Prevalence of medication discrepancies in pediatric patients transferred between hospital wards

Medication reconciliation on admission in paediatric chronic patients: A multicentre study

INTRODUCTION

Medication reconciliation (MC) is one of the main strategies to reduce medication errors in care transitions. In Spain, several guidelines have been published with recommendations for the implementation and development of MC aimed at the adult population, although paediatric patients are not included. In 2018, a study was carried out that led to the subsequent publication of a document with criteria for selecting paediatric patients in whom CM should be prioritised.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the characteristics of paediatric patients most likely to suffer from errors of reconciliation (EC), to confirm whether the results of a previous study can be extrapolated.

METHODOLOGY

Prospective, multicentre study of paediatric inpatients. We analysed the CE detected during the performance of the CM on admission. The best possible pharmacotherapeutic history of the patient was obtained using different sources of information and confirmed by an interview with the patient/caregiver.

RESULTS

1043 discrepancies were detected, 544 were identified as CD, affecting 317 patients (43%). Omission of a drug was the most common error (51%). The majority of CD were associated with drugs in groups A (31%), N (23%) and R (11%) of the ATC classification. Polymedication and onco-haematological based disease were the risk factors associated with the presence of CD with statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study allow prioritisation of CM in a specific group of paediatric patients, favouring the efficiency of the process. Onco-haematological patients and polymedication are confirmed as the main risk factors for the appearance of CD in the paediatric population.

Safe handoff practices and improvement of communication in different paediatric settings

Inadequate information management, especially during patient handoff, contributes to a large part of health care-related adverse events. The Committee for Quality of Care and Patient Safety of the Asociación Española de Pediatría has developed this document to provide an overview of handover practices in different paediatric care settings (emergency, inpatient, intensive care, neonatal and primary care). It describes resources to achieve safe and effective communication in all these settings, such as standardised handoff tools. It also proposes recommendations for the prevention of medication errors during the handover process, to improve safety in interhospital and intrahospital patient transfer, and to optimise communication and continuity of care in chronically ill and medically complex children.

Development and implementation of a medication reconciliation during pediatric transitions of care in a public hospital

OBJECTIVES

To generate effective changes in the work processes of an institution, such as hospitals, strategies are needed for the implementation of services. These should be based on the needs of the practice scenario and evidence that may develop programs applied to the routine of health care. This study aimed to implement medication reconciliation (MR) at the transition of care in the pediatric department of a public hospital located in Northeast Brazil.

SETTING

A step-by-step approach was adopted to implement MR in the studied hospital and conducted from March 2019 to December 2019.

PRACTICE INNOVATION

The implementation of MR used the "Model for Improvement" framework. The processes were built and tested in the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Children admitted to the hospital's pediatrics department were included in the study. The objective of the PDSA cycles was to reach 75% of the patients included, with the service performed in at least one transition of care episode.

EVALUATION

This study used the following indicators: number of steps performed, number of discrepancies identified, and resolution of discrepancies. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for all variables.

RESULTS

In the first cycle, all patients (n = 34) had the best possible medication history (BPMH) completed, and 26.4% went through all the MR stages. Seventy-two discrepancies were identified and 90.3% of them were resolved. In the second cycle, all patients (n = 35) had the BPMH completed, and 20% went through all the stages. A total of 32 discrepancies were identified and 96.8% of them were resolved. In the third cycle, all patients (n = 30) had the BPMH completed, and 56.6% of patients went through all the stages. Twenty-four discrepancies were identified and resolved.

CONCLUSION

The use of the "Model for Improvement" framework effectively contributed to the implementation of the service according to the characteristics of the studied hospital.