1
|
Ward JA, Cepeda J, Jackson DB, Johnson O, Webster DW, Crifasi CK. National Burden of Injury and Deaths From Shootings by Police in the United States, 2015‒2020. Am J Public Health 2024; 114:387-397. [PMID: 38478866 PMCID: PMC10937603 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2023.307560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Objectives. To describe all-outcome injurious shootings by police and compare characteristics of fatal versus nonfatal injurious shootings nationally. Methods. From July 2021 to April 2023, we manually reviewed publicly available records on all 2015-2020 injurious shootings by US police, identified from Gun Violence Archive. We estimated injury frequency, case fatality rates, and relative odds of death by incident and victim characteristics. Results. A total of 1769 people were injured annually in shootings by police, 55% fatally. When a shooting injury occurred, odds of fatality were 46% higher following dispatched responses than police-initiated responses. Injuries associated with physically threatening or threat-making behaviors, behavioral health needs, and well-being checks were most frequently fatal. Relative to White victims, Black victims were overrepresented but had 35% lower odds of fatal injury when shot. Conclusions. This first multiyear, nationwide analysis of injurious shootings by US police suggests that injury disparities are underestimated by fatal shootings alone. Nonpolicing responses to social needs may prevent future injuries. Public Health Implications. We call for enhanced reporting systems, comprehensive evaluation of emerging reforms, and targeted investment in social services for equitable injury prevention. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(4):387-397. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307560).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie A Ward
- Julie A. Ward is with the Department of Medicine, Health, and Society, the Program in Public Policy Studies, and the Center for Research on Inequality and Health at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. Javier Cepeda is with the Department of Epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. Dylan B. Jackson is with the Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. Odis Johnson Jr is with the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, the Johns Hopkins School of Education, and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. Daniel W. Webster and Cassandra K. Crifasi are with the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions
| | - Javier Cepeda
- Julie A. Ward is with the Department of Medicine, Health, and Society, the Program in Public Policy Studies, and the Center for Research on Inequality and Health at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. Javier Cepeda is with the Department of Epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. Dylan B. Jackson is with the Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. Odis Johnson Jr is with the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, the Johns Hopkins School of Education, and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. Daniel W. Webster and Cassandra K. Crifasi are with the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions
| | - Dylan B Jackson
- Julie A. Ward is with the Department of Medicine, Health, and Society, the Program in Public Policy Studies, and the Center for Research on Inequality and Health at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. Javier Cepeda is with the Department of Epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. Dylan B. Jackson is with the Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. Odis Johnson Jr is with the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, the Johns Hopkins School of Education, and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. Daniel W. Webster and Cassandra K. Crifasi are with the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions
| | - Odis Johnson
- Julie A. Ward is with the Department of Medicine, Health, and Society, the Program in Public Policy Studies, and the Center for Research on Inequality and Health at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. Javier Cepeda is with the Department of Epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. Dylan B. Jackson is with the Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. Odis Johnson Jr is with the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, the Johns Hopkins School of Education, and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. Daniel W. Webster and Cassandra K. Crifasi are with the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions
| | - Daniel W Webster
- Julie A. Ward is with the Department of Medicine, Health, and Society, the Program in Public Policy Studies, and the Center for Research on Inequality and Health at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. Javier Cepeda is with the Department of Epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. Dylan B. Jackson is with the Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. Odis Johnson Jr is with the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, the Johns Hopkins School of Education, and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. Daniel W. Webster and Cassandra K. Crifasi are with the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions
| | - Cassandra K Crifasi
- Julie A. Ward is with the Department of Medicine, Health, and Society, the Program in Public Policy Studies, and the Center for Research on Inequality and Health at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. Javier Cepeda is with the Department of Epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. Dylan B. Jackson is with the Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. Odis Johnson Jr is with the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, the Johns Hopkins School of Education, and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. Daniel W. Webster and Cassandra K. Crifasi are with the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith CM, Daley LA, Lea C, Daniel K, Tweedy DS, Thielman NM, Staplefoote-Boynton BL, Aimone E, Gagliardi JP. Experiences of Black Adults Evaluated in a Locked Psychiatric Emergency Unit: A Qualitative Study. Psychiatr Serv 2023; 74:1063-1071. [PMID: 37042104 PMCID: PMC10732806 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evidence shows that Black individuals have higher rates of coercive emergency psychiatric interventions than other racialized groups, yet no studies have elevated the voices of Black patients undergoing emergency psychiatric evaluation. This qualitative study sought to explore the experiences of Black individuals who had been evaluated in a locked psychiatric emergency unit (PEU). METHODS Electronic health records were used to identify and recruit adult patients (ages ≥18 years) who self-identified as Black and who had undergone evaluation in a locked PEU at a large academic medical center. In total, 11 semistructured, one-on-one interviews were conducted by telephone, exploring experiences during psychiatric evaluation. Transcripts were analyzed with thematic analysis. RESULTS Participants shared experiences of criminalization, stigma, and vulnerability before and during their evaluation. Although participants described insight into their desire and need for treatment and identified helpful aspects of the care they received, they noted a mismatch between their expectations of treatment and the treatment received. CONCLUSIONS This study reveals six major patient-identified themes that supplement a growing body of quantitative evidence demonstrating that racialized minority groups endure disproportionate rates of coercive interventions during emergency psychiatric evaluation. Interdisciplinary systemic changes are urgently needed to address structural barriers to equitable psychiatric care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin M Smith
- Hubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Smith); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Daley, Tweedy, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi) and Department of Medicine (Thielman, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi), School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; School of Medicine (Lea), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Divinity School, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Daniel); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (Aimone)
| | - Lori-Ann Daley
- Hubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Smith); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Daley, Tweedy, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi) and Department of Medicine (Thielman, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi), School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; School of Medicine (Lea), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Divinity School, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Daniel); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (Aimone)
| | - Chris Lea
- Hubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Smith); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Daley, Tweedy, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi) and Department of Medicine (Thielman, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi), School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; School of Medicine (Lea), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Divinity School, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Daniel); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (Aimone)
| | - Keith Daniel
- Hubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Smith); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Daley, Tweedy, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi) and Department of Medicine (Thielman, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi), School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; School of Medicine (Lea), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Divinity School, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Daniel); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (Aimone)
| | - Damon S Tweedy
- Hubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Smith); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Daley, Tweedy, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi) and Department of Medicine (Thielman, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi), School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; School of Medicine (Lea), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Divinity School, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Daniel); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (Aimone)
| | - Nathan M Thielman
- Hubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Smith); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Daley, Tweedy, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi) and Department of Medicine (Thielman, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi), School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; School of Medicine (Lea), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Divinity School, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Daniel); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (Aimone)
| | - B Lynette Staplefoote-Boynton
- Hubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Smith); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Daley, Tweedy, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi) and Department of Medicine (Thielman, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi), School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; School of Medicine (Lea), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Divinity School, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Daniel); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (Aimone)
| | - Elizabeth Aimone
- Hubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Smith); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Daley, Tweedy, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi) and Department of Medicine (Thielman, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi), School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; School of Medicine (Lea), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Divinity School, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Daniel); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (Aimone)
| | - Jane P Gagliardi
- Hubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Smith); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Daley, Tweedy, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi) and Department of Medicine (Thielman, Staplefoote-Boynton, Gagliardi), School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; School of Medicine (Lea), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Divinity School, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Daniel); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (Aimone)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cloud DH, Williams B, Haardöerfer R, Hosbey JT, Cooper HL. Self-injury and the embodiment of solitary confinement among adult men in Louisiana prisons. SSM Popul Health 2023; 22:101354. [PMID: 36865676 PMCID: PMC9971521 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Solitary confinement is a harrowing human rights and public health problem that is currently inflicted as a routine punishment for a litany of prison rule violations, a reactionary tactic to quell resistance to prison conditions, and as a destination of last resort for people serious mental illnesses (SMI) who are especially vulnerable to its harms. An extensive body of research has documented clusters of psychiatric symptoms-emotional distress, cognitive deficits, social withdrawal, anxiety, paranoia, sleeplessness, and hallucinations-linked to solitary confinement that often manifest in decompensating behaviors, which include self-injury and suicide. This study summarizes the historical evolution of solitary confinement, recaps its linkages to self-injury and suicidality, and offers a theoretical framework grounded in ecosocial theory, and supplemented with concepts from theories of dehumanization and carceral geography. Findings bolster extant evidence on the harms of solitary confinement by focusing on whether and how exertions of power by prison staff to deploy mechanisms of dehumanization-as a pathway between SMI and self-injury among a cross section of adult men (n = 517) exposed to solitary confinement in Louisiana prisons in 2017. Findings reinforce the need for structural interventions that diffuse forms of carceral power and practices that continue to subject people to isolation, dehumanization, and violence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H. Cloud
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, USA,Amend, Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine, USA,Corresponding author. Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| | - Brie Williams
- Amend, Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine, USA
| | - Regine Haardöerfer
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, USA
| | - Justin T. Hosbey
- College of Environmental Design, University of California, Berkeley, USA
| | - Hannah L.F. Cooper
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smith S, Ferguson CJ, San Miguel CE, Ynalvez MA, Henderson H. Social, health and ethnicity correlates of complaints of excessive police force. Crim Behav Ment Health 2022; 32:284-294. [PMID: 35938636 DOI: 10.1002/cbm.2255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Following several high-profile police shootings of Black Americans, renewed debate has focused on race as a predictor of police violence. Past research has been inconsistent on this score. Some scholars argue that socioeconomic issues are better predictors of police-related violence than are race and ethnicity. AIMS To test relationships between complaints of excessive use of police violence and racial/ethnic population demographics, allowing for social and mental health variables. METHODS We examined records from all 195 municipal police departments in California to identify complaints of excessive force by police and tested for associations between such complaints and health, socio-economic and demographic data from county records, using multivariate analyses. RESULTS There was no difference in reporting between communities according to Black or White American residency proportions; communities with more Latino Americans were less likely to complain formally of excessive use of police force. The strongest associate of complaints to police departments that their employees had used excessive force was experiencing mental distress in the community. CONCLUSIONS Our findings are limited by reliance on complaints to police authorities rather than actual incidence of police use of excessive force and by having to map municipal data on to county data, but the finding that factors other than or in addition to any inherent police problems may contribute to excessive use of force by the police offers new lines for remedying the problem. In particular, our findings suggest that more training for police in recognising and managing mental distress and more provision of mental health experts to work alongside police would be worth evaluating as a next step.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Smith
- Department of Psychology, Stetson University, DeLand, Florida, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Akter T, Ahmed T, Kapadia A, Swaminathan M. Shared Privacy Concerns of the Visually Impaired and Sighted Bystanders with Camera Based Assistive Technologies. ACM Trans Access Comput . [DOI: 10.1145/3506857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Camera based assistive technologies can provide people with visual impairments (PVIs) visually derived information about people in their vicinity. Furthermore, the advent of smart glasses offers the possibility of not only analyzing visual information in front of the wearer, but also behind them through an extended field of view. Although such ‘visually available’ information can enhance one’s social interactions, the privacy and ethical implications for automated judgments about bystanders especially
from the perspective of PVIs
remains underexplored. To study the concerns of both bystanders and PVIs with such technologies, we conducted two online surveys with visually impaired participants as wearers (N=128) and sighted participants as bystanders (N=136). Although PVIs found some types of information to be improper or impolite (such as someone’s weight), our overarching finding is the
shared
ethical concern between PVIs and bystanders related to the fallibility of AI, where bystanders can be misrepresented (algorithmically) by the devices. These mischaracterizations can range from occasional, unexpected algorithmic errors (e.g., errors in facial recognition) to the questionable use of AI for determining subjective, social constructs (such as gender). Based on our findings, we discuss the design implications and directions for future work in the development of camera based assistive technologies while mitigating the ethical concerns of PVIs and bystanders.
Collapse
|
6
|
Khatri UG, Delgado MK, South E, Friedman A. Racial Disparities in the Management of Emergency Department Patients Presenting with Psychiatric Disorders. Ann Epidemiol 2022; 69:9-16. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
7
|
Wahbi R, Beletsky L. Involuntary Commitment as "Carceral-Health Service": From Healthcare-to-Prison Pipeline to a Public Health Abolition Praxis. J Law Med Ethics 2022; 50:23-30. [PMID: 35244001 DOI: 10.1017/jme.2022.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Involuntary commitment links the healthcare, public health, and legislative systems to act as a "carceral health-service." While masquerading as more humane and medicalized, such coercive modalities nevertheless further reinforce the systems, structures, practices, and policies of structural oppression and white supremacy. We argue that due to involuntary commitment's inextricable connection to the carceral system, and a longer history of violent social control, this legal framework cannot and must not be held out as a viable alternative to the criminal legal system responses to behavioral and mental health challenges. Instead, this article proposes true alternatives to incarceration that are centered on liberation that seeks to shrink the carceral system's grasp on individuals' and communities' lives. In this, we draw inspiration from street-level praxis and action theory emanating from grassroots organizations and community organizers across the country under a Public Health Abolition framework.
Collapse
|
8
|
Thomas MD, Reeves AN, Jewell NP, Michaels EK, Allen AM. US law enforcement policy predictors of race-specific police fatalities during 2015-16. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0252749. [PMID: 34161363 PMCID: PMC8221500 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Mounting evidence suggests that law enforcement organizational factors contribute to higher incidence and racial disparities in police killings. To determine whether agency policies contribute to race-specific civilian fatalities, this exploratory study compared fatality rates among agencies with and without selected policies expected to reduce killings. A cross-section of 1085 fatalities in the 2015-2016 The Counted public-use database were matched to 481 agencies in the 2013 Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) database. Negative binomial regression estimated incidence rate ratios (IRR) adjusted for agency type, number of officers, percent female personnel, median income, percent with a bachelor's degree, violent crime rate, and population size, with inference using robust standard errors. Agencies with greater proportions of full-time personnel (range 43-100%) had lower rates of all (IRR = 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77-0.93) and non-White civilian killings (IRR = 0.85; CI = 0.73-0.99). Mission statements predicted lower rates of all (IRR = 0.70; CI = 0.58-0.84) and White killings (IRR = 0.60; CI = 0.40-0.90). Community evaluation and more types of personnel incentives predicted lower rates of White (IRR = 0.82; CI = 0.68-0.99) and non-White killings (IRR = 0.94; CI = 0.89-1.00), respectively. Increasing video use predicted higher rates of White killings (IRR = 1.13; CI = 1.01-1.28). No policies were significantly associated with Black civilian killings. Law enforcement policies that help reduce police killings may vary across racial groups with the least benefit for Black civilians. Impact evaluations and meta-analyses of initiatives aimed to mitigate fatalities should be explored, particularly policies to address anti-Black bias. A national registry tracking all police killings and agency policies is urgently needed to inform law enforcement policies aimed to mitigate civilian fatalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilyn D. Thomas
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Alexis N. Reeves
- Department of Epidemiologic Science, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Nicholas P. Jewell
- Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States of America
| | - Eli K. Michaels
- Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States of America
| | - Amani M. Allen
- Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|