Pharmacological Interventions of Atypical Antipsychotics Induced Weight Gain in the Pediatric Population: A Systemic Review of Current Evidence

A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study of Topiramate in Manic Adolescents Treated with Olanzapine

Objective: To conduct a pilot study to examine topiramate for the treatment of weight gain associated with olanzapine in manic adolescents with bipolar disorder. Methods: We conducted a 12-week double-blind randomized placebo-controlled pilot study of topiramate (300-400 mg/day) versus placebo in manic youth (ages 10-18 years) with bipolar disorder who were treated with olanzapine (10-20 mg/day). The primary outcome measure was gender- and weight-normed change in body mass index (BMI z-score). Results: Thirty manic adolescents were treated with olanzapine and were randomized to either topiramate (n = 16) or placebo (n = 14). There was a significantly greater increase in BMI z-scores in the placebo group (0.28 standard deviations [SDs]) compared with the topiramate group (0.10 SDs) when analyzed by longitudinal regression (p = 0.049). The placebo group had greater increases in raw BMI and weight (2.25 kg/m² and 6.9 kg, respectively) compared with the topiramate (0.99 kg/m² and 2.9 kg) group (p = 0.011 for BMI, p = 0.016 for weight). The most common adverse events in the topiramate group were headache (n = 7, 44%), gastrointestinal upset (n = 3, 19%), and muscle stiffness (n = 3, 19%). Conclusions: Topiramate may minimize the weight gain associated with olanzapine treatment in adolescents with bipolar disorder. Moreover, topiramate in combination with olanzapine was well tolerated. Larger studies that are adequately powered are necessary to determine the efficacy of topiramate for second-generation antipsychotic-related weight gain. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier number NCT00394095.

Glucose and Lipid Profiles Predict Anthropometric Changes in Drug-Naïve Adolescents Starting Treatment with Risperidone or Sertraline: A Pilot Study

Psychiatric disorders are associated with cardiometabolic diseases, partly due to adverse drug effects with individual risk variabilities. Risperidone and sertraline are widely used for youths. Although they may be exposed to anthropometric changes, few data about this population exist. We evaluated the correlation between several blood parameters and body changes in a very small group of drug-naïve adolescents who had started risperidone or sertraline. We examined weight, waist circumference (WC), WC/height ratio and body mass index (BMI) at baseline (T0) and after at least three months of therapy (T1), and blood glucose and lipid profiles at T0. Here, we show significant increases in several anthropometric parameters in both groups, a negative correlation between HDL and ΔWC in the risperidone group and positive correlations between insulin and ΔBMI and between HOMA-IR and ΔBMI in the sertraline group. Despite the sample size, these results are important because it is difficult to study adolescents who are long-term-compliant with psychotropic drugs. This pilot study supports the importance of future large-scale investigations to understand the metabolic risk profiles of psychotropic drugs, their individual vulnerabilities and their underlying mechanisms. Simultaneous guideline-based psychiatric and metabolic interventions should be part of daily practice.

Are the antidepressant effects of insulin-sensitizing medications related to improvements in metabolic markers?

Insulin-sensitizing medications were originally used in psychiatric practice to treat weight gain and other metabolic side effects that accompany the use of mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, and some antidepressants. However, in recent studies these medications have been shown to cause improvement in depressive symptoms, creating a potential new indication outside of metabolic regulation. However, it is still unclear whether the antidepressant properties of these medications are associated with improvements in metabolic markers. We performed a systematic search of the literature following PRISMA guidelines of studies investigating antidepressant effects of insulin-sensitizing medications. We specifically focused on whether any improvements in depressive symptoms were connected to the improvement of metabolic dysfunction. Majority of the studies included in this review reported significant improvement in depressive symptoms following treatment with insulin-sensitizing medications. Nine out of the fifteen included studies assessed for a correlation between improvement in symptoms and changes in metabolic markers and only two of the nine studies found such association, with effect sizes ranging from R² = 0.26-0.38. The metabolic variables, which correlated with improvements in depressive symptoms included oral glucose tolerance test, fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin following treatment with pioglitazone or metformin. The use of insulin-sensitizing medications has a clear positive impact on depressive symptoms. However, it seems that the symptom improvement may be unrelated to improvement in metabolic markers or weight. It is unclear which additional mechanisms play a role in the observed clinical improvement. Some alternative options include inflammatory, neuroinflammatory changes, improvements in cognitive functioning or brain structure. Future studies of insulin-sensitizing medications should measure metabolic markers and study the links between changes in metabolic markers and changes in depression. Additionally, it is important to use novel outcomes in these studies, such as changes in cognitive functioning and to investigate not only acute, but also prophylactic treatment effects.