Mental symptoms and quality of life in lipoprotein apheresis patients in comparison to hemodialysis patients, platelet donors and normal population

Health-related quality of life in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disease characterized by extreme elevations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and extremely premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. To date, impacts of HoFH and its treatment on the psychosocial wellbeing of patients have been poorly characterized.

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review of the association between HoFH and health-related quality of life (HRQL).

METHODS

This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) consensus guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), Pubmed, Scopus, AfricaWide (via EBSCO), and six trial registries and grey-literature databases from inception to May 2021 for published English-language literature examining HRQL and its determinants in HoFH. Studies were eligible if they included patients with confirmed HoFH and evaluated HRQL using validated tools. We performed a narrative synthesis of qualitative findings from included studies and, where data permitted, random-effects meta-analysis reporting standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Our review identified seven eligible studies examining HRQL in HoFH participants. Pooling data from two included studies, we found that relative to the general population, HoFH patients demonstrated significantly poorer HRQL in multiple dimensions of the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) with lower scores in physical functioning (SMD -0.37; 95% CI: -0.60, -0.15), role limitations due to physical health (SMD -0.63; 95% CI: -1.24, -0.02), social functioning (SMD -0.61; 95% CI: -1.19, -0.03), bodily pain (SMD -0.24; 95% CI: -0.46, -0.01), and general health (SMD -1.55; 95% CI: -1.80, -1.31). No differences were observed in domains of energy and vitality, mental health and emotional well-being, or role limitations due to emotional problems. Patients suffered high treatment burdens related to lipoprotein apheresis that compromised educational attainment and employment. However, few patients received psychological support in navigating their treatment challenges. No studies evaluated the association of HoFH with incident anxiety, depression, or other psychopathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited data are available on quality of life for patients with HoFH. The available data suggest that these patients may suffer disease-related impairments in quality of life. Future work should aim to elucidate relationships between HoFH and mental health outcomes and develop interventions to improve quality of life in this population.

Treatment-related and health-related quality of life in lipoprotein apheresis patients

BACKGROUND

There is evidence for beneficial effects of lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in terms of reduction of cardiovascular events and interventions, but quality of life (QOL) in LA patients has only been explored in small samples.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, both LA- or treatment-related and health-related QOL (HRQOL) were assessed in 206 LA patients.

METHODS

Mental and physical HRQOL of the LA patients was assessed by means of the SF-12 as well as the EQ-5D. Physical complaints were assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 and LA- or treatment-related QOL by the Apheresis Quality of Life Form, developed for this study.

RESULTS

Comparison with general population norms showed that LA patients scored significantly lower on HRQOL and significantly higher on physical complaints. A higher perceived impact of the treatment proved to have a significant negative association with HRQOL and a positive one with physical complaints.

CONCLUSION

Previous studies reported higher levels of QOL in LA patients. This study showed that treatment-related QOL contributes to HRQOL and physical complaints in LA patients. While many patients do not experience LA as a real burden and report positive effects of the treatment, there is also an important group of patients for whom this is not the case. Although the impact on QOL of LA patients does most probably not outweigh the cardiovascular benefits of the treatment, it is important to screen treatment-related QOL in LA patients to optimize care in a personalized way. Future research is needed to compare QOL in LA with non-LA patients with similar medical conditions.

Current insights into the German lipoprotein apheresis standard: PCSK9-inhibitors, lipoprotein apheresis or both?

According to current European guidelines, lipid lowering therapy for progressive cardiovascular disease including cardiovascular events has to be focused on a target level for LDL-C. In contrast for Lp(a) a threshold has to be defined with respect to the method of measurement. However, due to new lipid lowering drug developments like PCSK9-inhibitors (PCSK-9-I) a therapeutic algorithm for patients with severe hypercholesterolemia or isolated Lipoprotein(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia with progressive cardiovascular disease may be necessary to manage the use of PCSK9-I, lipoprotein apheresis (LA) or both. The therapeutic approach for patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia is unambiguous: In addition to LA, in order to improve LDL-C reduction, PCSK9-I could be applied. In patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, PCSK9-I is to be applied first. If in addition to a pronounced LDL-C elevation, cardiovascular complications exist or if imaging techniques documented atherosclerotic changes pre-disposing for a cardiovascular event while LDL-C reduction is insufficiently reduced (LDL-C > 100 mg/dl (2.6 mmol/l)), LA treatment should then be applied as last resort. In patients with elevated Lp(a) concentrations (Lp(a) > 60 mg/dl (>120 nmol/l)) and established cardiovascular disease, therapy should rely primarily on LA methods. If in addition to high Lp(a) levels insufficiently treated LDL-C concentrations (LDL-C > 100 mg/dl (2.6 mmol/l)) exist, in rare cases PCSK9-I can supplement the lipid lowering concept.

Lipoprotein apheresis in the management of severe hypercholesterolemia and of elevation of lipoprotein(a): current perspectives and patient selection

This review reports the current situation with respect to therapeutic options (lifestyle and drugs) reducing the concentrations of atherogenic low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]). Three lipoprotein apheresis (LA) principles have been realized: precipitation, filtration, and adsorption. Available LA methods are herein described in detail - major components, pumps, extracorporeal volume, treated volume, and anticoagulation. General features of all LA methods as well as pleotropic effects are elaborated. Indications for LA therapy are quoted: homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HCH), severe HCH, and isolated elevation of Lp(a) and progress of atherosclerotic disease. A major focus is on the evidence of the effect of LA on cardiovascular outcome data, and the most important publications are cited in this context. The best studies have been performed in patients with elevated Lp(a) in whom cardiovascular events were reduced by more than 80%. Major adverse effects and contraindications are listed. The impact of an LA therapy on patient quality of life and the requirements they have to fulfill are also highlighted. Finally, the future role of LA in treating high-risk patients with high LDL-C and/or high Lp(a) is discussed. It is probable that the significance of LA for treating patients with elevated LDL-C will decrease (with the exception of homozygous familial HCH) due to the application of PCSK9 inhibitors. The antisense oligonucleotide against apolipoprotein(a) could replace LA in patients with high Lp(a), provided positive outcome data are generated.