Antinociception produced by stimulation of the periaqueductal grey matter: Effects of antagonists microinjected into the nucleus raphe magnus

The role of endogenous opioid neuropeptides in neurostimulation-driven analgesia

Due to the prevalence of chronic pain worldwide, there is an urgent need to improve pain management strategies. While opioid drugs have long been used to treat chronic pain, their use is severely limited by adverse effects and abuse liability. Neurostimulation techniques have emerged as a promising option for chronic pain that is refractory to other treatments. While different neurostimulation strategies have been applied to many neural structures implicated in pain processing, there is variability in efficacy between patients, underscoring the need to optimize neurostimulation techniques for use in pain management. This optimization requires a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying neurostimulation-induced pain relief. Here, we discuss the most commonly used neurostimulation techniques for treating chronic pain. We present evidence that neurostimulation-induced analgesia is in part driven by the release of endogenous opioids and that this endogenous opioid release is a common endpoint between different methods of neurostimulation. Finally, we introduce technological and clinical innovations that are being explored to optimize neurostimulation techniques for the treatment of pain, including multidisciplinary efforts between neuroscience research and clinical treatment that may refine the efficacy of neurostimulation based on its underlying mechanisms.

Endogenous opioids acting at a medullary mu-opioid receptor contribute to the behavioral antinociception produced by GABA antagonism in the midbrain periaqueductal gray

This study examined the contribution of endogenous opioids to the antinociception produced by microinjection of the GABAA receptor antagonist, bicuculline, into the rat midbrain ventrolateral periaqueductal gray region. Microinjection of bicuculline (40 ng/0.4 microliter) into the periaqueductal gray produced robust antinociception as measured by the tail-flick latency to noxious heat. This antinociception was partially reversed by intravenous administration of the non-selective opioid antagonist naloxone hydrochloride (1 and 5 mg/kg), indicating that endogenous opioid release is necessary for this effect. To determine whether opioid release in the rostral ventromedial medulla, a major projection target of the periaqueductal gray, contributes to this effect, we microinjected another opioid antagonist, naltrexone, into the rostral ventromedial medulla. Naltrexone in the rostral ventromedial medulla (5 and 10 micrograms/microliter) significantly attenuated bicuculline antinociception elicited from the periaqueductal gray. Cys2, tyr3, orn5, pen7-amide (26.5 nmol), a selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist, also reversed the antinociception when microinjected into the rostral ventromedial medulla. Microinjections of naltrexone (10 micrograms/microliter) or cys2, tyr3, orn5, pen7-amide at sites in the medulla dorsal to the rostral ventromedial medulla were ineffective. None of the antagonists altered baseline tail-flick latencies. These results support the hypothesis that a population of periaqueductal gray neurons produces antinociception through a mu-opioid receptor-mediated action of endogenous opioids in the rostral ventromedial medulla. Thus, two opioid-sensitive pain-modulating brainstem sites are linked by an endogenous opioid synapse in the rostral ventromedial medulla.