1
|
Faza NN, Harb SC, Wang DD, van den Dorpel MMP, Van Mieghem N, Little SH. Physical and Computational Modeling for Transcatheter Structural Heart Interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2024; 17:428-440. [PMID: 38569793 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
Structural heart disease interventions rely heavily on preprocedural planning and simulation to improve procedural outcomes and predict and prevent potential procedural complications. Modeling technologies, namely 3-dimensional (3D) printing and computational modeling, are nowadays increasingly used to predict the interaction between cardiac anatomy and implantable devices. Such models play a role in patient education, operator training, procedural simulation, and appropriate device selection. However, current modeling is often limited by the replication of a single static configuration within a dynamic cardiac cycle. Recognizing that health systems may face technical and economic limitations to the creation of "in-house" 3D-printed models, structural heart teams are pivoting to the use of computational software for modeling purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadeen N Faza
- Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Stephen H Little
- Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oks D, Reza S, Vázquez M, Houzeaux G, Kovarovic B, Samaniego C, Bluestein D. Effect of Sinotubular Junction Size on TAVR Leaflet Thrombosis: A Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis. Ann Biomed Eng 2024; 52:719-733. [PMID: 38097896 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03419-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
TAVR has emerged as a standard approach for treating severe aortic stenosis patients. However, it is associated with several clinical complications, including subclinical leaflet thrombosis characterized by Hypoattenuated Leaflet Thickening (HALT). A rigorous analysis of TAVR device thrombogenicity considering anatomical variations is essential for estimating this risk. Clinicians use the Sinotubular Junction (STJ) diameter for TAVR sizing, but there is a paucity of research on its influence on TAVR devices thrombogenicity. A Medtronic Evolut® TAVR device was deployed in three patient models with varying STJ diameters (26, 30, and 34 mm) to evaluate its impact on post-deployment hemodynamics and thrombogenicity, employing a novel computational framework combining prosthesis deployment and fluid-structure interaction analysis. The 30 mm STJ patient case exhibited the best hemodynamic performance: 5.94 mmHg mean transvalvular pressure gradient (TPG), 2.64 cm2 mean geometric orifice area (GOA), and the lowest mean residence time (TR)-indicating a reduced thrombogenic risk; 26 mm STJ exhibited a 10 % reduction in GOA and a 35% increase in mean TPG compared to the 30 mm STJ; 34 mm STJ depicted hemodynamics comparable to the 30 mm STJ, but with a 6% increase in TR and elevated platelet stress accumulation. A smaller STJ size impairs adequate expansion of the TAVR stent, which may lead to suboptimal hemodynamic performance. Conversely, a larger STJ size marginally enhances the hemodynamic performance but increases the risk of TAVR leaflet thrombosis. Such analysis can aid pre-procedural planning and minimize the risk of TAVR leaflet thrombosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Oks
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Computer Applications in Science and Engineering, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Symon Reza
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8084, USA
| | - Mariano Vázquez
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Computer Applications in Science and Engineering, Barcelona, Spain
- ELEM Biotech SL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Guillaume Houzeaux
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Computer Applications in Science and Engineering, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Brandon Kovarovic
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8084, USA
| | - Cristóbal Samaniego
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Computer Applications in Science and Engineering, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Danny Bluestein
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8084, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim JH, Sadri V, Chen H, Bhat S, Kohli K, Makkar R, Babaliaros VC, Sharma RP, Yoganathan AP. Effect of Ascending Aortic Curvature on Flow in the Sinus and Neo-sinus Following TAVR: A Patient-Specific Study. Ann Biomed Eng 2024; 52:425-439. [PMID: 37922056 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03392-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/05/2023]
Abstract
Patient-specific aortic geometry and its influence on the flow in the vicinity of Transcatheter Aortic Valve (TAV) has been highlighted in numerous studies using both in silico and in vitro experiments. However, there has not yet been a detailed Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) experiment conducted to quantify the relationship between the geometry, flow downstream of TAV, and the flow in the sinus and the neo-sinus. We tested six different patient-specific aorta models with a 26-mm SAPIEN 3 valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) in a left heart simulator with coronary flow. Velocities in all three cusps and circulation downstream of TAV were computed to evaluate the influence of the ascending aorta curvature on the flow field. The in vitro analysis showed that the patient-specific aortic curvature had positive correlation to the circulation in the ascending aorta (p = 0.036) and circulation had negative correlation to the particle washout time in the cusps (p = 0.011). These results showed that distinct vortical flow patterns in the ascending aorta as the main jet impinges on the aortic wall causes a recirculation region that facilitates the flow back into the sinus and the neo-sinus, thus reducing the risk of flow stagnation and washout time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Hyun Kim
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Vahid Sadri
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Huang Chen
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sanchita Bhat
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Keshav Kohli
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Raj Makkar
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Rahul P Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ajit P Yoganathan
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grande Gutiérrez N, Mukherjee D, Bark D. Decoding thrombosis through code: a review of computational models. J Thromb Haemost 2024; 22:35-47. [PMID: 37657562 PMCID: PMC11064820 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
From the molecular level up to a blood vessel, thrombosis and hemostasis involves many interconnected biochemical and biophysical processes over a wide range of length and time scales. Computational modeling has gained eminence in offering insights into these processes beyond what can be obtained from in vitro or in vivo experiments, or clinical measurements. The multiscale and multiphysics nature of thrombosis has inspired a wide range of modeling approaches that aim to address how a thrombus forms and dismantles. Here, we review recent advances in computational modeling with a focus on platelet-based thrombosis. We attempt to summarize the diverse range of modeling efforts straddling the wide-spectrum of physical phenomena, length scales, and time scales; highlighting key advancements and insights from existing studies. Potential information gleaned from models is discussed, ranging from identification of thrombus-prone regions in patient-specific vasculature to modeling thrombus deformation and embolization in response to fluid forces. Furthermore, we highlight several limitations of current models, future directions in the field, and opportunities for clinical translation, to illustrate the state-of-the-art. There are a plethora of opportunity areas for which models can be expanded, ranging from topics of thromboinflammation to platelet production and clearance. Through successes demonstrated in existing studies described here, as well as continued advancements in computational methodologies and computer processing speeds and memory, in silico investigations in thrombosis are poised to bring about significant knowledge growth in the years to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noelia Grande Gutiérrez
- Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Mechanical Engineering Pittsburgh, PA, USA. https://twitter.com/ngrandeg
| | - Debanjan Mukherjee
- University of Colorado Boulder, Paul M. Rady Department of Mechanical Engineering Boulder, CO, USA. https://twitter.com/debanjanmukh
| | - David Bark
- Washington University in St Louis, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology and Oncology St Louis, MO, USA; Washington University in St Louis, Department of Biomedical Engineering St Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oks D, Reza S, Vázquez M, Houzeaux G, Kovarovic B, Samaniego C, Bluestein D. Effect of Sinotubular Junction Size on TAVR Leaflet Thrombosis: A Fluid-structure Interaction Analysis. medRxiv 2023:2023.11.13.23298476. [PMID: 38014278 PMCID: PMC10680880 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.13.23298476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Purpose TAVR has emerged as a standard approach for treating severe aortic stenosis patients. However, it is associated with several clinical complications, including subclinical leaflet thrombosis characterized by Hypoattenuated Leaflet Thickening (HALT). A rigorous analysis of TAVR device thrombogenicity considering anatomical variations is essential for estimating this risk. Clinicians use the Sinotubular Junction (STJ) diameter for TAVR sizing, but there is a paucity of research on its influence on TAVR devices thrombogenicity. Methods A Medtronic Evolut® TAVR device was deployed in three patient models with varying STJ diameters (26, 30, and 34mm) to evaluate its impact on post-deployment hemodynamics and thrombogenicity, employing a novel computational framework combining prosthesis deployment and fluid- structure interaction analysis. Results The 30 mm STJ patient case exhibited the best hemodynamic performance: 5.94 mmHg mean transvalvular pressure gradient (TPG), 2.64 cm 2 mean geometric orifice area (GOA), and the lowest mean residence time (T R ) - indicating a reduced thrombogenic risk; 26 mm STJ exhibited a 10 % reduction in GOA and a 35% increase in mean TPG compared to the 30 mm STJ; 34 mm STJ depicted hemodynamics comparable to the 30 mm STJ, but with a 6% increase in T R and elevated platelet stress accumulation. Conclusion A smaller STJ size impairs adequate expansion of the TAVR stent, which may lead to suboptimal hemodynamic performance. Conversely, a larger STJ size marginally enhances the hemodynamic performance but increases the risk of TAVR leaflet thrombosis. Such analysis can aid pre- procedural planning and minimize the risk of TAVR leaflet thrombosis.
Collapse
|
6
|
Barrett A, Brown JA, Smith MA, Woodward A, Vavalle JP, Kheradvar A, Griffith BE, Fogelson AL. A model of fluid-structure and biochemical interactions for applications to subclinical leaflet thrombosis. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2023; 39:e3700. [PMID: 37016277 PMCID: PMC10691439 DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) is a potentially serious complication of aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic valve in which blood clots form on the replacement valve. SLT is associated with increased risk of transient ischemic attacks and strokes and can progress to clinical leaflet thrombosis. SLT following aortic valve replacement also may be related to subsequent structural valve deterioration, which can impair the durability of the valve replacement. Because of the difficulty in clinical imaging of SLT, models are needed to determine the mechanisms of SLT and could eventually predict which patients will develop SLT. To this end, we develop methods to simulate leaflet thrombosis that combine fluid-structure interaction and a simplified thrombosis model that allows for deposition along the moving leaflets. Additionally, this model can be adapted to model deposition or absorption along other moving boundaries. We present convergence results and quantify the model's ability to realize changes in valve opening and pressures. These new approaches are an important advancement in our tools for modeling thrombosis because they incorporate both adhesion to the surface of the moving leaflets and feedback to the fluid-structure interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Barrett
- Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Jordan A. Brown
- Department of Mathematics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Margaret Anne Smith
- Department of Mathematics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andrew Woodward
- Advanced Medical Imaging Lab, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - John P. Vavalle
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Arash Kheradvar
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Boyce E. Griffith
- Departments of Mathematics, Applied Physical Sciences, and Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Carolina Center for Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Computational Medicine Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Aaron L. Fogelson
- Departments of Mathematics and Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Patel KP, Baumbach A. Future of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: where do we go from here? Heart 2023; 109:564-571. [PMID: 36631145 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kush P Patel
- Structural Heart Intervention Department, Barts Heart Centre, London, UK.,Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Andreas Baumbach
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK .,Cardiology, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Khodaei S, Garber L, Bauer J, Emadi A, Keshavarz-Motamed Z. Long-term prognostic impact of paravalvular leakage on coronary artery disease requires patient-specific quantification of hemodynamics. Sci Rep 2022; 12:21357. [PMID: 36494362 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21104-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a frequently used minimally invasive intervention for patient with aortic stenosis across a broad risk spectrum. While coronary artery disease (CAD) is present in approximately half of TAVR candidates, correlation of post-TAVR complications such as paravalvular leakage (PVL) or misalignment with CAD are not fully understood. For this purpose, we developed a multiscale computational framework based on a patient-specific lumped-parameter algorithm and a 3-D strongly-coupled fluid-structure interaction model to quantify metrics of global circulatory function, metrics of global cardiac function and local cardiac fluid dynamics in 6 patients. Based on our findings, PVL limits the benefits of TAVR and restricts coronary perfusion due to the lack of sufficient coronary blood flow during diastole phase (e.g., maximum coronary flow rate reduced by 21.73%, 21.43% and 21.43% in the left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LCX) and right coronary artery (RCA) respectively (N = 6)). Moreover, PVL may increase the LV load (e.g., LV load increased by 17.57% (N = 6)) and decrease the coronary wall shear stress (e.g., maximum wall shear stress reduced by 20.62%, 21.92%, 22.28% and 25.66% in the left main coronary artery (LMCA), left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LCX) and right coronary artery (RCA) respectively (N = 6)), which could promote atherosclerosis development through loss of the physiological flow-oriented alignment of endothelial cells. This study demonstrated that a rigorously developed personalized image-based computational framework can provide vital insights into underlying mechanics of TAVR and CAD interactions and assist in treatment planning and patient risk stratification in patients.
Collapse
|
9
|
Esmailie F, Razavi A, Yeats B, Sivakumar SK, Chen H, Samaee M, Shah IA, Veneziani A, Yadav P, Thourani VH, Dasi LP. Biomechanics of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Complications and Computational Predictive Modeling. Struct Heart 2022; 6:100032. [PMID: 37273734 PMCID: PMC10236878 DOI: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a rapidly growing field enabling replacement of diseased aortic valves without the need for open heart surgery. However, due to the nature of the procedure and nonremoval of the diseased tissue, there are rates of complications ranging from tissue rupture and coronary obstruction to paravalvular leak, valve thrombosis, and permanent pacemaker implantation. In recent years, computational modeling has shown a great deal of promise in its capabilities to understand the biomechanical implications of TAVR as well as help preoperatively predict risks inherent to device-patient-specific anatomy biomechanical interaction. This includes intricate replication of stent and leaflet designs and tested and validated simulated deployments with structural and fluid mechanical simulations. This review outlines current biomechanical understanding of device-related complications from TAVR and related predictive strategies using computational modeling. An outlook on future modeling strategies highlighting reduced order modeling which could significantly reduce the high time and cost that are required for computational prediction of TAVR outcomes is presented in this review paper. A summary of current commercial/in-development software is presented in the final section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fateme Esmailie
- The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Atefeh Razavi
- The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Breandan Yeats
- The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sri Krishna Sivakumar
- The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Huang Chen
- The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Milad Samaee
- The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Imran A. Shah
- The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Alessandro Veneziani
- Department of Mathematics, Department of Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Pradeep Yadav
- Department of Cardiology, Marcus Valve Center, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Vinod H. Thourani
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Marcus Valve Center, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lakshmi Prasad Dasi
- The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ihdayhid AR, Sathananthan J. Patient-Specific CT-Simulation in TAVR: An emerging guide in the lifetime journey of aortic valve disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
11
|
Pekkan K, Oshinski JN. Shaping the field of Cardiovascular Fluid Mechanics: The 40th Anniversary of Ajit Yoganathan's Research Laboratory. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2021; 12:557-558. [PMID: 34625905 DOI: 10.1007/s13239-021-00576-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kerem Pekkan
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - John N Oshinski
- Departments of Radiology & Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| |
Collapse
|