Anesthesia for interventional pulmonology procedures: a review of advanced diagnostic and therapeutic bronchoscopy

Supraglottic Jet Oxygenation and Ventilation to Minimize Hypoxia in Patients Receiving Flexible Bronchoscopy Under Deep Sedation: A 3-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Hypoxia often occurs due to shared airway and anesthetic sedation-induced hypoventilation in patients receiving flexible bronchoscopy (FB) under deep sedation. Previous evidence has shown that supraglottic jet oxygenation and ventilation (SJOV) via Wei nasal jet tube (WNJ) reduces the incidence of hypoxia during FB. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which SJOV via WNJ could decrease the incidence of hypoxia in patients under deep sedation as compared to oxygen supplementation via WNJ alone or nasal catheter (NC) for oxygen supplementation during FB.

METHODS

This was a single-center 3-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT). Adult patients scheduled to undergo FB were randomly assigned to 3 groups: NC (oxygen supplementation via NC), low-pressure low-flow (LPLF) (low-pressure oxygen supplementation via WNJ alone), or SJOV (high-pressure oxygen supplementation via WNJ). The primary outcome was hypoxia (defined as peripheral saturation of oxygen [Sp o2 ] <90% lasting more than 5 seconds) during FB. Secondary outcomes included subclinical respiratory depression or severe hypoxia, and rescue interventions specifically performed for hypoxia treatment. Other evaluated outcomes were sore throat, xerostomia, nasal bleeding, and SJOV-related barotraumatic events.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-two randomized patients were included in 3 interventions (n = 44 in each), and all were included in the final analysis under intention to treat. Hypoxia occurred in 4 of 44 patients (9.1%) allocated to SJOV, compared to 38 of 44 patients (86%) allocated to NC, with a relative risk (RR) for hypoxia, 0.11; 98% confidence interval (CI), 0.02-0.51; P < .001; or to 27 of 44 patients (61%) allocated to LPLF, with RR for hypoxia, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04-0.61; P < .001, respectively. The percentage of subclinical respiratory depression was also significantly diminished in patients with SJOV (39%) compared with patients with NC (100%) or patients with LPLF (96%), both P < .001. In SJOV, no severe hypoxia event occurred. More remedial interventions for hypoxia were needed in the patients with NC. Higher risk of xerostomia was observed in patients with SJOV. No severe adverse event was observed throughout the study.

CONCLUSIONS

SJOV via WNJ effectively reduces the incidence of hypoxia during FB under deep sedation.

Current Practices Supporting Rigid Bronchoscopy-An International Survey

BACKGROUND

There are no guidelines for anesthesia or staff support needed during rigid bronchoscopy (RB). Identifying current practice patterns for RB pertinent to anesthesia, multidisciplinary teams, and algorithms of intra and post-procedural care may inform best practice recommendations.

METHODS

Thirty-three-question survey created obtaining practice patterns for RB, disseminated via email to the members of the American Association of Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology and the American College of Chest Physicians Interventional Chest Diagnostic Procedures Network.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-five clinicians participated. Presence of a dedicated interventional pulmonology (IP) suite correlated with having a dedicated multidisciplinary RB team ( P =0.0001) and predicted higher likelihood of implementing team-based algorithms for managing complications (39.4% vs. 23.5%, P =0.024). A dedicated anesthesiology team was associated with the increased use of high-frequency jet ventilation ( P =0.0033), higher likelihood of laryngeal mask airway use post-RB extubation ( P =0.0249), and perceived lower rates of postprocedural anesthesia adverse effects ( P =0.0170). Although total intravenous anesthesia was the most used technique during RB (94.29%), significant variability in the modes of ventilation and administration of muscle relaxants was reported. Higher comfort levels in performing RB are reported for both anesthesiologists ( P =0.0074) and interventional pulmonologists ( P =0.05) with the presence of dedicated anesthesia and RB supportive teams, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Interventional bronchoscopists value dedicated services supporting RB. Multidisciplinary dedicated RB teams are more likely to implement protocols guiding management of intraprocedural complications. There are no preferred modes of ventilation during RB. These findings may guide future research on RB practices.

Safety of Rigid Bronchoscopy for Therapeutic Intervention at the Intensive Care Unit Bedside

Background and Objective: Although rigid bronchoscopy is generally performed in the operating room (OR), the intervention is sometimes emergently required at the intensive care unit (ICU) bedside. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of rigid bronchoscopy at the ICU bedside. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients who underwent rigid bronchoscopy while in the ICU from January 2014 to December 2020. According to the location of rigid bronchoscopic intervention, patients were classified into the ICU group (n = 171, cases emergently performed at the ICU bedside without anesthesiologists) and the OR group (n = 165, cases electively performed in the OR with anesthesiologists). The risk of intra- and post-procedural complications in the ICU group was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, with the OR group as the reference category. Results: Of 336 patients, 175 (52.1%) were moribund and survival was not expected without intervention, and 170 (50.6%) received invasive respiratory support before the intervention. The most common reasons for intervention were post-intubation tracheal stenosis (39.3%) and malignant airway obstruction (34.5%). Although the overall rate of intra-procedural complications did not differ between the two groups (86.0% vs. 80.6%, p = 0.188), post-procedural complications were more frequent in the ICU group than in the OR group (24.0% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.005). Severe complications requiring unexpected invasive management occurred only post-procedurally and were more common in the ICU group (10.5% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.052). In the fully adjusted model, the ICU group had increased odds for severe post-procedural complications, but statistical significance was not observed (odds ratio, 2.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-8.88; p = 0.144). Conclusions: Although general anesthesia is generally considered the gold standard for rigid bronchoscopy, our findings indicate that rigid bronchoscopy may be safely performed at the ICU bedside in selective cases of emergency. Moreover, adequate patient selection and close post-procedural monitoring are required to prevent severe complications.

Comparison of the Effects of Esketamine/Propofol and Sufentanil/Propofol on the Incidence of Intraoperative Hypoxemia during Bronchoscopy: Protocol for a Randomized, Prospective, Parallel-Group Trial

BACKGROUND

Propofol, ketamine, and sufentanil are the most commonly used anesthetics during bronchoscopy, alone or in combination, for sedation. Esketamine is an s-enantiomer of ketamine racemate and has both sedative and analgesic effects. Esketamine does not inhibit respiration and maintains hemodynamic stability. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of esketamine/propofol with sufentanil/propofol for patients during bronchoscopy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing bronchoscopy will be randomly assigned to receive either sufentanil/propofol (sufentanil group; n = 33; sufentanil: 0.2 μg/kg) or esketamine/propofol (esketamine group; n = 33; esketamine: 0.2 mg/kg) for sedation and analgesia. Intraoperative clinical information, general anesthetic drug dosage, the incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia, total time of hypoxemia, awakening time, delirium, nausea and vomiting, adverse reactions, and patient satisfaction will be collected.

DISCUSSION

Hypoxia has detrimental effects on patients with respiratory disease. Ameliorating hypoxemia in patients undergoing bronchoscopy is critical. Our results will provide effective sedation with esketamine in patients undergoing bronchoscopy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese clinical trial registry: ChiCTR2200058990.

The i-gel supraglottic airway device improves airway management during endobronchial ablative therapy under general anesthesia: a case report

Endobronchial ablative therapy (EAT) in patients with preexisting obstructive airway disease can cause hypoxemia because bronchoscope insertion interferes with ventilation and a low fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) is essential to avoid airway fire. A man in his early 50s with moderately severe obstructive airway disease was scheduled for EAT for treatment of tracheal papillomatosis. Ventilation and oxygenation would have been difficult because of narrowing of the endotracheal tube by bronchoscopic insertion and a low FiO₂; therefore, an i-gel supraglottic airway device with a larger inner diameter was inserted. All visible intratracheal papillomas were ablated by a potassium titanyl phosphate laser through the bronchoscopic port that passed through the lumen of the i-gel at an FiO₂ of 0.3. During anesthesia for EAT, the i-gel supraglottic airway device provided a wider lumen for ventilation. We were thus able to provide stable ventilation at an FiO₂ of 0.3 during EAT in this patient with obstructive airway disease, avoiding airway fire and hypoxemia.

Selection of the access channel in bronchoscopic intervention

BACKGROUND

At present, bronchoscopic intervention has become an important treatment approach for central airway obstruction (CAO). Choosing an appropriate access channel for different patients during this operation has become a research focus.

METHODS

Data of bronchoscopic interventions in 201 patients with CAO in which one of endotracheal intubation, laryngeal mask, or rigid bronchoscope were used as the only access channel were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The total immediate effective rate was 94.1% (398/423), and the main complications related to the access channels included hypoxemia, elevated arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, arrhythmia, airway mucosa tear, glottic edema, vocal cord injury, tooth loss, massive bleeding, airway mucosal necrosis, and asphyxia. The incidence of complications was 16.8% (71/423). Glottic edema was the most common complication with an incidence of 7.8% (33/423) and accounted for 46.5% of all complications. Glottic edema only occurred in the laryngeal mask and rigid bronchoscope groups, and the incidence was significantly correlated with the operation time (p < 0.001). Massive bleeding related to the access channel remains the most serious complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Endotracheal intubation, laryngeal mask, and rigid bronchoscope each have their own advantages and disadvantages. The most appropriate access channel should depend on a comprehensive assessment of the patient.

Anesthesia for interventional pulmonology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Anesthesia for pulmonological interventions is a demanding challenge. This article discusses recent innovations and the implications for periinterventional anesthetic management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Interventional pulmonology is a rapidly expanding specialty with very complex diagnostic and therapeutic approaches that include oncological staging, treatment of obstructive and restrictive lung diseases, recanalization of endobronchial obstructions, and retrieval of foreign bodies. With the development of advanced diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, the application is extended to critically ill patients. Current evidence focusing on the anesthetic techniques is presented here.

SUMMARY

The development of new pulmonological methods requires a tailored anesthesiological approach. Their specific impact must be taken into account to ensure patient safety, goal-oriented outcome diagnostics and -quality, successful interventions, and patient comfort.

Prospective cohort study of topical versus general anaesthesia for flexible bronchoscopy

BACKGROUND

Topical anaesthesia (TA) and general anaesthesia (GA) are performed for flexible bronchoscopy (FB) worldwide. However, few studies have compared the two anaesthesia methods in terms of perioperative discomforts.

METHODS

648 patients undergoing FB were recruited in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, a specialised medical centre in China, from January 2019 to December 2019. The patients underwent FB under TA or GA. The TA group received 1% lidocaine by nasal route, and the GA group received total intravenous anaesthesia. The level of perioperative discomfort and patient satisfaction were assessed. The investigators were blind to the group allocation.

RESULTS

Finally, 239 patients received TA and 182 patients received GA. The basic demographic properties were comparable between two groups. There were no significant differences in terms of sore throat, 61.5% in TA group vs 57.1% in GA group. However, there was a significant difference in terms of postoperative nausea and vomiting (34.3% in TA group vs 56.6% in GA group), and dizziness (37.7% in TA group vs 78% in GA group). There was a significant difference in terms of total complication scores (17.2±5.1 in TA group vs 7.7±4.3 in GA group) and satisfaction degree of patients (2.6±1.1 in TA group vs 4.3±0.8 in GA group).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with TA, GA significantly reduced the total complication scores of perioperative discomforts and improved the satisfaction score of patients for FB.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This clinical trial was registered with www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1800019971).

Foreign body aspirations in dental clinics: a narrative review

Foreign body aspiration can produce a medical emergency. Obstruction of the airways can be life-threatening, and complications may develop in less-severe cases if it is left untreated. Although it is more prevalent in children by approximately three times, adults can still experience it, and it is more frequently related to healthcare in adults. Objects used in dental treatment are usually placed in the oral cavity and can be ingested or inhaled by accident. Dental treatment has been identified as an important cause of the misplacement of foreign bodies in the airway. However, few reports have been published on dentistry-related foreign body aspiration. This paper discusses the disease course, management, and clinical outcomes of foreign body aspiration, especially those associated with dentistry. The patient must be examined for respiratory distress. If the patient is unstable, urgent airway management and the maneuvers for removal should be performed. Radiographs and computed tomography can help identify and locate the object. The treatment of choice is often bronchoscopy, and both flexible and rigid endoscopes can be used depending on the situation. Preventive measures need to be implemented to avoid inhalation accidents given the potential consequences. Though the incidence is rare, healthcare levels need to be enhanced to avert morbidity and mortality. Radiological evaluation and bronchoscopy are vital for management.

Complications of bronchial thermoplasty using laryngeal mask: case series

Severe asthma affects more than 250 million people and represents high healthcare costs. Bronchial thermoplasty is a relatively new technique in interventional pulmonology for managing this condition. The procedure is done under general anesthesia and the patients are mostly ASA II and III; therefore, the anesthesia plan must be safe. The purpose of the article is to describe the anesthetic technique used (general anesthesia and laryngeal mask) and the immediate and early complications of the procedure. Four patients were included, each undergoing three sessions. The complications during and immediately after the procedure, as well as the early complications (up to seven days post-procedure) that could have required hospital management were discussed. In three of the sessions at least one acute bronchospasm event presented, but only one patient required hospital admission for more than 24 hours. Experience suggests that thermoplasty may be safely conducted under general anesthesia and laryngeal mask.

Safety application of muscle relaxants and the traditional low-frequency ventilation during the flexible or rigid bronchoscopy in patients with central airway obstruction: a retrospective observational study

Background

Bronchoscopy treatments of central airway obstruction (CAO) under general anesthesia are high-risky procedures, and posing a giant challenge to the anesthesiologists. We summarized and analyzed our clinical experience in patients with CAO undergoing flexible or rigid bronchoscopy, to estimate the safety of skeletal muscle relaxants application and the traditional Low-frequency ventilation.

Methods

Clinical data of 375 patients with CAO who underwent urgent endoscopic treatments in general anesthesia from January 2016 to October 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The use ratio of skeletal muscle relaxants, dose of skeletal muscle relaxants used, the incidence of perioperative adverse events, adequacy of ventilation and gas exchange, post-operative recovery between rigid bronchoscopy and flexible bronchoscopy therapy, and risk factors for postoperative ICU admission were evaluated.

Results

Of the 375 patients with CAO, 204 patients were treated with flexible bronchoscopy and 171 patients were treated with rigid bronchoscopy. Muscle relaxants were used in 362 of 375 patients (including 313 cisatracurium, 45 rocuronium, 4 atracurium, and 13 unrecorded). The usage rate of muscle relaxants (96.5% in total) was very high in patients with CAO who underwent either flexible bronchoscopy (96.6%) or rigid bronchoscopy (96.5%) therapy. The dosage of skeletal muscle relaxants (Cisatracium) used was higher in rigid bronchoscopy compared with flexible bronchoscopy therapy (10.8 ± 3.8 VS 11.6 ± 3.6 mg, respectively, p < 0.05). No patient suffered the failure of ventilation, bronchospasm and intraoperative cough either in flexible or rigid bronchoscopy therapy. Hypoxemia was occurred in 13 patients (8 in flexible, 5 in rigid bronchoscopy) during the procedure, and reintubation after extubation happened in 2 patients with flexible bronchoscopy. Sufficient ventilation was successfully established using the traditional Low-frequency ventilation with no significant carbon dioxide accumulation and hypoxemia occurred both in flexible and rigid bronchoscopy group (p > 0.05). Three patients (1 in flexible and 2 in rigid) died, during the post-operative recovery, and the higher grade of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and obvious dyspnea or orthopnea were the independent risk factors for postoperative ICU admission.

Conclusion

The muscle relaxants and low-frequency traditional ventilation can be safely used both in flexible and rigid bronchoscopy treatments in patients with CAO. These results may provide strong clinical evidence for optimizing the anesthesia management of bronchoscopy for these patients.

Induction and maintenance of procedural sedation in adults: focus on remimazolam injection

Introduction: Procedural sedation (PS) is a humane way to help patients get through painful medical procedures by the administration of sedative drugs combined with analgesics. However, each of the currently used medications has certain shortcomings, urging the search for a new drug. Remimazolam, a novel benzodiazepine, is an ultra-short-acting hypnotic agent invented out of the 'soft drug' development.Areas covered: This presented review provides an overview of the drugs used in clinical practice for the induction and maintenance of procedural sedation in adults, focusing on the newly investigated benzodiazepine remimazolam. Literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE and ClinicalTrial.gov databases from January 2007 to December 2020.Expert opinion: Based on the reported clinical trials so far, remimazolam has demonstrated its effectiveness and safety with promising properties including rapid onset, short duration of action, predictable and consistent recovery profile, metabolism almost unaffected by liver or renal function, with non or minimal cardiorespiratory depression, and availability with a reversal drug. With marketing approval received recently, remimazolam is expected to have a place in the practice for procedural sedation in the near future if its efficacy and safety are further confirmed by more clinical trials and post-market analyses.

High frequency jet ventilation through mask contributes to oxygen therapy among patients undergoing bronchoscopic intervention under deep sedation

Background

High frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) is an open ventilating technique to maintain ventilation for emergency or difficult airway. However, whether jet ventilation or conventional oxygen therapy (COT) is more effective and safe in maintaining adequate oxygenation, is unclear among patients with airway stenosis during bronchoscopic intervention (BI) under deep sedation.

Methods

A prospective randomized cohort study was conducted to compare COT (high flow oxygen) with normal frequency jet ventilation (NFJV) and HFJV in oxygen supplementation during BI under deep sedation from March 2020 to August 2020. Patients receiving BI under deep sedation were randomly divided into 3 parallel groups of 50 patients each: the COT group (fractional inspired oxygen (FiO₂) of 1.0, 12 L/min), the NFJV group (FiO₂ of 1.0, driving pressure of 0.1 MPa, and respiratory rate (RR) 15 bpm) and the HFJV Group (FiO₂ of 1.0, driving pressure of 0.1 MPa, and RR of 1200 bpm). Pulse oxygen saturation (SpO₂), mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were recorded during the whole procedure. Arterial blood gas was examined and recorded 15 min after the procedure was initiated. The procedure duration, dose of anesthetics, and adverse events during BI in the three groups were also recorded.

Results

A total of 161 patients were enrolled, with 11 patients excluded. The clinical characteristics were similar among the three groups. PaO₂ of the COT and NFJV groups was significantly lower than that of the HFJV group (P < 0.001). PaO₂ was significantly correlated with ventilation mode (P < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.019) and procedure duration (P = 0.001). Multiple linear regression showed that only BMI and procedure duration were independent influencing factors of arterial blood gas PaO₂ (P = 0.040 and P = 0.002, respectively). The location of airway lesions and the severity of airway stenosis were not statistically correlated with PaCO₂ and PaO₂.

Conclusions

HFJV could effectively and safely improve intra-operative PaO₂ among patients with airway stenosis during BI in deep sedation, and it did not increase the intra-operative PaCO₂ and the risk of hypercapnia. PaO₂ was correlated with ventilation mode, BMI and procedure duration. Only BMI and procedure duration were independent influencing factors of arterial blood gas PaO₂. PaCO₂ was not correlated with any preoperative factor.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Registration number, ChiCTR2000031110, registered on March 22, 2020.

Upper Airway Nerve Block for Rigid Bronchoscopy in the Patients with Tracheal Stenosis: A Case Serie

Background

Rigid bronchoscopy is often used to diagnose and treat the location of resection of the tracheal stenosis. It is a selective procedure for the dilatation of tracheal stenosis, especially when accompanied by respiratory distress.

Objectives

We introduced patients who were diagnosed with tracheal stenosis and candidate for rigid bronchoscopy dilatation by the upper airway nerve blocks.

Methods

This prospective observational study was conducted on 17 patients who underwent dilatation with rigid bronchoscopy in tracheal stenosis at Hospitals affiliated with Babol University of Medical Sciences from 2002 to 2017. The patients were given three nerve blocks, 6 bilateral superior laryngeal nerve block, bilateral glossopharyngeal nerve block, and recurrent laryngeal nerve block (transtracheal) before awake rigid bronchoscopy using 2% lidocaine. We evaluated the demographic data, the cause of tracheal stenosis, the quality of the airway nerve block (Intubation score), patients’ satisfaction from bronchoscopy and thoracic surgeons’ satisfaction. Complications of nerve blocks were recorded.

Results

From 2002 to 2017, 17 patients (14 were male and 3 were) female with tracheal stenosis who were candidates for dilatation with bronchoscopy and accepted the upper nerve block were included. The quality of the block was acceptable in 16 (94%) patients. 15 patients received fentanyl, and only two patients did not need to intravenous sedation. The mean age of patients was 29.59 ± 11.59. The average satisfaction of the surgeon was 8.82 ± 1.13 and the satisfaction of patients with anesthesia was 8.89 ± 1.16. There was one serious complication (laryngospasm) in one patient.

Conclusions

The upper airway nerve block method is a suitable anesthesia technique for patients with tracheal stenosis who are candidates for the tracheal dilatation with rigid bronoscopy, especially when the patient has respiratory distress and has not been evaluated before surgery.

Analysis of Infusion Patterns of Propofol and Remifentanil During Rigid Bronchoscopy Under Total Intravenous Anesthesia

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed the dosage pattern of anesthetic drugs administered to maintain anesthesia during rigid bronchoscopy.

METHODS

We enrolled a total of 81 patients who underwent rigid bronchoscopy under total intravenous anesthesia between April 2015 and March 2019. Anesthesia was maintained using propofol (target brain concentration 2.0 - 6.0 µg/mL) and remifentanil (target brain concentration 2.0 - 6.0 ng/mL). We analyzed the dosage patterns of the anesthetic agents during the procedure, as well as the changes in the dose of the anesthetic agents and the number of procedures repeated in the same patient.

RESULTS

The dose of propofol administered per minute to maintain anesthesia was inversely correlated with the total operation time (r² = 0.355, β = -0.067, P < 0.000) but was not significantly correlated with the number of times the procedure was repeated. The dose of remifentanil did not significantly differ during repeated procedures in the same patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The dose of propofol infusion tended to decrease over time during the rigid bronchoscopy procedure. This pattern was specific to propofol but not to remifentanil using TIVA. Understanding the pharmacokinetic properties of anesthetic drugs will help in their appropriate administration.

Ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block assists in anesthesia for bronchoscopic surgical procedure: A case report of anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy

INTRODUCTION

Evolving techniques in the field of therapeutic bronchoscopy have led to the return of rigid bronchoscopy in the treatment of complex central airway disease. Rigid bronchoscopy is typically performed under general anesthesia because of the strong stimulation caused by metal instruments. Anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy is challenging to administer because anesthesiologists and interventionists share the same working channel: the airway. Previously reviewed anesthetic methods are used primarily for short procedures. Balanced anesthesia with ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) block and total intravenous anesthesia might provide anesthesia for a prolonged procedure and facilitate patient recovery.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A patient with obstructed endobronchial stent was referred for therapeutic rigid bronchoscopy, which requires deeper anesthesia than flexible bronchoscopy. There were concerns of the stronger stimulation of the rigid bronchoscopy, lengthy duration of the procedure, higher risk of hypoxemia, and the difficulty of mechanical ventilation weaning after anesthesia due to the patients co-morbidities.

DIAGNOSIS

A 66-year-old female patient presented with a history of breast cancer with lung metastases. Right main bronchus obstruction due to external compression of lung metastases was relieved through insertion of an endobronchial stent, but obstructive granulation developed after 4 months. Presence of the malfunctioning stent caused severe cough and discomfort. Removal of the stent by using a flexible bronchoscope was attempted twice but failed.

INTERVENTIONS

Regional anesthesia of the upper airway through ultrasound-guided SLN block combined with intratracheal 2% lidocaine spray was performed to assist in total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) during rigid bronchoscopy.

OUTCOMES

The patient maintained steady spontaneous breathing throughout the procedure without laryngospasm, bucking, or desaturation. Emergence from anesthesia was smooth and rapid after propofol infusion was discontinued. The surgery lasted 2.5 hours without discontinuity, and no perioperative pulmonary or cardiovascular complications were noted.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided SLN block is a simple technique with a high success rate and low complication rate. Application of SLN block to assist TIVA provides sufficient anesthesia for lengthened therapeutic rigid bronchoscopy without interruption and facilitates patient recovery.

E-cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use-Associated Lung Injury-Lessons Learned: A Case Series

E-cigarette, or vaping, product use has been declared an epidemic, and a new disease has emerged from their use. We describe 4 patients with significant acute lung injury related to e-cigarette use who underwent bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage. All cases posed anesthetic challenges, including increased airway reactivity, hypoxia, increasing oxygen requirements, and, in 2 severe cases, the need for continued postprocedural mechanical ventilatory support. It is imperative that all members of the treating team are aware of the disproportionate risk of respiratory complications to anticipate the possible need for increased postprocedural respiratory support.

Indications, contraindications, and safety aspects of procedural sedation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is a steadily increasing demand for procedural sedation outside the operating room, frequently performed in comorbid high-risk adult patients. This review evaluates the feasibility and advantages of sedation vs. general anesthesia for some of these new procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Generally, sedation performed by experienced staff is safe. Although for some endoscopic or transcatheter interventions sedation is feasible, results of the intervention might be improved when performed under general anesthesia. For elected procedures like intra-arterial treatment after acute ischemic stroke, avoiding general anesthesia and sedation at all might be the optimal treatment.

SUMMARY

Anesthesiologists are facing continuously new indications for procedural sedation in sometimes sophisticated diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. Timely availability of anesthesia staff will mainly influence who is performing sedation, anesthesia or nonanesthesia personal. While the number of absolute contraindications for sedation decreased to almost zero, relative contraindications are becoming more relevant and should be tailored to the individual procedure and patient.