Efficacy and Safety of Mechanical IVC Filtration for Preventing Pulmonary Embolism in High-Risk Orthopedic Patients Undergoing Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty

Patients Who Have a Prior History of Pulmonary Embolism Require Increased Postoperative Care Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

This study examined the effect of prior pulmonary embolism (PE) on total joint arthroplasty (TJA) outcomes.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who had a prior PE undergoing TJA at a single tertiary medical center between January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2021. There were 177 TJA patients who had a prior PE who underwent 1:3 propensity-matching to patients without a history of prior PE. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were performed. Changes over time were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty who had a prior PE had more complications (25.3% versus 2.0%, P < .001), and postoperative PE (17.3% versus 0.0%, P < .001).and longer hospitalizations (3.15 versus 2.32 days, P = .006). Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty who had a prior PE demonstrated more complications (14.7% versus 1.77%, P < .001) more postoperative PE (17.3% versus 0.0%, P < .001), and longer hospitalizations (3.30 versus 2.11 days, P < .001). Over the study, complication rates and hospitalizations lengths remained elevated in patients who had a prior PE. On multivariate analyses, prior PE was associated with longer hospitalizations (β: 0.67, P = .015) and increased complications (odds ratio [OR]: 9.44, P < .001) among total hip arthroplasty patients. Total knee arthroplasty patients had increased readmission (OR: 4.89, P = .003) and complication rates (OR: 21.4, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing TJA who had a prior PE are at higher risk of requiring postoperative care. Therefore, thorough preoperative evaluation must be implemented, especially in clinical environments lacking resources for acute care escalation.

The use of pre-operative Inferior Vena Cava filters for thromboprophylaxis in ultra-high-risk patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and narrative analysis

PURPOSE

Patients undergoing total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). As the number performed annually increases, the population at risk of fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) also grows. Ultra-high-risk arthroplasty patients (UHRAPs) include those with additional comorbidities, or a history of VTE, for many of whom routine prophylaxis will previously have failed. Pre-operative insertion of Inferior Vena Cava filters (IVCFs) has been recommended for thromboprophylaxis in UHRAPs, and this review was performed to establish their results.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase databases was performed for studies reporting the use of Inferior Vena Cava filters in hip and knee arthroplasty patients.

RESULTS

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, containing 718 IVCFs in Orthopaedic patients, 343 of which were permanent (47.8%), 369 potentially retrievable (51.4%), 5 absorbable (0.6%) and one of unknown design (0.1%). Patient age averaged 64.7yrs (17-95) and 56% were female. Pre-operatively, 415 prophylactic IVCFs were inserted in 409 UHRAPs, undergoing a total of 438 total joint arthroplasties (TJA). There were 11 cases of PE in the entire series (1.5%) only one of which was fatal (0.01%), with four non-fatal PE in the UHRAP group (0.96%). Removal was attempted for 283 of the retrievable filters (76.7%) and was successful in 280 (98.9%).

CONCLUSION

The use of IVCFs eliminated fatal PE in UHRAPs, but larger, high-quality studies, with standardised reporting, are still required to determine their absolute indications for use, complication profile, efficacy and optimum design.

Inferior Vena Cava Filters and Complications: A Systematic Review

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters have been used since the 1960s to treat patients with acute risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) to prevent migration of thrombus by trapping it within the filter. Traditional usage has been in patients with contraindication to anticoagulation that carry a significant mortality risk. In this systematic review, we sought to evaluate complications associated with placement of inferior vena cava filters based on published data from the past 20 years. A search was performed on October 6th, 2022, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews, using three databases (ProQuest, PubMed and ScienceDirect) for articles published between the dates of February 1, 2002 and October 1, 2022. Results were filtered to include full-text, clinical studies, and randomized trials written in English pertaining to keywords "IVC filter AND complications", "Inferior Vena Cava Filter AND complications", "IVC filter AND thrombosis" and "Inferior Vena Cava Filter AND thrombosis". Articles identified by the three databases were pooled and further screened for relevance based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Initial search results yielded 33,265 hits from all three databases combined. Screening criteria were applied, with 7721 results remaining. After further manual screening, including removal of duplicate hits, a total of 117 articles were selected for review. While there are no consensus guidelines for best practice, there is compelling evidence that IVC filters can provide significant protection against PE with minimal complications if the treatment window is appropriate. Increase in the variety of filter models has led to broader availability, but skepticism remains about their efficacy and safety, with ongoing controversy surrounding appropriate indications. Further research is needed to establish clear guidelines on appropriate indications for IVC placement and to determine time course of complications versus benefits for indwelling filters.