Malignant intraventricular meningioma: literature review and case report

Single versus multiple reoperations for recurrent intracranial meningiomas

PURPOSE

To identify the risk factors and management of the multiple recurrences and reoperations for intracranial meningiomas.

METHODS

Data of a neurosurgical series of 35 patients reoperated on for recurrent intracranial meningiomas were reviewed. Analyzed factors include patient age and sex, tumor location, extent of resection, WHO grade, Ki67-MIB1 and PR expression at initial diagnosis, time to recurrence; pattern of regrowth, extent of resection, WHO grade and Ki67-MIB1 at first recurrence were also analyzed. All these factors were stratified into two groups based on single (Group A) and multiple reoperations (Group B).

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (69%) belonged to group A and 11 (31%) to group B. The age < 65 years, male sex, incomplete resection at both initial surgery and first reoperation, and multicentric-diffuse pattern of regrowth at first recurrence are risk factors for multiple recurrences and reoperations. In group B, the WHO grade and Ki67-MIB1 increased in further recurrences in 54% and 64%, respectively. The time to recurrence was short in 7 cases (64%), whereas 4 patients (36%) further recurred after many years. Eight patients (73%) are still alive after 7 to 22 years and 2 to 4 reoperations.

CONCLUSION

The extent of resection and the multicentric-diffuse pattern of regrowth at first recurrence are the main risk factors for multiple recurrences and reoperations. Repeated reoperations might be considered even in patients with extensive recurrent tumors before the anaplastic transformation occurs. In such cases, even partial tumor resections followed by radiation therapy may allow long survival in good clinical conditions.

Clinical outcomes after microsurgical resection of giant lateral ventricular meningiomas

Giant lateral ventricular meningiomas (LVMs), with the largest diameter of at least 5 cm, form a distinct subset. The incidence of giant LVMs is considered to be relatively low. Here, we evaluated clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes after microsurgical resection, especially functional outcomes and morbidity of giant LVMs. We retrospectively reviewed 49 patients with LVMs, including 18 giant LVMs from 2012 to 2020. And we analyzed clinical, histopathological, surgical, and outcome data at our institution. Giant LVMs were most commonly present in the fourth decade of patients with the male-to-female ratio of 1:2. The most common subtypes were transitional and fibrous. Most lesions were resected via the temporal or parieto-occipital approach in our series. The median volume of blood loss was higher in the giant group (900 vs. 600 ml, p = 0.02). Meanwhile, the median length of hospital stay was prolonged for giant LVMs (20.5 vs. 16.0 days, p < 0.01). The proportion of discharged functional deterioration was higher in giant LVMs (38.9% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.02). However, there was no statistical significance between functional deterioration and tumor size at long-term follow-up (p = 0.28). Giant LVMs patients suffered from neurological and regional complications more commonly, particularly from a postoperative hematoma (4/18 vs. 1/31), and hydrocephalus (2/18 vs. 0/31). Patients with giant LVMs had a high incidence of immediate functional deterioration after microsurgery, and there was no difference in functional deterioration between the giant and non-giant LVMS during long-term follow-up. Microsurgery entails a higher complication rate in giant LVMs. We need to pay special attention to preventing postoperative hematoma and hydrocephalus.

Clinical, Histopathologic and Genetic Features of Rhabdoid Meningiomas

Rhabdoid meningiomas (RM) shows heterogeneous histological findings, and a wide variety of chromosomal copy number alterations (CNA) are associated with an unpredictable course of the disease. In this study, we analyzed a series of 305 RM samples from patients previously reported in the literature and 33 samples from 23 patients studied in our laboratory. Monosomy 22-involving the minimal but most common recurrent region loss of the 22q11.23 chromosomal region was the most observed chromosomal alteration, followed by losses of chromosomes 14, 1, 6, and 19, polysomies of chromosomes 17, 1q, and 20, and gains of 13q14.2, 10p13, and 21q21.2 chromosomal regions. Based on their CNA profile, RM could be classified into two genetic subgroups with distinct clinicopathologic features characterized by the presence of (1) chromosomal losses only and (2) combined losses and gains of several chromosomes. The latter displays a higher frequency of WHO grade 3 tumors and poorer clinical outcomes.

Clinical Implications of the Mitotic Index as a Predictive Factor for Malignant Transformation of Atypical Meningiomas

Objective

Intracranial atypical meningiomas have a poor prognosis and high rates of recurrence. Moreover, up to one-third of the recurrences undergo high-grade transformation into malignant meningiomas. We aimed to investigate the clinical factors that can predict the propensity of malignant transformation from atypical to anaplastic meningiomas.

Methods

Between 2001 and 2018, all patients with atypical meningioma, in whom the tumors had undergone malignant transformation to anaplastic meningioma, were included. The patients' medical records documenting the diagnosis of atypical meningioma prior to malignant transformation were reviewed to identify the predictors of transformation. The control group comprised 56 patients with atypical meningiomas who were first diagnosed between January 2017 and December 2018 and had no malignant transformation.

Results

Nine patients in whom the atypical meningiomas underwent malignant transformation were included. The median time interval from diagnosis of atypical meningioma to malignant transformation was 19 months (range, 7-78). The study group showed a significant difference in heterogeneous enhancement (77.8% vs. 33.9%), bone invasion (55.6% vs. 12.5%), mitotic index (MI; 14.8±4.9 vs. 3.5±3.9), and Ki-67 index (20.7±13.9 vs. 9.5±7.1) compared with the control group. In multivariate analysis, increased MI (odds ratio, 1.436; 95% confidence interval, 1.127-1.900; p=0.004) was the only significant factor for predicting malignant transformation.

Conclusion

An increased MI within atypical meningiomas might be used as a predictor of malignant transformation. Tumors at high risk for malignant transformation might require more attentive surveillance and management than other atypical meningiomas.