Central Nervous System Mechanisms of Nausea in Gastroparesis: An fMRI-Based Case-Control Study

Imaging in Gastroparesis: Exploring Innovative Diagnostic Approaches, Symptoms, and Treatment

Gastroparesis (GP) is a chronic disease characterized by upper gastrointestinal symptoms, primarily nausea and vomiting, and delayed gastric emptying (GE), in the absence of mechanical GI obstruction. The underlying pathophysiology of GP remains unclear, but factors contributing to the condition include vagal nerve dysfunction, impaired gastric fundic accommodation, antral hypomotility, gastric dysrhythmias, and pyloric dysfunction. Currently, gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) is considered the gold standard for GP diagnosis. However, the overall delay in GE weakly correlates with GP symptoms and their severity. Recent research efforts have focused on developing treatments that address the presumed underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of GP, such as pyloric hypertonicity, with Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (G-POEM) one of these procedures. New promising diagnostic tools for gastroparesis include wireless motility capsule (WMC), the 13 carbon-GE breath test, high-resolution electrogastrography, and the Endoluminal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP). Some of these tools assess alterations beyond GE, such as muscular electrical activity and pyloric tone. These modalities have the potential to characterize the pathophysiology of gastroparesis, identifying patients who may benefit from targeted therapies. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge on diagnostic pathways in GP, with a focus on the association between diagnosis, symptoms, and treatment.

Gastroparesis: Myths, Misconceptions, and Management

Gastroparesis (GP), a historically vexing disorder characterized by symptoms of nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, early satiety, and/or bloating, in the setting of an objective delay in gastric emptying, is often difficult to treat and carries a tremendous burden on the quality of patients' lives, as well as the healthcare system in general. Though the etiology of GP has been fairly well defined, much work has been done recently to better understand the pathophysiology of GP, as well as to identify novel effective and safe treatment options. As our understanding of GP has evolved, many myths and misconceptions still abound in this rapidly changing field. The goal of this review is to identify myths and misconceptions regarding the etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of GP, in the context of the latest research findings which have shaped our current understanding of GP. Recognition and dispelling of such myths and misconceptions is critical to moving the field forward and ultimately advancing the clinical management of what will hopefully become a better understood and more manageable disorder in the future.

Neural networks involved in nausea in adult humans: A systematic review

Nausea is a common clinical symptom, poorly managed with anti-emetic drugs. To identify potential brain regions which may be therapeutic targets we systematically reviewed brain imaging in subjects reporting nausea. The systematic review followed PRISMA statements with methodological quality (MINORS) and risk of bias (ROBINS-I) assessed. Irrespective of the nauseagenic stimulus the common (but not only) cortical structures activated were the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the anterior insula (AIns) with some evidence for lateralization (Left-IFG, Right-AIns, Right-ACC). Basal ganglia structures (e.g., putamen) were also consistently activated. Inactivation was rarely reported but occurred mainly in the cerebellum and occipital lobe. During nausea, functional connectivity increased, mainly between the posterior and mid- cingulate cortex. Limitations include, a paucity of studies and stimuli, subject demographics, inconsistent definition and measurement of nausea. Structures implicated in nausea are discussed in the context of knowledge of central pathways for interoception, emotion and autonomic control. Comparisons are made between nausea and other aversive sensations as multimodal aversive conscious experiences.

Children with chronic nausea and orthostatic intolerance have unique brain network organization: A case-control trial

BACKGROUND

Determine whether subjects with chronic nausea and orthostatic intolerance share common alterations in key brain networks associated with central autonomic control: default mode, salience, and central executive networks, and the insula, a key component of the salience network.

METHODS

Ten subjects (ages 12-18 years; 8 females, 2 males) with nausea predominant dyspepsia, orthostatic intolerance, and abnormal head-upright tilt test were consecutively recruited from pediatric gastroenterology clinic. These subjects were compared with healthy controls (n = 8) without GI symptoms or orthostatic intolerance. Resting-state fMRI and brain network modularity analyses were performed. Differences in the default mode, salience, and central executive networks, and insular connectivity were measured.

KEY RESULTS

The community structure of the default mode network and salience network was significantly different between tilt-abnormal children and controls (p = 0.034 and 0.012, respectively), whereas, no group difference was observed in the central executive network (p = 0.48). The default mode network was more consistently "intact," and the consistency of the community structure in the salience network was reduced in tilt-abnormal children, especially in the insula.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Children with chronic nausea and orthostatic intolerance have altered connectivity in the default mode network and salience network/insula, which supports over-monitoring of their body and altered processing of bodily states resulting in interoceptive hyper self-awareness. The connectivity of the salience network would not support optimal regulation of appropriate attention to internal and external stimuli, and the hyper-connected default mode network may result in a persistent self-referential state with feelings of emotion, pain, and anxiety.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Management of Medically Refractory Gastroparesis: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

Delayed gastric emptying on objective testing defines gastroparesis, but symptoms overlap with functional dyspepsia and do not correlate well with gastric emptying delay. This review outlines a strategy for defining, diagnosing, and managing refractory gastroparesis.

METHODS

The Best Practice Advice statements presented here were developed from review of existing literature combined with expert opinion to provide practical advice. Because this was not a systematic review, formal rating of the quality of evidence or strength of recommendations was not performed. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE.

Irritable bowel syndrome in women: Association between decreased insular subregion volumes and gastrointestinal symptoms

•

All insular subregions are smaller in IBS compared to healthy women.

•

Insular volume associates with GI symptoms independent of psychiatric comorbidity.

•

GI symptoms associate with anterior but not posterior insular volume.

•

More nausea associated with smaller dorsal anterior insula bilaterally.

•

Insula in major depression is not significantly smaller than in healthy women.

Objective

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic pain disorder characterized by disturbed interactions between the gut and the brain with depression as a common comorbidity. In both IBS and depression, structural brain alterations of the insular cortices, key structures for pain processing and interoception, have been demonstrated but the specificity of these findings remains unclear. We compared the gray matter volume (GMV) of insular cortex (IC) subregions in IBS women and healthy controls (HC) and examined relations to gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and glutamate + glutamine (Glx) concentrations. We further analyzed GMV of IC subregions in women with major depression (MDD) compared to HC and addressed possible differences between depression, IBS, IBS with depression and HC.

Design

Women with IBS (n = 75), MDD (n = 41) and their respective HC (n = 39 and n = 43) underwent structural brain MRI. IC subregion volumes were estimated using statistical parametric mapping software. General linear model approaches were applied to IC volumetric data and FDR-corrected partial correlation analyses assessed relations between GMV, GI symptoms and Glx concentrations.

Results

IBS patients had significantly smaller IC subregions than HC in both hemispheres but there was no significant difference between MDD compared with IBS and HC for any insular subregion. In IBS, the dorsal anterior insular volumes were negatively correlated with symptoms of nausea and pain, and the left ventral subregion showed a positive correlation with straining to defecate, while the posterior subregion volumes showed no relation to symptoms. In the anterior insula, concentration of Glx showed positive correlations with GMV bilaterally in HC and with GMV of the right anterior insula in IBS.

Conclusion

As the interoceptive cortex, the insula shows substantial and disease-specific structural differences in patients with chronic interoceptive visceral pain. Particularly changes in the anterior proportions might be related to chronic exposure to or enhanced salience towards adverse interoceptive visceral signals and could be linked to biochemical changes, calling for further multimodal and longitudinal work.

Gastroparesis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights recent research advances regarding the pathophysiology and treatment of gastroparesis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Differences in brain activity have been identified on functional MRI imaging in gastroparesis patients with nausea. Abdominal pain is common in patients with gastroparesis and does not correlate with the severity of gastric emptying delay, though may be associated with depression and anxiety. Autonomic dysfunction may play an important role in the pathophysiology of gastroparesis. There is increasing sentiment that gastroparesis should be considered a part of the same spectrum of gastric neuromuscular disorders. The risk of tardive dyskinesia with metoclopramide has likely been significantly overestimated historically. Endoscopic BoTox injection of the pylorus and gastric electrical stimulation remain controversial treatments for gastroparesis. New, highly selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 (5-HT4) agonists appear safe and may be effective in improving symptoms of gastric emptying. Long-term data assessing the use of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) for the treatment of refractory gastroparesis suggest durable clinical improvement.

SUMMARY

Altered central processing and autonomic dysfunction may be important factors in the pathogenesis of gastroparesis. While the risk of tardive dyskinesia appears much lower than historically advertised, there is increasing hope for novel therapeutics with the advent of new 5-HT4 agonists, neurokinin-1 receptor (N1KR) antagonists, and G-POEM.

United European Gastroenterology (UEG) and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) consensus on gastroparesis

BACKGROUND

Gastroparesis is a condition characterized by epigastric symptoms and delayed gastric emptying (GE) rate in the absence of any mechanical obstruction. The condition is challenging in clinical practice by the lack of guidance concerning diagnosis and management of gastroparesis.

METHODS

A Delphi consensus was undertaken by 40 experts from 19 European countries who conducted a literature summary and voting process on 89 statements. Quality of evidence was evaluated using grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation criteria. Consensus (defined as ≥80% agreement) was reached for 25 statements.

RESULTS

The European consensus defined gastroparesis as the presence of symptoms associated with delayed GE in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Nausea and vomiting were identified as cardinal symptoms, with often coexisting postprandial distress syndrome symptoms of dyspepsia. The true epidemiology of gastroparesis is not known in detail, but diabetes, gastric surgery, certain neurological and connective tissue diseases, and the use of certain drugs recognized as risk factors. While the panel agreed that severely impaired gastric motor function is present in these patients, there was no consensus on underlying pathophysiology. The panel agreed that an upper endoscopy and a GE test are required for diagnosis. Only dietary therapy, dopamine-2 antagonists and 5-HT₄ receptor agonists were considered appropriate therapies, in addition to nutritional support in case of severe weight loss. No consensus was reached on the use of proton pump inhibitors, other classes of antiemetics or prokinetics, neuromodulators, complimentary, psychological, or more invasive therapies. Finally, there was consensus that gastroparesis adversely impacts on quality of life and healthcare costs and that the long-term prognosis of gastroparesis depends on the cause.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

A multinational group of European experts summarized the current state of consensus on definition, symptom characteristics, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of gastroparesis.

United European Gastroenterology (UEG) and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) consensus on gastroparesis

Background

Gastroparesis is a condition characterized by epigastric symptoms and delayed gastric emptying (GE) rate in the absence of any mechanical obstruction. The condition is challenging in clinical practice by the lack of guidance concerning diagnosis and management of gastroparesis.

Methods

A Delphi consensus was undertaken by 40 experts from 19 European countries who conducted a literature summary and voting process on 89 statements. Quality of evidence was evaluated using grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation criteria. Consensus (defined as ≥80% agreement) was reached for 25 statements.

Results

The European consensus defined gastroparesis as the presence of symptoms associated with delayed GE in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Nausea and vomiting were identified as cardinal symptoms, with often coexisting postprandial distress syndrome symptoms of dyspepsia. The true epidemiology of gastroparesis is not known in detail, but diabetes, gastric surgery, certain neurological and connective tissue diseases, and the use of certain drugs recognized as risk factors. While the panel agreed that severely impaired gastric motor function is present in these patients, there was no consensus on underlying pathophysiology. The panel agreed that an upper endoscopy and a GE test are required for diagnosis. Only dietary therapy, dopamine‐2 antagonists and 5‐HT₄ receptor agonists were considered appropriate therapies, in addition to nutritional support in case of severe weight loss. No consensus was reached on the use of proton pump inhibitors, other classes of antiemetics or prokinetics, neuromodulators, complimentary, psychological, or more invasive therapies. Finally, there was consensus that gastroparesis adversely impacts on quality of life and healthcare costs and that the long‐term prognosis of gastroparesis depends on the cause.

Conclusions and Inferences

A multinational group of European experts summarized the current state of consensus on definition, symptom characteristics, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of gastroparesis.

Current knowledge

The epidemiology of gastroparesis is not well known.

Diagnosis and treatment of gastroparesis is challenging due to uncertainties in definition and optimal therapeutic approach.

What is new here

A Delphi panel consisting of 40 experts from 19 European countries established the level of consensus on 89 statements regarding gastroparesis.

The statements reaching consensus serve to guide clinicians in recognizing, diagnosing and treating gastroparesis in clinical practice.

The statements without consensus identify areas in need of future research.

Gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia: different diseases or different ends of the spectrum?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review assesses the relationship between gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia, in light of recent research assessing cause, pathophysiology and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) lacks the ability to readily distinguish functional dyspepsia from gastroparesis based on symptoms. Although prior studies found that the extent of delay in gastric emptying did not accurately predict severity of symptoms, when optimally measured, delayed gastric emptying may in fact correlate with gastroparesis symptoms. Enteric dysmotility may be an important risk factor for gastroparesis. Altered central processing may play a role in symptom generation for both gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia based on functional brain MRI. Treatment directed towards reducing low-grade inflammation and improving mucosal barrier function in the duodenum may represent a novel therapeutic target for functional dyspepsia, whereas gastric peroral endoscopy myotomy (G-POEM) remains a promising intervention for refractory gastroparesis.

SUMMARY

Abnormalities on functional MRI of the brain have been identified in patients with functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis. Small bowel dysmotility and duodenal barrier dysfunction have been implicated in the pathophysiology of gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia, respectively. New treatments for functional dyspepsia may target low-grade duodenal inflammation and barrier dysfunction. The pylorus remains a target in gastroparesis.

Status of Brain Imaging in Gastroparesis

The pathophysiology of nausea and vomiting in gastroparesis is complicated and multifaceted involving the collaboration of both the peripheral and central nervous systems. Most treatment strategies and studies performed in gastroparesis have focused largely on the peripheral effects of this disease, while our understanding of the central nervous system mechanisms of nausea in this entity is still evolving. The ability to view the brain with different neuroimaging techniques has enabled significant advances in our understanding of the central emetic reflex response. However, not enough studies have been performed to further explore the brain–gut mechanisms involved in nausea and vomiting in patients with gastroparesis. The purpose of this review article is to assess the current status of brain imaging and summarize the theories about our present understanding on the central mechanisms involved in nausea and vomiting (N/V) in patients with gastroparesis. Gaining a better understanding of the complex brain circuits involved in the pathogenesis of gastroparesis will allow for the development of better antiemetic prophylactic and treatment strategies.

Role of Gastric Electrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Gastroparesis

Introduction: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a surgically implanted treatment option for drug refractory gastroparesis syndromes. Evidence supporting use of GES and the pathophysiology of gastroparesis syndromes is not widely known. We conducted a descriptive review to elucidate the pathophysiology of gastroparesis syndromes, with particular focus on gastrointestinal neuromodulation and the known mechanisms of action of GES. Methods: A descriptive review of PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was conducted using the keywords gastric electrical stimulation, gastroparesis, nausea, vomiting, neuromodulation, gastroparesis syndromes, central nervous system, gastric pacing and electrical stimulation. Results: 1040 potentially relevant articles were identified, of which 34 were included. These studies explored various central and peripheral effects of GES, as well as its effect on quality of life, hospital stay, mortality and health-related costs. Conclusion: Although evidence supporting gastrointestinal (GI) electrical stimulation and GI neuromodulation use is not widely known, GES does seem to offer significant improvement in symptom control, quality of life and other effects to many patients. GES exerts its effects through multiple central and peripheral mechanisms and has potential to modify the natural history of disease. Future work on gastroparetic syndromes and their treatment might be better focused in terms of pathophysiologic mechanisms. Improving outcomes with specific neuromodulation therapies, like GES, may offer improvements in health for many patients with refractory upper gastrointestinal symptoms.