The Concentration of Total Nucleated Cells in Harvested Bone Marrow for Transplantation Has Decreased over Time

Bone Marrow Harvest: A White Paper of Best Practices by the NMDP Marrow Alliance

Data on recent bone marrow harvest collections from the NMDP has shown that bone marrow quality has decreased based on total nucleated cell count in the product. To ensure that quality bone marrow products are available to all recipients, the NMDP Marrow Alliance was formed in April of 2021 to increase the ability for bone marrow collection centers to safely deliver high-quality products consistently and to identify and disseminate guidelines for performing bone marrow harvests. This White Paper describes the best practices of performing a bone marrow harvest as defined by the NMDP Marrow Alliance.

Bone Marrow Quality Index: A Predictor of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Thalassemia

Bone marrow (BM) continues to be the preferred source of stem cells in allogenic transplantation for nonmalignant disorders. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-primed BM is associated with low rates of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and allows reduced collection volumes while ensuring speedy engraftment. However, variability in BM harvest quality is a concern. This study evaluated the utility of a novel indicator, the Bone Marrow Quality Index (BMQI), to predict aGVHD. We analyzed 184 consecutive first matched related donor bone marrow transplants for thalassemia using G-CSF-primed bone marrow over 6 years from March 2017 to April 2023 across 2 centers in India. BMQI was defined as the ratio of the G-CSF-primed BM WBC count to the peripheral blood WBC count within 24 hours of harvest. European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria were used to grade aGVHD. The log-rank test was used to assess the impact of BMQI on aGVHD. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical data, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the numerical data. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the association of BMQI vis-à-vis other factors on aGVHD. Of the 184 patients studied, 19 had a BMQI <.9, 18 had a BMQI between .9 and 1, and the remaining 147 had a BMQI >1. The rate of aGVHD grade II-IV was 37% in patients with a BMQI <.9 , 22% in those with BMQI .9 to 1, and 12% in those with BMQI >1 (P = .018). Patients with BMQI <.9 had a 3.1-fold greater chance (95% confidence interval [CI], .9 to 10.6) and those with BMQI .9 to 1 had a 2-fold greater chance (95% CI, .5 to 6.6) of developing aGVHD grade II-IV. BMQI was the significant predictor associated with aGVHD hazard (P = .014). BMQI appears to be the most relevant and controllable predictor of aGVHD. It is a novel, informative, and very simple indicator that could influence aGVHD prophylaxis decision making. Our indicator is accurately measurable, inexpensive, precise, and timely; furthermore, it does not involve any sophisticated equipment and thus may be widely applicable. Prior knowledge of poor BM quality may help intensify prophylaxis and monitoring for aGVHD, as well as trigger a review of collection procedures.

Harvest Quality, Nucleated Cell Dose and Clinical Outcomes in Bone Marrow Transplantation: A Retrospective Study

Higher doses of infused nucleated cells (NCs) are associated with improved clinical outcomes in bone marrow transplantation (BMT) recipients. Most clinicians recommend infusing at least 2.0 × 108 NCs/kg. BMT clinicians request a target NC dose, but the harvested NC dose may be below the requested NC dose even before cell processing. We conducted this retrospective study to investigate the quality of bone marrow (BM) harvest and factors that influence infused NC doses at our institution. We also correlated infused NC doses with clinical outcomes. The study population included 347 BMT recipients (median age, 11 years; range, <1 to 75 years) at the University of Minnesota between 2009 and 2019. Underlying diagnoses mainly included 39% malignant and 61% nonmalignant diagnoses. Requested, harvested, and infused NC doses, as well as cell processing data, were obtained from the Cell Therapy Laboratory; clinical outcomes data were obtained from the University of Minnesota BMT Database. BM harvests were facilitated either by our institution (61%) or by the National Marrow Donor Program (39%). Associations of infused doses with baseline characteristics were assessed using the general Wilcoxon test/Pearson's correlation coefficient. The association of infused dose with neutrophil engraftment (absolute neutrophil count >500) by day 42, platelet engraftment (>20,000) by 6 months, acute graft-versus-host disease grade II-IV, and overall survival (OS) at 5 years were evaluated using regression and Kaplan-Meier curves. The median requested NC dose was 3.0 × 108/kg (range, 2 to 8 × 108/kg), and the median harvested and infused NC doses were 4.0 × 108/kg and 3.6 × 108/kg, respectively. Only 7% of donors had a harvested dose below the minimum requested dose. Moreover, the correlation between requested doses and harvested doses was adequate, with a harvested/requested dose ratio <.5 observed in only 5% of harvests. Additionally, the harvest volume and cell processing method were significantly correlated with the infused dose. Harvest volume exceeding the median of 948 mL was related to a significantly lower infused dose (P < .01). Moreover, hydroxyethyl starch (HES)/buffy coat processing (used to reduce RBCs with major ABO incompatibility) led to a significantly lower infused dose (P < .01). Donor age (median, 19 years; range, <1 to-70 years) and sex did not significantly influence the infused dose. Finally, the infused dose was significantly correlated with neutrophil and platelet engraftment (P < .05) but not with 5-year OS (P = .87) or aGVHD (P = .33). In our program's experience, BM harvesting is efficient and meets the requested minimum dose for 93% of recipients. Harvest volume and cell process play significant roles in determining the final infused dose. Minimizing harvest volume and cell processing could lead to increased infused dose and thus improved outcomes. Moreover, a higher infused dose leads to a better rate of neutrophil and platelet engraftment but not to improved OS, which may be linked to the sample size of our study.

Small volume bone marrow aspirates with high progenitor cell concentrations maximize cell therapy dose manufacture and substantially reduce donor hemoglobin loss

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow (BM) transplantation is a life-saving therapy for hematological diseases, and the BM harbors also highly useful (progenitor) cell types for novel cell therapies manufacture. Yet, the BM collection technique is not standardized.

METHODS

Benchmarking our collection efficiency to BM collections worldwide (N = 1248), we noted a great variability of total nucleated cell (TNC) yields in BM products (HPC-M) with superior performance of our center, where we have implemented a small volume aspirate policy. Thus, we next prospectively aimed to assess the impact of BM collection technique on HPC-M quality. For each BM collection (N = 20 donors), small volume (3 mL) and large volume (10 mL) BM aspirates were sampled at 3 time points and analyzed for cell composition.

RESULTS

Compared to large volume aspirates, small volume aspirates concentrated more TNCs, immune cells, platelets, hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), and endothelial progenitors. Inversely, the hemoglobin concentration was higher in large volume aspirates indicating more hemoglobin loss. Manufacturing and dosing scenarios showed that small volume aspirates save up to 42% BM volume and 44% hemoglobin for HPC-M donors. Moreover, MSC production efficiency can be increased by more than 150%.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose to consider small volume BM aspiration as standard technique for BM collection.

Development of an in-house bone marrow collection kit: The Catalan bone marrow transplantation group experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Bone marrow (BM) harvesting is one of the essential sources of stem cells for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In 2019, commercial BM collection kits became unavailable in Europe. Consequently, we created an in-house BM collection kit as an alternative.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared two groups of BM collections. The first collections were taken using an in-house kit from June 2022 through February 2023 and the second with a commercial kit from February 2021 through May 2022. These all took place at seven collection centres (CC). We analysed the harvest quality (cell blood count, CD34+ cells, viability, potency and sterility), the incidents occurring with each kit and the time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment in recipients.

RESULTS

A total of 23 donors underwent BM harvesting with the in-house kit and 23 with the commercial one. Both cohorts were comparable regarding donor characteristics, CC and time to procedure. No statistical differences were found in harvest quality between the in-house and commercial kits. A new transfusion set was required in three BM harvests (13%) with the in-house kit because of filter clogging. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 21 days for both cohorts and 29 days (in-house) and 33 days (commercial), p = 0.284, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The in-house BM collection kit offers a real approach to solve the diminished supply of commercial kits. A higher risk of filter clogging was observed compared with commercial kits due to the lack of 850 and 500 μm filters.

Preleukemic Fusion Genes Induced via Ionizing Radiation

Although the prevalence of leukemia is increasing, the agents responsible for this increase are not definitely known. While ionizing radiation (IR) was classified as a group one carcinogen by the IARC, the IR-induced cancers, including leukemia, are indistinguishable from those that are caused by other factors, so the risk estimation relies on epidemiological data. Several epidemiological studies on atomic bomb survivors and persons undergoing IR exposure during medical investigations or radiotherapy showed an association between radiation and leukemia. IR is also known to induce chromosomal translocations. Specific chromosomal translocations resulting in preleukemic fusion genes (PFGs) are generally accepted to be the first hit in the onset of many leukemias. Several studies indicated that incidence of PFGs in healthy newborns is up to 100-times higher than childhood leukemia with the same chromosomal aberrations. Because of this fact, it has been suggested that PFGs are not able to induce leukemia alone, but secondary mutations are necessary. PFGs also have to occur in specific cell populations of hematopoetic stem cells with higher leukemogenic potential. In this review, we describe the connection between IR, PFGs, and cancer, focusing on recurrent PFGs where an association with IR has been established.

Are We Making PROGRESS in Preventing Graft-versus-Host Disease and Improving Clinical Outcomes? Impact of BMT CTN 1301 Study Results on Clinical Practice

The need for prospective randomized clinical trials investigating novel graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prevention strategies that include other clinical outcomes impacted by GVHD has been highlighted as a priority for the field of hematopoietic cell transplantation. A recently completed study through the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN 1301) comparing CD34⁺ selection and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide with tacrolimus/methotrexate (Tac/MTX) for GVHD prevention demonstrated no significant differences in the primary endpoint of chronic GVHD relapse-free survival among the 3 approaches. The trial did not demonstrate a superior approach compared with Tac/MTX; however, it did highlight several challenges in determining the best and most relevant approaches to clinical trial design, particularly in the context of current and ongoing changes in real-world practices. Here we review the results of BMT CTN 1301 and their implications for clinical practice and future clinical trial design.

Bone Marrow versus Peripheral Blood Grafts for Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide

In the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic era, the number of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantations (HCTs) with peripheral blood (PB) grafts increased significantly compared with HCTs with bone marrow (BM) grafts, which may be associated with adverse outcomes. We compared outcomes of HCT in BM graft and PB graft recipients age ≥18 years with hematologic malignancies who underwent T cell- replete haploidentical HCT and received graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Among the 264 patients, 180 (68%) received a BM graft and 84 (32%) received a PB graft. The median patient age was 50 years in both groups. The majority (n = 199; 75%) received reduced-intensity conditioning. The rate of acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome was higher in the BM graft recipients compared with the PB graft recipients (85% [n = 152] versus 55% [n = 46]; P < .01). The median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment and the incidence of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) were comparable in the 2 groups. Among the patients with grade II-IV aGVHD, the rate of steroid-refractory aGVHD was 9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5% to 18%) in the BM group versus 32% (95% CI, 19% to 54%) in the PB group (hazard ratio [HR], 3.7, 95% CI, 1.5 to 9.3; P = .006). At 1 year post-HCT, the rate of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 8% (95% CI, 4% to 13%) in the BM group versus 22% (95% CI, 14% to 36%) in the PB group (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.4-6.6; P = .005), and the rate of systemic therapy-requiring cGVHD was 2.5% (95% CI, 1% to 7%) versus 14% (95% CI, 7% to 27%), respectively (HR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.7 to 18; P = .004). The PB group had a significantly higher risk of bacterial and viral infections, with no appreciable advantage in the duration of hospitalization, immune reconstitution, relapse, nonrelapse mortality, or survival. Our data suggest a benefit of the use of BM grafts over PB grafts for haplo-HCT.

The impact of donor total estimated blood volume on nucleated cell yield in bone marrow harvests for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Nucleated cell yields of marrow harvests depend on factors related to donors, the procedure itself, and the volume of marrow harvested. Few attempts have been made to relate donor characteristics to harvest volume. We hypothesize that the percentage of total donor blood volume accessed for harvesting impacts the nucleated cell yield per ml of marrow collected.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We investigated 481 consecutive unrelated marrow harvests from a single center. Donor characteristics including weight, body mass index (BMI), white blood cells (WBCs), hemoglobin (Hgb), and platelet counts, as well as estimated total blood volume, were recorded and compared with nucleated cell yields and harvest volumes.

RESULTS

The percentage of donor blood volume accessed for marrow harvesting was inversely related to nucleated cell yields (r = -0.57). The donor-recipient weight differential impacted cell yields as well (r = 0.35), with heavier recipients requiring increased marrow volumes from smaller donors to satisfy their nucleated cell needs. 3.73 × 10⁸ /kg of recipient weight could be collected with 95% certainty when harvest volumes did not exceed 16.1% of donor total blood volume. In a stepwise multiple regression analysis, 45.4% of cell yield variance was explained by blood volume percentage accessed for harvesting, donor weight, and WBC. Donor sex, BMI, and platelet counts did not contribute further to cell yield variance. Smokers had higher cell yields than nonsmokers (20.4 vs. 18.3 × 10⁶ /ml; 95% confidence interval 0.62, 3.47) independent of other parameters.

CONCLUSION

Establishing the relationship between percentage of estimated donor total blood volume and recipient cell needs can facilitate donor selection for successful hematopoietic cell (HPC) transplants.

Shorter Interdonation Interval Contributes to Lower Cell Counts in Subsequent Stem Cell Donations

Approximately 7% of unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donors are asked to donate stem cells a subsequent time to the same or a different recipient. Recent studies have shown that donation-related symptoms for second donations are similar to those for the first donation. Little is known about differences in stem cell mobilization and yields for subsequent peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) and bone marrow (BM) collections. We hypothesized that CD34⁺ cell yields and total nucleated cell (TNC) concentrations for subsequent PBSC or BM donations are lower than those at the first donation. We also evaluated the factors influencing stem cell yields in healthy unrelated second-time donors. Data were gathered from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database on 513 PBSC and 43 BM donors who donated a second time between 2006 and 2017 through the National Marrow Donor Program. Among the second-time PBSC donors, we found significantly lower preapheresis peripheral blood CD34⁺ cell counts (68.6 × 10⁶/L versus 73.9 × 10⁶/L; P = .03), and collection yields (556 × 10⁶ versus 608 × 10⁶; P = .02) at the second donation compared to the first. This decrease at the subsequent donation was associated with a shorter interdonation interval, lower body mass index (BMI), and a lower total G-CSF dose. In most instances, suboptimal mobilizers at their first donation donated suboptimal numbers of stem cells at their subsequent donations. Among repeat BM donors, the TNC concentration was lower at the second donation. The small size of this group precluded additional analysis. Overall, when considering repeat donations, increasing the interdonation intervals and evaluating for BMI changes should be considered to optimize stem cell yields. Some of these parameters may be improved by increasing G-CSF dose in PBSC donors within permissible limits.

Stem cell donor registry activities during the COVID-19 pandemic: a field report by DKMS

The COVID-19 pandemic has serious implications also for patients with other diseases. Here, we describe the effects of the pandemic on unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donation and transplantation from the perspective of DKMS, a large international donor registry. Especially, we cover the development of PBSC and bone marrow collection figures, donor management including Health and Availability Check (HAC), transport and cryopreservation of stem cell products, donor recruitment and business continuity measures. The total number of stem cell products provided declined by around 15% during the crisis with a particularly strong decrease in bone marrow products. We modified donor management processes to ensure donor and product safety. HAC instead of confirmatory typing was helpful especially in countries with strict lockdowns. New transport modes were developed so that stem cell products could be safely delivered despite COVID-19-related travel restrictions. Cryopreservation of stem cell products became the new temporary standard during the pandemic to minimize risks related to transport logistics and donor availability. However, many products from unrelated donors will never be transfused. DKMS discontinued public offline donor recruitment, leading to a 40% decline in new donors during the crisis. Most DKMS employees worked from home to ensure business continuity during the crisis.