VP3-2021: A randomized phase II study of second-line osimertinib (Osi) and bevacizumab (Bev) versus Osi in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and T790M mutations (mt): Results from the ETOP BOOSTER trial

RELAY, Ramucirumab plus Erlotinib (RAM+ERL) in Untreated Metastatic EGFR-Mutant NSCLC (EGFR+ NSCLC): Association between TP53 Status and Clinical Outcome

BACKGROUND

Ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM+ERL) demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) in RELAY, a randomised Phase III trial in patients with untreated, metastatic, EGFR-mutated, non-small-cell lung cancer (EGFR+ NSCLC). Here, we present the relationship between TP53 status and outcomes in RELAY.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients received oral ERL plus intravenous RAM (10 mg/kg IV) or placebo (PBO+ERL) every 2 weeks. Plasma was assessed by Guardant 360 next-generation sequencing and patients with any gene alteration detected at baseline were included in this exploratory analysis. Endpoints included PFS, overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), DoR, overall survival (OS), safety, and biomarker analysis. The association between TP53 status and outcomes was evaluated.

RESULTS

Mutated TP53 was detected in 165 (42.7%; 74 RAM+ERL, 91 PBO+ERL) patients, wild-type TP53 in 221 (57.3%; 118 RAM+ERL, 103 PBO+ERL) patients. Patient and disease characteristics and concurrent gene alterations were comparable between those with mutant and wildtype TP53. Independent of treatment, TP53 mutations, most notably on exon 8, were associated with worse clinical outcomes. In all patients, RAM+ERL improved PFS. While ORR and DCR were comparable across all patients, DoR was superior with RAM+ERL. There were no clinically meaningful differences in the safety profiles between those with baseline TP53 mutation and wild-type.

CONCLUSION

This analysis indicates that while TP53 mutations are a negative prognostic marker in EGFR+ NSCLC, the addition of a VEGF inhibitor improves outcomes in those with mutant TP53. RAM+ERL is an efficacious first-line treatment option for patients with EGFR+ NSCLC, independent of TP53 status.

Impact of Smoking Status in Combination Treatment with EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Anti-Angiogenic Agents in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Susceptible EGFR Mutations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who harbor susceptible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and are treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) show longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those treated with chemotherapy. However, developed EGFR-TKI resistance limits PFS improvements. Currently, combination treatment with EGFR-TKIs and anti-angiogenic agents is considered a beneficial regimen for advanced-stage NSCLC harboring susceptible EGFR mutations. However, several trials reported osimertinib plus bevacizumab failed to show superior efficacy over osimertinib alone. However, subgroup analysis showed significantly longer PFS among patients with a history of smoking over those who never smoked. We performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the smoking status impact. At the end of the process, a total of 2068 patients from 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in our meta-analysis. Overall, combination EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agent treatment showed significantly better PFS among patients with a smoking history (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.48-0.73). Erlotinib-based combination therapy showed positive PFS benefits regardless of smoking status (HR = 0.54, 95%CI = 0.41-0.71 for ever smoker, HR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.54-0.87 for never smoker). Combination therapy prolonged PFS significantly regardless of ethnicity (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.93 for Asian RCTs, HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.41-0.74 for global and non-Asian RCTs). PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022304198).

Effect of smoking habits on the efficacy of EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agent in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC

BACKGROUND

The types of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who could obtain significant clinical benefit from the dual inhibition of EGFR/vascular EGFR (VEGFR) pathways remain unclear. No consensus has been reached on the significance of smoking habits in clinical benefit obtained from EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agents.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for all phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of EGFR-TKI combined with anti-angiogenic agents stratified by smoking habits (updated October 2021) were searched systematically. The primary outcomes were the pooled HRs for PFS/OS in smokers and non-smokers, and differences in efficacy of EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic treatment between smokers and non-smokers, measured by difference in PFS and OS.

RESULTS

Seven phase II/III RCTs involving 1452 patients were identified. The pooled analysis demonstrated that EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agent could decrease the risk of progression by 40% (HR, 0.60; 95%CI 0.48-0.75) in smokers when compared with EGFR-TKI alone, but not in non-smokers (HR, 0.92; 95%CI 0.68-1.25). The comparison analysis further demonstrated that EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients who smoked obtained greater progression-free survival (PFS) benefit from treatment with EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agents (HR, 0.68; 95%CI 0.51-0.91). Consistent with the results for PFS, smokers receiving EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agents appeared to exhibit better overall survival (OS) than non-smokers but not to a statistically significant degree (HR, 0.60; 95%CI 0.23-1.52). Meta-regression analysis revealed no significant effect of the line of treatment (P = 0.52), trial phase (P = 0.52), EGFR-TKI type (P = 0.13), or anti-angiogenic agent type (P = 0.50) on PFS effect sizes under multivariate models.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive analysis suggested that EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agents led to favorable PFS among smoking EGFR-mutant patients, comparable to nonsmokers, which might provide a useful guide for clinicians.

Update on molecular pathology and role of liquid biopsy in nonsmall cell lung cancer

Personalised medicine, an essential component of modern thoracic oncology, has been evolving continuously ever since the discovery of the epidermal growth factor receptor and its tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Today, screening for driver alterations in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma as well as those with squamous cell carcinoma and no/little history of smoking is mandatory. Multiplex molecular platforms are preferred to sequential molecular testing since they are less time- and tissue-consuming. In this review, we present the latest updates on the nine most common actionable driver alterations in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Liquid biopsy, a simple noninvasive technique that uses different analytes, mostly circulating tumour DNA, is an appealing tool that is used in thoracic oncology to identify driver alterations including resistance mutations. Additional roles are being evaluated in clinical trials and include monitoring the response to treatment, screening for lung cancer in high-risk patients and early detection of relapse in the adjuvant setting. In addition, liquid biopsy is being tested in immune-oncology as a prognostic, predictive and pharmacodynamic tool. The major limitation of plasma-based assays remains their low sensitivity when compared to tissue-based assays. Ensuring the clinical validity and utility of liquid biopsy will definitely optimise cancer care.

Screening for driver alterations in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and those with squamous cell carcinoma and no/little smoking history is mandatory. Liquid biopsy is evolving constantly and will definitely improve outcomes in thoracic oncology.https://bit.ly/2XjuQrD