Y-box binding protein 1 (YB-1) promotes gefitinib resistance in lung adenocarcinoma cells by activating AKT signaling and epithelial-mesenchymal transition through targeting major vault protein (MVP)

Upregulated PARP1 confers breast cancer resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors via YB-1 phosphorylation

BACKGROUND

Cyclic-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 kinases, as the critical drivers of the cell cycle, are involved in the tumor progression of various malignancies. Pharmacologic inhibitors of CDK4/6 have shown significant clinical prospects in treating hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor-negative (HR + /HER2-) breast cancer (BC) patients. However, acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), as a common issue, has developed rapidly. It is of great significance that the identification of novel therapeutic targets facilitates overcoming the CDK4/6i resistance. PARP1, an amplified gene for CDK4/6i-resistant patients, was found to be significantly upregulated during the construction of CDK4/6i-resistant strains. Whether PARP1 drives CDK4/6i resistance in breast cancer is worth further study.

METHOD

PARP1 and p-YB-1 protein levels in breast cancer cells and tissues were quantified using Western blot (WB) analysis, immunohistochemical staining (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) assays. Bioinformatics analyses of Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA), Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) datasets were applied to explore the relationship between YB-1/PARP1 protein levels and CDK4/6i IC50. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) and crystal violet staining assays were performed to evaluate cell proliferation rates and drug killing effects. Flow cytometry assays were conducted to assess apoptosis rates and the G1/S ratio in the cell cycle. An EdU proliferation assay was used to detect the DNA replication ratio after treatment with PARP1 and YB-1 inhibitors. A ChIP assay was performed to assess the interaction of the transcription factor YB-1 and associated DNA regions. A double fluorescein reporter gene assay was designed to assess the influence of WT/S102A/S102E YB-1 on the promoter region of PARP1. Subcutaneous implantation models were applied for in vivo tumor growth evaluations.

RESULTS

Here, we reported that PARP1 was amplified in breast cancer cells and CDK4/6i-resistant patients, and knockdown or inhibition of PARP1 reversed drug resistance in cell experiments and animal models. In addition, upregulation of transcription factor YB-1 also occurred in CDK4/6i-resistant breast cancer, and YB-1 inhibition can regulate PARP1 expression. p-YB-1 and PARP1 were upregulated when treated with CDK4/6i based on the WB and IF results, and elevated PARP1 and p-YB-1 were almost simultaneously observed during the construction of MCF7AR-resistant strains. Inhibition of YB-1 or PAPR1 can cause decreased DNA replication, G1/S cycle arrest, and increased apoptosis. We initially confirmed that YB-1 can bind to the promoter region of PARP1 through a ChIP assay. Furthermore, we found that YB-1 phosphorylated at S102 was crucial for PARP1 transcription according to the double fluorescein reporter gene assay. The combination therapy of YB-1 inhibitors and CDK4/6i exerted a synergistic antitumor effect in vitro and in vivo. The clinical data suggested that HR + /HER2- patients with low expression of p-YB-1/PARP1 may be sensitive to CDK4/6i in breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicated that a ''YB-1/PARP1'' loop conferred resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Furthermore, interrupting the loop can enhance tumor killing in the xenograft tumor model, which provides a promising strategy against drug resistance in breast cancer.

A novel risk model of three gefitinib-related genes FBP1, SBK1 and AURKA is related to the immune microenvironment and is predicting prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma patients

PURPOSE

Gefitinib, an anticancer drug, has been reported to potentially improve the prognosis of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). This study aims to investigate the roles and mechanisms of Gefitinib.

METHODS

The effects of Gefitinib on the growth and migration of LUAD cells were assessed using various methods, including CCK-8, flow cytometry, wound healing, and Transwell assays. To analyze the function and mechanisms of the differentially expressed Gefitinib target genes (GTGs), data from the TCGA database were utilized. Kaplan-Meier survival and ROC analysis identified prognostic-related GTGs and constructed a prognostic nomogram in LUAD. Consensus clustering, COX analysis and survival analysis evaluated the relationship between GTGs and the prognosis of LUAD patients. The mechanisms of the risk model involved LUAD progression, and the relationship between the risk model and immune microenvironment were investigated.

RESULTS

Gefitinib could inhibit proliferation, migration and invasion and promote cell apoptosis. 84 DEGTGs were involved in RAS, MAPK, ERBB pathways. The DEGTGs (FBP1, SBK1, and AURKA) were the independent risk factors for dismal prognosis of LUAD patients and were used to establish risk model and nomogram. Gefitinib could promote the expression of FBP1 and inhibit the expression of SBK1 and AURKA. High-risk LUAD patients had the dismal prognosis, and the high-risk score group was significantly associated with the immune microenvironment.

CONCLUSION

FBP1, SBK1, and AURKA are prognostic risk factors, and the risk model and nomogram of FBP1, SBK1 and AURKA are associated with dismal prognosis and immune cell infiltration, and have huge prospects for application in evaluating the prognosis in LUAD.

CHD4 promotes acquired chemoresistance and tumor progression by activating the MEK/ERK axis

AIMS

Chemoresistance remains a major challenge in gastric cancer (GC). Chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 4 (CHD4) mediated chromatin remodeling plays critical roles in various tumor types, but its role in chemoresistance in GC remains uncharacterized.

METHODS

CHD4 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry and Western blotting. The role of CHD4 on cell proliferation and chemoresistance of GC was examined in vitro and in vivo. Immunoprecipitation and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry were used to identify CHD4-binding proteins and a proximity ligation assay was used to explore protein-protein interaction.

RESULTS

Chemoresistance is associated with upregulation of CHD4 in the tumor tissues of GC patients. Overexpression of CHD4 increased chemoresistance and cell proliferation. Knockdown of CHD4 induced cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. CHD4 mediates the decrease of the intracellular concentration of cisplatin by inducing drug efflux. Additionally, CHD4 promotes the interaction between ERK1/2 and MEK1/2, resulting in continuous activation of MEK/ERK pathway. Knockdown of CHD4 in GC increased sensitivity to chemotherapy and suppressed tumor growth in a mouse xenograft model.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies CHD4 dominated multi-drug efflux as a promising therapeutic target for overcoming acquired chemoresistance in GC.

From targeted therapy to a novel way: Immunogenic cell death in lung cancer

Lung cancer (LC) is one of the most incident malignancies and a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Common tumorigenic drivers of LC mainly include genetic alterations of EGFR, ALK, KRAS, BRAF, ROS1, and MET. Small inhibitory molecules and antibodies selectively targeting these alterations or/and their downstream signaling pathways have been approved for treatment of LC. Unfortunately, following initial positive responses to these targeted therapies, a large number of patients show dismal prognosis due to the occurrence of resistance mechanisms, such as novel mutations of these genes and activation of alternative signaling pathways. Over the past decade, it has become clear that there is no possible cure for LC unless potent antitumor immune responses are induced by therapeutic intervention. Immunogenic cell death (ICD) is a newly emerged concept, a form of regulated cell death that is sufficient to activate adaptive immune responses against tumor cells. It transforms dying cancer cells into a therapeutic vaccine and stimulates long-lasting protective antitumor immunity. In this review, we discuss the key targetable genetic aberrations and the underlying mechanism of ICD in LC. Various agents inducing ICD are summarized and the possibility of harnessing ICD in LC immunotherapy is further explored.

Y-box binding protein 1 augments sorafenib resistance via the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib is the first-line treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Y-box binding protein 1 (YB-1) is closely correlated with tumors and drug resistance. However, the relationship between YB-1 and sorafenib resistance and the underlying mechanism in HCC remain unknown.

AIM

To explore the role and related mechanisms of YB-1 in mediating sorafenib resistance in HCC.

METHODS

The protein expression levels of YB-1 were assessed in human HCC tissues and adjacent nontumor tissues. Next, we constructed YB-1 overexpression and knockdown hepatocarcinoma cell lines with lentiviruses and stimulated these cell lines with different concentrations of sorafenib. Then, we detected the proliferation and apoptosis in these cells by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling, flow cytometry and Western blotting assays. We also constructed a xenograft tumor model to explore the effect of YB-1 on the efficacy of sorafenib in vivo. Moreover, we studied and verified the specific molecular mechanism of YB-1 mediating sorafenib resistance in hepatoma cells by digital gene expression sequencing (DGE-seq).

RESULTS

YB-1 protein levels were found to be higher in HCC tissues than in corresponding nontumor tissues. YB-1 suppressed the effect of sorafenib on cell proliferation and apoptosis. Consistently, the efficacy of sorafenib in vivo was enhanced after YB-1 was knocked down. Furthermore, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DGE-seq demonstrated that the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt) signaling pathway was essential for the sorafenib resistance induced by YB-1. Subsequently, YB-1 interacted with two key proteins of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway (Akt1 and PIK3R1) as shown by searching the BioGRID and HitPredict websites. Finally, YB-1 suppressed the inactivation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway induced by sorafenib, and the blockade of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway by LY294002 mitigated YB-1-induced sorafenib resistance.

CONCLUSION

Overall, we concluded that YB-1 augments sorafenib resistance through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in HCC and suggest that YB-1 is a key drug resistance-related gene, which is of great significance for the application of sorafenib in advanced-stage HCC.

A comprehensive review of the functions of YB-1 in cancer stemness, metastasis and drug resistance

The Y Box binding protein 1 (YB-1) is a member of the highly conserved Cold Shock Domain protein family with multifunctional properties both in the cytoplasm and inside the nucleus. YB-1 is also involved in various cellular functions, including regulation of transcription, mRNA stability, and splicing. Recent studies have associated YB-1 with the regulation of the malignant phenotypes in several tumor types. In this review article, we provide an in-depth and expansive review of the literature pertaining to the multiple physiological functions of YB-1. We will also review the role of YB-1 in cancer development, progression, metastasis, and drug resistance in various malignancies, with more weight on literature published in the last decade. The methodology included querying databases PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar for Y box binding protein 1, YB-1, YBX1, and Y-box-1.

The Vault Nanoparticle: A Gigantic Ribonucleoprotein Assembly Involved in Diverse Physiological and Pathological Phenomena and an Ideal Nanovector for Drug Delivery and Therapy

Simple Summary

In recent decades, a molecular complex referred to as vault nanoparticle has attracted much attention by the scientific community, due to its unique properties. At the molecular scale, it is a huge assembly consisting of 78 97-kDa polypeptide chains enclosing an internal cavity, wherein enzymes involved in DNA integrity maintenance and some small noncoding RNAs are accommodated. Basically, two reasons justify this interest. On the one hand, this complex represents an ideal tool for the targeted delivery of drugs, provided it is suitably engineered, either chemically or genetically; on the other hand, it has been shown to be involved in several cellular pathways and mechanisms that most often result in multidrug resistance. It is therefore expected that a better understanding of the physiological roles of this ribonucleoproteic complex may help develop new therapeutic strategies capable of coping with cancer progression. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the current knowledge.

Abstract

The vault nanoparticle is a eukaryotic ribonucleoprotein complex consisting of 78 individual 97 kDa-“major vault protein” (MVP) molecules that form two symmetrical, cup-shaped, hollow halves. It has a huge size (72.5 × 41 × 41 nm) and an internal cavity, wherein the vault poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (vPARP), telomerase-associated protein-1 (TEP1), and some small untranslated RNAs are accommodated. Plenty of literature reports on the biological role(s) of this nanocomplex, as well as its involvement in diseases, mostly oncological ones. Nevertheless, much has still to be understood as to how vault participates in normal and pathological mechanisms. In this comprehensive review, current understanding of its biological roles is discussed. By different mechanisms, vault’s individual components are involved in major cellular phenomena, which result in protection against cellular stresses, such as DNA-damaging agents, irradiation, hypoxia, hyperosmotic, and oxidative conditions. These diverse cellular functions are accomplished by different mechanisms, mainly gene expression reprogramming, activation of proliferative/prosurvival signaling pathways, export from the nucleus of DNA-damaging drugs, and import of specific proteins. The cellular functions of this nanocomplex may also result in the onset of pathological conditions, mainly (but not exclusively) tumor proliferation and multidrug resistance. The current understanding of its biological roles in physiological and pathological processes should also provide new hints to extend the scope of its exploitation as a nanocarrier for drug delivery.