What mediates the racial/ethnic disparity in psychosocial stress among breast cancer patients?

Depression and Anxiety Among English- and Spanish-Speaking Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

An estimated 30% and 40% of patients with breast cancer experience depression and anxiety, respectively. However, distress experienced by patients with breast cancer receiving radiation therapy may vary among patients and vary at different time points. This study sought to describe the changes in levels of depression and anxiety experienced by English- and Spanish-speaking patients throughout a course of radiation therapy for breast cancer, along with the effect of different variables to better understand potential gaps.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligibility criteria included English- and Spanish-speaking females, aged 18 or older, undergoing radiation therapy treatment for breast cancer at 2 institutions. Pre- and posttreatment surveys were completed before and after delivery of radiation therapy. Sociodemographic characteristics collected included race, ethnicity, marital status, education level, longest residency location, religion, housing, and food insecurity. The survey ended with the standardized PHQ-4 questionnaire to assess anxiety and depression. Results were analyzed using the analysis of covariance procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 160 participants completed pre- and posttreatment surveys, with an initial response rate of 100% (169 patients), though 9 were lost to follow-up. Most of the participants were nonwhite (50%), primarily married (42.5%), and had a high school or associate's level education (46.9%). The total baseline distress mean (BDM) was 2.96 and the final distress mean was 2.78. English-speaking patients comprised 82.5% (n = 132) of the sample and had a BDM of 2.91 with an adjusted change mean decrease of 0.45. Spanish-speaking patients comprised 17.5% (n = 28) of the sample, with a baseline distress mean of 3.21 and an adjusted change mean increase of 1.03 (P = .002). Housing (P = .017) and food insecurity (P = .0002) also showed increasing distress with increased insecurity at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who speak Spanish, identify as Hispanic, or are experiencing food and housing insecurity are at an increased risk for depression and anxiety, and could benefit from more support during their course of radiation therapy to minimize distress.

Psychometric validation of the 15-item Patient Health Questionnaire - Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS) to assess psychological distress in breast cancer survivors

OBJECTIVE

Psychological distress persists amongst breast cancer survivors, so reliable assessment of symptoms is essential. The Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS) is a composite measure of depression and anxiety and has been used to measure distress. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PHQ-ADS within breast cancer survivors.

METHOD

Breast cancer survivors (N = 280) were recruited online and followed up at 12-months. Depression (PHQ-8) and anxiety (GAD-7) items formed the composite PHQ-ADS score. Additional measures included: distress thermometer (convergent validity), fear of cancer recurrence and COVID distress (discriminant validity), and self-compassion (predictive validity). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using weighted least squares mean and variance adjusted estimation was undertaken.

RESULTS

One, two, and bifactor models underlying the PHQ-ADS were evaluated. The bifactor model had the most appropriate model fit overall. Omega hierarchical for the general distress factor was 0.914, accounting for 82% of explained variance. This suggests the PHQ-ADS is sufficiently unidimensional to warrant use of a total composite score. The PHQ-ADS demonstrated strong convergent and moderate discriminant validity. Self-compassion was an independent predictor of distress at 12-months.

CONCLUSIONS

The PHQ-ADS is a valid measure for psychological distress in breast cancer survivors prescribed hormone therapy.

Digital Health Psychosocial Intervention in Adult Patients With Cancer and Their Families: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer and their families often experience significant distress and deterioration in their quality of life. Psychosocial interventions were used to address patients' and families' psychosocial needs. Digital technology is increasingly being used to deliver psychosocial interventions to patients with cancer and their families.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to review the characteristics and effectiveness of digital health interventions on psychosocial outcomes in adult patients with cancer and their family members.

METHODS

Databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental studies that tested the effects of a digital intervention on psychosocial outcomes. The Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal checklists for RCTs and quasi-experimental studies were used to assess quality. Standardized mean differences (ie, Hedges g) were calculated to compare intervention effectiveness. Subgroup analysis was planned to examine the effect of delivery mode, duration of the intervention, type of control, and dosage on outcomes using a random-effects modeling approach.

RESULTS

A total of 65 studies involving 10,361 patients (mean 159, SD 166; range 9-803 patients per study) and 1045 caregivers or partners (mean 16, SD 54; range 9-244 caregivers or partners per study) were included in the systematic review. Of these, 32 studies were included in a meta-analysis of the effects of digital health interventions on quality of life, anxiety, depression, distress, and self-efficacy. Overall, the RCT studies' general quality was mixed (applicable scores: mean 0.61, SD 0.12; range 0.38-0.91). Quasi-experimental studies were generally of moderate to high quality (applicable scores: mean 0.75, SD 0.08; range 0.63-0.89). Psychoeducation and cognitive-behavioral strategies were commonly used. More than half (n=38, 59%) did not identify a conceptual or theoretical framework. Most interventions were delivered through the internet (n=40, 62%). The median number of intervention sessions was 6 (range 1-56). The frequency of the intervention was highly variable, with self-paced (n=26, 40%) being the most common. The median duration was 8 weeks. The meta-analysis results showed that digital psychosocial interventions were effective in improving patients' quality of life with a small effect size (Hedges g=0.05, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.10; I2=42.7%; P=.01). The interventions effectively reduced anxiety and depression symptoms in patients, as shown by moderate effect sizes on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale total scores (Hedges g=-0.72, 95% CI -1.89 to 0.46; I2=97.6%; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the effectiveness of digital health interventions on quality of life, anxiety, and depression in patients. Future research with a clear description of the methodology to enhance the ability to perform meta-analysis is needed. Moreover, this study provides preliminary evidence to support the integration of existing digital health psychosocial interventions in clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020189698; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=189698.

Satisfaction with Care and Attention to Age-Specific Concerns by Race and Ethnicity in a National Sample of Young Women with Breast Cancer

Purpose: In light of disparities in breast cancer care and outcomes, we explored whether attention to fertility, genetic, and emotional health concerns, as well as satisfaction with care, differs by race/ethnicity among young breast cancer patients. Methods: The Young and Strong Study was a cluster randomized trial of an intervention for patients and providers at 54 U.S. oncology practices enrolling women diagnosed with breast cancer at ≤45 years of age. Provider attention to fertility, genetics, and emotional health was evaluated by medical record review. The proportions of patients with attention to these concerns were compared by race/ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black [NHB], Asian, non-Hispanic White [NHW], or multiracial/other). Satisfaction with care was assessed with the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18 (PSQ-18) at 3 months, with median scores for each of 7 PSQ-18 subscales (general satisfaction, interpersonal manner, communication, financial, time spent with doctor, accessibility, and technical quality) compared by race/ethnicity. Results: Among 465 patients, median age at diagnosis was 40; 6% were Hispanic, 11% NHB, 4% were Asian, 75% NHW, and 3% multiracial/other. Provider attention to genetics, emotional health, and fertility did not differ by race/ethnicity. Median PSQ-18 scores did not differ by race/ethnicity, with median subscale scores ranging from 3.0 to 4.5 across groups, indicating high levels of satisfaction. Conclusion: Satisfaction with care and provider attention to age-specific concerns were similar across racial/ethnic groups among young patients enrolled in an educational and supportive care intervention study. These data suggest that high-quality, equitable care is feasible. Further care delivery research is warranted in more diverse patient and practice settings. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT01647607.

Race, ethnicity, and experienced racism are associated with adverse physical and mental health outcomes among cancer survivors

INTRODUCTION

Survivors of cancer are at risk for adverse mental and physical health outcomes. It is not well understood, however, how these outcomes are differentially experienced according to an individual's exposure to racism. This study sought to evaluate associations of race/ethnicity, and experiences of racism, with adverse health outcomes in survivors of cancer.

METHODS

Using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System database, data from 48,200 survivors between 2014 and 2020 were evaluated. Survey items included negative physical and emotional symptoms as a result of race-based treatment. Outcomes of interest included days of poor mental and physical health, activity limitations, depression, and inadequate sleep. Associations using prevalence ratios were evaluated.

RESULTS

All historically marginalized racial/ethnic groups were more likely to experience at least one adverse health outcome compared with non-Hispanic White survivors. Those who physically experienced racism were 2.1 (95% CI, 1.64-2.69) times as likely to report poor physical health, 3.51 (95% CI, 2.61-4.71) times as likely to report poor mental health, 2.14 (95% CI, 1.77-2.58) times as likely to report inadequate sleep, 2.33 (95% CI: 1.91-2.83) times as likely to report depression, and 1.42 (95% CI, 1.04-1.93) times as likely to report activity limitations compared with those who have not experienced racism. Similar associations were observed for emotionally experienced racism.

DISCUSSION

Racial inequities in health outcomes for survivors of cancer from marginalized racial/ethnic groups are well-established. Experienced racism contributes to adverse health outcomes and widens these disparities. Improving outcomes for survivors of cancer may require screening for experienced racism.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Survivors of cancer from marginalized racial/ethnic populations are more likely to have poor mental and physical health than their non-Hispanic White counterparts. Whether survivors from certain racial/ethnic populations of smaller size also have poorer health is less well understood. Generally, individuals who report experienced racism also report poor health, this association has not been studied in survivors of cancer. This study, from a national survey of survivors of cancer, describes disparities in health outcomes experienced by a variety of racial and ethnic populations. Our findings suggest racism is associated with poor mental and physical health in survivors of cancer.

Perceived negative consequences of cancer and psychological distress in survivors: the moderating role of social support

PURPOSE

Many cancer survivors experience psychological distress at some point during their care. The degree to which individuals perceive negative consequences of cancer has been associated with psychological distress, including anxiety and depression. Identifying psychosocial factors that buffer the effects of illness perceptions on distress may provide a target for intervention to improve the psychological health of cancer survivors. As such, the present study aimed to examine whether social support moderates the relationship between perceived negative consequences of cancer and psychological distress.

METHODS

The current longitudinal study of 413 cancer survivors (64% female, 58% breast cancer, Mage = 59.68, SD = 11.41) examined social support as a potential moderator of the relationship, hypothesizing that greater overall perceived social support would buffer the relationship between perceived negative consequences of cancer and subsequent symptoms of anxiety and depression.

RESULTS

Perceived negative consequences of cancer predicted anxiety and depression over time (p < .05), but social support had a buffering effect on the perceived negative consequences of cancer-anxiety relationship (β =  - .20, p < .001) as well as the perceived negative consequences of cancer-depression relationship (β =  - .11, p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that social support is a protective factor over time against the pathway of illness perceptions leading to psychological distress among cancer survivors.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Interventions that improve social support in cancer survivors may attenuate psychological distress and help support these individuals in their survivorship journey.

Racial/Ethnic Disparity in the Relationship of Mental and Physical Health With Colorectal Cancer Screening Utilization Among Breast and Prostate Cancer Survivors

PURPOSE

We examined colorectal cancer (CRC) screening utilization among non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black (NHB), non-Hispanic other (NHO)/Hispanic cancer survivors. We also determined whether experiencing poor physical and/or mental health affects CRC screening utilization in breast and prostate cancers across different racial/ethnic groups.

METHODS

Data from years 2016, 2018, and 2020 of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System on 3,023 eligible treatment-utilizing cancer survivors with complete treatment were used. We performed descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression to examine the mentioned association.

RESULTS

Among 3,023 eligible survivors, 67.7% of NHO/Hispanic survivors demonstrated lower CRC screening use compared with non-Hispanic White (82%) and NHB (89%) survivors (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, having frequent (14-30 days) poor mental health was associated with lower odds of receiving CRC screening among NHB (odds ratio [OR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.95) and NHO/Hispanic (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.81) survivors. Similar results in physical health were also found in NHB (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.91) and NHO/Hispanic (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.91) groups. Among those experienced both frequent poor mental and physical health, NHB/NHO/Hispanic were less likely to be screened for CRC (OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.10).

CONCLUSION

NHO/Hispanic survivors demonstrated lower CRC screening use. Frequent poor mental and/or physical health was strongly associated with lower CRC screening use among NHB and NHO/Hispanic survivors. Our study suggests that cancer survivorship care considering mental and physical health status may improve adherence to CRC screening recommendation (for secondary cancer prevention) for NHB, NHO, and Hispanic survivors.

Financial toxicity in cancer care: origins, impact, and solutions

Financial toxicity describes the financial burden and distress that can arise for patients, and their family members, as a result of cancer treatment. It includes direct out-of-pocket costs for treatment and indirect costs such as travel, time, and changes to employment that can increase the burden of cancer. While high costs of cancer care have threatened the sustainability of access to care for decades, it is only in the past 10 years that the term "financial toxicity" has been popularized to recognize that the financial burdens of care can be just as important as the physical toxicities traditionally associated with cancer therapy. The past decade has seen a rapid growth in research identifying the prevalence and impact of financial toxicity. Research is now beginning to focus on innovations in screening and care delivery that can mitigate this risk. There is a need to determine the optimal strategy for clinicians and cancer centers to address costs of care in order to minimize financial toxicity, promote access to high value care, and reduce health disparities. We review the evolution of concerns over costs of cancer care, the impact of financial burdens on patients, methods to screen for financial toxicity, proposed solutions, and priorities for future research to identify and address costs that threaten the health and quality of life for many patients with cancer.

Cardio-Oncology Health Disparities: Social Determinants of Health and Care for Black Breast Cancer Survivors

BACKGROUND

Black women experience higher rates of cardiotoxicity and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related comorbidities than White women. These racial and ethnic disparities are primarily from the earlier onset of CVD risk factors, social determinants of health (SDOH), and cardiotoxicity screening and surveillance disparities.

OBJECTIVES

This article discusses the role of SDOH in cardio-oncology and strategies to prevent and detect adverse cardiovascular outcomes among Black breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

Preliminary case study findings are presented, including treatment exposures to cardiotoxicity and SDOH in cardio-oncology influencing health outcomes in Black breast cancer survivors.

FINDINGS

Nurses can address SDOH and racial disparities in cardio-oncology by being mindful of Black breast cancer survivors' increased burden of CVD risk factors, evaluating barriers to receive preventive care and cardio-oncology rehabilitation, practicing cultural humility, and adhering to evidence-based guidelines for behavioral risk management for Black breast cancer survivors.

Determinants of Psychosocial Distress in Breast Cancer Patients at a Safety Net Hospital

INTRODUCTION

Psychosocial distress screening of cancer patients is an American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer mandate for accredited cancer programs. We evaluated psychosocial distress in breast cancer patients to characterize risk factors for high distress scores at a safety net hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The psychosocial distress screening form includes a list of potential issues and a distress score scaled from 1 through 10. Psychosocial distress screening results were retrospectively analyzed, along with patient demographics and clinical data. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was applied to identify predictors for high distress scores, which were defined as a score of 5 and greater.

RESULTS

775 distress screens were completed by 171 breast cancer patients. High distress scores were reported in 21.3%. Patients who had no evidence of disease at time of screening were less likely to report a high distress score compared to those who were newly diagnosed or in active treatment (odds ratio 0.51, 95% CI, 0.38-0.68, P< .0001). Patients with high distress scores were more likely to report concerns with insurance (29.1% vs. 7.6%, P< .0001), transportation (16.4% vs. 4.6%, P< .0001), housing (15.2% vs 2.1%, P< .0001), sadness/depression (63.6% vs. 14.1, P< .0001), and physical issues (89.1% vs. 52.8%, P< .0001).

CONCLUSION

Status of cancer at time of screening, particularly newly diagnosed cancer and active treatment of cancer were associated with high distress scores in this patient group. While there should be an emphasis to ensure patients with these risk factors receive psychosocial distress screening, routine periodic screening for all patients should continue to be implemented to ensure quality cancer care.