1
|
Bertelsen N, Dewulf L, Ferrè S, Vermeulen R, Schroeder K, Gatellier L, Sargeant I, Luzuriaga D, Chapman H, Brooke N. Patient Engagement and Patient Experience Data in Regulatory Review and Health Technology Assessment: A Global Landscape Review. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2024; 58:63-78. [PMID: 37743397 PMCID: PMC10764510 DOI: 10.1007/s43441-023-00573-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Working with patients through meaningful patient engagement (PE) and incorporating patient experience data (PXD) is increasingly important in medicines and medical device development. However, PE in the planning, organization, generation, and interpretation of PXD within regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) decision-making processes remains challenging. We conducted a global review of the PE and PXD landscape to identify evolving resources by geography to support and highlight the potential of integration of PE and PXD in regulatory assessment and HTA. METHODS A review of literature/public information was conducted (August 2021-January 2023), led by a multistakeholder group comprising those with lived or professional experience of PE and PXD, to identify relevant regulatory and HTA initiatives and resources reviewed and categorized by geography and focus area. RESULTS Overall, 53 relevant initiatives/resources were identified (global, 14; North America, 11; Europe, 11; Asia, nine; UK, six; Latin America, one; Africa, one). Most focused either on PE (49%) or PXD (28%); few (11%) mentioned both PE and PXD (as largely separate activities) or demonstrated an integration of PE and PXD (11%). CONCLUSIONS Our analysis demonstrates increasing interest in PE, PXD, and guidance on their use individually in decision-making. However, more work is needed to offer guidance on maximizing the value of patient input into decisions by combining both PE and PXD into regulatory and HTA processes; the necessity of integrating PE in the design and interpretation of PXD programs should be highlighted. A co-created framework to achieve this integration is part of a future project.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Bertelsen
- HTAi Patient & Citizen Involvement in HTA Interest Group, Neil Bertelsen Consulting, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lode Dewulf
- Independent Expert, Les Contamines-Montjoie, France
| | | | | | | | - Laureline Gatellier
- National Cancer Center Japan, Tokyo, Japan
- NPO Japan Brain Tumor Alliance, Yokohama, Japan
| | | | | | - Hayley Chapman
- Patient Focused Medicines Development (PFMD), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Nicholas Brooke
- Patient Focused Medicines Development (PFMD), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wagner M, Goetghebeur MM, Ganache I, Demers-Payette O, Auclair Y, Olivier C, Arbour S, de Guise M. HTA challenges for appraising rare disease interventions viewed through the lens of an institutional multidimensional value framework. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 23:143-152. [PMID: 36542763 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2161513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evaluating rare disease interventions poses challenges for HTA agencies, including uncertainties and ethical issues and tensions. INESSS has recently adopted a Statement of Principles and Ethical Foundations which proposes a multidimensional approach to value appraisal as well as five principles to frame the evaluation process. AREAS COVERED Our aim was to identify and analyze HTA challenges for appraising interventions for rare diseases, using the Statement's approach to value appraisal as an analytical framework, and outline how the Statement's principles can help address these challenges. Challenges, covering a diversity of aspects, were identified by leveraging institutional experience in diverse domains of expertise and consolidated through narrative literature review. Challenges were categorized by value dimension (clinical, populational, economic, organizational, and sociocultural), which allowed to pinpoint how each challenge affects the ability to appraise the value of an intervention. Key ethical tensions across dimensions were also identified. Specific approaches to addressing these challenges - related to knowledge mobilization and integration, deliberation, and recommendation-making - were outlined on the basis of the principles promulgated in the Statement. EXPERT OPINION A multidimensional approach can be fruitful for analyzing challenges for appraising the value of rare disease interventions and help guide approaches to tackle them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Wagner
- Bureau - Méthodologies et éthique, Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), 2021 Avenue Union, bureau 1200; Montréal H3A 2S9, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mireille M Goetghebeur
- Bureau - Méthodologies et éthique, Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), 2021 Avenue Union, bureau 1200; Montréal H3A 2S9, Quebec, Canada.,School of Public Health, Department of Management, Evaluation and Health Policy, Université de Montréal; 7101, avenue du Parc, 3e étage H3N 1X9 Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Ganache
- Bureau - Méthodologies et éthique, Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), 2021 Avenue Union, bureau 1200; Montréal H3A 2S9, Quebec, Canada.,School of Public Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, 7101avenue du Parc, 3e étage H3N 1X9 Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Olivier Demers-Payette
- Bureau - Méthodologies et éthique, Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), 2021 Avenue Union, bureau 1200; Montréal H3A 2S9, Quebec, Canada.,School of Public Health, Department of Management, Evaluation and Health Policy, Université de Montréal; 7101, avenue du Parc, 3e étage H3N 1X9 Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Yannick Auclair
- Bureau - Méthodologies et éthique, Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), 2021 Avenue Union, bureau 1200; Montréal H3A 2S9, Quebec, Canada
| | - Catherine Olivier
- Bureau - Méthodologies et éthique, Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), 2021 Avenue Union, bureau 1200; Montréal H3A 2S9, Quebec, Canada.,School of Public Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, 7101avenue du Parc, 3e étage H3N 1X9 Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sylvie Arbour
- Bureau - Méthodologies et éthique, Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), 2021 Avenue Union, bureau 1200; Montréal H3A 2S9, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michèle de Guise
- Bureau - Méthodologies et éthique, Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), 2021 Avenue Union, bureau 1200; Montréal H3A 2S9, Quebec, Canada.,Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), 2021 Avenue Union, bureau 1200; Montréal H3A 2S9, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|