Recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor in the treatment of small cell lung cancer: a long-term follow-up

Prophylaxis of infectious complications with colony-stimulating factors in adult cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy-evidence-based guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Working Party AGIHO of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO)

BACKGROUND

Current evidence on myelopoietic growth factors is difficult to overview for the practicing haematologist/oncologist. International guidelines are sometimes conflicting, exclude certain patient groups, or cannot directly be applied to the German health system. This guideline by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) gives evidence-based recommendations for the use of G-CSF, pegylated G-CSF, and biosimilars to prevent infectious complications in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, including those with haematological malignancies.

METHODS

We systematically searched and evaluated current evidence. An expert panel discussed the results and recommendations. We then compared our recommendations to current international guidelines.

RESULTS

We summarised the data from eligible studies in evidence tables, developed recommendations for different entities and risk groups.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive literature search and expert panel consensus confirmed many key recommendations given by international guidelines. Evidence for growth factors during acute myeloid leukaemia induction chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim use in haematological malignancies was rated lower compared with other guidelines.

Model-based design of chemotherapeutic regimens that account for heterogeneity in leucopoenia

Patients treated with multicycle chemotherapy can exhibit large interindividual heterogeneity of haematotoxicity. We describe how a biomathematical model of human granulopoiesis can be used to design risk-adapted dose-dense chemotherapies, leading to more similar leucopoenias in the population. Calculations were performed on a large data set for cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone (CHOP)-like chemotherapies for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, lactate dehydrogenase and the degree of leucopoenia within the first therapy cycle were used to stratify patients into groups with different expected severity of leucopoenia. We estimated risk-specific bone marrow toxicities depending on the drug doses administered. These toxicities were used to derive risk-adapted therapy schedules. We determined different doses of cyclophosphamide and additional etoposide for patients treated with CHOP-14. Alternatively, the model predicted that further reductions of cycle duration were feasible in groups with low toxicity. We also used the model to identify appropriate granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) schedules. In conclusion, we present a method to estimate the potential of risk-specific dose adaptation of different cytotoxic drugs in order to design chemotherapy protocols that result in decreased diversity of leucopoenia between patients, to develop dose-escalation strategies in cases of low leucopoenic reaction and to determine optimal G-CSF support.

Early tandem high-dose ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide therapy with stem cell rescue for small-cell lung cancer: brief report on the results of a phase-I/II trial

OBJECTIVE

High-dose therapy (HDT) for small-cell lung cancer is experimental. Late intensification HDT for chemosensitive disease can increase the number and quality of remissions and prolong relapse-free survival, but has not yet shown impact on overall survival. This is possibly due to resistant residual disease. To overcome the development of resistance, we have tested early intensification tandem HDT.

METHODS

We performed a phase-I/II trial using 1 conventional cycle of ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide (ICE) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for stem cell recruitment followed by 2 cycles of high-dose ICE with rescue by CD34+ cell-enriched peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Dose escalation was performed for the 2 high-dose ICE cycles. Radiotherapy for limited disease was according to standard protocols.

RESULTS

17 patients were entered: 2 female patients; 15 male patients; median age 53 (range 36-65) years; 2 patients with limited disease, and 15 patients with extensive disease. We treated 4 patients at dose level 1, 11 patients at level 2, and 2 patients at level 3. The maximum tolerable dose was at level 2 with neuropathy being dose-limiting. Overall, toxicity was < or = grade 2 for all patients up to dose level 2 with hematotoxicity being grade 4 for all patients. There were 15 partial remissions (88%), 1 no change (6%), and 1 progressive disease (6%). Median time to progression was 7.9 months. Overall survival was 12.9 months (median).

CONCLUSIONS

Early intensification with this protocol is feasible. Although a comparatively good response rate and median time to progression have been observed in this group dominated by patients with extensive disease, overall survival is short and no substantial long-term survival was found.

Role of granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with methodological assessment and meta-analysis

In order to clarify the role of haematological colony-stimulating factors (CSF) in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer, we performed a systematic review of the randomised trials published on this topic. Since 1991, 12 studies were eligible, including a total of 2107 randomised patients. They were divided into three groups: (1) maintenance of dose-intensity when chemotherapy was given at conventional doses and time intervals (seven trials); (2) accelerated chemotherapy with increased dose-intensity by reducing the delay between chemotherapy cycles (five trials); (3) concentration of chemotherapy on an overall shorter duration time with a lower number of cycles (one trial). Before quantitative aggregation, we performed a methodological assessment using two previously published quality scales (Chalmers and ELCWP). The median quality scores for the pooled 12 trials was 59.9% (range: 42.2-82.0%) for the ELCWP scale and 55.8% (range: 38.0-76.8%) for the Chalmers scale. No statistically significant difference was observed between positive (significant) and negative (non-significant) studies allowing us to perform a meta-analysis. A detrimental effect on response rate was associated with CSF administration in the maintenance group (RR 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.97) without significant effect on survival (HR 1.004; 95% CI, 0.89-1.13). In the accelerated group, no significant impact on response rate (RR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94-1.09) or survival (HR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67-1.00) was found. Although no difference in response rate was observed, a reduced survival was associated with concentrated chemotherapy. In conclusion, the published data do not support the routine use of haematological colony-stimulating factors in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

A three-arm phase III randomised trial assessing, in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer, accelerated chemotherapy with support of haematological growth factor or oral antibiotics

The European Lung Cancer Working Party (ELCWP) designed a 3-arm phase III randomised trial to determine the role of accelerated chemotherapy in extensive-disease (ED) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Eligible patients were randomised between the 3 following arms: (A) Standard chemotherapy with 6 courses of EVI (epirubicin 60 mg m(-2), vindesine 3 mg m(-2), ifosfamide 5 g m(-2); all drugs given on day 1 repeated every three weeks. (B) Accelerated chemotherapy with EVI administered every 2 weeks and GM-CSF support. (C) Accelerated chemotherapy with EVI and oral antibiotics (cotrimoxazole). Primary endpoint was survival. 233 eligible patients were randomised. Chemotherapy could be significantly accelerated in arm B with increased absolute dose-intensity. Best response rates, in the population of evaluable patients, were, respectively for arm A, B and C, 59%, 76% and 70%. The response rate was significantly higher in arm B in comparison to arm A (P = 0.04). There was, however, no survival difference with respective median duration and 2-year rate of 286 days and 5% for arm A, 264 days and 6% for arm B and 264 days and 6% for arm C. Severe thrombopenia occurred more frequently in arm B but without an increased rate of bleeding. Non-severe infections were more frequent in arm B and severe infections were less frequent in arm C. Our trial failed to demonstrate, in ED-SCLC, a survival benefit of chemotherapy acceleration by using GM-CSF support.

Colony-stimulating factors in the prevention of solid tumors induced by chemotherapy in patients with febrile neutropenia

Haematologic toxicity and its most frequent complication, febrile neutropenia represents the main limiting factor to the use of anti-cancer chemotherapy. The recent availability of recombinant human colony stimulating factors offers a new opportunity to improve the tolerance of these treatments. Most randomized trials in various solid tumors have demonstrated the ability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to significantly reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia and related complications. Interestingly enough, these compounds are well tolerated and easy to administrate. However, since the increase in dose-intensity does not translate into any improved efficacy in terms of response rates or survival, the use of colony-stimulating factors has to be decided on the basis of cost-benefit considerations. Therefore, some scientific societies such as the American Association of Clinical Oncology in the US and the Anti-Cancer Centers Group in France have published recommendations for their use in routine oncology practice. We here discuss these guidelines on the basis of an overview of the literature.