Focused Education Increases Hepatocellular Cancer Screening in Patients with Cirrhosis Regardless of Functional Health Literacy

Interventions to Improve Surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-Risk Patients: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is most often a sequela of chronic liver disease or chronic hepatitis B infection. Among high-risk patients, surveillance for HCC every 6 months is recommended by international guidelines. However, rates of HCC surveillance are suboptimal (11-64%). Barriers at the patient, provider, and healthcare delivery system levels have been identified.

METHODS

We performed a systemic scoping review to identify and characterize interventions to improve HCC surveillance that has previously been evaluated. Searches using key terms in PubMed and Embase were performed to identify studies examining interventions designed to improve the surveillance rate for HCC in patients with cirrhosis or chronic liver disease that were published in English between January 1990 and September 2021.

RESULTS

Included studies (14) had the following study designs: (1) randomized clinical trials (3, 21.4%), (2) quasi-experimental (2, 14.3%), (3) prospective cohort (6, 42.8%), and (4) retrospective cohort (3, 21.4%). Interventions included mailed outreach invitations, nursing outreach, patient education with or without printed materials, provider education, patient navigation, chronic disease management programs, nursing-led protocols for image ordering, automated reminders to physicians and nurses, web-based clinical management tools, HCC surveillance databases, provider compliance reports, radiology-led surveillance programs, subsidized HCC surveillance, and the use of oral medications. It was found that HCC surveillance rates increased after intervention implementation in all studies.

CONCLUSION

Despite improvements in HCC surveillance rates with intervention, compliance remained suboptimal. Further analysis of which interventions yield the greatest increases in HCC surveillance, design of multi-pronged strategies, and improved implementation are needed.

Effectiveness of a nurse-led decision counselling programme on hepatocellular carcinoma screening uptake among patients with hepatitis B: A randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The globally endemic hepatocellular carcinoma induced by hepatitis B highlights the need for an ultrasonography-based screening strategy to reduce the tumour burden. However, patient non-adherence due to unawareness and complex decisions in weighting uncertainties of hepatocellular carcinoma screening has continuously challenged its continuum.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness and process of a nurse-led decision counselling programme for improving hepatocellular carcinoma screening among patients with hepatitis B.

DESIGN

Single-blind randomised controlled trial.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Between 12 March and 19 July 2021, 178 patients with hepatitis B were recruited from six inpatient wards of a university-affiliated hospital in northern China.

METHODS

Participants were randomly allocated to receive usual care (n = 89) or usual care plus a nurse-led decision counselling programme (n = 89). Underpinned by the preventive health model, the programme consisted of health education, tailored information, and values clarification exercises to elicit informed and value-based preferences for hepatocellular carcinoma screening. Screening barriers were explored and addressed through procedural problem-solving. Hepatocellular carcinoma screening rate at six months post-baseline was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes (knowledge, perceptions, and decision conflicts regarding hepatocellular carcinoma screening) were measured at baseline (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and the six-month follow-up (T2). A Medical Research Council framework-guided process evaluation was conducted by drawing on data from intervention documentation, WeChat discussions, and interviews with stakeholders (n = 13).

RESULTS

With a mean age of 47.32 (8.78) years, participants mostly occupied rural residences (63.5 %). Compared with the control group, the intervention group had significantly higher hepatocellular carcinoma screening rates (75.6 % vs. 42.1 %, p < 0.001) and displayed greater improvements in the scores of hepatocellular carcinoma screening knowledge (β = 3.643, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 3.030, 4.255), salience and coherence (β = 0.410, 95 % CI = 0.234, 0.586), response efficacy (β = 0.327, 95 % CI = 0.181, 0.473), and perceived susceptibility (β = 0.214, 95 % CI = 0.040, 0.388) at T1. Improvement in perceived susceptibility was not maintained, whereas a higher decrease of the decision conflict score was found at T2 (β = -4.156, 95 % CI = -7.851, -0.461). The process evaluation revealed potential intervention mechanisms and contextual factors affecting intervention effectiveness, such as living status and natural disasters.

CONCLUSION

The programme was effective in improving hepatocellular carcinoma screening and showed that nurses could play a decision counselling role in optimising the screening among patients with hepatitis B.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.govNCT04659005. Registration date: 9 December, 2020.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Nurse-led decision counselling improves hepatocellular carcinoma screening in patients with hepatitis B.

Risk factors and prevention of liver cancer: A bibliometric and visual analysis

Liver cancer has become an important public health problem. In this study, bibliometrics and visual analysis were performed on the literature related to the risk factors and prevention of liver cancer, in order to understand the latest research progress of the risk factors and prevention of liver cancer. The Web of Science database was used as a retrieval platform to retrieve the published research results from 2012 to 2023. CiteSpace and VOSviewer were utilized for bibliometrics and visual analysis. A total of 2388 articles were screened according to exclusion criteria. Between 2012 and 2018, the number of articles published fluctuated. From 2018 to 2023, the number of published documents showed a steady upward trend. The 3 journals with the most publications are World Journal of Gastroenterology, PLOS ONE, and Hepatology. The United States and China are the countries with the most publications, while Harvard University, the National Institutes of Health and the University of Texas System are the 3 institutions with the most publications. Keywords such as hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, alcohol, obesity, recrudescence rate, global burden are hot words in the field of liver cancer risk factors and prevention. The current research mainly focuses on the influence of environmental factors, behavioral lifestyle and biological factors on liver cancer, as well as the primary and secondary prevention of liver cancer, but there are still many undetermined factors to be explored.

Patient-, Provider-, and System-Level Barriers to Surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-Risk Patients in the USA: a Scoping Review

PURPOSE

Hepatocellular carcinoma has a dismal prognosis, except in patients diagnosed early who are candidates for potentially curative therapies. Most HCC cases develop in patients with chronic liver disease. Therefore, expert society guidelines recommend surveillance every 6 months with ultrasound with or without serum alpha-fetoprotein for high-risk patients. However, fewer than 20% of patients in the USA undergo appropriate surveillance.

METHODS

A systematic scoping review was performed with the objective of identifying barriers to screening among high-risk patients in the USA including mapping key concepts in the relevant literature, identifying the main sources and types of evidence available, and identifying gaps in the literature. A total of 43 studies published from 2007 to 2021 were included. Data were extracted and a conceptual framework was created.

RESULTS

Assessment of quantitative studies revealed poor surveillance rates, often below 50%. Three categories of barriers to surveillance were identified: patient-level, provider-level, and system-level barriers. Prevalent patient-level barriers included financial constraints, lack of awareness of surveillance recommendations, and scheduling difficulties. Common provider-level barriers were lack of provider awareness of guidelines for surveillance, difficulty accessing specialty resources, and time constraints in the clinic. System-level barriers included fewer clinic visits and rural/safety-net settings. Proposed interventions include improved patient/provider education, patient navigators, increased community/academic collaboration, and EMR-based reminders.

CONCLUSION

Based on these findings, there is a crucial need to implement and evaluate proposed interventions to improve HCC surveillance.