1
|
Yu J, Khamzina Y, Kennedy J, Liang NL, Hall DE, Arya S, Tzeng E, Reitz KM. The association between frailty and outcomes following ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2024:S0741-5214(24)00983-2. [PMID: 38614142 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is a less invasive method than the more physiologically stressful open surgical repair (OSR) for patients with anatomically appropriate abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Early postoperative outcomes are associated with both patients; physiologic reserve and the physiologic stresses of the surgical intervention. Among frail patients with reduced physiologic reserve, the stress of an aortic rupture in combination with the stress of an operative repair are less well tolerated, raising the risk of complications and mortality. This study aims to evaluate the difference in association between frailty and outcomes among patients undergoing minimally invasive EVAR and the physiologically more stressful OSR for ruptured AAAs (rAAAs). METHODS Our retrospective cohort study included adults undergoing rAAA repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2010 to 2022. The validated Risk Analysis Index (RAI) (robust, ≤20; normal, 21-29; frail, 30-39; very frail, ≥40) quantified frailty. The association between the primary outcome of 1-year mortality and frailty status as well as repair type were compared using multivariable Cox models generating adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Interaction terms evaluated the association's moderation. RESULTS We identified 5806 patients (age, 72 ± 9 years; 77% male; EVAR, 65%; robust, 6%; normal, 48%; frail, 36%; very, frail 10%) with a 53% observed 1-year mortality rate following rAAA repair. OSR (aHR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.19-1.73) was associated with increased 1-year mortality when compared with EVAR. Increasing frailty status (frail aHR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.00-1.59; very frail aHR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.26-2.13) was associated with increased 1-year mortality, which was moderated by repair type (P-interaction < .05). OSR was associated with increased 1-year mortality in normal (aHR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.20-1.87) and frail (aHR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.20-1.89), but not among robust (aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.59-1.32) and very frail (aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.97-1.72) patients. CONCLUSIONS Frailty and OSR were associated with increased adjusted risk of 1-year mortality following rAAA repair. Among normal and frail patients, OSR was associated with an increased adjusted risk of 1-year mortality when compared with EVAR. However, there was no difference between OSR and EVAR among robust patients who can well tolerate the stress of OSR and among very frail patients who are unable to withstand the surgical stress from rAAA regardless of repair type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Yu
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Jason Kennedy
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Nathan L Liang
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Vascular Surgery, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Daniel E Hall
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA; Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA; Wolff Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Shipra Arya
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, PA
| | - Edith Tzeng
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Vascular Surgery, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Katherine M Reitz
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Vascular Surgery, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schutt J, Bohr NL, Cao K, Pocivavsek L, Milner R. Social Determinants of Health Factors and Loss-To-Follow-Up in the Field of Vascular Surgery. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 105:316-324. [PMID: 38609010 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is estimated that 22-57% of vascular patients are lost to follow-up (LTF) which is of concern as the Society of Vascular Surgery recommends annual patient follow-up. The purpose of this report was to identify social determinants of health factors (SDoH) and their relationship to LTF in vascular patients. METHODS The methods employed were a systematic literature review of 29 empirical articles and a retrospective quality improvement report with 27 endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) patients at the University of Chicago. RESULTS The systematic literature review resulted in 2,931 articles which were reduced to 29 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Demographic variables were more frequently cited than SDoH factors, but the most common were smoking, transportation, and socioeconomic status/insurance. Additionally, 176 EVAR and TEVAR patients were called resulting in 27 patients who completed a SDoH questionnaire. Twenty-six percent indicated they had missed at least 1 appointment with the top reasons being work or family responsibilities. Due to limited patient size no statistical analyses were performed, but frequencies of responses to SDoH questions were reported to augment the existing limited literature and guide future research into variables such as one's ability to pay for basics like food or mortgage. CONCLUSIONS SDoH factors are important yet understudied aspects of endovascular repairs that require more research to understand their impact on vascular surgery follow-up rates and outcomes. Additional research is needed as lack of consideration of such factors may impact the generalizability of existing research and such knowledge may help in informing clinician treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathon Schutt
- Midwestern University Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Downers Grove, IL.
| | - Nicole L Bohr
- Department of Nursing Research, UChicago Medicine, Chicago, IL; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Kathleen Cao
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Ross Milner
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Walensi M, Krasniuk I, Tsilimparis N, Hoffmann JN. [Late Open Semi-conversion with Endograft Preservation for (Type II) Endoleaks with Late Aneurysm Sac Enlargement after EVAR - Indications, Method and Results in Our Own Patient Collective]. Zentralbl Chir 2023; 148:445-453. [PMID: 37846164 DOI: 10.1055/a-2174-7563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
EVAR (endovascular aortic repair) is the most common method for treating an abdominal aortic aneurysm, but according to the latest findings it carries the risk of subsequent complications. These can be caused by (late) aneurysm sac growth. If conservative and surgical therapies fail to treat the aneurysm sac growth, open conversion is necessary to prevent aneurysm rupture. There are several options for open conversion, in which the EVAR prosthesis can be completely preserved or is (partially) removed. Late open semi-conversion with complete in-situ preservation of the EVAR-prosthesis and gathering of the aneurysm sac are a less invasive method than complete conversion and may be performed instead for selected patients. The aim of the present work is to present the surgical method, including indications and technical information, as well as the presentation of the results in our recent patient collective.All patients semi-converted in our department of vascular surgery and phlebology due to (type II) endoleak were included. All data are presented as n (%) or median (range).Between 6/2019 and 3/2023, 13 patients underwent semi-conversion 6 (2-12) years (median, range) after the initial EVAR. The aneurysm sac diameter at the time of semi-conversion was 69 mm (58-95 mm), the operating time was 114 min (97-147 min), the blood loss was 100 ml (100-1500 ml). Five (38%) patients received blood transfusion intraoperatively and 2 (15%) postoperatively. The stay in the intensive care unit lasted 1 (1-5) days, the hospitalisation time was 8 (6-11) days. Postoperative complications were intestinal atony (3 [23%], 1 [8%] with nausea/emesis and gastric tube insertion), anaemia (2 [15%]), hyponatraemia (2 [15%]), delirium (1 [8%]), COVID-19 infection (1 [8%]) and 1 [8%] intra-abdominal postoperative bleeding with the indication for surgical revision and the transfusion of 8 erythrocyte concentrates.Semi-conversion is a safe and practicable surgical method with few severe complications for a selected group of patients, which should be considered as an alternative to more invasive methods with (partial) removal of the EVAR-prosthesis. Further long-term studies comparing semi-conversion to full conversion are needed to demonstrate its benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikolaj Walensi
- Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie und Phlebologie, Contilia Gruppe, Elisabeth-Krankenhaus, Essen, Deutschland
| | - Iuri Krasniuk
- Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie und Phlebologie, Contilia Gruppe, Elisabeth-Krankenhaus, Essen, Deutschland
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Abteilung für Gefäßchirurgie - Vaskuläre und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, LMU Klinikum München, München, Deutschland
| | - Johannes N Hoffmann
- Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie und Phlebologie, Contilia Gruppe, Elisabeth-Krankenhaus, Essen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Antoniou GA, Kontopodis N, Rogers SK, Golledge J, Forbes TL, Torella F, Verhagen HJM, Schermerhorn ML. Editor's Choice - Meta-Analysis of Compliance with Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Surveillance: The EVAR Surveillance Paradox. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65:244-254. [PMID: 36273676 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the survival of patients who attended surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with those who were non-compliant. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE and Embase were searched using the Ovid interface. REVIEW METHODS A systematic review was conducted complying with the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies compared survival in EVAR surveillance compliant patients with non-compliant patients. Non-compliance was defined as failure to attend at least one post-EVAR follow up. The risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE framework. Primary outcomes were survival and aneurysm related death. Effect measures were the hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated using the inverse variance or Mantel-Haenszel statistical method and random effects models. RESULTS Thirteen cohort studies with a total of 22 762 patients were included. Eight studies were deemed high risk of bias. The pooled proportion of patients who were non-compliant with EVAR surveillance was 43% (95% CI 36 - 51). No statistically significant difference was found in the hazard of all cause mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.61 - 1.77), aneurysm related mortality (HR 1.80, 95% CI 0.85-3.80), or secondary intervention (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.31 - 1.41) between patients who had incomplete and complete follow up after EVAR. The odds of aneurysm rupture were lower in non-compliant patients (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.39 - 1.01). The certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. Subgroup analysis for patients who had no surveillance vs. those with complete surveillance showed no significant difference in all cause mortality (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.43 - 2.80). CONCLUSION Patients who were non-compliant with EVAR surveillance had similar survival to those who were compliant. These findings question the value of intense surveillance in all patients post-EVAR and highlight the need for further research on individualised or risk adjusted surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George A Antoniou
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Nikolaos Kontopodis
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University General Hospital of Heraklion, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Steven K Rogers
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jonathan Golledge
- Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia; Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, Australia; Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Thomas L Forbes
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre and University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Francesco Torella
- Liverpool Vascular & Endovascular Service, Liverpool, UK; School of Physical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Liverpool, UK
| | - Hence J M Verhagen
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc L Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|