Admission en réanimation pour les cancers du poumon: quels patients pour quels bénéfices ?

Practices in Triage and Transfer of Critically Ill Patients: A Qualitative Systematic Review of Selection Criteria

OBJECTIVES

To identify and appraise articles describing criteria used to prioritize or withhold a critical care admission.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Medline, EBM Reviews, and CINAHL Complete databases. Gray literature searches and a manual review of references were also performed. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed.

STUDY SELECTION

We sought all articles and abstracts of original research as well as local, provincial, or national policies on the topic of ICU resource allocation. We excluded studies whose population of interest was neonatal, pediatric, trauma, or noncritically ill. Screening of 6,633 citations was conducted.

DATA EXTRACTION

Triage and/or transport criteria were extracted, based on type of article, methodology, publication year, and country. An appraisal scale was developed to assess the quality of identified articles. We also developed a robustness score to further appraise the robustness of the evidence supporting each criterion. Finally, all criteria were extracted, evaluated, and grouped by theme.

DATA SYNTHESIS

One-hundred twenty-nine articles were included. These were mainly original research (34%), guidelines (26%), and reviews (21%). Among them, we identified 200 unique triage and transport criteria. Most articles highlighted an exclusion (71%) rather than a prioritization mechanism (17%). Very few articles pertained to transport of critically ill patients (4%). Criteria were classified in one of four emerging themes: patient, condition, physician, and context. The majority of criteria used were nonspecific. No study prospectively evaluated the implementation of its cited criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review identified 200 criteria classified within four themes that may be included when devising triage programs including the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. We identified significant knowledge gaps where research would assist in improving existing triage criteria and guidelines, aiming to decrease arbitrary decisions and variability.

[Emergency room management of patients with lung cancer and organ failure]

BACKGROUND

When patients with lung cancer present to the emergency department with organ failure the question of admission to intensive care has to be considered. Our aim is to describe the process leading to the proposed management.

METHODS

Retrospectively, all patients admitted to the emergency room between December 2010 and January 2015 with a diagnosis of ICD-10 C34.9 (lung cancer) were reviewed. Those with at least one organ failure were included.

RESULTS

The records of 561 patients were reviewed, 79 (14%) had at least one organ failure. The majority of these patients received maximal medical care (59%), 25% exclusive palliative care, and 15% intensive care. Performance status, metastatic status and efficacy of anti-tumor treatment were recorded in the emergency medical record in 20%, 66% and 74% of cases, respectively. An opinion was obtained from the oncologist in 44% of cases and from the intensivist in 41% of cases. No external advice was provided in 27% of cases.

CONCLUSION

In the majority of cases, the decision on the intensity of care to be provided to patients with lung cancer and organ failure was made in a collective manner.