1
|
Wang E, Ahad T, Liu YA, Lee TK, Lui H, Crawford RI, Kalia S. Incidence and profile of skin cancers in patients following ultraviolet phototherapy without psoralens: A retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2024; 90:759-766. [PMID: 38070541 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.11.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psoralen + ultraviolet-A (PUVA) is associated with photocarcinogenesis. However, carcinogenic risk with other ultraviolet phototherapies remains unclear. OBJECTIVE Evaluate whether phototherapy without psoralens increases skin cancer risk. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of patients treated at a teaching-hospital phototherapy center (1977-2018). Skin cancer records were validated against pathology reports. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) of skin cancer were evaluated for gender, skin phototype, diagnosis, ultraviolet modality, anatomical site; and compared to provincial population incidence rates (2003). RESULTS In total, 3506 patients treated with broadband-ultraviolet-B, narrowband-UVB and/or combined UVAB were assessed with a mean follow-up of 7.3 years. Majority of patients had psoriasis (60.9%) or eczema (26.4%). Median number of treatments was 43 (1-3598). Overall, 170 skin cancers (17 melanoma, 33 squamous cell carcinoma and 120 basal cell carcinoma) occurred in 79 patients. Patient-based and tumor-based ASIR of skin cancer was 149 (95% CI: 112-187)/100,000 and 264 (219-309)/100,000 person-years, respectively. There was no significant difference between tumor-based ASIRs for melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma compared to the general population; or in phototherapy patients with-psoriasis or eczema; or immunosuppressants. No cumulative dose-response correlation between UVB and skin cancer was seen. LIMITATIONS Treatment and follow-up duration. CONCLUSION No increased risk of melanoma and keratinocyte cancer was found with phototherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elle Wang
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Photomedicine Institute, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tashmeeta Ahad
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Photomedicine Institute, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Yi A Liu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tim K Lee
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Photomedicine Institute, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Harvey Lui
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Photomedicine Institute, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Richard I Crawford
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sunil Kalia
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Photomedicine Institute, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bouceiro Mendes R, Alpalhão M, Filipe P. UVB phototherapy in the treatment of vitiligo: State of the art and clinical perspectives. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2022; 38:215-223. [PMID: 34626483 DOI: 10.1111/phpp.12740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Vitiligo is a chronic pigmentary skin disorder that results in white, hypopigmented macules and patches. It causes a considerable psychological and emotional burden on the affected individuals and their families. Several therapeutic options have been employed in vitiligo including topical and oral drugs, surgical techniques, and phototherapy which is considered the cornerstone treatment. Different wavelengths and modalities are available, but narrowband UVB (NB-UVB) is considered the safest and the most effective phototherapy alternative. NB-UVB acts on multiple steps in vitiligo pathogenesis, and it is capable of inducing stabilization and repigmentation of vitiligo lesions. Technological advances have led to the development of both new phototherapy devices and new medical and surgical therapeutic options that can be combined with phototherapy to achieve optimal results. There is no standard treatment, and individual patient and disease characteristics should be considered. We review the current evidence in what concerns UVB phototherapy for vitiligo treatment, including novel combination treatments that may help to provide the best care for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Bouceiro Mendes
- Dermatology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Miguel Alpalhão
- Dermatology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal.,Lisbon Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Paulo Filipe
- Dermatology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal.,Lisbon Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Ultraviolet (UV) radiation contributes to the development of skin cancer through direct and indirect DNA damage, production of reactive oxygen species, and local immunomodulation. The association between UV radiation and skin cancer has raised concern for the risk of carcinogenesis following phototherapy. The photocarcinogenic impact of psoralen and UVA radiation (PUVA) has been extensively studied, whereas limited safety studies exist for other phototherapy modalities, such as broadband and narrowband UVB and UVA1. Because of the as of yet unclear risk, patients who have undergone any type of phototherapy should be followed for age-appropriate skin cancer screening.
Collapse
|
5
|
Aguilera J. Riesgo fotocarcinogénico asociado a la fototerapia ultravioleta B de banda estrecha. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas 2018; 109:296. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2018.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|