Intravenous Milrinone for Cerebral Vasospasm in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The MILRISPASM Controlled Before-After Study

Systemic tolerance of intravenous milrinone administration for cerebral vasospasm secondary to non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage

PURPOSE

Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a severe subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) complication, closely related to cerebral vasospasm (CVS). CVS treatment frequently comprises intravenous milrinone, an inotropic and vasodilatory drug. Our objective is to describe milrinone's hemodynamic, respiratory and renal effects when administrated as treatment for CVS.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center observational study of patients receiving intravenous milrinone for CVS with systemic hemodynamics, oxygenation, renal disorders monitoring. We described these parameters' evolution before and after milrinone initiation (day - 1, baseline, day 1 and day 2), studied treatment cessation causes and assessed neurological outcome at 3-6 months.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were included. Milrinone initiation led to cardiac output increase (4.5 L/min [3.4-5.2] at baseline vs 6.6 L/min [5.2-7.7] at day 2, p < 0.001), Mean Arterial Pressure decrease (101 mmHg [94-110] at baseline vs 95 mmHg [85-102] at day 2, p = 0.001) norepinephrine treatment requirement increase (32% of patients before milrinone start vs 58% at day 1, p = 0.002) and slight PaO2/FiO2 ratio deterioration (401 [333-406] at baseline vs 348 [307-357] at day 2, p = 0.016). Milrinone was interrupted in 8% of patients. 55% had a favorable outcome.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous milrinone for CVS treatment seems associated with significant impact on systemic hemodynamics leading sometimes to treatment discontinuation.

Interventional Treatment of Symptomatic Vasospasm in the Setting of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Reported Cases

Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) is frequently comorbid with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and may induce secondary injury through vascular changes such as vasospasm and subsequent delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). While aneurysmal SAH is well studied regarding vasospasm and DCI, less is known regarding tSAH and the prevalence of vasospasm and DCI, the consequences of vasospasm in this setting, when treatment is indicated, and which management strategies should be implemented. In this article, a systematic review of the literature that was conducted for cases of symptomatic vasospasm in patients with TBI is reported, association with tSAH is reported, risk factors for vasospasm and DCI are summarized, and commonalities in diagnosis and management are discussed. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of 38 cases across 20 studies were identified in which patients with TBI with vasospasm underwent medical or endovascular management. Of the patients with data available for each category, the average age was 48.7 ± 20.3 years (n = 31), the Glasgow Coma Scale score at presentation was 10.6 ± 4.5 (n = 35), and 100% had tSAH (n = 29). Symptomatic vasospasm indicative of DCI was diagnosed on average at postinjury day 8.4 ± 3.0 days (n = 30). Of the patients, 56.6% (n = 30) had a new ischemic change associated with vasospasm confirming DCI. Treatment strategies are discussed, with 11 of 12 endovascularly treated and 19 of 26 medically treated patients surviving to discharge. tSAH is associated with vasospasm and DCI in moderate and severe TBI, and patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of symptomatic vasospasm and subsequent DCI may benefit from endovascular or medical management strategies.

Cerebral Hemodynamics and Levosimendan Use in Patients with Cerebral Vasospasm and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An Observational Perfusion CT-Based Imaging Study

BACKGROUND

Delayed cerebral ischemia associated with cerebral vasospasm (CVS) in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage significantly affects patient prognosis. Levosimendan has emerged as a potential treatment, but clinical data are lacking. The aim of this study is to decipher levosimendan's effect on cerebral hemodynamics by automated quantitative measurements of brain computed tomography perfusion (CTP).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of a database of a neurosurgical intensive care unit. All patients admitted from January 2018 to July 2022 for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and treated with levosimendan for CVS who did not respond to other therapies were included. Quantitative measurements of time to maximum (Tmax), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), and relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) were automatically compared with coregistered CTP before and after levosimendan administration in oligemic regions.

RESULTS

Of 21 patients included, CTP analysis could be performed in 16. Levosimendan improved Tmax from 14.4 s (interquartile range [IQR] 9.1-21) before treatment to 7.1 s (IQR 5.5-8.1) after treatment (p < 0.001). rCBV (94% [IQR 79-103] before treatment and 89% [IQR 72-103] after treatment, p = 0.63) and rCBF (85% [IQR 77-90] before treatment and 87% [IQR 73-98] after treatment, p = 0.98) remained stable. The subgroup of six patients who did not develop cerebral infarction attributed to delayed cerebral ischemia showed an approximately 10% increase (rCBV 85% [IQR 79-99] before treatment vs. 95% [IQR 88-112] after treatment, p = 0.21; rCBF 81% [IQR 76-87] before treatment vs. 89% [IQR 84-99] after treatment, p = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

In refractory CVS, levosimendan use was associated with a significant reduction in Tmax in oligemic regions. However, this value remained at an abnormal level, indicating the presence of a persistent CVS. Further analysis raised the hypothesis that levosimendan causes cerebral vasodilation, but other studies are needed because our design does not allow us to quantify the effect of levosimendan from that of the natural evolution of CVS.

Twelve controversial questions in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Critical care management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remains a major challenge. Despite the recent publication of guidelines from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association and the Neurocritical Care Society, there are many controversial questions in the intensive care unit (ICU) management of this population. The authors provide an analysis of common issues in the ICU and provide guidance on the daily management of this specific population of neurocritical care patients.

The Impact of Inotropes and Vasopressors on Cerebral Oxygenation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Narrative Review

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) are critical neurological conditions that necessitate specialized care in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Managing cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) is of primary importance in these patients. To maintain targeted MAP and CPP, vasopressors and/or inotropes are commonly used. However, their effects on cerebral oxygenation are not fully understood. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to date review regarding the current uses and pathophysiological issues related to the use of vasopressors and inotropes in TBI and SAH patients. According to our findings, despite achieving similar hemodynamic parameters and CPP, the effects of various vasopressors and inotropes on cerebral oxygenation, local CBF and metabolism are heterogeneous. Therefore, a more accurate understanding of the cerebral activity of these medications is crucial for optimizing patient management in the ICU setting.

Percutaneous cervical sympathetic block to treat cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia: a review of the evidence

Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) affects 30% of patients following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and is a major driver of morbidity, mortality, and intensive care unit length of stay for these patients. DCI is strongly associated with cerebral arterial vasospasm, reduced cerebral blood flow and cerebral infarction. The current standard treatment with intravenous or intra-arterial calcium channel antagonist and balloon angioplasty or stent has limited efficacy. A simple treatment such as a cervical sympathetic block (CSB) may be an effective therapy but is not routinely performed to treat vasospasm/DCI. CSB consists of injecting local anesthetic at the level of the cervical sympathetic trunk, which temporarily blocks the innervation of the cerebral arteries to cause arterial vasodilatation. CSB is a local, minimally invasive, low cost and safe technique that can be performed at the bedside and may offer significant advantages as complementary treatment in combination with more conventional neurointerventional surgery interventions. We reviewed the literature that describes CSB for vasospasm/DCI prevention or treatment in humans after aSAH. The studies outlined in this review show promising results for a CSB as a treatment for vasospasm/DCI. Further research is required to standardize the technique, to explore how to integrate a CSB with conventional neurointerventional surgery treatments of vasospasm and DCI, and to study its long-term effect on neurological outcomes.

Comment on the 2023 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage can be a devastating disease, with an in-hospital mortality rate of up to 20%. The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association 2023 Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Guidelines provide a comprehensive update to the 2012 Guidelines based on a systematic review of the intervening evidence. The guidelines are broad in scope, covering prehospital care, aneurysm treatment modality, medical complications, detection and treatment of delayed cerebral ischemia, and recovery. Here, we comment on salient aspects of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage care, compare these guidelines with the 2023 Neurocritical Care aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guidelines, and review relevant updates.

Cerebral Vasospasm After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Respective Short-Term Effects of Induced Arterial Hypertension and its Combination With IV Milrinone: A Proof-of-Concept Study Using Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

It is unclear whether IV milrinone relaxes spasmed cerebral arteries and therefore reduces cerebral blood mean velocity (Vmean). In patients treated for cerebral vasospasm, we aimed to assess and delineate the respective impacts of induced hypertension and its combination with IV milrinone on cerebral hemodynamics as assessed with transcranial Doppler.

DESIGN

Observational proof-of-concept prospective study.

SETTING

ICU in a French tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who received induced hypertension (mean arterial blood pressure [MBP] of 100-120 mm Hg) and IV milrinone (0.5 µg/kg/min) for moderate-to-severe cerebral vasospasm. We excluded patients who underwent invasive angioplasty or milrinone discontinuation within 12 hours after the diagnosis of vasospasm.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Vmean was measured at vasospasm diagnosis (TDIAGNOSIS), after the induction of hypertension (THTN), and 1 (THTN+MILRINONE_H1) and 12 hours after the adjunction of IV milrinone (THTN+MILRINONE_H12). Thirteen patients were included. Median Vmean was significantly lower (p < 0.01) at THTN+MILRINONE_H1 (99 [interquartile range (IQR) 89; 134] cm.s-1) and THTN+MILRINONE_H12 (85 [IQR 73-127] cm/s) than at TDIAGNOSIS (136 [IQR 115-164] cm/s) and THTN (148 [IQR 115-183] cm/s), whereas TDIAGNOSIS and THTN did not significantly differ. In all patients but one, Vmean at THTN+MILRINONE_H1 was lower than its value at TDIAGNOSIS (p = 0.0005). Vmean-to-MBP and Vmean-to-cardiac output (CO) ratios (an assessment of Vmean regardless of the level of MBP [n = 13] or CO [n = 7], respectively) were, respectively, similar at TDIAGNOSIS and THTN but were significantly lower after the adjunction of milrinone (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The induction of arterial hypertension was not associated with a significant decrease in Vmean, whereas the adjunction of IV milrinone was, regardless of the level of MBP or CO. This suggests that IV milrinone may succeed in relaxing spasmed arteries.

Hemodynamic Management in the Prevention and Treatment of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

One of the most serious complications after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is delayed cerebral ischemia, the cause of which is multifactorial. Delayed cerebral ischemia considerably worsens neurological outcome and increases the risk of death. The targets of hemodynamic management of SAH have widely changed over the past 30 years. Hypovolemia and hypotension were favored prior to the era of early aneurysmal surgery but were subsequently replaced by the use of hypervolemia and hypertension. More recently, the concept of goal-directed therapy targeting euvolemia, with or without hypertension, is gaining preference. Despite the evolving concepts and the vast literature, fundamental questions related to hemodynamic optimization and its effects on cerebral perfusion and patient outcomes remain unanswered. In this review, we explain the rationale underlying the approaches to hemodynamic management and provide guidance on contemporary strategies related to fluid administration and blood pressure and cardiac output manipulation in the management of SAH.

Therapies for Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is one of the most important complications of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Despite lack of prospective evidence, medical rescue interventions for DCI include hemodynamic augmentation using vasopressors or inotropes, with limited guidance on specific blood pressure and hemodynamic parameters. For DCI refractory to medical interventions, endovascular rescue therapies (ERTs), including intraarterial (IA) vasodilators and percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty, are the cornerstone of management. Although there are no randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of ERTs for DCI and their impact on subarachnoid hemorrhage outcomes, survey studies suggest that they are widely used in clinical practice with significant variability worldwide. IA vasodilators are first line ERTs, with better safety profiles and access to distal vasculature. The most commonly used IA vasodilators include calcium channel blockers, with milrinone gaining popularity in more recent publications. Balloon angioplasty achieves better vasodilation compared with IA vasodilators but is associated with higher risk of life-threatening vascular complications and is reserved for proximal severe refractory vasospasm. The existing literature on DCI rescue therapies is limited by small sample sizes, significant variability in patient populations, lack of standardized methodology, variable definitions of DCI, poorly reported outcomes, lack of long-term functional, cognitive, and patient-centered outcomes, and lack of control groups. Therefore, our current ability to interpret clinical results and make reliable recommendations regarding the use of rescue therapies is limited. This review summarizes existing literature on rescue therapies for DCI, provides practical guidance, and identifies future research needs.

2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

AIM

The "2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage" replaces the 2012 "Guidelines for the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage." The 2023 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

METHODS

A comprehensive search for literature published since the 2012 guideline, derived from research principally involving human subjects, published in English, and indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline, was conducted between March 2022 and June 2022. In addition, the guideline writing group reviewed documents on related subject matter previously published by the American Heart Association. Newer studies published between July 2022 and November 2022 that affected recommendation content, Class of Recommendation, or Level of Evidence were included if appropriate. Structure: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a significant global public health threat and a severely morbid and often deadly condition. The 2023 aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guideline provides recommendations based on current evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to preventing, diagnosing, and managing patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' and their families' and caregivers' interests. Many recommendations from the previous aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

Intravenous milrinone for delayed cerebral ischaemia in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) is a major contributor to mortality worldwide, with delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI) contributing significantly to morbidity in these patients. There are limited evidence-based therapies for DCI. A 2012 case series first recommended the use of intravenous (IV) milrinone in this patient population, stating the need for formal prospective trials. However, uptake of this therapy into clinical practice has proceeded without adequate studies for efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We sought to determine the effect of IV milrinone on DCI in patients with aSAH in terms of functional outcome through a systematic review using Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases. Quality assessment was performed using MINORS criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 2429 studies were screened, with ten studies included in the review. Of these, no randomized trials were identified. Three observational comparative studies were included, and the remaining seven studies were non-comparative in nature, and mainly retrospective. Overall, the quality of evidence for non-comparative studies was poor.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals a paucity of evidence in the literature and highlights the need for high-quality randomized trials to investigate the safety and efficacy of IV milrinone, a commonly utilized treatment in critically ill aSAH patients with DCI. Ultimately, without evidence of efficacy and absence of harm, we caution continued use of intravenous milrinone for the treatment of DCI.

Nimodipine vs. Milrinone – Equal or Complementary Use? A Retrospective Analysis

Background

Cerebral vasospasm (CVS) continues to account for high morbidity and mortality in patients surviving the initial aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Nimodipine is the only drug known to reduce delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), but it is believed not to affect large vessel CVS. Milrinone has emerged as a promising option. Our retrospective study focused on the effectiveness of the intra-arterial application of both drugs in monotherapy and combined therapy.

Methods

We searched for patients with aneurysmal SAH, angiographically confirmed CVS, and at least one intra-arterial pharmacological angioplasty. Ten defined vessel sections on angiograms were assessed before and after vasodilator infusion. The improvement in vessel diameters was compared to the frequency of DCI-related cerebral infarction before hospital discharge and functional outcome reported as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score after 6 months.

Results

Between 2014 and 2021, 132 intra-arterial interventions (144 vascular territories, 12 bilaterally) in 30 patients were analyzed for this study. The vasodilating effect of nimodipine was superior to milrinone in all intradural segments. There was no significant intergroup difference concerning outcome in mRS (p = 0.217). Only nimodipine or the combined approach could prevent DCI-related infarction (both 57.1%), not milrinone alone (87.5%). Both drugs induced a doubled vasopressor demand due to blood pressure decrease, but milrinone alone induced tachycardia.

Conclusions

The monotherapy with intra-arterial nimodipine was superior to milrinone. Nimodipine and milrinone may be used complementary in an escalation scheme with the administration of nimodipine first, complemented by milrinone in cases of severe CVS. Milrinone monotherapy is not recommended.

The incidence of cerebral arterial vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To describe a pooled estimated incidence of cerebral arterial vasospasm (aVSP) following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) and to describe sources of variation in the reported incidence.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. The primary outcome was the proportion of study participants diagnosed with aVSP. We assessed for heterogeneity based on mode of imaging, indication for imaging, study design and clinical characteristics at a study level.

Results

We identified 120 studies, including 19,171 participants. More than 40 different criteria were used to diagnose aVSP. The pooled estimate of the proportion of patients diagnosed with aVSP was 0.42 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.46, I² = 96.5%). There was no evidence that the incidence aVSP was different, nor that heterogeneity was reduced, when the estimate was assessed by study type, imaging modalities, the proportion of participants with high grade CT scores or poor grade clinical scores. The pooled estimate of the proportion of study participants diagnosed with aVSP was higher in studies with routine imaging (0.47, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.52, I² = 96.5%) compared to those when imaging was performed when indicated (0.30, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.36, I² = 94.0%, p for between-group difference < 0.0005).

Conclusion

The incidence of cerebral arterial vasospasm following aSAH varies widely from 9 to 93% of study participants. Heterogeneity in the reported incidence may be due to variation in the criteria used to diagnose aVSP. A standard set of diagnostic criteria is necessary to resolve the role that aVSP plays in delayed neurological deterioration following aSAH.

PROSPERO registration

CRD42020191895

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00234-022-03004-w.

Early management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in a hospital with neurosurgical/neuroendovascular facilities: a consensus and clinical recommendations of the Italian Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SIAARTI)-part 2

BACKGROUND

Questions remain on the optimal management of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients once they are admitted to the referring center, before and after the aneurysm treatment. To address these issues, we created a consensus of experts endorsed by the Italian Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) to provide clinical guidance regarding this topic. Specifically, in this manuscript (part 2), we aim to provide a list of experts' recommendations regarding the management of SAH patients in a center with neurosurgical/neuroendovascular facilities after aneurysm treatment.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary consensus panel composed by 24 physicians selected for their established clinical and scientific expertise in the acute management of SAH patients with different specializations (anesthesia/intensive care, neurosurgery, and interventional neuroradiology) was created. A modified Delphi approach was adopted.

RESULTS

A total of 33 statements were discussed, voted, and approved. Consensus was reached on 30 recommendations (28 strong and 2 weak). In 3 cases, where consensus could not be agreed upon, no recommendation was provided.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus provides practical recommendations (and not mandatory standard of practice) to support clinician's decision-making in the management of SAH patients in centers with neurosurgical/neuroendovascular facilities after aneurysm securing.

Early Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Non-Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage who Undergo Catheter Angiography: Incidence, Associated Risk Factors and Impact on Outcome

OBJECTIVES

After subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), potential renal insults are numerous but the burden of early acute kidney injury (AKI) is unclear. We determined its incidence, rate of persistence, risk factors, and impact on patients' outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with non-traumatic SAH were retrospectively included if they underwent catheter angiography within the 48 h after their admission to the intensive care unit. Early AKI was defined according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) criteria, analyzed from the time of catheter angiography. Early AKI was considered as persistent if the KDIGO stage did not decrease between the 48th and the 60th hour.

RESULTS

Among 499 consecutive patients, early AKI (mostly oliguria) occurred in 132 (26%): stage 1, 2 and 3 in 72 (14%), 44 (9%), and 16 (3%) patients, respectively. It persisted in 36% of cases. Early AKI occurred more likely when SAH was severe or renal function was impaired at hospital admission: adjusted odds ratio of 2.76 [95% 1.77-4.30] and 3.32 [1.17-9.46], respectively. ICU and hospital lengths of stay were longer in patients who developed early AKI than in patients who did not: 16 [9-29] versus 12 [4-24] days (p = 0.0003) and 21 [14-43] versus 16 [11-32] days (p = 0.007), respectively. There was an independent link between early AKI and renal outcome (n = 274 in the model) but not with hospital mortality (n = 453).

CONCLUSIONS

One quarter of our population developed early AKI, mostly oliguria. It persisted beyond the 48th hour in one third of cases. The associated risk factors we identified were non-modifiable.

Hemodynamic response and clinical outcome following intravenous milrinone plus norepinephrine-based hyperdynamic hypertensive therapy in patients suffering secondary cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Purpose

Intravenous and intra-arterial milrinone as a rescue measure for delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has been adopted by several groups, but so far, evidence for the clinical benefit is unclear and effect on brain perfusion is unknown. The aim of the actual analysis was to define cerebral hemodynamic effects and outcome of intravenous milrinone plus norepinephrine supplemented by intra-arterial nimodipine as a rescue strategy for DCI following aneurysmal SAH.

Methods

Of 176 patients with aneurysmal SAH treated at our neurosurgical department between April 2016 and March 2021, 98 suffered from DCI and were submitted to rescue therapy. For the current analysis, characteristics of these patients and clinical response to rescue therapy were correlated with hemodynamic parameters, as assessed by CT angiography (CTA) and perfusion CT. Time to peak (TTP) delay in the ischemic focus and the volume with a TTP delay of more than 4 s (T4 volume) were used as hemodynamic parameters.

Results

The median delay to neurological deterioration following SAH was 5 days. Perfusion CT at that time showed median T4 volumes of 40 cc and mean focal TTP delays of 2.5 ± 2.1 s in these patients. Following rescue therapy, median T4 volume decreased to 10 cc and mean focal TTP delay to 1.7 ± 1.9 s. Seventeen patients (17% of patients with DCI) underwent additional intra-arterial spasmolysis using nimodipine. Visible resolution of macroscopic vasospasm on CTA was observed in 43% patients with DCI and verified vasospasm on CTA, including those managed with additional intra-arterial spasmolysis. Initial WFNS grade, occurrence of secondary infarction, ischemic volumes and TTP delays at the time of decline, the time to clinical decline, and the necessity for additional intra-arterial spasmolysis were identified as the most important features determining neurological outcome at 6 months.

Conclusion

The current analysis shows that cerebral perfusion in the setting of secondary cerebral ischemia following SAH is measurably improved by milrinone and norepinephrine–based hyperdynamic therapy. A long-term clinical benefit by the addition of milrinone appears likely. Separation of the direct effect of milrinone from the effect of induced hypertension is not possible based on the present dataset.