Medical comorbidities should not deter the application of laparoscopic fundoplication

Causes of dissatisfaction after laparoscopic fundoplication: the impact of new symptoms, recurrent symptoms, and the patient experience

BACKGROUND

Although laparoscopic fundoplication effectively alleviates gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the great majority of patients, some patients remain dissatisfied after the operation. This study was undertaken to report the outcomes of these patients and to determine the causes of dissatisfaction after laparoscopic fundoplication.

METHODS

All patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication in the authors' series from 1992 to 2010 were evaluated for frequency and severity of symptoms before and after laparoscopic fundoplication, and their experiences were graded from "very satisfying" to "very unsatisfying." Objective outcomes were determined by endoscopy, barium swallow, and pH monitoring. Primary complaints were derived from postoperative surveys. Median data are reported.

RESULTS

Of the 1,063 patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication, 101 patients reported dissatisfaction after the procedure. The follow-up period was 33 months. The dissatisfied patients (n = 101) were more likely than the satisfied patients to have postoperative complications (9 vs 4 %; p < 0.05) and to have undergone a prior fundoplication (22 vs 11 %; p < 0.05). For the dissatisfied patients, heartburn decreased in frequency and severity after fundoplication (p < 0.05) but remained notable. Also for the dissatisfied patients, new symptoms (gas bloat/dysphagia) were the most prominent postoperative complaint (59 %), followed by symptom recurrence (23 %), symptom persistence (4 %), and the overall experience (14 %). Primary complaints of new symptoms were most common within the first year of follow-up assessment and less frequent thereafter. Primary complaints of recurrent symptoms generally occurred more than 1 year after fundoplication.

CONCLUSIONS

Dissatisfaction is uncommon after laparoscopic fundoplication. New symptoms, such as dysphagia and gas/bloating, are primary causes of dissatisfaction despite general reflux alleviation among these patients. New symptoms occur sooner after fundoplication than recurrent symptoms and may become less common with time.

A Single Institution's Experience and Journey with over 1000 Laparoscopic Fundoplications for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

There have been great advances in laparoscopic surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), including laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery. This study details our experience with over 1000 patients undergoing fundoplication for GERD and the journey therein. A total of 1078 patients have been prospectively followed after fundoplication. Patients scored the frequency/severity of symptoms using a Likert scale (0 = never/not bothersome to 10 = always/very bothersome). We compared the outcomes of the first and last 100 patients. Median data are reported. Of 1078 patients, 943 underwent conventional laparoscopic fundoplication and 135, most recently, underwent LESS fundoplication. Before fundoplication, patients noted frequent/severe symptoms (e.g., heartburn: frequency = 8, severity = 8). Fundoplication ameliorated frequency/severity of symptoms (e.g., heartburn: frequency = 2, severity = 0; less than preoperatively, P < 0.05). Relative to our first 100 patients, patients after LESS surgery had similar symptom control (e.g., heartburn: frequency = eight to two vs eight to zero, severity = eight to one vs six to one) but had shorter hospital stays (2 vs 1 day, P < 0.05) and had no apparent scars. Laparoscopic fundoplication provides durable and efficacious treatment for GERD; long-term symptom resolution and patient satisfaction support its continued application. The advent of LESS surgery advances surgeons’ abilities to provide safe and salutary care while promoting cosmesis.

Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) vs. conventional laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD: is there a difference?

BACKGROUND

This report details our experience with laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) fundoplication for GERD and provides a comparison to earlier contiguous patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic fundoplication.

METHODS

With institutional review board approval, symptoms before and after LESS fundoplications and conventional laparoscopic fundoplications were scored by patients. Outcomes after 130 consecutive LESS fundoplications were compared to 130 contiguous consecutive outcomes after conventional laparoscopic fundoplications.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic vs. LESS fundoplication were very similar. There were no conversions to "open" operations and no notable complications with LESS fundoplication. Symptom reduction was broad and dramatic for patients undergoing LESS or conventional laparoscopic fundoplication; 96 % of patients who underwent LESS fundoplication scored their incision as ≥8 (1 = revolting to 10 = beautiful).

CONCLUSIONS

Relative to conventional laparoscopy, LESS surgery provides excellent resolution of symptoms without an apparent scar. In comparison to conventional laparoscopy, LESS fundoplication is as safe with similar symptom improvement and superior cosmesis.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

Millions of Americans are affected by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in many different ways. The magnitude of the problem of GERD was brought to light by the ambulatory pH test, the introduction of minimally invasive surgery, and the advent of the many medications that are effective in acid suppression. Patients with GERD suffer from various consequences associated with the disease. However, interventions beyond medical therapy, such as laparoscopic fundoplication, provide satisfactory outcomes and definitive relief of acid reflux.