expanded indications after ESD.

Histological Differentiated/Undifferentiated Mixed Type Should Not Be Considered as a Non-Curative Factor of Endoscopic Resection for Patients With Early Gastric Cancer

Background

Histological differentiated/undifferentiated mixed-type adenocarcinomas are frequently found in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). Yet it is unclear whether these mixed-type adenocarcinomas can be treated by endoscopic resection (ER) in EGC patients.

Aims

To evaluate the lymph node metastasis (LNM) rate and long-term outcomes in mixed-type EGC patients and assess the feasibility of ER in these patients.

Methods

Clinicopathological features, risk factors of LNM, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates of EGC patients were analyzed according to different histological types.

Results

Patients with mixed-type EGC had higher LNM rates than patients with non-mixed-type EGC (11.4 vs. 6.2%, P = 0.044). In the multivariate analysis, larger tumor diameter, presence of an ulcer, submucosal invasion, histological undifferentiated type, histological mixed type, and lymphovascular invasion resulted as independent risk factors for LNM in EGC patients (all P < 0.05). The LNM rate in mixed-type patients who met the Japanese ER criteria was 3.3%, including fulfilling the absolute criteria 0%. The 5-year OS and PFS rates in mixed-type patients were 94.59 and 91.47%, respectively. There was no statistical significance in the OS (P = 0.870) and PFS (P = 0.705) between mixed-type and non-mixed-type EGC patients fulfilling the Japanese ER criteria.

Conclusion

Histological differentiated/undifferentiated mixed type in EGC patients meeting the Japanese absolute criteria for ER are associated with low risk of LNM and favorable prognosis, and thus, it should not be considered as a non-curative factor for ER.

Characteristics of proximal early gastric cancer differentiating distal early gastric cancer

Previous studies reported substantial differences between proximal and distal gastric cancer, however, most of the cases included in these studies were advanced gastric cancers (AGCs). The aim of this study was to investigate the unique characteristics of proximal early gastric cancer (EGC) by comparing with distal EGC. From March 2007 to March 2016, proximal and distal EGC patients who underwent endoscopic or surgical resection at our institution were matched 1:3 according to age and sex. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and histopathological information. A total of 368 patients were enrolled including 92 (25%) in the proximal and 276 (75%) in the distal group. The proportion of patients who underwent surgery (56.5 vs. 20.3%, p<0.001), undifferentiated type (38.0 vs. 19.6%, p<0.001), tumor size (29.5 ±19.4 vs. 20.3 ±16.8 mm, p<0.001) and submucosal (SM) invasion (60.9 vs. 25.7%, p<0.001) were significantly higher in the proximal group than in the distal group. In multivariate analysis, the proximal location of EGC was a significant risk factor for SM invasion in the total population (odds ratio [OR], 3.541; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.053–6.110; p<0.001), and in subgroup with EGC < 30mm (n = 279) (OR, 5.940; 95% CI, 2.974–11.862; p<0.001). In conclusion, careful therapeutic decision of proximal EGC is essential due to the different histopathological characteristics such as large tumor size and higher potential for SM invasion.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions on the proximal location between remnant and entire stomach

BACKGROUND

Tumors located on the proximal stomach are associated with a longer procedure time and lower en-block resection of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Additionally, it is more difficult to perform ESD for lesions after distal gastrectomy because of the narrow inner space. We aimed to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of ESD for lesions on the remnant stomach compared with those on the upper third of the entire stomach.

METHODS

A total of 135 patients with a neoplasm located on the proximal stomach who received ESD between Aug 2008 and Dec 2016 were enrolled. We retrospectively reviewed en-bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, and complication rate according to whether distal gastrectomy was performed. Clinical outcomes were compared among the 1:2 propensity-matched groups.

RESULTS

Between the remnant stomach and entire stomach, the en-bloc [92% (23/25) and 92.0% (46/50), respectively; P = 1.000] and complete resection [84% (21/25) and 88.0 (44/50), respectively; P = 0.723] rates were not significantly different. In patients with lesions that indicated ESD, there was no significant difference in en-bloc and complete resection rates. In a multivariable analysis, submucosal fibrosis [odds ratio (OR) 5.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-30.7] and submucosa invasive cancer (OR 10.1, 95% CI 1.4-74.3) were independent risk factors for incomplete resection.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD is a feasible therapeutic option for lesions located on the proximal stomach regardless the operation history of distal gastrectomy. However, the complete resection rate decreases for lesions with submucosal fibrosis or the submucosa invasion.

Prognostic significance of lymphovascular infiltration in overall survival of gastric cancer patients after surgery with curative intent

Objective

Lymphovascular infiltration (LVI) is frequently detected in gastric cancer (GC) specimens. Studies have revealed that GC patients with LVI have a poorer prognosis than those without LVI.

Methods

In total, 1,007 patients with curatively resected GC at Department of Gastric Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the LVI status: a positive group (PG; presence of LVI) and a negative group (NG; absence of LVI). The clinicopathological factors corrected with LVI and prognostic variables were analyzed. Additionally, a pathological lymphovascular-node (lvN) classification system was proposed to evaluate the superiority of its prognostic prediction of GC patients compared with that of the eighth edition of the N staging system.

Results

Two hundred twenty-four patients (22.2%) had LVI. The depth of invasion and lymph node metastasis were independently associated with the presence of LVI. GC patients with LVI demonstrated a significantly lower overall survival (OS) rate than those without LVI (42.8% vs. 68.9%, respectively; P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, LVI was identified as an independent prognostic factor for GC patients (hazard ratio: 1.370; 95% confidence interval: 1.094−1.717; P=0.006). Using strata analysis, significant prognostic differences between the groups were only observed in patients at stage I−IIIa or N0−2. The lvN classification was found to be more appropriate to predict the OS of GC patients after curative surgery than the pN staging system. The −2 log-likelihood of lvN classification (4,746.922) was smaller than the value of pN (4,765.196), and the difference was statistically significant (χ²=18.434, P<0.001).

Conclusions

The presence of LVI influences the OS of GC patients at stage I−IIIa or N0−2. LVI should be incorporated into the pN staging system to enhance the accuracy of the prognostic prediction of GC patients.

The impact of lymphovascular invasion in patients with prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy and its association with their clinicopathological features: An updated PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Numerous studies have shown that lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is linked to biochemical recurrence (BCR) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients following radical prostatectomy (RP). However, the actual clinicopathological impacts of LVI remain unclear. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the pathologic and prognostic impacts of LVI in PCa patients.

METHODS

Following the guidance of the PRISMA statement, relevant studies were collected systematically from the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies published before June 2018. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to investigate the association of LVI with BCR and clinicopathological features.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies including 25,570 patients (106-6678 per study) with PCa were incorporated into this meta-analysis. Overall pooled analysis suggested that LVI was associated with a higher BCR risk both in univariate (pooled HR=1.50, 95% CI: 1.34-1.68, P <.001) and multivariate analyses (pooled HR=1.25, 95% CI: 1.17-1.34, P <.001). In addition, LVI was closely correlated with extraprostatic extension (yes vs no: OR = 4.23, 95% CI: 1.86-9.61, P <.001), pathological GS (≥7 vs <7: OR = 5.46, 95% CI: 2.25-13.27, P <.001), lymph node metastases (yes vs no: OR = 18.56, 95% CI: 7.82-44.06, P <.001), higher pathological stage (≥ T3 vs < T2: OR = 6.75, 95% CI: 5.46-8.36, P <.001), positive surgical margin (positive vs negative: OR = 2.42, 95% CI: 1.57-3.72, P <.001) and seminal vesicle invasion (yes vs no: OR = 5.72, 95% CI: 2.45-13.36, P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that LVI in histopathology is associated with a higher risk of BCR and advanced clinicopathological features in PCa patients and could serve as a poor prognostic factor in patients who underwent RP.