1
|
Alagh A, Ramm O, Lyon LL, Ritterman Weintraub ML, Shatkin-Margolis A. Implication of Neighborhood Deprivation Index on Pelvic Organ Prolapse Management. Urogynecology (Phila) 2024:02273501-990000000-00183. [PMID: 38465980 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Differences in the rate of diagnosis of POP have been described based on race and ethnicity; however, there are few data available on the management and treatment patterns of POP based on multiple factors of socioeconomic status and deprivation. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to investigate the association between pelvic organ prolapse (POP) management and the Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI), a standardized multidimensional measure of socioeconomic status. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included female members of a large integrated health care delivery system who were 18 years or older and had ≥4 years of continuous health care membership from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. Demographic, POP diagnosis, urogynecology consultation, and surgical treatment of POP were obtained from the electronic medical record. Neighborhood Deprivation Index data were extrapolated via zip code and were reported in quartiles, with higher quartiles reflecting greater deprivation. Descriptive, bivariate, and logistic regression analyses were conducted by NDI. RESULTS Of 1,087,567 patients identified, 34,890 (3.2%) had a POP diagnosis. Q1, the least deprived group, had the highest prevalence of POP (26.3%). Most patients with POP identified as White (57.3%) and represented approximately a third of Q1. Black patients had the lowest rate of POP (5.8%) and comprised almost half of Q4, the most deprived quartile. A total of 13,730 patients (39.4%) had a urogynecology consultation, with rates ranging from 23.6% to 26.4% (P < 0.01). Less than half (12.8%) of patients with POP underwent surgical treatment, and the relative frequencies of procedure types were similar across NDI quartiles except for obliterative procedures (P = 0.01). When controlling for age, no clinically significant difference was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS Differences in urogynecology consultation, surgical treatment, and surgical procedure type performed for prolapse across NDI quartiles were not found to be clinically significant. Our findings suggest that equitable evaluation and treatment of prolapse can occur through a membership-based integrated health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Alagh
- From the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Oakland, Kaiser Permanente East Bay-University of California San Francisco Urogynecology Fellowship Training Program
| | - Olga Ramm
- Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California San Francisco, Kaiser Permanente East Bay-University of California San Francisco Urogynecology Fellowship Training Program
| | - Liisa L Lyon
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | | | - Abigail Shatkin-Margolis
- Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California San Francisco, Kaiser Permanente East Bay-University of California San Francisco Urogynecology Fellowship Training Program
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pfeuti CK, Madsen A, Habermann E, Glasgow A, Occhino JA. Postoperative Complications After Sling Operations for Incontinence: Is Race a Factor? Urogynecology (Phila) 2024; 30:197-204. [PMID: 38484232 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Racial and ethnic disparities exist in urogynecologic surgery; however, literature identifying specific disparities after sling operations for stress incontinence are limited. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate racial and ethnic disparities in surgical complications within 30 days of midurethral sling operations. STUDY DESIGN This retrospective cohort study identified women who underwent an isolated midurethral sling operation between 2014 and 2021 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Women were stratified by racial and ethnic category to assess the primary outcome, 30-day surgical complications, and the secondary outcome, comparison of urinary tract infections (UTIs). RESULTS There were 20,066 patients included. Mean age and body mass index were 53.9 years and 30.8, respectively. More Black or African American women had diabetes and hypertension, and more American Indian or Alaska Native women used tobacco. The only difference in 30-day complications was stroke/cerebrovascular accident, which occurred in only 1 Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander patient (0.1%, P < 0.0001). The most frequent complication was UTI (3.3%). Black or African American women were significantly less likely to have a diagnosis of UTI than non-Hispanic White (P = 0.04), Hispanic White (P = 0.03), and American Indian or Alaska Native women (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Surgical complications within 30 days of sling operations are rare. No clinically significant racial and ethnic differences in serious complications were observed. Urinary tract infection diagnoses were lower among Black or African American women than in non-Hispanic White, Hispanic White, and American Indian or Alaska Native women despite a greater comorbidity burden. No known biologic reason exists to explain lower UTI rates in this population; therefore, this finding may represent a disparity in diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Annetta Madsen
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Amy Glasgow
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, Rochester, MN
| | - John A Occhino
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carter-Brooks CM, Brown OE, Ackenbom MF. Pelvic Floor Disorders in Black Women: Prevalence, Clinical Care, and a Strategic Agenda to Prioritize Care. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2024; 51:157-179. [PMID: 38267125 DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2023.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Pelvic floor disorders are a group of common conditions affecting women of all racial and ethnic groups. These disorders are undertreated in all women, but this is especially magnified in Black people who have been historically marginalized in the United States. This article seeks to highlight the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in Black women, evaluate the clinical care they receive, examine barriers they face to equitable care, and present a strategic agenda to prioritize the care of Black women with pelvic floor disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charelle M Carter-Brooks
- The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2150 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 6A- 416, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
| | - Oluwateniola E Brown
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 250 East Superior Avenue Suite 05-2113, Chicago, IL 60601, USA
| | - Mary F Ackenbom
- Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, 3240 Craft Place, Suite 226, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Downing P, Dong SM, Ardizzone MA, Lynch CD, Hickman LC. Association of Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status With Prolapse Management Decision. Urogynecology (Phila) 2024; 30:345-351. [PMID: 38484252 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE This study identifies how neighborhood-level socioeconomic status (SES) may affect patients' treatment decisions for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the association of neighborhood-level SES with the decision of surgical versus conservative POP management. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study of patients newly diagnosed with POP at a tertiary medical center between 2015 and 2021. Patients lost to follow-up or poor surgical candidates were excluded. Patient characteristics, demographics, and treatment selection were abstracted from the electronic health record. Conservative management was defined as expectant, pessary, and/or pelvic floor physical therapy. Five-digit zip codes were linked to the Area Deprivation Index and used as a surrogate for neighborhood-level SES. Area Deprivation Indices were dichotomized at or below the sample median (less disadvantaged area) and above the sample median (more disadvantaged area). Logistic regression models estimated the odds of choosing surgical versus conservative management as a function of the Area Deprivation Index. RESULTS A total of 459 patients met the eligibility criteria (non-Hispanic White, 88.2%). The median age was 63 years (interquartile range, 52-70 years), and the majority had stage 2 POP (65.7%). Of all patients, 59.3% had Medicare/Medicaid, 39.9% were privately insured, and 0.9% were uninsured. Furthermore, 74.7% selected surgical management, and 25.3% chose conservative management. Increasing age and higher Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System stage were significantly associated with selecting surgery (P = 0.01). Women residing in a more disadvantaged area had a 67% increased odds of choosing surgical over conservative management (adjusted odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.64) after adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System stage. CONCLUSIONS Residing in a more disadvantaged zip code was associated with 67% increased odds of choosing surgical versus conservative POP management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Perrin Downing
- From the Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Shirley M Dong
- From the Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Courtney D Lynch
- Obstetrics and Gynecology and Epidemiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Lisa C Hickman
- From the Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Livergant RJ, Stefanyk K, Binda C, Fraulin G, Maleki S, Sibbeston S, Joharifard S, Hillier T, Joos E. Post-operative outcomes in Indigenous patients in North America and Oceania: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Glob Public Health 2023; 3:e0001805. [PMID: 37585444 PMCID: PMC10431673 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Indigenous Peoples across North America and Oceania experience worse health outcomes compared to non-Indigenous people, including increased post-operative mortality. Several gaps in data exist regarding global differences in surgical morbidity and mortality for Indigenous populations based on geographic locations and across surgical specialties. The aim of this study is to evaluate disparities in post-operative outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Eight electronic databases were searched with no language restriction. Studies reporting on Indigenous populations outside of Canada, the USA, New Zealand, or Australia, or on interventional procedures were excluded. Primary outcomes were post-operative morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes included reoperations, readmission rates, and length of hospital stay. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. Eighty-four unique observational studies were included in this review. Of these, 67 studies were included in the meta-analysis (Oceania n = 31, North America n = 36). Extensive heterogeneity existed among studies and 50% were of poor quality. Indigenous patients had 1.26 times odds of post-operative morbidity (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.10-1.44, p<0.01) and 1.34 times odds of post-operative infection (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.12-1.59, p<0.01) than non-Indigenous patients. Indigenous patients also had 1.33 times odds of reoperation (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.02-1.74, p = 0.04). In conclusion, we found that Indigenous patients in North American and Oceania experience significantly poorer surgical outcomes than their non-Indigenous counterparts. Additionally, there is a low proportion of high-quality research focusing on assessing surgical equity for Indigenous patients in these regions, despite multiple international and national calls to action for reconciliation and decolonization to improve quality surgical care for Indigenous populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel J. Livergant
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kelsey Stefanyk
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Catherine Binda
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Terrace, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Georgia Fraulin
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sasha Maleki
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sarah Sibbeston
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Northwest Territory Métis Nation, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada
| | - Shahrzad Joharifard
- Department of Pediatric and Thoracic Surgery, British Columbia Children’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Tracey Hillier
- Mi’kmaq Qalipu First Nation, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Emilie Joos
- Division of General Surgery, Branch for Global Surgical Care, Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Laughman K, Ogu NQ, Warner KJ, Traylor J. Disparities in Benign Gynecologic Surgical Care. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2023; 66:124-31. [PMID: 36657049 DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
A person's health is not only affected by their disease states, but also the quality of care and posttreatment sequelae. Research shows that disparities exist in benign gynecologic surgery access to care, techniques, and perioperative outcomes. Surgical education, pathways that emphasize minimally invasive approaches, and patient-centered care that recognizes historical influences on patient perspectives are critical to dampening these disparities.
Collapse
|
7
|
Halloran SJ, Alvarado CE, Sarode AL, Jiang B, Sinopoli J, Linden PA, Towe CW. Disparities in Access to Thoracic Surgeons among Patients Receiving Lung Lobectomy in the United States. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:2801-2811. [PMID: 36975426 PMCID: PMC10047038 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30030213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Lung lobectomy is the standard of care for early-stage lung cancer. Studies have suggested improved outcomes associated with lobectomy performed by specialized thoracic surgery providers. We hypothesized that disparities would exist regarding access to thoracic surgeons among patients receiving lung lobectomy for cancer. Methods: The Premier Hospital Database was used to identify adult inpatients receiving lung lobectomy from 2009 to 2019. Patients were categorized as receiving their lobectomy from a thoracic surgeon, cardiovascular surgeon, or general surgeon. Sample-weighted multivariable analysis was performed to identify factors associated with provider type. Results: When adjusted for sampling, 121,711 patients were analyzed, including 71,709 (58.9%) who received lobectomy by a thoracic surgeon, 36,630 (30.1%) by a cardiovascular surgeon, and 13,373 (11.0%) by a general surgeon. Multivariable analysis showed that thoracic surgeon provider type was less likely with Black patients, Medicaid insurance, smaller hospital size, in the western region, and in rural areas. In addition, non-thoracic surgery specialty was less likely to perform minimally-invasive (MIS) lobectomy (cardiovascular OR 0.80, p < 0.001, general surgery OR 0.85, p = 0.003). Conclusions: In this nationally representative analysis, smaller, rural, non-teaching hospitals, and certain regions of the United States are less likely to receive lobectomy from a thoracic surgeon. Thoracic surgeon specialization is also independently associated with utilization of minimally invasive lobectomy. Combined, there are significant disparities in access to guideline-directed surgical care of patients receiving lung lobectomy.
Collapse
|
8
|
O'Brien MS, Gupta A, Quevedo A, Lenger SM, Shah V, Warehime J, Gaskins J, Biscette S. Postoperative Complications of Appendectomy in Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Indications. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 141:354-360. [PMID: 36649317 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether concomitant appendectomy in patients who undergo laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic indications is associated with increased rates of complications in the 30-day postoperative period. METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery by a gynecologist. Patients were excluded if they underwent open abdominal surgeries, bowel resections, urogynecologic surgeries, or if diagnoses of cancer or appendicitis were present. There were 246,987 patients included in the population cohort from 2010 to 2020. Demographic information and postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent concomitant appendectomy were compared with patients who did not undergo appendectomy. A matched cohort was created by computing propensity scores, and outcomes were again compared between groups. All patients undergoing appendectomy were 1:1 matched to a unique patient who did not undergo appendectomy using a greedy matching based on the propensity score calculated from demographic and surgical characteristics. RESULTS A total of 1,760 patients (0.7%) underwent concomitant appendectomy. There was an 8.0% complication rate in the appendectomy group, compared with 5.5% in the group of those without appendectomy ( P <.001), and this was similar to the results in the propensity-matched sample. Patients who underwent appendectomy had significantly higher rates of readmission (4.3% vs 2.3%), which remained significant in the propensity-matched sample. There were no differences in the rates of postoperative thromboembolic events, blood transfusion, or reoperation. CONCLUSION Patients who are undergoing concomitant appendectomy have an increased risk of any complication and hospital readmission. Additional studies may be conducted to identify patients with optimal risk benefit profiles when considering performing concomitant appendectomy at time of gynecologic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Shea O'Brien
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, the Department of Urogynecology, Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstruction, the Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, and the School of Public Health and Information Science, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Northington GM, Minaglia S. Diversity in Pelvic Floor Disorders Research: A Matter of Equity and Inclusion. Urogynecology (Hagerstown) 2023; 29:1-4. [PMID: 36548100 DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
10
|
Gurayah AA, Mason MM, Grewal MR, Nackeeran S, Martin LE, Wallace SL, Amin K, Syan R. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in cost and postoperative complications following sacrocolpopexy in a US National Inpatient Database. World J Urol 2023; 41:189-196. [PMID: 36515723 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04226-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to determine the association between socioeconomic factors, procedural costs, and postoperative complications among patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy. METHODS The 2016-2017 US National Inpatient Sample from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project was used to identify females > 18 years of age with an ICD10 diagnosis code of apical prolapse who received open or laparoscopic/robotic sacrocolpopexy. We analyzed relationships between socioeconomic factors, procedural costs, and postoperative complications in these patients. Multivariate logistic and linear regressions were used to identify variables associated with increased complications and costs, respectively. RESULTS We identified 4439 women who underwent sacrocolpopexy, of which 10.7% had complications. 34.6% of whites, 29.1% of Blacks, 29% of Hispanics, and 34% of Others underwent a laparoscopic/robotic procedure. Hispanic patients had the highest median charge associated with surgical admission for sacrocolpopexy at $51,768, followed by Other ($44,522), White ($43,471), and Black ($40,634) patients. Procedure being within an urban teaching hospital (+ $2602), laparoscopic/robotic (+ $6790), or in the West (+ $9729) were associated with a significantly higher median cost of surgical management. CONCLUSIONS In women undergoing sacrocolpopexy, the protective factors against postoperative complications included private insurance status, a laparoscopic approach, and concurrent hysterectomy. Procedures held within an urban teaching hospital, conducted laparoscopically/robotically or in the West are associated with significantly higher costs of surgical management. Hispanic patients observe significantly higher procedure charges and costs, possibly resulting from the large number of this ethnic group living in the Western United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron A Gurayah
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Matthew M Mason
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Meghan R Grewal
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Sirpi Nackeeran
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Laura E Martin
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Shannon L Wallace
- Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Disorders, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Katherine Amin
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Raveen Syan
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Boyd B, Guaderrama N, Mishra K, Whitcomb E. Health inequities within the field of urogynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2022; 34:391-5. [PMID: 36036463 DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize some of the most recent evidence on disparities in the prevalence, treatment and outcomes of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), and to address potential interventions to dismantle these inequities. RECENT FINDINGS There is a paucity of data on the prevalence and treatment of PFDs in racial minority women. The existing studies are limited and poor quality. These studies suggest that racial and ethnic minorities may be at a higher risk of PFDs, however the epidemiologic data regarding prevalence varies by disorder and at times are conflicting. Nevertheless, the data on treatment and complications is clear. Racial and ethnic minorities are less likely to receive gold-standard treatment and are more likely to experience treatment related complications. SUMMARY We discuss the lack of racially inclusive research that perpetuates ongoing health inequities.
Collapse
|
12
|
Yadav GS, Rutledge EC, Nisar T, Xu J, Rozycki SK, Muir T, Antosh DD. Health Care Disparities in Surgical Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Contemporary Nationwide Analysis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2022; 28:207-12. [PMID: 35443256 DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Our objective was to compare the rate of native tissue repair (NTR) versus sacrocolpopexy (SCP) and reconstructive (RECON) versus obliterative repair (OBR) for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), evaluating for health care disparities based on race, socioeconomic, and geographic factors. METHODS The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients older than 18 years undergoing POP surgery from 2008 to 2018. Baseline demographics, comorbidity index, socioeconomic, and hospital variables were extracted. The weighted t test, Wilcoxon test, and χ2 test were used to compare the rate of (1) NTR versus SCP and (2) RECON vs OBR. Multivariate weighted logistic regression was used to compare while controlling for confounders. Reference groups were White race, Medicare patients, northeast region, small hospital size, and rural location. RESULTS Of 71,262 patients, 67,382 (94.6%) underwent RECON. Patients undergoing OBR were older and had a higher comorbidity score. Multivariate analysis showed the following: (1) Black, Hispanic, and other races; (2) Medicaid patients; (3) patients at urban teaching hospitals are less likely to receive RECON. Patients in the midwest were more likely to receive RECON. Among 68,401 patients, 23,808 (34.8%), and 44,593 (65.19%) underwent SCP and NTR, respectively. Hysterectomy was more common in the NTR group. Multivariate analysis showed the following:(1) Black, Hispanic, and "other" races; (2) uninsured and Medicaid patients; (3) patients in the midwest, south, and west were at higher odds of receiving NTR. Patients in large and urban hospitals were less likely to undergo NTR. CONCLUSIONS Racial, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities exist in surgical management for POP warranting further study to seek to eliminate these disparities.
Collapse
|