1
|
Hurley ET, Calvo E, Collin P, Claro R, Magosch P, Schoierer O, Karelse A, Rasmussen J. European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow (SECEC) rotator cuff tear registry Delphi consensus. JSES Int 2024; 8:478-482. [PMID: 38707551 PMCID: PMC11064705 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to establish consensus statements via a Delphi process on the factors that should be included in a registry for those patients undergoing rotator cuff tear treatment. Methods A consensus process on the treatment of rotator cuff utilizing a modified Delphi technique was conducted. Fifty-seven surgeons completed these consensus statements and 9 surgeons declined. The participants were members of the European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow committees representing 23 European countries. Thirteen questions were generated regarding the diagnosis and follow-up of rotator cuff tears were distributed, with 3 rounds of questionnaires and final voting occurring. Consensus was defined as achieving 80%-89% agreement, whereas strong consensus was defined as 90%-99% agreement, and unanimous consensus was defined by 100% agreement with a proposed statement. Results Of the 13 total questions and consensus statements on rotator cuff tears, 1 achieved unanimous consensus, 6 achieved strong consensus, 5 achieved consensus, and 1 did not achieve consensus. The statement that reached unanimous consensus was that the factors in the patient history that should be evaluated and recorded in the setting of suspected/known rotator cuff tear are age, gender, comorbidities, smoking, traumatic etiology, prior treatment including physical therapy/injections, pain, sleep disturbance, sports, occupation, workmen's compensation, hand dominance, and functional limitations. The statement that did not achieve consensus was related to the role of ultrasound in the initial diagnosis of patients with rotator cuff tears. Conclusion Nearly all questions reached consensus among 57 European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow members representing 23 different European countries. We encourage surgeons to use this minimum set of variables to establish rotator cuff registries and multicenter studies. By adapting and using compatible variables, data can more easily be compared and eventually merged across countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eoghan T. Hurley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Emilio Calvo
- Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Rui Claro
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | - SECEC Committee Members
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
- American Hospital of Paris, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
- University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sambare ND, Chalmers PN, Camp CL, Bowman EN, Erickson BJ, Sciascia A, Freehill MT, Smith MV. High variability among surgeons in evaluation, treatment, and rehabilitation of medial ulnar collateral ligament injuries. JSES REVIEWS, REPORTS, AND TECHNIQUES 2024; 4:182-188. [PMID: 38706672 PMCID: PMC11065763 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
Hypothesis and/or Background The incidence of elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) injuries has been increasing, leading to advances in surgical treatments. However, it is not clear that there is consensus among surgeons regarding diagnostic imaging, the indications for acute surgery and postoperative rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is evaluate surgeon variability in the presurgical, surgical, and postsurgical treatment of MUCL injuries regarding the imaging modalities used for diagnosis, indications for acute surgical treatment, and postoperative treatment recommendations for rehabilitation and return to play (RTP). Our hypothesis is that indications for acute surgical treatment will be highly variable based on MUCL tear patterns and that agreement on the time to RTP will be consistent for throwing athletes and inconsistent for nonthrowing athletes. Methods A survey developed by 6 orthopedic surgeons with expertise in throwing athlete elbow injuries was distributed to 31 orthopedic surgeons who routinely treat MUCL injuries. The survey evaluated diagnostic and treatment topics related to MUCL injuries, and responses reaching 75% agreement were considered as high-level agreement. Results Twenty-four surgeons responded to the survey, resulting in a 77% response rate. There is 75% or better agreement among surveyed surgeons regarding acute surgical treatment for distal full thickness tears, ulnar nerve transposition in symptomatic patients or with ulnar nerve subluxation, postoperative splinting for 1-2 weeks with initiation of rehabilitation within 2 weeks, the use of bracing after surgery and the initiation of a throwing program at 3 months after MUCL repair with internal brace by surgeons performing 20 or more MUCL surgeries per year. There were a considerable number of survey topics without high-level agreement, particularly regarding the indications for acute surgical treatment, the time to return to throwing and time RTP in both throwing and nonthrowing athletes. Discussion and/or Conclusion The study reveals that there is agreement for the indication of acute surgical treatment of distal MUCL tears, duration of bracing after surgery, and the time to initiate physical therapy after surgery. There is not clear agreement on indications for surgical treatment for every MUCL tear pattern, RTP time for throwing, hitting and participation in nonthrowing sports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Namit D. Sambare
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Peter N. Chalmers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Eric N. Bowman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Brandon J. Erickson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, New York NY, USA
| | - Aaron Sciascia
- Institute for Clinical Outcomes and Research, Lexington Clinic, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Michael T. Freehill
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Matthew V. Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jackson GR, Mowers CC, Sachdev D, Knapik DM, Lapica H, Sabesan VJ. Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Is Commonly Performed Using a Palmaris Graft and Provides Favorable Patient Outcomes With Variable Return-to-Play and Postoperative Complication Rates: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy 2024:S0749-8063(24)00262-7. [PMID: 38599535 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.03.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To systematically review the literature to provide an updated evaluation of postoperative clinical outcomes, return to play (RTP), and postoperative complications after primary ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) in throwing and nonthrowing athletes at minimum 2-year follow-up. METHODS A literature search was performed on November 25, 2023, by querying the Embase, PubMed, and Scopus online databases using the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The inclusion criteria consisted of Level I to IV human clinical studies reporting postoperative outcomes and/or complications after primary UCLR with minimum 2-year follow-up. The exclusion criteria consisted of non-English-language studies; biomechanical, animal, and cadaveric studies; review articles; letters to the editor; and studies not reporting postoperative outcomes or complications. Study quality was evaluated using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. The incidence of reported complications among the included studies was extracted. Clinical outcome scores included the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder & Elbow (KJOC) score, Andrews-Timmerman (AT) score, and satisfaction score. RTP data were also extracted. RESULTS A total of 21 studies published from 2006 to 2023, consisting of 2,452 patients (2,420 male patients) with a mean age of 21.7 years (mean range, 12-65 years) and mean follow-up period of 50.5 months (mean range, 24-151.2 months), were included. The mean Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score was 16 (range, 13-20). A total of 46% of patients (1,138 of 2,452) underwent concomitant ulnar nerve transposition. Palmaris graft was the most frequently used method (66.6%; n = 1,799), followed by hamstring graft (26.0%, n = 703). At the final follow-up, mean postoperative KJOC scores ranged from 72.0 to 88.0; mean AT scores, from 83.6 to 98.3; and mean satisfaction scores, from 86.1 to 98.3. The overall RTP rate ranged from 62.5% to 100% at a mean range of 9.5 to 18.5 months. The total incidence of complications ranged from 0% to 31.8%, with 0% to 7.4% of patients undergoing revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS UCLR was commonly performed using a palmaris graft, with concomitant ulnar nerve transposition reported in 46% of patients. At a mean follow-up of 50.5 months, mean postoperative KJOC scores ranged from 72 to 98.3, AT scores ranged from 83.6 to 98.3, and satisfaction scores ranged from 86.1 to 98.3, with variable RTP rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, systematic review of Level II to IV studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett R Jackson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, U.S.A.
| | | | | | - Derrick M Knapik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University and Barnes-Jewish Orthopedic Center, Chesterfield, Missouri, U.S.A
| | - Hans Lapica
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Corporation of America, John F. Kennedy Hospital/University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Lake Worth, Florida, U.S.A
| | - Vani J Sabesan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Corporation of America, John F. Kennedy Hospital/University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Lake Worth, Florida, U.S.A.; Palm Beach Shoulder Service Atlantis Orthopaedics, Lake Worth, Florida, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Johns WL, Kellish A, Farronato D, Ciccotti MG, Hammoud S. ChatGPT Can Offer Satisfactory Responses to Common Patient Questions Regarding Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2024; 6:100893. [PMID: 38375341 PMCID: PMC10875189 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine whether ChatGPT effectively responds to 10 commonly asked questions concerning ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction. Methods A comprehensive list of 90 UCL reconstruction questions was initially created, with a final set of 10 "most commonly asked" questions ultimately selected. Questions were presented to ChatGPT and its response was documented. Responses were evaluated independently by 3 authors using an evidence-based methodology, resulting in a grading system categorized as follows: (1) excellent response not requiring clarification; (2) satisfactory requiring minimal clarification; (3) satisfactory requiring moderate clarification; and (4) unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification. Results Six of 10 ten responses were rated as "excellent" or "satisfactory." Of those 6 responses, 2 were determined to be "excellent response not requiring clarification," 3 were "satisfactory requiring minimal clarification," and 1 was "satisfactory requiring moderate clarification." Four questions encompassing inquiries about "What are the potential risks of UCL reconstruction surgery?" "Which type of graft should be used for my UCL reconstruction?" and "Should I have UCL reconstruction or repair?" were rated as "unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification." Conclusions ChatGPT exhibited the potential to improve a patient's basic understanding of UCL reconstruction and provided responses that were deemed satisfactory to excellent for 60% of the most commonly asked questions. For the other 40% of questions, ChatGPT gave unsatisfactory responses, primarily due to a lack of relevant details or the need for further explanation. Clinical Relevance ChatGPT can assist in patient education regarding UCL reconstruction; however, its ability to appropriately answer more complex questions remains to be an area of skepticism and future improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William L. Johns
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Alec Kellish
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Dominic Farronato
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Michael G. Ciccotti
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Sommer Hammoud
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Savoie FH, O'Brien MJ. Medial elbow injuries in the throwing athlete. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:457-465. [PMID: 37844833 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
There has been an epidemic increase in injuries to the elbow in our youth sports over the past 15 years. Initially, career-ending elbow injuries occurred almost exclusively in the professional population. The landmark procedure developed by Dr. Frank Jobe, colloquially termed "Tommy John surgery" after the initial player in whom he performed the surgical procedure, allowed roughly two-thirds of professional athletes to return to play at or near the same level. As the surgical procedure became more widespread, modifications of the technique by Jobe and many other contributors raised the return-to-play level to 85%-94% of players regaining the ability to return to sport at the preinjury level. Almost simultaneously, the emphasis on velocity in the professional ranks led to an unintentional increase in stress on the throwing elbow. This was magnified in our athletes by the advent of year-round sports, as well as the formation of "showcase" events to demonstrate skills and measure velocity. This, unfortunately, has resulted in an increase in both repetitive stress injuries and acute traumatic injuries in our young athletes. The purpose of this article is to discuss age-related injuries from both a preventative standpoint and a treatment standpoint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix H Savoie
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
| | - Michael J O'Brien
- Shoulder and Elbow Services, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Martínez FM, Martínez García C, López AG, León-Muñoz VJ, Medina FS. Acute Dislocation of the Elbow: An All-Arthroscopic Repair of the Lateral Ligament Complex. Arthrosc Tech 2023; 12:e1827-e1836. [PMID: 37942102 PMCID: PMC10628172 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The elbow is one of the most commonly dislocated joints. While conservative management is frequently performed for simple elbow dislocations, the importance of primary surgical treatment is still undetermined. However, promising results have been reached after surgical repair. We propose an arthroscopic surgical repair of the lateral ligament complex (LCL), performed with a horizontal suture and 2 Fibertak Knotless implants (Arthrex) placed on the LCL origin, one anterior and the other posterior. Operative treatment should be performed in patients with moderate and gross elbow laxity to avoid post-traumatic sequelae and decrease revision rates. Arthroscopic techniques create fewer complications. This procedure allows one to address intra-articular elbow joint pathology with less chance of wound complications and the ability to use bone anchors if desired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Celia Martínez García
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Antonio García López
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Spain
| | - Vicente J. León-Muñoz
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofía, Murcia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hohmann E. Editorial Commentary: Diagnosis, Treatment, Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury: Agreement Does not Equal Consensus. Arthroscopy 2023; 39:1172-1174. [PMID: 37019531 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Tommy John surgical reconstruction for ulnar collateral ligament injuries was first described by Frank Jobe in 1974. Although he estimated the chance for successful return very low, John, famous baseball pitcher, was able to return to play for another 14 years. Modern techniques and better understanding of anatomy and biomechanics have now resulted in a return-to-play rate of more than 80%. Ulnar collateral ligament injuries occur mainly in overhead athletes. Generally, partial tears can be treated nonoperatively, but in baseball pitchers, success rates are less than 50%. Complete tears often require surgery. Primary repair or reconstruction are feasible options, and the choice will depend not only on the clinical scenario, but also the surgeon. Unfortunately, the current evidence is not convincing, and a recent expert consensus study exploring diagnosis, treatment options, rehabilitation, and return to sports showed agreement among the experts, but not necessarily a consensus.
Collapse
|