Combined endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid and sublabial transmaxillary approaches for a large infratemporal fossa trigeminal schwannoma

Neurosurgery for the rhinologist

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive anatomical appraisal of the neurosurgical anatomy exposed through the endonasal and paranasal sinuses routes, focusing on the most common expanded endonasal approaches (EEAs) as well as recent advances in this surgical field.

RECENT FINDINGS

The EEAs are redefining the management of skull base pathology. Neurovascular structures previously considered a limitation, can be now approached through these surgical corridors. Advances in this field include the development of new surgical techniques and routes that allow better visualization and access to pathologies located in the ventral skull base. Understanding the surgical anatomy related to EEAs is essential not only for neurosurgeons but also for rhinologists.

SUMMARY

Knowledge of the surgical anatomy of the most common EEAs that utilize paranasal sinuses as a surgical corridor enables more effective management of complex skull base pathologies. Comprehensive anatomical knowledge of these corridors and the surrounding neurovascular structures is crucial to maximize benefits of EEAs and improve outcomes.

Operative management of trigeminal schwannomas: based on a modified classification in a study of 93 cases

BACKGROUND

Advances in microscopic and endoscopic surgical techniques have outpaced traditional classification and transcranial surgical strategies, especially with reference to the treatment of trigeminal schwannomas (TSs). A modified TS classification is proposed and appropriate surgical strategies are discussed.

METHODS

The cases of 93 patients who underwent surgical treatment in Beijing Tiantan Hospital in the previous 6 years were analyzed retrospectively, and a literature review was conducted.

RESULTS

Classification is based on surgical direction. Tumors were classified as follows: type A, backward orientation, located in the orbit or orbit and middle cranial fossa (8 cases, 8.6%); type B, upward orientation, located in the pterygopalatine fossa, infratemporal fossa or pterygopalatine fossa, infratemporal fossa, and middle cranial fossa (23 cases, 24.7%); type C, forward and backward orientations, located in the middle cranial fossa, posterior cranial fossa or both (58 cases, 62.4%); and type D, located in multiple regions (4 cases, 4.3%). 91.40% of patients underwent gross total resection (GTR) with 29 cases receiving endoscopic resection of whom 93.10% (27/29) experienced GTR.

CONCLUSION

The 93 cases were satisfactorily divided into four types, according to tumor location and surgical orientation, enabling safe and effective removal by appropriate surgery.