Is microductectomy still necessary to diagnose breast cancer: a 10-year study on the effectiveness of duct excision and galactography

A Second Ductoscopy Procedure in Patients with Recurrent and Persistent Pathological Nipple Discharge

Background

Most patients suffering from pathological nipple discharge (PND) undergo local surgical procedures because standard radiological imaging often fails to reveal the cause. Ductoscopy is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique that enables direct intraductal visualization and can avoid unnecessary diagnostic surgical procedures. Hence, patients with recurrent or persistent PND after an unsuccessful ductoscopy procedure still undergo unnecessary surgery. This study describes the experience of a second ductoscopy procedure in patients with recurrent or persistent PND without suspicious radiological findings.

Methods

Patients with recurrent or persistent PND who underwent two ductoscopy procedures between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The second ductoscopy was performed when the first ductoscopic attempt was unsuccessful due to technical problems. The primary outcome was the number of preventable surgical procedures.

Results

A total of 17 patients underwent two ductoscopy procedures. The first ductoscopy showed a polypoid lesion in 10 patients (58.8%), no abnormalities in 3 patients (17.6%), and in 4 patients (23.5%), it was not possible to visualize the ductal tree. Post-procedure, all patients suffered from PND. After two ductoscopic attempts, PND stopped in 10 patients (58.8%), and 7 patients (41.2%) still suffered from PND and were operated on. Pathology of the resection specimens showed no abnormalities in 1 patient, a papilloma in 5 patients, and ductal carcinoma in situ in 1 patient.

Conclusion

A second ductoscopy procedure can be considered in the diagnostic work-up of patients suffering from persistent or recurrent PND after an unsuccessful first ductoscopic attempt to avoid unnecessary surgery in about 59% of the cases.

Role of duct excision surgery in the treatment of pathological nipple discharge and detection of breast carcinoma: systematic review

BACKGROUND

The role of duct excision surgery is not clearly defined in patients with pathological nipple discharge without other clinical and radiological abnormalities. The primary aim of this systematic review was to determine the malignancy rate in patients with pathological nipple discharge after duct excision surgery (microdochectomy/major duct excision). The secondary aims were to determine the recurrence rate of pathological nipple discharge after surgery and to assess breast cancer development after surgery.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception to March 2023, using search terms related to 'nipple discharge', 'nipple fluid', 'microdochectomy', 'duct excision', and 'minimally invasive surgical procedure'. Studies reporting data about women who underwent duct excision surgery for pathological nipple discharge without clinical and radiological suspicion of breast cancer, as well as reporting data on women diagnosed with breast cancer after duct excision surgery, were included.

RESULTS

A total of 318 titles were identified, of which nine publications were included in the analysis. This resulted in 1108 patients with pathological nipple discharge who underwent a duct excision. The weighted mean rate of malignancy after duct excision surgery was 8.1 per cent (ranging from 2.3 to 13.5 per cent). Three studies described the recurrence rate of pathological nipple discharge (ranging from 0 to 12 per cent) and two studies reported breast cancer development in the follow-up in a total of three patients (less than 1 per cent).

CONCLUSION

The malignancy rate after duct excision surgery for pathological nipple discharge was low in patients with pathological nipple discharge without radiological and clinical abnormalities and approximately 9 of 10 patients undergo surgery for a benign cause. Improvement of the diagnostic and therapeutic workup is needed to prevent patients from undergoing (unnecessary) exploratory surgery.

Could ductoscopy alleviate the need of microdochectomy in pathological nipple discharge?

BACKGROUND

Microdochectomy is the gold-standard for definitive diagnosis for pathological nipple discharge (PND); however, problem of over-treating exists since majority of PND are self-limiting and due to benign causes. Ductoscopy may assist diagnosis, and triage patients for intervention or expectant management. This study aimed to evaluate if ductoscopy could reduce unnecessary microdochectomy but not compromising the diagnosis of malignancy.

METHOD

A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted in consecutive patients of PND without a suspected malignancy on routine diagnostic evaluation. Ductoscopy was performed with attempts to remove intraductal lesions if they were found. Microdochectomy was carried out if there were positive intraductal lesions, but failed endoscopic extraction, or failed ductoscopy and persistent PND. Efficacy of ductoscopy was determined by cannulation success rate, number of avoided surgery and number of missed malignancy.

RESULTS

In a 3-year period between 2016 and 2018, a total of 223 ductoscopy were performed and 94.2% had successful cannulation. Within such, 59.5% (N = 125) had intraductal mass identified, and 82 microdochectomy were carried out. The final histology showed 15 malignancy, making the overall malignancy rate 6.7%. Ductoscopy successful and negative patients (N = 85, 37.8%) were triaged for surveillance and the malignancy rate is 0% in a median follow-up of 2 years; hence, microdochectomy was avoided.

CONCLUSION

PND with non-suspicious conventional imaging and negative ductoscopy have rare malignancy rate which makes subsequent microdochectomy unnecessary. However, intraductal mass in ductoscopy is a predictor for malignancy so definitive histology diagnosis is mandatory.