Role of induction chemotherapy in invasive cervical cancer

Tumor-related leukocytosis is associated with poor radiation response and clinical outcome in uterine cervical cancer patients

BACKGROUND

To evaluate response to radiation and clinical outcome of uterine cervical cancer patients with tumor-related leukocytosis (TRL) at initial diagnosis and during definitive radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 2456 patients with stage IA-IVA uterine cervical cancer who received definitive radiotherapy with (37.4%) or without (62.6%) platinum-based chemotherapy between 1986 and 2012. TRL was defined as two or more occurrences of leukocytosis over 9000/μl at the time of diagnosis and during the course of treatment. Locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with or without TRL.

RESULTS

The median age of all patients was 55 years, and the median follow-up time was 65.1 months. TRL was observed in 398 patients (16%) at initial diagnosis; TRL (+) patients were younger and had larger tumors, advanced stage, and more frequent lymph node metastases (all P < 0.05). TRL (+) patients showed a significantly lower rate of complete remission than TRL (-) patients (89.9% versus 96.3%, respectively, P = 0.042). Ten-year LFFS and OS for all patients were 84% and 78%, respectively. LFFS and OS were significantly lower in TRL (+) patients than TRL (-) patients (10-year LFFS: 69% versus 87% respectively, P < 0.001; 10-year OS: 63% versus 81% respectively P < 0.001). After propensity score matching, LFFS and OS rates in TRL (+) patients remained significantly lower than for TRL (-) patients; this significant difference was also observed on multivariate analysis. Twenty-six percent of patients with locoregional failure (n = 345) were TRL (+) and had significantly poorer median OS (6 versus 12 months, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study reveals the aggressive nature of cervical cancer with TRL and its poor response to radiation therapy. Given the unfavorable prognosis and higher probability of treatment failure, optimal diagnostic and therapeutic approaches and careful monitoring for early detection of recurrence should be considered for these patients.

Drug-induced hypomagnesaemia : scope and management

Nearly 50 medications have been implicated as inducing hypomagnesaemia, sometimes based on insufficient data regarding clinical significance and frequency of occurrence. In fact, clinical effects attributed to hypomagnaesemia have been reported in only 17 of these drugs. A considerable amount of literature relating to individual drugs has been published, yet a comprehensive overview of this issue is not available and the hypomagnesaemic effect of a drug could be either overemphasised or under-rated. In addition, there are neither guidelines regarding treatment, prevention and monitoring of drug-induced hypomagnesaemia nor agreement as to what serum level of magnesium may actually be defined as 'hypomagnesaemia'. By compiling data from published papers, electronic databases, textbooks and product information leaflets, we attempted to assess the clinical significance of hypomagnesaemia induced by each drug. A practical approach for managing drug-induced hypomagnesaemia, incorporating both published literature and personal experience of the physician, is proposed. When drugs classified as inducing 'significant' hypomagnesaemia (cisplatin, amphotericin B, ciclosporin) are administered, routine magnesium monitoring is warranted, preventive treatment should be considered and treatment of hypomagnesaemia should be initiated with or without overt clinical manifestations. In drugs belonging to the 'potentially significant' category, among which are amikacin, gentamicin, laxatives, pentamidine, tobramycin, tacrolimus and carboplatin, magnesium monitoring is justified when either of the following occurs: clinical manifestations are apparent; persistent hypokalaemia, hypocalcaemia or alkalosis are present; other precipitating factors for hypomagnesaemia coexist; or treatment is with more than one potentially hypomagnesaemic drug. No preventive treatment is required and treatment should be initiated only if hypomagnesaemia is accompanied by symptoms or clinically significant relevant laboratory findings. In those drugs whose hypomagnesaemic effect is labelled as 'questionable', including furosemide and hydrochlorothiazide, routine monitoring and treatment are not required.

Stage Ia-IIa Cancer of the Cervix

Early-stage cervical cancer is unique among malignancies in that two radically different yet equally efficacious treatments can be offered to most patients with the disease. The choice between surgery and radiation therapy depends on the patient's age and comorbidities, tumor factors, physician bias, and discussion of the risks and benefits of each modality. A thorough discussion between the physician and patient is necessary to determine the optimal management for each individual. This review discusses the major factors that influence physician and patient management choices.

Postoperative adjuvant therapy in early invasive cervical cancer patients with histopathologic high-risk factors

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant therapy in preventing treatment failure after primary treatment with surgery in early invasive cervical cancer patients associated with the following histopathologic high-risk factors: lymph node metastasis (either macroscopic or microscopic), parametrial extension, lymphovascular permeation and depth of invasion > or =10 mm. Postoperative adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (PCCRT), postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (PCT), or postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (PRT) alone was administered to the 80 early invasive cervical cancers with at least one of the high-risk factors. Each of 61 patients received three to six cycles of chemotherapy at intervals of approximately 3 weeks. Twenty three patients were treated with PCCRT, 38 patients were treated with PCT alone, and 19 patients received PRT. The 5-year survival rates of patients with macroscopic lymph node metastasis were 66.7% and 35.7% in PCCRT and PRT, respectively. With microscopic lymph node metastasis, the 5-year survival rates were 83.3%, 60.0%, and 70.1% in PCCRT, PCT, and PRT, respectively. With parametrial extension, the 5-year survival rate was 58.1% in PCCRT. The 5-year survival rates of patients with lymphovascular permeation were 100%, 90.9%, and 66.7% in PCCRT, PCT, and PRT, respectively. With depth of invasion > or =10 mm, the 5-year survival rates were 100% and 91.3%, in PCCRT and PCT, respectively. PCCRT appears to be superior to PRT or PCT alone in early invasive cervical cancer patients with histopathologic high-risk factors.

Chemotherapy of advanced and recurrent cervical carcinoma

Chemotherapy is used primarily to treat advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. There are three major applications: primary therapy, as a radiation sensitizer, and neoadjuvant therapy. Primary chemotherapy is employed in advanced and disseminated cervical carcinoma (Stage VB). The four best single drugs with moderate activity against cervical cancer are: cisplatin, ifosfamide, dibromodulcitol (mitolactol), and Adriamycin (doxorubicin). Cisplatin and ifosfamide appear to be the best combination therapy: they provide an objective response rate of 33%. However, because the overall survival was not significantly improved with combination therapy, single-agent therapy with one of the above active drugs is acceptable. For stages IIB, III and IVA, the primary therapy is still radiation. Concomitant chemotherapy with hydroxyurea or a combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have been shown to enhance radiation response in several randomized trials. Hydroxyurea is the preferred radiation sensitizer because it offers less toxicity, ease of administration, and equivalent results. Chemotherapy in neoadjuvant setting produces promising results. Various cisplatin combinations of mitomycin C, 5-FU, vincristine, and bleomycin have been employed to shrink locally advanced cervical cancer and permit safe, radical excision. Early results with these combinations in small trials are encouraging but further studies are needed to fully evaluate their potential.

Tumor size, irradiation dose, and long-term outcome of carcinoma of uterine cervix

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of tumor size and extent, and dose of irradiation on pelvic tumor control, incidence of distant metastases, and disease-free survival in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Records were reviewed of 1499 patients (Stages IA-IVA) treated with definitive irradiation (combination of external beam plus two intracavitary insertions to deliver doses of 65-95 Gy to point A, depending on stage and tumor volume). Follow-up was obtained in 98% of patients (median 11 years, minimum 3 years, maximum 30 years). The relationship between outcome and tumor size was analyzed in each stage. Pelvic tumor control was correlated with total doses to point A and to the lateral pelvic wall.

RESULTS

The 10-year actuarial pelvic failure rate in Stage IB was 5% for tumors <2 cm, 15% for 2.1-5 cm, and 35% for tumors >5 cm (p = 0.01); in Stage IIA, the rates were 0%, 28%, and 25%, respectively (p = 0.12). Stage IIB unilateral or bilateral nonbulky tumors <5 cm had a 23% pelvic failure rate compared with 34% for unilateral or bilateral bulky tumors >5 cm (p = 0.13). In Stage IIB, pelvic failures were 18% with medial parametrial involvement only, compared with 28% when tumor extended into the lateral parametrium (p = 0.05). In Stage III, unilateral parametrial involvement was associated with a 32% pelvic failure rate versus 50% for bilateral extension (p < 0.01). Ten-year disease-free survival rates were 90% for IB tumors <2 cm, 76% for 2.1-4 cm, 61% for 4.1-5 cm, and 47% for >5 cm (p = 0.01); in Stage IIA, the rates were 93%, 63%, 39%, and 59%, respectively (p < or = 0.01). Patients with Stage IIB medial parametrial involvement had better 10-year disease-free survival (67%) than those with lateral parametrial extension (56%) (p = 0.02). Stage III patients with unilateral tumor extension had a 48% 10-year disease-free survival rate compared with 32% for bilateral parametrial involvement (p < or = 0.01). The presence of endometrial extension or tumor only in the endometrial curettings had no significant impact on pelvic failure. However, in patients with Stage IB disease, the incidence of distant metastases was 31% with positive curettings, 15% with negative curettings, and 22% with admixture (p < or = 0.01). In Stage IIA, the corresponding values were 51%, 33%, and 18% (p = 0.05). The 10-year disease-free survival rates in Stage IB were 67% with positive curettings, 81% for negative curettings, and 77% for admixture (p = 0.02); in Stage IIA, the rates were 45%, 66%, and 67%, respectively (p = 0.14). Because this is not a prospective Phase II dose-escalation study, the correlation of doses of irradiation with pelvic tumor control in the various stages and tumor size groups is not consistent. Nevertheless, with Stage IB and IIA tumors <2 cm in diameter, the pelvic failure rate was under 10% with doses of 70-80 Gy to point A, whereas for larger lesions even doses of 85-90 Gy resulted in 25% to 37% pelvic failure rates. In Stage IIB with doses of 70 Gy to point A, the pelvic failure rate was about 50% compared with about 20% in nonbulky and 30% in bulky tumors with doses > 80 Gy. In Stage III unilateral lesions, the pelvic failure rate was about 50% with < or =70 Gy to point A versus 35% with higher doses, and in bilateral or bulky tumors it was 60% with doses <70 Gy and 50% with higher doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical stage and size of tumor are critical factors in prognosis, therapy efficacy, and evaluation of results in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The doses to point A suggest that for lesions <2 cm, doses of 75 Gy result in < or =10% pelvic failures, whereas in more extensive lesions, even with doses of 85 Gy, the pelvic failure rate is about 30%; and in Stage IIB-III tumors, doses of 85 Gy result in 35-50% pelvic failures. Refinements in brachytherapy techniques and/or use of agents to selectively sensitize the tumors to irradiation will be necessary to improve the present results in invasive carcinoma of t

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer--where does it stand?: a review

Platinum-based combination chemotherapy has been utilized in the neoadjuvant setting in locally advanced inoperable cervical cancer with the aim of improving response and survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be followed by either radiation therapy (RT) or by surgery in cases in which it seems to be appropriate. Available data indicate that preradiation chemotherapy yields no survival advantage over RT alone. However, presurgery chemotherapy may increase resectability in women with locally advanced cervical cancer to around 70 percent. Nonrandomized trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery have shown some improvement in the outcome. Prospective randomized trials are needed to evaluate this approach as compared with RT alone and to define its precise role in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Lymph node metastases, cell type, age, HPV status and type, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and treatment failures in cervical cancer

Conflicting evidence on the prognostic influence of some of the clinical and histopathological variables in cervical cancer of the HPV status and type and chemotherapeutic response prompted a number of reviews from nearly 40 years experience in a tertiary referral centre. The collation and analyses of these data with those from recent literature allow some proposals to be made. The disease is more prevalent in the young women in whom, in many centers, the mortality is also higher; the latter may be related to the reported increase in both small cell types and adeno and adenosquamous carcinoma--a finding more marked in the young. Lymph node metastases, related to increasing grade, size, stage and lymph space invasion, are unequivocally associated with a worse prognosis. Resolution of the exact nature of the intimate association of this disease with the human papilloma virus remains to be resolved as does the influence on prognosis of the tumor HPV status and that of the different oncogenic types. Reports on the efficiency of neoadjuvant platinum based combination chemotherapy are generally promising but vary considerably depending on the regimen used. Its value will not be determined without properly conducted large randomized studies.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy using a platinum, vincristine and peplomycin (CVP) combination in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of a cis-platinum, vincristine and peplomycin (CVP) combination has been used to treat patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix at our departments since 1983. Twenty-one patients are reviewed in this study. A high response rate (71.4%) was obtained with 19.0% complete and 52.4% partial responses prior to radical therapy. Survival times and the progression free interval for stage I and III disease treated with CVP show improvement compared to patients not treated with CVP. No life-threatening toxicity related to chemotherapy was noted. This combination chemotherapy used in neoadjuvant setting warrants further study.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, vincristine, and bleomycin and radical surgery in early-stage bulky cervical carcinoma

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of 2-3 courses of cisplatin, vincristine, and bleomycin was used in the primary treatment of 36 consecutive patients with locally advanced early-stage cervical carcinoma [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages Ib or IIa; tumor size, greater than or equal to 4 cm]. The effectiveness of the preoperative chemotherapy was evaluated in the surgical specimens. Among the 33 evaluable patients, the overall clinical response rate was 84.8%, which included a complete response in 8 patients (24.2%) and a partial response in 20 subjects (60.6%). No residual tumor was found in the surgical specimens obtained from 2 complete responders. This therapy induced varying degrees of tumor shrinkage and rendered radical surgery feasible in all evaluable cases despite the initial bulky size of the lesions. No significant difference was observed in the response rate according to age and disease stage. Lymph-node metastases were found after chemotherapy in 18.2% (6/33) of the patients. Grade II and III hematological toxicities occurred in 23.3% of the 90 chemotherapy cycles completed. Nausea and vomiting occurred to a mild to moderate degree in 75 (83.3%) cycles. These preliminary results suggest that the administration of induction chemotherapy involving two to three courses of cisplatin, vincristine, and bleomycin prior to surgery is effective in reducing the tumor volume and in providing better circumstances for surgical removal of the early yet bulky cervical tumors and results in tolerable toxicity. This protocol is now undergoing prospective randomized trials to test its impact on long-term survival.