Actualisation des données concernant le mélanome stade III : nouvelles recommandations du groupe français de cancérologie cutanée

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Melanoma, a Clinical Point of View

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a surgical procedure that has been used in patients with cutaneous melanoma for nearly 30 years. It is used for both staging and regional disease control with minimum morbidity, as proven by numerous worldwide prospective studies. It has been incorporated in the recommendations of national and professional guidelines. In this article, we provide a summary of the general information on SLNB in the clinical guidelines for the management of cutaneous malignant melanoma (American Association of Dermatology, European Society of Medical Oncology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and Cancer Council Australia) and review the most relevant literature to provide an update on the existing recommendations for SLNB.

Phase I study of [131I] ICF01012, a targeted radionuclide therapy, in metastatic melanoma: MELRIV-1 protocol

Background

Benzamide-based radioligands targeting melanin were first developed for imaging melanoma and then for therapeutic purpose with targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT).

[¹³¹I]ICF01012 presents a highly favorable pharmacokinetics profile in vivo for therapy. Tumour growth reduction and increase survival have been established in preclinical models of melanoma. According the these preclinical results, we initiate a first-in-human study aimed to determine the recommended dose of [¹³¹I]ICF01012 to administer for the treatment of patients with pigmented metastatic melanoma.

Methods

The MELRIV-1 trial is an open-label, multicentric, dose-escalation phase I trial. The study is divided in 2 steps, a selection part with an IV injection of low activity of [¹³¹I]ICF01012 (185 MBq at D0) to select patients who might benefit from [¹³¹I]ICF01012 TRT in therapeutic part, i.e. patient presenting at least one tumour lesion with [¹³¹I]ICF01012 uptake and an acceptable personalized dosimetry to critical organs (liver, kidney, lung and retina). According to dose escalation scheme driven by a Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) design, a single therapeutic injection of 800 MBq/m², or 1600 MBq/m², or 2700 MBq/m² or 4000 MBq/m² of [¹³¹I]ICF01012 will be administered at D11 (± 4 days). The primary endpoint is the recommended therapeutic dose of [¹³¹I]ICF01012, with DLT defined as any grade 3-4 NCI-CT toxicity during the 6 weeks following therapeutic dose. Safety, pharmacokinetic, biodistribution (using planar whole body and SPECT-CT acquisitions), sensitivity / specificity of [¹³¹I]ICF01012, and therapeutic efficacy will be assessed as secondary objectives. Patients who received therapeutic injection will be followed until 3 months after TRT. Since 6 to 18 patients are needed for the therapeutic part, up to 36 patients will be enrolled in the selection part.

Discussion

This study is a first-in-human trial evaluating the [¹³¹I]ICF01012 TRT in metastatic malignant melanomas with a diagnostic dose of the [¹³¹I]ICF01012 to select the patients who may benefit from a therapeutic dose of [¹³¹I]ICF01012, with at least one tumor lesion with [¹³¹I]ICF01012 uptake and an acceptable AD to healthy organ.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03784625. Registered on December 24, 2018.

Identifier in French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM): N°EudraCT 2016-002444-17.

Melanoma and intellectual disability: do prognostic factors at diagnosis differ from general population?

BACKGROUND

Few melanoma cases are reported in individuals with intellectual disability (ID), and prognostic factors at diagnosis are unknown in this population. This work was designed to investigate whether prognostic factors at diagnostic are different in patients with ID compared with a general population.

METHODS

Melanoma cases retrieved from Hérault's Tumour Registry (HTR) from 1995 to 2015 were cross-referenced against a list of adult patients with ID, living in Hérault. Major prognostic factors were compared with those in non-ID melanoma patients included in HTR and in patients followed by Montpellier University Hospital and included in the Réseau pour la Recherche et l'Investigation Clinique sur le Mélanome (RIC-Mel) database.

RESULTS

Ten melanoma cases in individuals with ID were identified and compared with 3804 non-ID melanoma cases in HTR and 1024 non-ID melanoma cases included in RIC-Mel. Mean Breslow thickness at diagnosis was 4.6 mm in melanoma cases among those with ID versus 1.89 mm in HTR (P = 0.109) and 2.36 mm in RIC-Mel (P = 0.156). Stage at diagnosis was superior to stage IIB in 42.9% of ID cases versus 11.4% of non-ID cases in HTR (P < 0.05) and 8.5% in RIC-Mel (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Melanomas in patients with ID had less favourable prognostic factors at diagnosis, including higher Breslow thickness and more advanced stage, than melanomas in non-ID patients. These adverse prognostic factors indicate a later diagnosis in this population, leading to a poorer prognosis. This work underlines the need to improve melanoma screening among individuals with ID.

Which adjuvant treatment for patients with BRAFV600-mutant cutaneous melanoma?

Treatment of patients with melanoma has considerably improved over the past decade and more recently with adjuvant therapies for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III (loco-regional metastases) or IV (distant metastases) totally resected melanoma, in order to prevent recurrence. In the adjuvant setting, two options are available to patients with BRAF^V600-mutant AJCC stage III totally resected melanoma: anti-PD-1 blockers (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) or BRAF plus MEK inhibitors (dabrafenib plus trametinib). In the absence of comparative studies, it is difficult to determine which of these options is best. Our aim was to review published studies focusing on the management of patients with BRAF^V600-mutant melanoma in the adjuvant setting. We also reviewed the main clinical trials of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors and immunotherapy in advanced (i.e. unresectable metastatic) BRAF-mutant melanoma in an attempt to identify results potentially affecting the management of patients on adjuvants. More adverse events are observed with targeted therapy, but all resolve rapidly upon drug discontinuation, whereas with immune checkpoint blockers some adverse events may persist. New therapeutic strategies are emerging, notably neoadjuvant therapies for stage III patients and adjuvant therapies for stage II patients; the place of the adjuvant strategy amidst all these options will soon be re-evaluated. The choice of adjuvant treatment could influence the choice of subsequent treatments in neo-adjuvant or metastatic settings. This review will lead clinicians to a better understanding of the different adjuvant treatments available for patients with totally resected AJCC stage III and IV BRAF^V600-mutant melanoma before considering subsequent treatment strategies.

Systemic adjuvant therapy for adult patients at high risk for recurrent cutaneous or mucosal melanoma: an Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) clinical practice guideline

Background

Previous versions of the guideline from the Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc) at Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) recommended that the use of high-dose interferon alfa 2b therapy be discussed and offered to patients with resected cutaneous melanoma with a high risk of recurrence. Subsequently, several clinical trials in patients with resected or metastatic melanoma found that immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies have a benefit greater than that with interferon. It was therefore considered timely for an update to the guideline about adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma.

Methods

The present guideline was developed by the pebc and the Melanoma Disease Site Group (dsg). Based on a systematic review from a literature search conducted using medline, embase, and the Evidence Based Medicine Reviews databases for the period 1996 to 28 May 2019, the Working Group drafted recommendations. The systematic review and recommendations were then circulated to the Melanoma dsg and the pebc Report Approval Panel for internal review; the revised document underwent external review.

Recommendations

For patients with completely resected cutaneous or mucosal melanoma with a high risk of recurrence, the recommended adjuvant therapies are nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or dabrafenib-trametinib for patients with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations; nivolumab or pembrolizumab are recommend for patients with BRAF wild-type disease. Use of ipilimumab is not recommended. Molecular testing should be conducted to help guide treatment decisions. Interferon alfa, chemotherapy regimens, vaccines, levamisole, bevacizumab, bacillus Calmette-Guérin, and isolated limb perfusion are not recommended for adjuvant treatment of cutaneous melanoma except as part of a clinical trial.

[Sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck oncology]

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been initially developed for melanoma and breast cancers. Its application in head and neck cancers is recent, probably due to the complexity of the lymphatic drainage, the proximity between the primary tumor and the lymph nodes and the critical anatomical structures (such as the facial nerve). In onco-dermatology, SLNB is validated in head and neck surgery for melanoma with Breslow thickness up to 1mm or ulceration, Merkel carcinoma and high-risk squamous cell carcinoma. Considering the malignancies of the upper aerodigestive tract, the feasibility and oncologic safety of SLNB are now established for T1-T2N0 oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Thus, it could allow patients with negative sentinel nodes to avoid an unnecessary neck dissection, leading to a decrease of morbidity with an quality of life improvement. For some primary locations (e.g., anterior floor of the mouth) with high proximity between tumor and lymph nodes, it is recommended to remove the tumor before the SLNB so as to improve the detection. New techniques of detection are currently being developed with intra-operative procedures and new tracers (such as tilmanocept), leading to a better accuracy of detection and, probably, new indications.