Development of an Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Specific Medication Adherence Instrument and Reasons for Non-adherence

Impact of an intervention program on drug adherence in patients with ulcerative colitis: Randomized clinical trial

AIMS

Evaluate the impact of an intervention program in non-adherent patients with ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Parallel controlled randomized clinical trial (1:1), approved by the ethics committee (No. 3.068.511/2018) and registered at The Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (No. RBR-79dn4k). Non-adherent ulcerative colitis patients according to the Morisky-Green-Levine-test were included. Recruitment began in August 2019 until August 2020, with 6-month follow-up. All participants received standard usual care, and additionally the intervention group received educational (video, educational leaflet, verbal guidance) and behavioral interventions (therapeutic scheme, motivational and reminder type short message services). Researchers were blinded for allocation prior to data collection at Visits 1 and 2 (0 and 6 months). Primary outcome: 180-day adherence rate, with relative risk 95%CI. Secondary outcome: 180-day quality of life according to SF-36 domains, using Student's t test. Variables with p<0.20 were selected for regression. Analysis included data from August/2019 to May/2021.

RESULTS

Forty-six and 49 participants were allocated in control and intervention groups, respectively. Two were excluded due to intervention refusal, and 4 and 6 were lost to follow-up in control and intervention groups. There was no post-intervention adherence rate difference, even after adjustment for type of non-adherence (unintentional/both/intentional) as confounder, or if considered as adherent the intervention group participants lost in follow-up. Interventions promoted better quality of life scores even after multivariate analysis for "Pain", when adjusted for ulcerative colitis severity, sex, and marital status (β = 18.352, p = 0.004), "Vitality", when adjusted for ulcerative colitis severity (β = 10.568, p = 0.015) and "Emotional Aspects", when adjusted for disease severity, income, and education (β = 24.907, p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention program was not able to produce a significant medication adherence rate difference between comparative groups, however, there was a significant improvement in quality of life. Study limitations may include: sample size calculated to identify differences of 30%, leading to a possible insufficient power; non blinded participants, exposing the results to the risk of performance bias; outcomes based on self-reported data.

Understanding Medication Nonadherence in Crohn's Disease Patients: A Qualitative Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Immune-modifying medications are widely available and recognized as valuable by most gastroenterologists. However, approximately 40% of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) do not comply with regimens using these medications, resulting in complications, hospitalization, and surgeries. We sought to identify factors that motivate adherence or nonadherence with medication recommendations for CD.

METHODS

We conducted qualitative interviews with patients living with CD who were identified as adherent or nonadherent to immune-modifying medication recommendations by their treating gastroenterologist. Semistructured interview guides were developed based on an established framework for understanding health behaviors. We conducted content analysis of the resulting qualitative data using an inductive-deductive approach to identify emergent themes that influence medication decision-making.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with CD completed interviews for this study. Interviews were independently coded and analyzed for thematic content. Two broad domains emerged comprising (1) themes reflected in the Theoretical Domains Framework and (2) novel themes specific to medication decision-making in CD. Adherent patients conveyed a sense of trust in science and healthcare provider expertise, while nonadherent patients were more likely to express beliefs in their ability to self-manage CD, concern about risks associated with medication, and a general ambivalence to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

There are clear cognitive, behavioral, and relational factors that guide patients' medication-related decision-making. Several of the factors share features of other behavioral change and decision-making processes, while others are specific to the experience of patients with CD. A fuller understanding of these factors is essential to developing effective behavioral interventions to improve adherence to evidence-based treatment recommendations.

Factors contributing to flares of ulcerative colitis in North India- a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis is a relapsing and remitting disease that may be associated with flares. The causes of flares in the Indian setting are not well recognized.

METHODS

The present prospective case-control study was conducted at a single center in North India. Cases were defined as patients admitted for flare of ulcerative colitis, while controls were patients in remission enrolled from the outpatient department. The basis of the diagnosis of flare was a simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI) of ≥ 5 and endoscopic activity, while remission was based on SCCAI < 4 and a normal fecal calprotectin. A questionnaire evaluating recent infections, stress, drug intake (antibiotics, pain medication), adherence to therapy, and use of complementary and alternative therapy (CAM) was administered.

RESULTS

We included 84 patients (51 with flare and 33 in remission) with a median age of 38 years, of whom 47 (55.9%) were males. The two groups were similar for baseline parameters, including age (38, 23-50 and 38, 25.5-48.5 years), male gender (52.9% and 60.6%), extent of disease, extraintestinal manifestations (21.6% and 12.1%), use of 5-aminosalicylates (76.5% and 90.9%). The thiopurine use was lower in those having a flare (15.7% and 36.4%). Amongst the predictors of flare, the recent infections (39.2% and 30.3%), recent travel (31.4 and 27.3%), eating outside food (47.1% and 39.4%), consumption of milk products (88.2% and 75.8%), use of pain medication (43.1% and 33.3%) and recent stress (62.7% and 60.6%) were similar between cases and controls. The rates of antibiotic use (29.4% and 6.1%), lack of adherence (50.9% and 15.2%), and intake of CAM (70.6% and 33.3%) were higher in those with flare. Patients attributed a lack of adherence to the cost of therapy, presumed cure (due to lack of symptoms), and fear of adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Lack of adherence to inflammatory bowel disease therapies and recent CAM and antibiotic intake was higher in patients with flares of UC. The study makes ground for educational intervention(s) promoting knowledge and adherence to IBD therapies.