Clinical Outcomes in Patients with FLT3-ITD-Mutated Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation after Quizartinib or Salvage Chemotherapy in the QuANTUM-R Trial

FLT3-targeted therapy restores GATA1 pathway function in NPM1/FLT3-ITD mutated acute myeloid leukaemia

One-third of newly diagnosed adult acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) carry FLT3 mutations, which frequently occur together with nucleophosmin (NPM1) mutations and are associated with worse prognosis. FLT3 inhibitors are widely used in clinics with limitations due to drug resistance. AML cells carrying FLT3 mutations in both mouse models and patients present low expression of GATA1, a gene involved in haematopoietic changes preceding AML. Here, we show that FLT3 inhibition induces cellular responses and restores the GATA1 pathway and functions in NPM1/FLT3-ITD mutated AML, thus providing a new mechanism of action for this drug.

Successful Pre- and Post-transplant Administration of Gilteritinib in a Patient with Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)-internal tandem duplication mutation are associated with a poor survival outcome, even those receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT). An additional treatment strategy with allo-SCT is therefore required to reduce relapse in these patients. Gilteritinib is a specific FLT3 inhibitor that has shown clinical benefit for patients with relapsed and refractory (R/R) AML harboring FLT3 mutation. We herein report a 49-year-old woman with R/R AML who was successfully treated with pre- and post-transplant gilteritinib. Post-transplant gilteritnib yielded a durable response with possible exacerbation of graft-versus-host disease.

How ITD Insertion Sites Orchestrate the Biology and Disease of FLT3-ITD-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Mutations of the FLT3 gene are among the most common genetic aberrations detected in AML and occur mainly as internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD). However, the specific sites of FLT3-ITD insertion within FLT3 show marked heterogeneity regarding both biological and clinical features. In contrast to the common assumption that ITD insertion sites (IS) are restricted to the juxtamembrane domain (JMD) of FLT3, 30% of FLT3-ITD mutations insert at the non-JMD level, thereby integrating into various segments of the tyrosine kinase subdomain 1 (TKD1). ITDs inserted within TKD1 have been shown to be associated with inferior complete remission rates as well as shorter relapse-free and overall survival. Furthermore, resistance to chemotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibition (TKI) is linked to non-JMD IS. Although FLT3-ITD mutations in general are already recognized as a negative prognostic marker in currently used risk stratification guidelines, the even worse prognostic impact of non-JMD-inserting FLT3-ITD has not yet been particularly considered. Recently, the molecular and biological assessment of TKI resistance highlighted the pivotal role of activated WEE1 kinase in non-JMD-inserting ITDs. Overcoming therapy resistance in non-JMD FLT3-ITD-mutated AML may lead to more effective genotype- and patient-specific treatment approaches.

Therapeutic Targeting of FLT3 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Status and Novel Approaches

FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) is mutated in approximately 30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. The presence of FLT3-ITD (internal tandem duplication, 20-25%) mutation and, to a lesser extent, FLT3-TKD (tyrosine kinase domain, 5-10%) mutation is associated with poorer diagnosis and therapy response since the leukemic cells become hyperproliferative and resistant to apoptosis after continuous activation of FLT3 signaling. Targeting FLT3 has been the focus of many pre-clinical and clinical studies. Hence, many small-molecule FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3is) have been developed, some of which are approved such as midostaurin and gilteritinib to be used in different clinical settings, either in combination with chemotherapy or alone. However, many questions regarding the best treatment strategy remain to be answered. On the other hand, various FLT3-dependent and -independent resistance mechanisms could be evolved during FLT3i therapy which limit their clinical impact. Therefore, identifying molecular mechanisms of resistance and developing novel strategies to overcome this obstacle is a current interest in the field. In this review, recent studies of approved FLT3i and knowledge about major resistance mechanisms of clinically approved FLT3i's will be discussed together with novel treatment approaches such as designing novel FLT3i and dual FLT3i and combination strategies including approved FLT3i plus small-molecule agents targeting altered molecules in the resistant cells to abrogate resistance. Moreover, how to choose an appropriate FLT3i for the patients will be summarized based on what is currently known from available clinical data. In addition, strategies beyond FLT3i's including immunotherapeutics, small-molecule FLT3 degraders, and flavonoids will be summarized to highlight potential alternatives in FLT3-mutated AML therapy.

FLT3 Inhibitors as Maintenance Therapy after Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation

Mutations in the FLT3 gene are associated with poor prognosis in patients with AML, even after consolidation with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in first remission. Treatment failure in FLT3-mutated AML is largely driven by excessive risk of relapse compared to other genetic subtypes, including in patients post-alloHCT. As a result, there is substantial interest in studying posttransplant maintenance therapy in FLT3-mutated AML as an approach to optimize disease control and improve long-term outcomes. Clinical trials utilizing posttransplant FLT3 inhibitors, such as sorafenib and midostaurin, have shown feasibility, safety, and encouraging posttransplant outcomes, and there are ongoing studies using newer-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors as posttransplant maintenance therapy. Here, we review the toxicities and efficacy of FLT3 inhibitors as posttransplant maintenance, recommendations on the use of FLT3 inhibitors by international consensus guidelines, and highlight key remaining questions.

Follow-up of patients with R/R FLT3-mutation-positive AML treated with gilteritinib in the phase 3 ADMIRAL trial

The phase 3 ADMIRAL (NCT02421939; Study ID: 2215-CL-0301) trial showed superior overall survival in patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutation-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) randomized 2:1 to receive the oral FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitor gilteritinib vs those randomized to receive salvage chemotherapy (SC). Here we provide a follow-up of the ADMIRAL trial 2 years after the primary analysis to clarify the long-term treatment effects and safety of gilteritinib in these patients with AML. At the time of this analysis, the median survival follow-up was 37.1 months, with deaths in 203 of 247 and 97 of 124 patients in the gilteritinib and SC arms, respectively; 16 gilteritinib-treated patients remained on treatment. The median overall survival for the gilteritinib and SC arms was 9.3 and 5.6 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.665; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.518, 0.853; two-sided P = .0013); 2-year estimated survival rates were 20.6% (95% CI, 15.8, 26.0) and 14.2% (95% CI, 8.3, 21.6). The gilteritinib-arm 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse after composite complete remission was 75.7%, with few relapses occurring after 18 months. Overall, 49 of 247 patients in the gilteritinib arm and 14 of 124 patients in the SC arm were alive for ≥2 years. Twenty-six gilteritinib-treated patients remained alive for ≥2 years without relapse; 18 of these patients underwent transplantation (hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [HSCT]) and 16 restarted gilteritinib as post-HSCT maintenance therapy. The most common adverse events of interest during years 1 and 2 of gilteritinib therapy were increased liver transaminase levels; adverse event incidence decreased in year 2. Thus, continued and post-HSCT gilteritinib maintenance treatment sustained remission with a stable safety profile. These findings confirm that prolonged gilteritinib therapy is safe and is associated with superior survival vs SC. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02421939.

Which FLT3 Inhibitor for Treatment of AML?

OPINION STATEMENT

Treatment options in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have improved significantly over the last decade with better understanding of disease biology and availability of a multitude of targeted therapies. The use of FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3i) in FLT3-mutated (FLT3^mut) AML is one such development; however, the clinical decisions that govern their use and dictate the choice of the FLT3i are evolving. Midostaurin and gilteritinib are FDA-approved in specific situations; however, available data from clinical trials also shed light on the utility of sorafenib maintenance post-allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) and quizartinib as part of combination therapy in FLT3^mut AML. The knowledge of the patient's concurrent myeloid mutations, type of FLT3 mutation, prior FLT3i use, and eligibility for allo-SCT helps to refine the choice of FLT3i. Data from ongoing studies will further precisely define their use and help in making more informed choices. Despite improvements in FLT3i therapy, the definitive aim is to enable the eligible patient with FLT3^mut AML (esp. ITD) to proceed to allo-SCT with regimens containing FLT3i incorporated prior to SCT and as maintenance after SCT.

Understanding FLT3 Inhibitor Resistance to Rationalize Combinatorial AML Therapies

Patients treated with Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor-based acute myeloid leukemia therapies nearly always develop resistance. In this issue, Alotaibi and colleagues describe the patterns of mutations that emerge upon relapse after FLT3 inhibitor therapy after initial response, as well as in treatment-refractory disease in a single-institution study; the findings offer insights for sequential therapies targeting the dominant clone at the time of relapse. See related article by Alotaibi et al., p. 125.