Influence of a ward-based pharmacist on the medication quality of geriatric inpatients: a before-after study

Prescriptions of Antipsychotics in Younger and Older Geriatric Patients with Polypharmacy, Their Safety, and the Impact of a Pharmaceutical-Medical Dialogue on Antipsychotic Use

Geriatric patients are a particularly vulnerable and, at the same time, very heterogeneous group due to their multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Antipsychotics are often prescribed in their complex drug regimens, whereby the prescription of antipsychotics is not without controversy. To date, questions remain as to whether there are differences in the prescribing pattern, safety, and impact of a consultant pharmacist regarding antipsychotic use between younger and older geriatric patients in the heterogenic geriatric group. This monocentric study of 744 patients was based on the analysis of routine data collected from January 2018 to June 2020 in a geriatric department during a weekly pharmaceutical and medical consultation. The frequency of the prescription of antipsychotics in our study was 30.7%. Regarding antipsychotic safety and/or adverse drug reaction (ADR) antipsychotics, only a difference in terms of overuse in younger geriatric patients was found. The binary logistic regression analyses of geriatric patients with antipsychotics revealed that ADRs and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were particularly related to the number of medications prescribed. The higher the number of prescribed drugs, the higher the risk of ADRs and DDIs. In 26.7% of geriatric patients on antipsychotics, the pharmacist made recommendations that were almost exclusively implemented by the physician, with no difference made between the two age groups. The prescriptions of antipsychotics in geriatric patients with polypharmacy, their safety, and the impact of a pharmaceutical-medical dialogue on the use of antipsychotics seem comparable between younger and older geriatric patients in the geriatric setting. Antipsychotics should always be critically considered and used cautiously, whereby a regular pharmaceutical-medical dialogue is recommended in geriatric settings.

Medication regimen complexity index and rehabilitation outcomes in post-acute hip fracture patients study: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy is a common problem amongst the elderly population. The complexity of the drug regimen refers not only to a simple medication count, but also to the number of daily doses, frequency, and special instructions given for their use. Medication regimen complexity may affect health outcomes, including an increase in hospitalization rates, drug non-adherence, and mortality rates.

AIM

To assess whether the admission medication regimen complexity index score is associated with rehabilitation outcomes in hip fracture patients; secondary- to assess whether changes in the medication regimen complexity index scores during rehabilitation are associated with rehabilitation outcomes.

METHOD

A retrospective study of 336 hip fracture patients admitted to a post-acute rehabilitation hospital. Primary rehabilitation outcome was assessed via the discharge functional independence measure score. Secondary outcomes included functional independence measure score changes, length of stay and discharge destination.

RESULTS

Patients with low admission medication regimen complexity index scores attained significantly higher admission and discharge motor functional independence measure scores (40.1 vs. 37.1, p = 0.044; 57.1 vs. 52.9, p = 0.014, respectively), a higher motor functional independence measure score effectiveness (36.1 vs. 31.3, p = 0.030) and a higher rate of favorable motor functional independence measure effectiveness score (58.1% vs. 42.0%, p = 0.004). A multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the admission medication regimen complexity index score was not associated with the discharge functional independence measure score (standardized coefficient = - 0.058; p = 0.079).

CONCLUSION

A high medication regimen complexity which usually implies severe comorbidity should not be considered a barrier for the rehabilitation of older patients.

Strategies and Tools for Supporting the Appropriateness of Drug Use in Older People

Through this structured review of the published literature, we aimed to provide an up-to-date description of strategies (human-related) and tools (mainly from the digital field) facilitating the appropriateness of drug use in older adults. The evidence of each strategy and tool’s effectiveness and sustainability largely derives from local and heterogeneous experiences, with contrasting results. As a general framework, three main steps should be considered in implementing measures to improve appropriateness: prescription, acceptance by the patient, and continuous monitoring of adherence and risk-benefit profile. Each step needs efforts from specific actors (physicians, patients, caregivers, healthcare professionals) and dedicated supporting tools. Moreover, how to support the appropriateness also strictly depends on the particular setting of care (hospital, ambulatory or primary care, nursing home, long-term care) and available economic resources. Therefore, it is urgent assigning to each approach proposed in the literature the following characteristics: level of effectiveness, strength of evidence, setting of implementation, needed resources, and issues for its sustainability.